The Natural Ontological Attitude in a Hermeneutic Context


  • Dimitri Ginev University of Konstanz



the natural ontological attitude, hermeneutic fore-structure of scientific research, characteristic hermeneutic situation, proto-normativity, local epistemological positions


My aim in this paper is to re-examine Arthur Fine’s concept of the natural ontological attitude. Whereas earlier critical interpretations focus on the compatibility of NOA with scientific realism, I argue that Fine’s conception is to be recast in terms of an interpretative theory of scientific research. Specifically, I make the case that the hermeneutic reformulation of NOA is unavoidable when at stake are the issues of the structural, conceptual, and experimental articulation of scientific domain. The paper concludes by considering the formation of local epistemological positions in the research process.


Download data is not yet available.


Brading, K. (2011). Structuralist approaches to physics: Objects, models and modality, in A. Bokulich and P. Bokulich (eds), Scientific Structuralism, Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 43-66.

Eger, M. (2006). Science, Understanding and Justice, Open Court.

Fine, A. (1984). The natural ontological attitude, in J. Leplin (ed.), Scientific Realism, University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 83-107.

Fine, A. (1986). Natural attitudes: Realist and instrumentalist attachments to science, Mind 95: 149-179.

Fine, A. (1991). Piecemeal realism, Philosophical Studies 61: 79-96.

Fine, A. (1996). Shaky Game: Einstein, Realism, and the Quantum Theory, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Fine, A. (2009). Science fiction, Philosophical Studies 143: 117-125.

French, S. and Ladyman, J. (2011). In defence of ontic structural realism, in A. Bokulich and P. Bokulich (eds), Scientific Structuralism, Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 25-42.

Ginev, D. (1997). A Passage to the Hermeneutic Philosophy of Science, Rodopi, Amsterdam.

Ginev, D. (2006). The Context of Constitution: Beyond the Edge of Justification, Springer, Dordrecht.

Ginev, D. (2008). Cognitive existentialism, Iyyun: The Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly 57: 227-242.

Ginev, D. (2011). The Tenets of Cognitive Existentialism, Ohio University Press, Athens.

Heelan, P. (1983). Natural science as hermeneutic of instrumentation, Philosophy of Science 50: 181-204.

Heelan, P. (1989). Yes! there is a hermeneutics of natural science: A rejoinder to Markus, Science in Context 3: 477-488.

Heelan, P. (1998). The scope of hermeneutics in natural science, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 29: 273-298.

Kockelmans ,J. (1993). Ideas for a Hermeneutic Phenomenology of the Natural Sciences, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

Mitchell, P. (1972). Chemiosmotic coupling in energy transduction: A logical development of biochemical knowledge, Bioenergetics 3: 5-24.

Musgrave, A. (1989). NOA’s ark–Fine for realism, Philosophical Quarterly 39: 383-398.

Prebble, J. (2001). The philosophical origins of Mitchell’s chemiosmotic concepts, Journal of the History of Biology 34: 433-460.

Rheinberger, H.-J. (1997). Toward a history of epistemic things: Synthesizing proteins in the test tube, Stanford University Press, Stanford.

Rorty, R. (2007). A pragmatist view of contemporary analytical philosophy, Philosophy as Cultural Politics. Philosophical Papers, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 133-146.

Rouse, J. (1988). Arguing for the natural ontological attitude, in J. Leplin, A.Fineand M.Forbes (eds), PSA: Proceedings of the Biennal Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 294-301.

Rouse, J. (1996). Engaging Science: How to Understand Its Practices Philosophically, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

van Fraassen, B. (1976). To save the phenomena, Journal of Philosophy 73: 623-632.

van Fraassen, B. (1980). The Scientific Image, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Ward, R. (2001). Peirce and politics, Philosophy and Social Criticism 27: 67-90.

Weber, M. (2002). Incommensurability and theory comparison in experimental biology, Philosophy and Biology 17: 155-169.




How to Cite

Ginev, D. (2012). The Natural Ontological Attitude in a Hermeneutic Context. Studia Philosophica Estonica, 17–43.