Ecocritical Considerations of Nature in Contemporary British and Estonian Literature
AbstractThe issue of the environment has been never more topical than at present, with environmental problems being an urgent 21st century concern. This topic, otherwise characteristic to natural sciences, has also found its way into literary studies in the form of ecocriticism, which affords an interesting insight into the representation of place and nature in literary texts. This article proposes to take an ecocritical stance, focusing on the aspect of nature in the work of contemporary British and Estonian writers, Graham Swift and Andrus Kivirähk; of special interest is the representation of nature, nature–culture interactions, and a possibility of a new way for seeing the world, that is, through the eyes of nonhumans. It is the nonhuman beings and green environment that constitute a presence in the novels and suggest questioning of such debate-spurning issues as anthropocentrism, nature’s voice(lessness) and agency. Challenging established ideas of humanism and directing attention to topical environmental issues, the contemporary novels highlight a unique ecocentric direction in literature.
Abram, D. 2007. The Spell of the Sensuous: Perception and Language in a More-than-Human World. New York: Vintage.
Buell, L. 2003. Writing for an Endangered World: Literature, Culture, and the Environment in the U.S. and Beyond. Cambridge, MA: Belknap of Harvard University Press.
Buell, L. 2005. The Future of Environmental Criticism: Environmental Crisis and Literary Imagination. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Garrard, G. 2004. Ecocriticism. London: Routledge.
Glotfelty, C. 1996. Introduction: Literary Studies in an Age of Environmental Crisis. – C. Glotfelty and H. Fromm, eds., The Ecocriticism Reader: Landmarks in Literary Ecology. Athens: University of Georgia Press, xv–xxxvii.
Hasselblatt, C. 2007. Eesti esimene ökoromaan. – Looming, 8, 1262–1267.
Heise, U. K. 2004. Eco-Narrative. – D. Herman, M. Jahn, and M-L. Ryan, eds., Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory. London: Routledge, 129.
Huggan, G. and H. Tiffin. 2010. Postcolonial Ecocriticism: Literature, Animals, Environment. London and New York: Routledge.
Kivirähk, A. 2010. Mees, kes teadis ussisõnu. Tallinn: Eesti Keele Sihtasutus.
Manes, C. 1996. Nature and Silence. – C. Glotfelty and H. Fromm, eds., The Ecocriticism Reader: Landmarks in Literary Ecology. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 15–29.
Oppermann, S. 1999. Ecocriticism: Natural World in the Literary Viewfinder. – The Association for the Study of Literature and Environment, http://www.asle.org/assets/docs/oppermann.pdf (31.07.2012).
Oppermann, S. 2010. The Rhizomatic Trajectory of Ecocriticism. – Ecozon@, 1.1, 17–21, http://www.ecozona.eu/index.php/journal/article/view/22/66 (31.07.2012).
Rueckert, W. 1996. Literature and Ecology: An Experiment in Ecocriticism. – C. Glotfelty and H. Fromm, eds., The Ecocriticism Reader: Landmarks in Literary Ecology. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 105–123.
Sanders, S. R. 1996. Speaking a Word for Nature. – C. Glotfelty and H. Fromm, eds., The Ecocriticism Reader: Landmarks in Literary Ecology. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 182–195.
Soper, K. 2000. The Idea of Nature. – L. Coupe, ed., The Green Studies Reader: From Romanticism to Ecocriticism. London: Routledge, 123–126.
Swift, G. 1996. Last Orders. London: Picador.
Swift, G. 2007. Tomorrow. London: Picador.
Tofantšuk, J. 2007. Construction of Identity in the Fiction of Contemporary British Women Writers (Jeanette Winterson, Meera Syal, and Eva Figes). Tallinn: TLÜ Kirjastus.