Neuplatonische Mystik und Magie als Modernisierung des traditionellen Paganismus im Imperium Romanum

Authors

  • David Hernández de la Fuente

Keywords:

Neoplatonism, theurgy, pagan religion, graeco-roman religion, Roman Empire

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to examine the philosophical update of Late Antique Graeco-Roman Religion in the attitudes, theories and proposals of Neoplatonic thinkers such as Plotinus, Porphyry, Iamblichus and Proclus. In the framework of the Late Roman state and society two main aspects of this Neoplatonic redefinition of „paganism“ are studied here: mysticism and magic, through the religious reading of the Platonic „ascent to the Good“ and the practice of theurgy. Moreover, the emphasis of some Neoplatonists such as Porphyry upon the mantic tradition is also analysed, with special regard to the oracular poetry. To sum up, this contribution shows in brief how Neoplatonism represents a renewal of Late Antique Roman Religion upon the basis of tradition – both religious and philosophical – but also as a response and reaction to the new Christian ideas and milieu.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alvarado Planas, Javier. 2014. History of Non-Dual Meditation Methods. Madrid: Sanz y Torres.

Athanassiadi, Polymnia. 1981. Julian and Hellenism. An Intellectual Biography. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Athanassiadi, Polymnia. 1999. „The Chaldean Oracles: Theology and Theurgy,“ Pagan Monotheism in Late Antiquity, edd. Polymnia Athanassiadi, Michael Frede. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 149–183.

Athanassiadi, Polymnia. 2010. „Julian the Theurgist: man or myth?“ Die Chaldaeischen Orakel: Kontext, Interpretation, Rezeption, edd. Helmut Seng, Michel Tardieu. Heidelberg: Winter Verlag: 193–208.

Bechtle, Gerald. 2006. Iamblichus. Aspekte seiner Philosophie und Wissen- schaftskonzeption. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.

Bidez, Joseph. 1913. Vie de Porphyre. Ghent: E. van Goethem.

Blumenthal, Henry J., Clark, E. Gillian, edd. 1993. The Divine Iamblichus, Philosopher and Man of Gods. London: Bristol Classical Press.

Bonazzi, Mauro, Carlos Lévy, Carlos Steel, edd. 2007. A Platonic Pythagoras: Platonism and Pythagoreanism in the Imperial Age. Turnhout: Brepols.

Brisson, Luc. 2005. „Socrates and the Divine Signal according to Plato’s Testimony: Philosophical Practice as Rooted in Religious Tradition,“ Apeiron 38.2: 1–12.

Bussanich, John R. 1988. The One and its Relation to Intellect in Plotinus. Leiden: Brill.

Chadwick, Henry. 1999. „Philosophical Tradition and the Self “. Late Antiquity: A Guide to the Postclassical World, edd. Glen W. Bowersock, Peter Brown, Oleg Grabar. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press: 60–81.

Cumont, Franz. 1911. Oriental Religions and Roman Paganism. Chicago: Open Court Publishing.

Des Places, Édouard. 1971. Oracles Chaldaïques. Avec un choix de commentaires anciens. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.

Deuse, Werner. 1983. Untersuchungen zur mittelplatonischen und neuplatoni- schen Seelenlehre. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner.

Di Pasquale Barbanti, Maria. 1993. Proclo: Tra filosofia e teúrgia. Catania: Bonanno.

Dillon, John M. 1977. The Middle Platonists. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Edwards, Mark J. ed. 2000. Neoplatonic Saints. The Lives of Plotinus and Proclus by their Students. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.

Emilsson, Eyjólfur Kjalar. 2017. Plotinus. London: Routledge.

Gerson, Lloyd P. 1994. Plotinus. London – New York: Routledge.

Gerson, Lloyd P. ed. 1996. The Cambridge Companion to Plotinus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gurtler, Gary M. 1988. Plotinus: The Experience of Unity. New York: Peter Lang.

Hadot, Pierre. 1999. Plotin: Porphyre – études néoplatoniciennes. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.

