Action Understanding in Infancy: Do Infant Interpreters Attribute Enduring Mental States or Track Relational Properties of Transient Bouts of Behavior?
We address recent interpretations of infant performance on spontaneous false belief tasks. According to most views, these experiments show that human infants attribute mental states from a very young age. Focusing on one of the most clearly worked out, minimalist versions of this idea, Butterfill and Apperly's (2013) "minimal theory of mind" framework, we defend an alternative characterization: the minimal theory of rational agency. On this view, rather than conceiving of social situations in terms of states of an enduring mental substance animating agents, infant interpreters parse observed bouts of behavior and their contexts into goals, rational means to those goals, and available information. In other words, the social ontology of infant interpreters consists in goal-directed, (mis- or un-) informed bouts of behavior, by non-enduring agents, rather than agents animated by states of enduring, unobservable minds. We discuss a number of experiments that support this interpretation of infant socio-cognitive competence.
Andrews, K. (2012). Do Apes Read Minds?: Toward a New Folk Psychology, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Apperly, I. A. & Butterfill, S. A. (2009). Do humans have two systems to track beliefs and belief-like states?, Psychological Review 116: 953-970.
Baillargeon, R., Scott, R. M. & He, Z. (2010). False-belief understanding in infants, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14: 110-118.
Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M. & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a ``Theory of Mind''?, Cognition 21: 37-46.
Bloom, P. & German, T. P. (2000). Two reasons to abandon the false belief task as a test of Theory of Mind, Cognition 77: 25-31.
Buckner, C. (2014). The semantic problem(s) with research on animal mind-reading, Mind & Language 29: 566-589.
Butterfill, S. A. & Apperly, I. A. (2013). How to construct a minimal theory of mind, Mind & Language 28: 606-637.
Byrne, R. W. & Whiten, A. (eds) (1988). Machiavellian Intelligence: Social Expertise and the Evolution of Intellect in Monkeys, Apes, and Humans, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Carruthers, P. (2013). Mindreading in infancy, Mind & Language 28: 141-172.
Csibra, G., Biro, S., Koos, O. & Gergely, G. (2003). One-year-old infants use teleological representations of actions productively, Cognitive Science 27: 111-133.
Csibra, G., Gergely, G., Biro, S., Koos, O. & Brockbank, M. (1999). Goal attribution without agency cues: The perception of ``pure reason'' in infancy, Cognition 72: 237-267.
Fenici, M. (2014). A simple explanation of apparent early mindreading: Infants' sensitivity to goals and gaze direction, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 14: 1-19.
Fenici, M. (2015). Social cognitive abilities in infancy: Is mindreading the best explanation?, Philosophical Psychology 28: 387-411.
Fenici, M. (forthcoming). What is the role of experience in children's success in the false belief test: Maturation, facilitation, attunement, or induction?, Mind & Language.
Fenici, M. (submitted). How children approach the false belief test: Social development, pragmatics, and the assembly of theory of mind.
Fenici, M. & Carpendale, J. I. M. (submitted). Overcoming the false belief test puzzle: A constructivist approach to the development of social understanding.
Fodor, J. A. (1992). A theory of the child's theory of mind, Cognition 44: 283-296.
Gergely, G. & Csibra, G. (2003). Teleological reasoning in infancy: The na"ive theory of rational action, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7: 287-292.
Helming, K. A., Strickland, B. & Jacob, P. (2016). Solving the puzzle about early belief-ascription, Mind & Language 31: 438-469.
Heyes, C. M. (2014). False belief in infancy: A fresh look, Developmental Science 17: 647-659.
Humphrey, N. K. (1976). The social function of intellect, in P. P. G. Bateson & J. R. Hinde (eds), Growing Points in Ethology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 303-317.
Hutto, D. D. (2008). Folk Psychological Narratives, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Hutto, D. D. (2015). Basic social cognition without mindreading: Minding minds without attributing contents, Synthese Online first: 1-20.
Kampis, D., Somogyi, E., Itakura, S. & Kiraly, I. (2013). Do infants bind mental states to agents?, Cognition 129: 232-240.
