Evangelisatsioon kui kommunikatsioon: religioonisotsioloogiline vaatlus krusaadi Pro Christ näitel
Abstract
Ingmar Kurg, Evangelization as Communication, Observations in Sociology of Religion: the Pro Christ Crusade Example
Evangelization, as defined in the document Mission and Evangelization in unity today issued by the World Council of Churches, „...focuses on explicit and intentional voicing of the gospel, including the invitation to personal conversion to a new life in Christ and to discipleship”. Evangelization, understood in the light of the aforesaid, refers to the indispensable need of religious communication. The contact between the proclaimer and the listener is thereby interactive - it cannot remain an one-sided monologue but has to take place in an open communicative system. According to the definition of communication theory presented by the sociologist Niklas Luhmann, communication is considered to have taken place only when understanding of the conveyed message and acceptance by the receiver has occurred in the process. The ability of conveying a message and mediating symbols in an understandable and acceptable way should be part of the church competences in present-day evangelization.
The specific feature of communication occurring in evangelization lies in the fact that the message is conveyed provocatively: by using the concept frame extension — in the context of the sociology of religion - the aim of the act of evangelization is to shift the communication frames into a position where it would be possible to motivate and mobilise the potential person entering the communication space. On the example of the evangelization event Pro Christ (based on the analysis of the sociologist of religion Detlef Pollack) it will take place in three stages: a) building up communicative bridges between the evangelist, his message and the listener while inhibiting other, unnecessary communication possibilities in the process of evangelization; b) intensifying the communication, the end result of which is affirmation, conversion and a new group-specific socialization; c) rendering meaning to the communication by encompassing person’s whole life-story which has complex religious features as well as re-orientation of all other everyday relations in the light of the gospel of God.
Churches that participate, willingly or not, in the present-day „market” of religions can test their competence in the area of evangelization by the fact whether the search for contact initiated by them is transparent for the person receiving it, whether it is allowing free acceptance as well as creating an on-going interactive and social communication.
Downloads
References
Altnurme, Lea. 2005. ‘Kristlusest Oma Usuni. Uurimus Muutustest Eestlaste Religioossuses 20. Sajandi II Poolel’. Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus.
Austin, John L. 1963. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Berger, Peter L. 1980. Der Zwang Zur Häresie: Religion in Der Pluralistischen Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.
Berger, Peter L., and Thomas Luckmann. 1969. Die Gesellschaftliche Konstruktion Der Wirklichkeit: Eine Theorie Der Wissenssoziologie. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.
Davie, Grace. 2000. Religion in Modern Europe: A Memory Mutates. European Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Finney, Charles Grandison. 2001. Kui Saabub Ärkamine. Rakvere: Rakvere Nelipüha Kogudus.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1981. Theorie Des Kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Knoblauch, Herbert. 1998. ‘Transzendenzerfahrung Und Symbolische Kommunikation’. In Religion Als Kommunikation. Vol. 4. Religion in Der Gesellschaft. Würzburg: Ergon-Verlag.
Krech, Volkhard. 1994. ‘Religiöse Bekehrung in Soziologischer Perspektive. Zur Gegenwärtigen Lage Der Konversionsforschung’. Spirita, 34.
Kurg, Ingmar. 2006. ‘Misjon: Eessõna’. In Documenta Oecumenica: Kirik, Ühiskond, Misjon. Tallinn: EELK Usuteaduse Instituut.
‘Lausanne’i Leping’. 2006. In Documenta Oecumenica: Kirik, Ühiskond, Misjon. Tallinn: EELK Usuteaduse Instituut.
Luckmann, Thomas. 1986. ‘„Grundformen Der Gesellschaftlichen Vermittlung Des Wissens: Kommunikative Gattungen’. In Kultur Und Gesellschaft, 1986th ed., 191–211. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Luckmann, Thomas. 1991. Die unsichtbare Religion. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Luhmann, Niklas. 1984. Soziale Systeme Grundriss Einer Allgemeinen Theorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Luhmann, Niklas. 1998. ‘Religion Als Kommunikation’. In Religion Als Kommunikation. Vol. 4. Religion in Der Gesellschaft. Würzburg: Ergon-Verlag.
Luther, Martin. 1996. Suur Katekismus. Translated by Elmar Salumaa. Tallinn: EELK Konsistooriumi kirjastusosakond.
Pollack, Detlef. 2003. Säkularisierung - Ein Moderner Mythos? Studien Zum Religiösen Wandel in Deutschland. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Sanneh, Lamin. 2003. Whose Religion Is Christianity?: The Gospel Beyond the West. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
Scherer, James A. 1964. Missionary, Go Home! Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Snow, David A., E. Burke Rochford, Steven K. Worden, and Robert D. Benford. 1986. ‘Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation’. American Sociological Review 51 (4): 464–81.
Sundermeier, Theo. 1986. ‘Konvivenz Als Grundstruktur Ökumenischer Existenz Heute’. In Ökumenische Existenz Heute, 40–100. München: Kaiser. https://www.booklooker.de/B%C3%BCcher/Huber-Wolfgang+%C3%96kumenische-Existenz-heute-%C3%96kumenische-Existenz-heute-1/id/A02kvQMM01ZZG.
Tyrell, Hartmann. 1998. ‘„Handeln, Religion Und Kommunikation. Begriffsgeschichtliche Und Systematische Überlegungen’. In Religion Als Kommunikation. Vol. 4. Religion in Der Gesellschaft. Würzburg: Ergon-Verlag.
Weber, Max. 1988. Gesammelte Aufsätze Zur Wissenschaftslehre. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Wrogemann, Henning. 2006. ‘Wer Betreibt Inkulturation? Evangelium Und Kulturen Im Spannungsfeld von Machtkonstellationen, Anerkennung Und Kritischem Dialog’. Zeitschrift Für Mission, no. 3: 234–53.