http://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/issue/feed Sign Systems Studies 2020-02-21T09:30:49+02:00 Kalevi Kull sss@ut.ee Open Journal Systems <p>An international journal of semiotics and sign processes in culture and living nature.</p> http://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/SSS.2019.47.3-4.01 Learning and knowing as semiosis: Extending the conceptual apparatus of semiotics 2020-02-13T09:15:30+02:00 Cary Campbell cary_campbell@sfu.ca Alin Olteanu alin.olteanu@ut.ee Kalevi Kull kalevi.kull@ut.ee <p>If all knowing comes from semiosis, more concepts should be added to the semiotic toolbox. However, semiotic concepts must be defined via other semiotic concepts. We observe an opportunity to advance the state-of-the-art in semiotics by defining concepts of cognitive processes and phenomena via semiotic terms. In particular, we focus on concepts of relevance for theory of knowledge, such as learning, knowing, affordance, scaffolding, resources, competence, memory, and a few others. For these, we provide preliminary definitions from a semiotic perspective, which also explicates their interrelatedness. Redefining these terms this way helps to avoid both physicalism and psychologism, showcasing the epistemological dimensions of environmental situatedness through the semiotic understanding of organisms’ fittedness with their environments. Following our review and presentation of each concept, we briefly discuss the significance of our embedded redefinitions in contributing to a semiotic theory of knowing that has relevance to both the humanities and the life sciences, while not forgetting their relevance to education and psychology, but also social semiotic and multimodality studies.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> 2020-02-12T16:36:47+02:00 Copyright (c) http://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/SSS.2019.47.3-4.02 Cartographies of the mind: Generalization and relevance in cognitive landscapes 2020-02-13T09:13:24+02:00 Sergio Rodríguez Gómez sergiol.rodriguezg@utadeo.edu.co <p>The problem of relevance, at individual agent scale – or how we decide what is adequate for our interpretation of the signs we encounter in the world – is a question that keeps reappearing in semiotics and other disciplines concerned with meaning. In this article I propose an approximation on relevance that conceives meaning as a trajectory across a cognitive landscape. Unlike conventional accounts on relevance, which presuppose mental processes built on feature-based representations, my proposal suggests conceiving cognition as a fluid and emergent field of attractors basins that become specified and modified when experiences appear, and conceiving meaning as a trajectory across the cognitive field. Consequently, I suggest that when cognitive landscapes better fit world experience, agents’ categorizations will be more relevant. My proposal is mainly supported by two approaches: the enactivist notion of structural coupling and the theories of dynamic neural populations of Walter Freeman III.</p> 2020-02-12T16:41:57+02:00 Copyright (c) http://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/SSS.2019.47.3-4.03 General sociolinguistics, social semiotics and semiotics of culture – ex pluribus unum? Forty years after Language as Social Semiotic 2020-02-13T09:13:22+02:00 Suren Zolyan surenzolyan@gmail.com <p>The birth of social semiotics is usually associated with the publication of Michael Halliday’s book <em>Language as Social Semiotic</em> (1978). We try to draw attention to possible new developments in social semiotics, which still remain a potential transdisciplinary project for social sciences. In order to do this, we address the interrelation between sociolinguistics, social semiotics and the semiotics of culture. All of these describe mechanisms of meaning production and translation beyond linguistic structures. The differentiation between these workings is based on a distinc tion between various aspects of meaning production and communication and functional characteristics of goal setting. The complexity of these processes legitimates the complexity of methodology used to describe them. Interconnection between different domains and aspects may create synthetic methods based on the dynamic approach to meaning production and transmission.</p> 2020-02-13T08:15:01+02:00 Copyright (c) http://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/SSS.2019.47.3-4.04 Everything seems so settled here: The conceivability of post-Peircean biosemiotics 2020-02-13T09:13:20+02:00 Claudio J. Rodríguez Higuera claudiojrodriguezh@gmail.com <p>Theory change is a slow, tortuous process. Problems associated with how we communicate ideas and how these ideas are received by our peers become catalysts for change in how we ourselves perceive and sanction what the discipline is capable of doing. Some parts of semiotics, and particularly biosemiotics, have come under critical scrutiny because of their heavy commitment to Peircean philosophy, but at the same time, the contributions of Peircean philosophy are almost impossible to discount. The ripples of this situation are quite visible in the emergence of code biology as a post-semiotic research programme. Yet there is a general balance between those who do not put that much stock in Peircean concepts and those who cannot conceive semiotics without these.