Engaging learners in STEM education

Joseph Krajcik, İbrahim Delen

Abstract


In this manuscript we focus on how to develop STEM learning environments, and how STEM can be implemented in K-12 schools. We focus on the following question: “How can we support students in building a deep, integrated knowledge of STEM so that they have the practical knowledge and problem solving skills necessary to live in and improve the world?” We also discuss criteria for evaluating STEM learning environments and the challenges teachers face in implementing STEM. We define STEM as the integration of science, engineering, technology, and mathematics to focus on solving pressing individual and societal problems. Engaging students in STEM also means engaging learners in the design process. Design is integral to student thinking in the STEM world. The design process is very non-linear and iterative in its nature but requires clearly articulating and identifying the design problem, researching what is known about the problem, generating potential solutions, developing prototype designs (artifacts) that demonstrate solutions, and sharing and receiving feedback. With the integration of design, STEM education has the potential to support students in learning big ideas in science and engineering, as well as important scientific and engineering practices, and support students in developing important motivational outcomes such as ownership, agency and efficacy. Moreover, students who engage in STEM learning environments will also develop 21st century capabilities such as problem solving, communication, and collaboration skills.


Keywords


STEM education, design-based education, learning environments, integrated knowledge, scientific and engineering practices, big ideas of science and engineering

Full Text:

PDF

References


American Association for the Advancement of Science (1989). Science for all Americans. Washington. Retrieved from http://www.project2061.org/publications/sfaa/online/sfaatoc.htm.

Carey, B. (2016, April). Chip, implanted in brain, helps paralyzed man regain control of hand. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/14/health/paralysis-limb-reanimation-brain-chip.html?_r=0.

Corcoran, T. B., Mosher, F. A., & Rogat, A. (2009). Learning progressions in science: An evidence-based approach to reform (CPRE Report). New York: Columbia University.

Damelin, D., Krajcik, J., McIntyre, C., & Bielik, T. (2017). Students making system models: An accessible approach. Science Scope, 40(5), 78–82. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/ss17_040_05_78

Delen, I., & Krajcik, J. (2016). Using mobile devices to connect teachers and museum educators. Research in Science Education, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9512-8

Duncan, R., Krajcik, J., & Ravit, A. (2016). Disciplinary core ideas: Reshaping teaching and learning. Arlington: National Science Teachers Association Press.

Fortus, D., Dershimer, C. R., Krajcik, J., Marx, R. W, & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2004). Design-based science and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 1081–1110. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20040

Fortus, D., & Krajcik, J. (2015). Engineering in IQWST. In C. Sneider (Ed.), The go-to guide for engineering curricula grades 6-8: Choosing and using the best instructional materials for your student. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

Greeno, J. G., & Engestrom, Y. (2014). Learning in activity. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed., pp. 128–147). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Hurriyet Daily News (2017). Puppy stuck in well rescued after 10 days in Istanbul. Retrieved from http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/puppy-stuck-in-well-rescued-after-10-days-in-istanbul.aspx?pageID=238&nID=109770&NewsCatID=378.

Kesidou, S., & Roseman, J. E. (2002). How well do middle school science programs measure up? Findings from Project 2061’s curriculum review. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 522‒549. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10035

Klager, C., Schneider, B., Krajcik, J. S., Lavonen, J., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2017). Creativity in a project-based physics and chemistry intervention. Paper presented at the annual meeting of NARST, April, 2017, San Antonio, Texas.

Krajcik, J. S., & Czerniak, C. (2013). Teaching science in elementary and middle school classrooms: A project-based approach (4th ed.). London: Routledge.

Krajcik, J., & Delen, I. (2017). How to support students in developing usable and lasting knowledge of STEM. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 5(1), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.16863

Krajcik, J. S., & Shin, N. (2014). Project-based learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed., pp. 275–297). New York: Cambridge University Press.

National Research Council (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington: The National Academies Press.

National Research Council (2011a). Successful K-12 STEM Education: Identifying Effective Approaches in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Washington: The National Academies Press.

National Research Council (2011b). Learning science through computer games and simulations. Washington: The National Academies Press.

National Research Council (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington: The National Academies Press.

National Research Council (2013). Monitoring progress toward successful K-12 STEM education: A nation advancing? Washington: The National Academies Press.

National Research Council (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. Washington: The National Academies Press.

National Science Foundation (2016, December). NSF awards $61 million in new projects to enhance understanding of STEM education and workforce development. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=190509.

Novak, A., & Krajcik, J. S. (2005). Using learning technologies to support inquiry in middle school science. In L. B. Flick & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science: Implications for teaching, learning, and teacher education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Osborne, J. F., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections. A Report to the Nuffield Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/sites/default/files/Sci_Ed_in_Europe_Report_Final.pdf.

Roseman, J. E., Stern, L., & Koppal, M. (2010). A method of analyzing the coherence of high school biology textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(1), 47–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20305

Sadler, P. M., Coyle, H. P., & Schwartz, M. (2000). Engineering competitions in the middle school classroom: Key elements in developing effective design challenges. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(3), 299–327. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS0903_3

Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM education, STEM mania. The Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20–26.

Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.) (2014). The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Schwarz, C., Passmore, C., & Reiser, B. J. (Eds.) (2016). Helping students make sense of the world using next generation science and engineering practices. Arlington: National Science Teachers Association Press.

Songer, N. B. (2007). Digital resources or cognitive tools: A discussion of learning science with technology. In S. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 471–491). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

Stevens, S., Sutherland, L., & Krajcik, J. S. (2009). The big ideas of nanoscale science and engineering: A guidebook for secondary teachers. Arlington: National Science Teachers Association Press.

U.S. Department of Education Office for Civil Rights (2014). Civil rights data collection. Data snapshot: College and career readiness. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/crdc-college-and-career-readiness-snapshot.pdf.

Vedder-Weiss, D., & Fortus, D. (2012). Adolescents’ declining motivation to learn science: A follow-up study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(9), 1057–1095. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21049




DOI: https://doi.org/10.12697/eha.2017.5.1.02b

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




ISSN: 2346-562X

Journal DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12697/issn2346-562X

http://www.eha.ut.ee