The dilemma of environmental taxation – case study of Estonia. Keskkonna maksustamise dilemma Eesti näitel
Keywords: environmental taxes, revenue raising, damage cost estimates
AbstractEnvironmental tax rhetoric in the Estonian policy discussion leads to a dilemma. Policy makers want to increase environmental charges for budgetary reasons and at the same time achieve environmental goals. The article examines the empirics of this issue, i.e. whether pollution charges have been successful as a fiscal or as an environmental instrument. By index analysis the authors find that pollution charges were fiscally successful in the beginning of the 2000’s and have since 2004 been successful environmental taxes. The proposition that environmental charges do not cover the damage costs of pollution is also under investigation. It is found that the damage cost estimates have incorrectly been interpreted as average costs. The implication is that the damage costs which have been used as evidence for increasing pollution charges are incorrect and that the over-estimation of damages is in the order of a magnitude of two or more.
Download data is not yet available.
How to Cite
Pädam, S., & Ehrlich, Üllas. (1). The dilemma of environmental taxation – case study of Estonia. Keskkonna maksustamise dilemma Eesti näitel. Estonian Discussions on Economic Policy, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.15157/tpep.v22i2.11856
Articles. Artikeln. Artiklid
Copyright (c) 2016 Estonian Discussions on Economic Policy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.The publication Estonian Discussions on Economic Policy uses the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. With the delivery of a paper, the author grants to the Board also the right to publish the paper in the journal. The journal has set no obstacles or prohibitions to the authors for the future, and according to the current practice, authors subsequently use their paper as they consider it appropriate. Authors are personally responsible for the content, correct spelling and formatting of their publications.