</p> <p>This paper will ask whether a biosemiotics after Peirce is possible at all in the sense of acknowledging Peirce’s contributions to the field while also taking to heart the criticisms raised by those skeptical of the implications of Peircean semiotics. While the answer is most likely positive, it depends on what background our concept of meaning relies on and how it may bleed into the other areas of semiotics that biosemiotics may claim a stake on. Being able to discuss potential theoretical distinctions across semiotics while also allowing communication between the areas caught in this differentiation will be crucial for the health of the discipline as the gap between theories becomes more profound.</p> 2020-02-13T08:20:47+02:00 Copyright (c) http://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/SSS.2019.47.3-4.05 A strawberry, an animal cry and a human subject: Where existential semiotics, biosemiotics and relational metaphysics seem to meet one another 2020-02-13T09:13:18+02:00 Katarzyna Machtyl machtylk@amu.edu.pl <p>The article discus ses some semiotic approaches to the relation between nature and culture. Starting with outlining the structuralistic approach to this issue, especially the ideas of Juri Lotman and Algirdas Julien Greimas, the author finds parallels between different views on the relation between the natural world and human beings. First, the juxtaposition of Eero Tarasti’s existential semiotics with selected concepts of biosemiotics is discussed. The following part of the paper is dedicated to Bruno Latour’s ideas on nature–culture relation, hybrids and mediations. Then the author refers to Lotman’s notion of the semiosphere as the common space for all living and inanimate elements. Closing the paper with a return to biosemiotics, the author comes back to Tarasti’s ideas and compares these with some ideas in biosemiotics, paying special attention to the concepts of unpredictability, choice and dynamics. The comparison shows that some intuitions, assumptions and theses of these different scholars turn out to be surprisingly convergent. The author believes that the outlined parallels between Tarasti’s view, Latour’s and Lotman’s concepts, and biosemiotics may be promising for further research, inviting detailed study.</p> 2020-02-13T08:27:15+02:00 Copyright (c) http://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/SSS.2019.47.3-4.06 Keepers as social companions: Tactile communication and social enrichment for captive apes 2020-02-13T09:13:16+02:00 Mirko Cerrone mirko.cerrone@ut.ee <p>The article addresses the topic of great ape–keeper tactile communication. The aim of this paper is to understand whether direct physical contact can be considered a source of enrichment for captive apes and whether it could be used to enhance animal welfare in zoos. We make use of a multispecies perspective provided by umwelt theory in an attempt to determine the role of touch in zoological gardens. By referring to Konrad Lorenz, we describe keeper–animal relationships as a special case of companionship, highlighting the role of keepers in apes’ social behaviour. The paper considers social touch as the primary means used by social animals to create and maintain increasingly complex relationships. Since tactile communication in interspecific contexts has been underestimated previously, our theoretical framework allows for a better understanding of physical contact in zoological gardens without assuming an anthropocentric point of view. Our hypothesis is that physical contact with keepers may provide enriching opportunities for social animals and help strengthen the bond between animals and their keepers. We emphasize that ape–animal interactions in zoos need to involve keeper–animal physical contact as a possible means for enhancing the apes’ welfare.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> 2020-02-13T08:31:43+02:00 Copyright (c) http://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/SSS.2019.47.3-4.07 Translating from monosemiotic to polysemiotic narratives: A study of Finnish speech and gestures 2020-02-13T09:13:14+02:00 Karoliina Louhema karoliina.louhema@gmail.com Jordan Zlatev jordan.zlatev@semiotik.lu.se Maria Graziano maria.graziano@humlab.lu.se Joost van de Weijer joost.van_de_weijer@ling.lu.se <p>Human communication can be either monosemiotic or polysemiotic, depending on whether it combines ensembles of representations from one or more <em>semiotic systems</em> such as language, gesture and depiction. Each semiotic system has its unique storytelling potentials, which makes intersemiotic translation from one system to another challenging. We investigated the influence of the source semiotic system, realised in speech and a sequence of pictures, respectively, on the way the same story was retold using speech and co-speech gestures. The story was the content of the picture book <em>Frog, Where Are You?</em>. A group of Finnish speakers saw the story in pictures, and another group heard it in matched oral narration. Each participant retold the story to an addressee and all narrations were video-recorded and analysed for both speech and gestures. Given the high degree of iconicity in depiction, we expected more iconic gestures (especially enactments) in the narratives translated from pictures than in those translated from speech. Conversely, we expected greater narrative coherence in the narratives translated from speech. The results showed that more iconic gestures were produced in the narratives translated from speech, but these were primarily not from the enactment subtype. As expected, iconic enactments were more frequent in the narratives translated from the story presented in pictures. The narratives produced by participants who had only heard the story did not have a greater variety of connective devices, yet the type of devices differed slightly between the groups. Together with some additional differences between the groups that had not been anticipated, the results indicate that a story presented in different semiotic systems tends to be translated into different polysemiotic narratives.