Metaphysics: Inside or Outside of Science?
For decades, the British philosopher of science Nicholas Maxwell has been promoting a new approach to science called aim-oriented empiricism. Maxwell's basic claim is that the regular way of doing science, called standard empiricism, is untenable because it does not account for the basic general assumptions that scientists actually adhere to without acknowledgment. Standard empiricism is unable to make sense of the progress of science as it is happening. The alternative approach that Maxwell advocates, aim-oriented empiricism, acknowledges some basic metaphysical assumptions, comprehensibility, unity and simplicity as inherent parts of science itself. By including these metaphysical assumptions into science, Maxwell is looking for ways to make sense of the progress of science from a philosophical perspective. This paper challenges Maxwell's claim with the help of another new approach to science, practical realism. While the founder of practical realism, Rein Vihalemm, claims that his approach is closely related to Maxwell's views, he does not acknowledge any need for metaphysics in science.
Marx, K. (1845). Theses on Feuerbach. URL: http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1845/theses/index.htm
Maxwell, N. (2015). What’s Wrong With Aim-Oriented Empiricism? Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum, 3 (2): 5-31.
Miller, D. (2006). Out of Error, Ashgate, London.
Muller, F. A. (2004). Essay review: Maxwell’s lonely war. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 35: 109-119.
Muller, F. A. (2008). In Defence of Constructive Empiricism: Maxwell’s Master Argument and Aberrant Theories. Journal of General Philosophy of Science, 39: 131-156.
Müürsepp, P. (2012). The Changing Role of Scientific Experiment. Studia Philosophica Estonica. 5.2: 152-166.
Rouse, J. (1987). Knowledge and Power: Toward a Political Philosophy of Science. Ihaca: Cornell University Press.
Toulmin, S. (1969). From Logical Analysis to Conceptual History. The Legacy of Logical Positivism. Studies in the Philosophy of Science. P. Achinstein, S.F. Barker (eds.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press: 29-53.
Vicente, A. (2010). An Enlightened Revolt: on the Philosophy of Nicholas Maxwell. Philosophia, vol. 3 no. 4: 631-648.
Vihalemm, R. (1993). Teadusfilosoofia ilma filosoofiata. Akadeemia. Nr 9 (54): 1800-1817.
Vihalemm, R. (2011). Towards a Practical Realist Philosophy of Science. Baltic Journal of European Studies. Vol. No. 1(9): 46-60.
Copyright (c) 2017 Peeter Müürsepp
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.