@article{Gao_2012, place={Tartu, Estonia}, title={Basic colour terms for black and white in Chinese: with discussions on models of language development}, volume={3}, url={https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/jeful/article/view/jeful.2012.3.1.03}, DOI={10.12697/jeful.2012.3.1.03}, abstractNote={<p><span style="left: 214.749px; top: 249.181px; font-size: 16.6667px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.94379);">The basic colour terms for black and white are studied in </span><span style="left: 141.749px; top: 269.181px; font-size: 16.6667px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.97237);">four archaic and two contemporary linguistic norms of the Chinese </span><span style="left: 141.749px; top: 289.181px; font-size: 16.6667px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.987757);">language. It is presented that studied Chinese linguistic norms use </span><span style="left: 141.749px; top: 309.181px; font-size: 16.6667px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.971507);">a common term for white and three different terms for black. It is </span><span style="left: 141.749px; top: 329.181px; font-size: 16.6667px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(1.03862);">suggested that the different basic colour terms for black might origi</span><span style="left: 141.749px; top: 349.181px; font-size: 16.6667px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(1.04066);">nate from different source languages. The study supports a panchro</span><span style="left: 141.749px; top: 369.181px; font-size: 16.6667px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.963874);">nic language development instead of a diachronic one, and includes </span><span style="left: 141.749px; top: 389.181px; font-size: 16.6667px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(1.01777);">introductions to histories of the Chinese linguistic norms</span></p>}, number={1}, journal={Eesti ja soome-ugri keeleteaduse ajakiri. Journal of Estonian and Finno-Ugric Linguistics}, author={Gao, Jingyi}, year={2012}, month={Dec.}, pages={87–128} }