Estonian in-service teachers’, pre-service teachers’ and teacher educators’ research literacy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12697/eha.2021.9.2.11Keywords:
research literacy, knowledge of research, research-based teachingAbstract
Õpetajate uurimistööalane kirjaoskus väljendub teaduspõhises praktikas, oma õpetamise ja õpilaste õppimise uurimises ning õpilaste uurimistööalaste teadmiste omandamise toetamises. Kasutades kombineeritud uurimismeetodit, oli siinse uuringu eesmärk selgitada välja, millised on Eesti õpetajakoolituse üliõpilaste ja õppejõudude ning õpetajate uurimistööalased teadmised ning kirjeldada, kuidas kasutavad õpetajad uurimistööalast kirjaoskust oma õpetamistöös. Tulemused näitavad, et kui õppejõududel on teiste valimirühmadega võrreldes paremad teadmised, siis õpetajate ja üliõpilaste uurimistööalased teadmised on pigem sarnased. Intervjuudest õpetajatega selgus, et igapäevases õpetamistöös rakendatakse uurimistööalaseid teadmisi eelkõige õpilastele uurimistööga seotud ülesannete koostamisel. Teaduspõhisele õpetamisele eelistatakse praktilisi koolitusi ja arutelusid kolleegidega ning enda õpetamist ja õpilaste õppimise uurimist intervjuudes osalenud õpetajad pigem ei rakenda. Tulemused näitavad, et uurimistööalase kirjaoskuse kujunemist tuleb rohkem toetada ning kõige enam toetust vajavad just töötavad õpetajad.
SummaryDownloads
References
Aspfors, J., & Eklund, G. (2017). Explicit and implicit perspectives on research-based teacher education: newly qualified teachers’ experiences in Finland. Journal of Education for Teaching, 43(4), 400–413.
Barber, M., & Mourshed, M. (2007). How the world’s best-performing school systems come out on top. McKinsey & Co.
Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., Neubrand, M., & Tsau, Y.-M. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 133–180. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209345157
Berliner, D. C. (2004) Describing the behavior and documenting the accomplishments of expert teachers. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 24(3), 200–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467604265535
Block, D. (2000). Revisiting the gap between SLA researchers and language teachers. Links & Letters, 7, 129–143.
Borg, S. (2010). Language teacher research engagement. Language Teaching, 43, 391–429. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444810000170
Bowen, G. A. (2006). Grounded theory and sensitizing concepts. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(3) 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500304
Boyd, D., Grossman, P., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2006). How changes in entry requirements alter the teacher workforce and affect student achievement. Education Finance and Policy, 1, 176–216. https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp.2006.1.2.176
Burn, K., & Mutton, T. (2015). A review of ‘research-informed clinical practice’ in Initial Teacher Education. Oxford Review of Education, 41(2), 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2015.1020104
Burns, T., & Köster, F. (2016). Modern governance challenges in education. Teoses T. Burns & F. Köster (toim), Governing Education in a Complex World (lk 17–39). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264255364-3-en
Carter, A. (2015). Carter review of Initial Teacher Training (ITT). DfE. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/carter-review-of-initial-teacher-training.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (1999). The Teacher Research Movement: A decade later. Educational Researcher, 28(7), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X028007015
Cooper, M., & Stewart, J. (2009). ’Learning together, shaping tomorrow’: New teachers try new ways. Research in Comparative and International Education, 4(1), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.2304/rcie.2009.4.1.111
Creswell, J. (2012). Educational research: planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.
Earl, L. M., & Timperley, H. (2008). Professional learning conversations: Challenges in using evidence for improvement. Springer.
Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
Evans, C., Waring, M., & Christodoulou, A. (2017). Building teachers’ research literacy: integrating practice and research, Research Papers in Education, 32(4), 403–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2017.1322357
German Council of Science and Humanities. (s.a.). Külastatud aadressil http://www.wissenschaftsrat.de/download/archiv/4418-00.pdf.
Grossman, P. L. (2010). Learning to practice: The design of clinical experience teacher preparation (Policy Brief). AACTE & NEA.
Kiely, R. (2008). The purpose, promise and potential of teacher research. Teoses M. Pawlak (toim), Investigating English language learning and teaching (lk 11–30). Adam Mickiewicz University.
King, M. (2002). Professional development to promote school wide inquiry. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00067-1
Ko, J., & Sammons, P. (2012). Effective teaching: A review of research. Executive summary report prepared for CfBT. University of Oxford, Department of Education.
Krajcik, J. S., & Sutherland, L. M. (2010). Supporting students in developing literacy in science. Science, 328(5977), 456–459. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1182593
Kutsestandard. Õpetaja, tase 7. (2020). Külastatud aadressil https://www.kutseregister.ee/ctrl/et/Standardid/exportPdf/10824233/.