</p> 2020-02-13T08:40:14+02:00 Copyright (c) http://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/SSS.2019.47.3-4.08 Fairy tales between transformation and repetition: How audiences rethink the big romantic myth through Disney princess stories 2020-02-13T09:13:11+02:00 Tatjana Menise tatjana.pilipovec@gmail.com <p>One of the ways in which culture becomes enriched is through reconsideration and reinterpretation of well-known stories, and classic fairy tales provide promising material for investigation of the nature of this complex process. The Walt Disney Company is among the most powerful tellers of classic tales, its line of princess animations being an example of simultaneous development and preservation of the fairy-tale phenomenon in a changing cultural context.</p> <p>We analyse the dialogue among classic and modern princess stories and the discussions that these stories give rise to in English-language academic criticism and English-based participatory culture. We focus on the interaction among authors, texts and readers, showing how traditional tales balance between mythological and nonmythological consciousness, between innovative and canonical art.</p> <p>The diversity of fans’ practices may be seen as a key to possible explanation of why fairy tales exist in culture as a complex, constantly growing web, not as a limited number of selected final versions. Amateur authors demonstrate their interest in the mythopoetics of classic fairy tale plots. They are attracted by the old romantic myth that stands behind princess stories, participate in the creation of the romantic antimyth that is supported by the professional critics, and expect the appearance of new modern myths that might be generated by the new productions of Disney. New fairy tales appear, but this does not result in the disappearance of the old ones. Not only the interests towards the plots themselves, but also discussions and conflict around classic stories keep them topical for contemporary heterogeneous audiences.</p> 2020-02-13T08:47:46+02:00 Copyright (c) http://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/SSS.2019.47.3-4.09 The case for a semiotic method in Earth system science: Semantic networks of environmental research 2020-02-21T09:30:49+02:00 Alin Olteanu alin.olteanu@ut.ee Florian Rabitz florian.rabitz@ktu.lt Jurgita Jurkevičienė jurgita.jurkeviciene@ktu.lt Agnė Budžytė a.budzyte@ktu.lt <p>This paper sets a framework for using semiotics as an analytical method for Earth system science. It illustrates the use of such a method by analysing a dataset consisting of 32,383 abstracts of research articles pertaining to Earth system science, modelled as semantic networks. The analysis allows us to explain the epistemological advantages of this method as originating in the systems thinking common in both Earth system science and semiotics. The purpose of this methodological proposal is that of bringing the recent and critical planetary boundaries framework to the attention of ecosemiotics and biosemiotic criticism, and <em>vice versa</em>. Ecosemiotics is a branch of the biosemiotic modelling theory and is thus grounded in Charles Peirce’s schematic semiotics, but also developed in inspiration of Juri Lotman’s systemic semiotics. Both of these foundations of ecosemiotics are compatible with the rationale of Earth system science, given the schematism of Peirce’s semiotics and Lotman’s notion of meaning as an affordance of the biosphere. Far from exhausting the hermeneutic possibilities evoked by the discussed dataset, we argue that such semiotic analysis, made possible by the digital capacity of modelling large amounts of data, reveals new horizons for semiotic analysis, particularly regarding humans’ modelling of the environment.</p> 2020-02-13T08:53:39+02:00 Copyright (c) http://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/SSS.2019.47.3-4.10 Multiculturalism, biosemiotics, and cross-cultural friendship: An essay review of Olteanu’s multimodal semiotics of culture 2020-02-13T09:13:07+02:00 Claus Emmeche cemmeche@ind.ku.dk <p>Review of <em>Multiculturalism as Multimodal Communication: A Semiotic Perspective</em> [Series <em>Numanities – Arts and Humanities in Progress</em> 9; Dario Martinelli, series ed.] by Alin Olteanu. Cham: Springer, 2019, xviii+140 pp.</p> 2020-02-13T08:57:36+02:00 Copyright (c) http://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/SSS.2019.47.3-4.11 Möbius semioticity: Six takes on Peeter Torop’s semiotics-of-culture model of textuality 2020-02-13T09:13:05+02:00 Douglas Robinson robinson@hkbu.edu.hk <p>Möbius semioticity: Six takes on Peeter Torop’s semiotics-of-culture model of textuality</p> 2020-02-13T09:01:17+02:00 Copyright (c) http://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/SSS.2019.47.3-4.12 Report on the 19th annual Gathering in Biosemiotics in Moscow 2020-02-13T09:13:02+02:00 Arran Gare agare@swin.edu.au <p>Report on the 19th annual Gathering in Biosemiotics in Moscow</p> 2020-02-13T09:03:54+02:00 Copyright (c)