@article{Merrell_2010, title={Resemblance: From a complementarity point of view?}, volume={38}, url={https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/SSS.2010.38.1-4.04}, DOI={10.12697/SSS.2010.38.1-4.04}, abstractNote={Three premises set the stage for a Peirce based notion of resemblance, which, as Firstness, cannot be more than vaguely distinguished from Secondness and Thirdness. Inclusion of Firstness with, and within, Secondness and Thirdness, calls for a nonbivalent, nonlinear, context dependent mode of thinking characteristic of semiosis — that is, the process by which everything is always becoming something other than what it was becoming — and at the same time it includes linear, bivalent classical logic as a subset. Certain aspects of the Dao, Buddhist philosophy, and Donald Davidson’s ‘radical interpretation’ afford additional, and perhaps unexpected, support for the initial set of three premises.}, number={1/4}, journal={Sign Systems Studies}, author={Merrell, Floyd}, year={2010}, month={Dec.}, pages={91–129} }