König, J., Blömeke, S., Klein, P., Suhl, U., Busse, A., & Kaiser, G. (2014). Is teachers’ general pedagogical knowledge a premise for noticing and interpreting classroom situations? A video-based assessment approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 38, 76–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.11.004
Lillejord, S., & Børte, K. (2016). Partnership in teacher education – A research mapping. European Journal of Teacher Education, 39(5), 550–563. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2016.1252911
Malva, L., & Leijen, Ä. (2020). Läbilõikeline ülevaade üliõpilaste hinnangutest Tartu Ülikooli õpetajakoolituse õppekavade sidususele 2014.–2018. aastal. Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakiri, 8(1), 100–127. https://doi.org/10.12697/eha.2020.8.1.05
Malva, L., Leijen, Ä., & Arcidiacono, F. (2021). Identifying teachers’ general pedagogical knowledge: A video stimulated recall study. Educational Studies, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2021.1873738
Malva, L., Leijen, Ä., & Baucal, A. (2020). Towards measuring teachers’ general pedagogical knowledge – A mixed method investigation of a pilot test. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 64, 100815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.100815
Malva, L., Linde, M., Poom-Valickis, K., & Leijen, Ä. (2018). OECD õpetaja pedagoogiliste teadmiste pilootuuringu Eesti raport. Haridus- ja Teadusministeerium.
Munthe, E., & Rogne, M. (2015). Research based teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 46, 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.10.006
Mutton, T., Burn, K., & Hagger, H. (2010). Making sense of learning to teach: Learners in context. Research Papers in Education, 25(1), 73–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520802382912
NCSL (2012). Powerful professional learning: a school leader’s guide to joint practice development. National College for School Leadership.
Ophoff, J. G., Schladitz, S., Leuders, J., Leuders, T., & Wirtz, M. A. (2015) Assessing the development of educational research literacy: the effect of courses on research methods in studies of educational science. Peabody Journal of Education, 90(4), 560–573. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2015.1068085
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., De Jong, T., Van Riesen, S. A., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
Pedaste, M. (2021). Inquiry approach and phases of learning in undergraduate research. Teoses H. A. Mieg, B. Ambos, A. Brew, W. Deicke, & J. Lehmann (toim), Cambridge handbook of undergraduate research. Cambridge University Press.
Pedaste, M., Baucal, A., & Reisenbuk, E. (2021). Towards a science inquiry test in primary education: Development of items and scales. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00278-z
Pedder, D., James, M., & MacBeath, J. (2005). How teachers value and practise professional learning. Research Papers in Education, 20(3), 209–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520500192985
Roulston, K., Legette, R., DeLoach, M., & Pittman, C. B. (2005). What is ’research’ for teacher-researchers? Educational Action Research, 13(2), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790500200283
Schepens, A., Aelterman, A., & Van Keer, H. (2007). Studying learning processes of student teachers with stimulated recall interviews through changes in interactive cognitions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(4), 457–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.12.014
Shank, G., & L. Brown. (2013). Exploring educational research literacy. Routledge.
Sonmark, K., Revai, N., Gottschalk, F., Deligiannidi, K., & Burns, T. (2017). Understanding teachers’ pedagogical knowledge: report on an international pilot study. OECD Education working Papers.
Sugrue, C., & Day, C. (2002). Developing teachers and teaching practice: international research perspectives. Routledge.
Zeichner, K. (2014). The struggle for the soul of teaching and teacher education in the USA. Journal of Education for Teaching, 40(5), 551–568.
Tagle, T., Díaz, C., Etchegaray, P., Alarcón, P., Quintana, M., & Ramos, L. (2020). Lesson planning: What types of professional knowledge are activated by chilean pre-service EFL teachers? Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 17(1), 258–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2014.956544
Tatto, M. T. (2015). The role of research in the policy and practice of quality teacher education: An international review. Oxford Review of Education, 41(2), 171–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2015.1017405
Wilson, A., Åkerlind, G., Walsh, B., Stevens, B., Turner, B., & Shield, A. (2013). Making ‘professionalism’ meaningful to students in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(8), 1222–1238. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.833035
Winch, C., Oancea, A., & Orchard, J. (2013). The Contribution of Research to Teachers’ Professional Learning. Paper Commissioned for the BERA-RSA Inquiry. BERA.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors who publish in Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakiri. Estonian Journal of Education agree to the following terms:
- This journal provides immediate open access to its content. All the articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License.
- Authors grant the journal right of (1) first publication and distribution of the article, (2) making it available to public, (3) public presentation.
- Authors have the right to enter into separate contractual arrangements for posting the article to an institutional repository or publish it in a book with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted to post citations from their work online (e.g. on their website) with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal (see Open Access).
