@article{Rush_2012, title={Objectivities}, url={https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/spe/article/view/spe.2012.5.1.01}, DOI={10.12697/spe.2012.5.1.01}, abstractNote={<p>I argue that one in particular of Crispin Wright’s attempts to capture our common or intuitive concepts of objectivity, warrant, and other associated notions, relies on an ambiguity between a given constructivist reading of the concepts and at least one other, arguably more ‘ordinary’, version of the notions he tries to accommodate. I do this by focusing on one case in point, and concluding with a brief argument showing how this case generalises. I demonstrate why this ambiguity is unacceptable and also that its resolution undermines the aim it serves: to account for and accommodate our ordinary conception of (at least) objectivity, warrant (or justification) and truth.</p>}, journal={Studia Philosophica Estonica}, author={Rush, Penelope A}, year={2012}, month={Jul.}, pages={1–16} }