Kenney, John P. 1997. „Mysticism and contemplation in the Enneads“. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 71.3: 315–337.

Lewy, Hans. 2011. Chaldaean Oracles and Theurgy Mysticism, Magic and Platonism in the later Roman Empire. Troisième édition par Michel Tardieu, avec un supplément «Les Oracles chaldaïques 1891–2011». Paris: Institut des Etudes Augustiniennes.

Lisi, Francisco L. 2011. „How Original was Neoplatonism in the Platonic Tradition?“. New Perspectives on Late Antiquity, ed. David Hernández de la Fuente: 247–262. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Lloyd, Antony C. 1970. „The Later Neoplatonists.“ The Cambridge History of Later Greek and Early Medieval Philosophy, ed. Arthur H. Armstrong: 272–325. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lloyd, Antony C. 1990. The Anatomy of Neoplatonism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Majercik, Ruth. 1989. The Chaldean Oracles. Leiden: Brill.

O’Meara, Dominic J. 1993. Plotinus: An Introduction to the Enneads. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

Penella, Robert J. 1990. Greek Philosophers and Sophists in the Fourth Century A.D. Studies in Eunapius of Sardis. Leeds: Francis Cairns.

Remes, Pauline. 2008. Neoplatonism. Stocksfield: Acumen.

Rosenberger, Veit. 2001. Griechische Orakel. Eine Kulturgeschichte. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

Saffrey, Henri-Dominique. 1984. „La Théurgie comme phénomène culturel

chez les néoplatoniciens (IVe-Ve siècles)“, Koinonia 8: 161–171.

Saffrey, Henri-Dominique, Alain-Philippe Segonds, Concetta Luna. 2001. Proclus ou Sur le bonheur. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.

Seng, Helmut. 2009. Kosmagoi, Azonoi, Zonaioi. Drei Begriffe chaldaeischer Kosmologie und ihr Fortleben. Heidelberg: Winter Verlag.

Seng, Helmut. 2012. „Chaldaeerrhetorik bei Michael Psellos“. La retorica greca fra tardo antico ed età bizantina: idee e forme, ed. Ugo Criscuolo: 355–369. Napoli: D’Auria.

Seng, Helmut. 2016. Un livre sacré de l’Antiquité tardive: Les Oracles Chaldaïques. Turnhout: Brepols.

Shaw, Gregory. 1995. Theurgy and the Soul: The Neoplatonism of Iamblichus. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.

Sheppard, Anne D.R. 1982. „Proclus’ attitude to theurgy“. Classical Quarterly, 32: 212–224.

Smith, Andrew. 1974. Porphyry’s Place in the Neoplatonic Tradition. A Study in post-Plotinian Neoplatonism. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

Smith, Andrew. 2004. Philosophy in Late Antiquity. London and New York: Routledge.

Steel, Carlos. 1978. The Changing Self: A Study on the Soul in Later Neoplatonism. Brussels: Koninklijke Academie voor Wetenschappen, Letteren en Schone Kunsten.

Tanaseanu-Döbler, Ilinca. 2013. Theurgy in Late Antiquity. The Invention of a Ritual Tradition. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

Versnel, Henk S. 1990. Inconsistencies in Greek and Roman Religion. Vol. 1: Ter Unus. Isis, Dionysos and Hermes. Three Studies in Henotheism. Leiden: Brill.

Wallis, Richard T. 1995. Neoplatonism, with a foreword and bibliography by Lloyd P. Gerson (2nd edition) London-Duckworth-Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

Zintzen, Clemens. 1965. „Die Wertung von Mystik und Magie in der neuplatonischer Philosophie“. Rheinisches Museum, 108: 71–100.

Downloads

Published

2019-01-01

How to Cite

de la Fuente, David Hernández. 2019. “Neuplatonische Mystik Und Magie Als Modernisierung Des Traditionellen Paganismus Im Imperium Romanum”. Usuteaduslik Ajakiri 74 (1):28-46. https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/UA/article/view/23194.

Issue

Section

Artiklid / Articles