Kovacs, A. M. (2016). Belief files in theory of mind reasoning, Review of Philosophy and Psychology 7: 509-527.
Low, J. & Watts, J. (2013). Attributing false-belief about object identity is a signature blindspot in humans' efficient mindreading system, Psychological Science 24: 305-311.
Luo, Y. (2011). Do 10-month-old infants understand others' false beliefs?, Cognition 121: 289-298.
Luo, Y. & Baillargeon, R. (2005). Can a self-propelled box have a goal? Psychological reasoning in 5-month-old infants, Psychological Science 16: 601-608.
Luo, Y. & Baillargeon, R. (2007). Do 12.5-month-old infants consider what objects others can see when interpreting their actions?, Cognition 105: 489-512.
Luo, Y. & Baillargeon, R. (2010). Toward a mentalistic account of early psychological reasoning, Current Directions in Psychological Science 19: 301-307.
Nichols, S. & Stich, S. (2003). Mindreading: An Integrated Account of Pretence, Self-Awareness, and Understanding Other Minds, Oxford University Press, New York.
Onishi, K. H. & Baillargeon, R. (2005). Do 15-month-old infants understand false beliefs?, Science 308: 255-258.
Overton, W. F. (2015). Processes, relations, and relational-developmental-systems, in W. F. Overton & P. C. M. Molenaar (eds), Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science, pp. 9-62.
Penn, D. C. & Povinelli, D. J. (2007). On the lack of evidence that non-human animals possess anything remotely resembling a `theory of mind', Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 362: 731-744.
Pfeifer, R. & Bongard, J. (2006). How the Body Shapes the Way We Think: A New View of Intelligence, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Povinelli, D. J. & Vonk, J. (2004). We don't need a microscope to explore the chimpanzee's mind, Mind & Language 19: 1-28.
Rubio-Fernandez, P. & Geurts, B. (2013). How to pass the false-belief task before your fourth birthday, Psychological Science 24: 27-33.
Rubio-Fernandez, P. & Geurts, B. (2016). Don't mention the marble! The role of attentional processes in false-belief tasks, Review of Philosophy and Psychology 7: 835-850.
Ruffman, T. (2014). To belief or not belief: Children's theory of mind, Developmental Review 34: 265-293.
Ruffman, T. & Perner, J. (2005). Do infants really understand false belief? Response to Leslie, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9: 462-463.
Saxe, R., Carey, S. & Kanwisher, N. (2004). Understanding other minds: Linking developmental psychology and functional neuroimaging, Annual Review of Psychology 55: 87-124.
Saxe, R. & Wexler, A. (2005). Making sense of another mind: The role of the right temporo-parietal junction, Neuropsychologia 43: 1391-1399.
Scott, R. M. & Baillargeon, R. (2009). Which penguin is this? Attributing false beliefs about object identity at 18 months, Child Development 80: 1172-1196.
Song, H., Onishi, K. H., Baillargeon, R. & Fisher, C. (2008). Can an agent's false belief be corrected by an appropriate communication? Psychological reasoning in 18-month-old infants, Cognition 109: 295-315.
Southgate, V., Senju, A. & Csibra, G. (2007). Action anticipation through attribution of false belief by 2-year-olds, Psychological Science 18: 587-592.
Trauble, B., Marinovic, V. & Pauen, S. (2010). Early theory of mind competencies: Do infants understand others' beliefs?, Infancy 15: 434-444.
Wellman, H. M., Cross, D. & Watson, J. (2001). Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: the truth about false belief, Child Development 72: 655-684.
Whiten, A. (1996). When does smart behaviour-reading become mind-reading?, in P. Carruthers & P. K. Smith (eds), Theories of Theories of Mind, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 277-292.
Wimmer, H. & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception, Cognition 13: 103-128.
Zawidzki, T. W. (2011).How to interpret infant socio-cognitive competence, Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2: 483-497.
Zawidzki, T. W. (2013). Mindshaping: A New Framework for Understanding Human Social Cognition, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Copyright (c) 2017 Tadeusz Zawidzki, Marco Fenici
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.