First-person Folk Psychology: Mindreading or Mindshaping?
Proponents of mindshaping argue that third-person folk psychology (i.e., the ascription of mental states to others) is not primarily about "reading" mental states for the purpose of behavior prediction and explanation. Instead, they claim that third-person folk psychology is first and foremost a regulative practice -- one that "shapes" mental states in accordance with the norms of a shared folk psychological framework. This paper investigates to what extent the core assumptions behind the mindshaping hypothesis are compatible with an account of first-person folk psychology (i.e., the ascription of mental states to ourselves) that is based on the notion of "self-regulative agency."
Andrews, K. (2008). It's in your nature: A pluralistic folk psychology, Synthese 165: 13-29.
Andrews, K. (2015). Pluralistic folk psychology and varieties of self-knowledge: An exploration, Philosophical Explorations 18: 282-296.
Bruner, J. S. (1990). Acts of Meaning, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Carruthers, P. (2009). How we know our own minds: The relationship between mindreading and metacognition, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32: 121-181.
Carruthers, P. (2011). The Opacity of Mind, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
De Bruin, L. C., Jongepier, F. & Strijbos, D. W. (2015). Mental agency as self-regulation, Review of Philosophy and Psychology 6: 815-825.
De Bruin, L. C. & Strijbos, D. W. (2015). Self-interpretation as first-person mindshaping: Implications for confabulation research, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18: 297-307.
De Bruin, L. C., Van Elk, M. & Newen, A. (2012). Reconceptualizing second-person interaction, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 6: 151.
Gallagher, S. (2001). The practice of mind: Theory, simulation or primary interaction?, Journal of Consciousness Studies 8: 83-108.
Gallagher, S. (2012). In defense of phenomenological approaches to social cognition: Interacting with the critics, Review of Philosophy and Psychology 3: 187-212.
Goldman, A. (1993). Consciousness, folk-psychology, and cognitive science, Consciousness and Cognition 2: 364-382.
Goldman, A. (2006). Simulating Minds, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Hutto, D. D. (2008). Folk Psychological Narratives: The Sociocultural Basis of Understanding Reasons, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Kant, I. (1973). What is Enlightenment?, in P. Gay (ed.), The Enlightenment: A comprehensive Anthology, Simon and Schuster, New York, pp. 383-390.
Kloosterboer, N. (2015). Transparent emotions? A critical analysis of Moran's transparency claim, Philosophical Explorations 18: 246.
McGeer, V. (1996). Is `self-knowledge' an empirical problem? Renegotiating the space of philosophical explanation, Journal of Philosophy 93: 483-515.
McGeer, V. (2007). The regulative dimension of folk psychology, in D. Hutto & M. Ratcliffe (eds), Folk-Psychology Re-Assessed, Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 137-156.
McGeer, V. (2008). The moral development of first-person authority, European Journal of Philosophy 16: 81-108.
Moran, R. (2001). Authority and Estrangement, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Overgaard, S. & Michael, J. (2015). The interactive turn in social cognition research: A critique, Philosophical Psychology 28: 160-183.
Pettit, P. & McGeer, V. (2002). The self-regulating mind, Language and Communication 22: 281-299.
Ratcliffe, M. (2005). Folk psychology and the biological basis of intersubjectivity, in A. O'Hear (ed.), Philosophy, Biology and Life, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 211-233.
Ratcliffe, M. (2007). Rethinking Commonsense Psychology: A Critique of Folk Psychology, Theory of Mind and Simulation, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Zawidzki, T. (2008). he function of folk psychology: Mind reading or mind shaping?, Philosophical Explorations 11: 193-210.
Zawidzki, T. (2013). Mindshaping: A New Framework for Understanding Human Social Cognition, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Copyright (c) 2017 Leon De Bruin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.