Ecosemiotics and cybersemiotics

Authors

  • Søren Brier Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Rolighedsvej 23, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2001.29.1.08

Abstract

The article develops a suggestion of how cybersemiotics is pertinent to ecosemiotics. Cybersemiotics uses Luhmann's triadic view of autopoietic systems (biological, psychological, and socio-communicative autopoiesis) and adopts his approach to communication within a biosemiotic framework. The following levels of exosemiosis and signification can be identified under the consideration of nonintentional signs, cybernetics, and information theory: (1) the socio-communicative level of self-conscious signification and language games. (2) the instinctual and species specific level of sign stimuli signifying through innate release response mechanism and sign games, and (3) the level of structural coupling, signal recognition, and languaging, where cybernetic feedback loops evince differences. Signification and communication levels arise whenever autopoietic systems interpenetrate (1) with the language system's semiotic and the psyche's phenosemiotic processes based on imaging, emotion, and volition and (2) between the psyche's phenosemiotic and the body's endosemiotic processes. It is at these two levels that we have the ecosemiotic signification processes of nonintentional signs in nature. Humans are linguistic cyborgs as animals are sign cyborgs because signs at different levels interpenetrate and form our embodied processes. Sign producing and interpreting capability has had selective influence on both animals and humans in evolution.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2001-12-31

How to Cite

Brier, S. (2001). Ecosemiotics and cybersemiotics. Sign Systems Studies, 29(1), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2001.29.1.08

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)