In Favor of a Shift, Against Elimination: The Future of RE in Catholic Schools in XXI Century Belgium

Autorid

  • Leni Franken

Kokkuvõte

In Favor of a Shift, against Elimination: the Future of RE in Catholic Schools in 21st Century Belgium In spite of recent tendencies of secularization and religious pluralism, most Belgian schools are Catholic schools, where Roman Catholic RE is a compulsory subject. Given the large number of non-Catholic students in these schools, this can lead to a de facto undermining of the freedom of religion and education. Accordingly, a shift in the system is required. In the long term, the number of Catholic schools should be in proportion with the number of students/parents choosing for these schools. In the short term, however, this strategy is not recommended and for pragmatic reasons, I propose a system in which confessional RE in substantially subsidized faith-based schools is no longer compulsory. I will argue that such a system does not lead to an infringement of the (internal) freedom of religion of faith-based institutions and that it will guarantee more educational and religious freedom than the actual system does. Finally, I will argue that RE should not be excluded from the curriculum, but that a shift to non-confessional RE is, within a context of secularization, religious pluralism and growing religious extremism, an absolute requirement.

 

Muutus versus elimineerimine: religiooniõpetuse tulevik
XXI sajandi Belgia katoliiklikes koolides Hoolimata viimase aja sekulariseerumise ning religioosse pluralismi trendidest on enamik Belgia koole katoliiklikud ning nende õppekavas on katoliiklik usuõpetus kohustuslik. Pidades silmas mittekatoliiklastest õpilaste suurt arvu neis koolides, võib niisugune olukord päädida usu- ja haridusvabaduse de facto piiramisega. Järelikult vajab süsteem muutust. Pikas perspektiivis peaks katoliiklike koolide arv olema proportsioonis õpilaste ja/või lapsevanemate arvuga, kes neid koole valivad. Ent lähemas perspektiivis ei ole niisugune strateegia soovitatav. Pragmaatilistel põhjustel pakun välja süsteemi, milles konfessionaalne usuõpetus peamiselt riikliku rahastusega usukoolides poleks enam kohustuslik. Väidan, et selline süsteem ei vii konfessionaalsete
institutsioonide (seesmise) usuvabaduse riivamiseni ning et see tagab enam religioosset ja haridusvabadust kui praegune süsteem. Ka väidan ma, et religiooniõpetust ei tuleks õppekavast siiski eemaldada, ent arvestades sekulariseerumise, religioosse mitmekesisuse ja kasvava religioosse ekstremismi konteksti, on vältimatu pöörduda mittekonfessionaalse religiooniõpetuse poole.

Allalaadimised

Download data is not yet available.

Viited

Alberts, Wanda. 2007. Integrative Religious Education in Europe: A Study-of-Religions Approach. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Billiet, Jaak, Koen Abts, and Marc Swyngedouw. 2013. De Evolutie van de Kerkelijke Betrokkenheid in Vlaanderen Tijdens de Voorbije Twee Decennia En Het Verlies van Vertrouwen in de Kerk in Het Bijzonder Tussen 2009 En 2011. Leuven: IPSO.

Billiet, Jaak, Karel Dobbelaere, and Liliane Voyé. 2011. ‘Religie En Kerkbetrokkenheid: Naar Een Sociaal Gemarginaliseerde Kerk?’ In Nieuwe Tijden, Nieuwe Mensen: Belgen over Arbeid, Gezin, Ethiek, Religie En Politiek, 143–72. Leuven: LannooCampus.

Boeve, Lieven. 2014. ‘Interview Met Lieven Boeve’. Forum 45: 5–9.

Brighouse, Harry. 2002. ‘School Vouchers, Separation of Church and State, and Personal Autonomy’. In Moral and Political Education. New York: New York University Press.

Council of Europe. 2007. Draft Recommendation on the Religious Dimension of Intercultural Education: Principles, Objectives and Teaching Approache. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

De Jong, Johan, and Ger Snik. 2002. ‘Why Should States Fund Denominational Schools?’ Journal of Philosophy of Education 36 (4): 573–87.

Derroitte, Henri, Guido Meyer, Didier Pollefeyt, and Bert Roebben. 2014. ‘Religious Education at Schools in Belgium’. In Religious Education at Schools in Europe. Vol. 2. Vienna: Vienna University Press.

Franken, Leni. 2014. ‘Religious and Citizenship Education in Belgium/Flanders: Suggestions for the Future.’ Education, Citizenship and Social Justice 9 (3): 255–67.

Franken, Leni, and Patrick Loobuyck. 2013. ‘The Future of Religious Education on the Flemish School Curriculum: A Plea for Integrative Religious Education for All’. Religious Education 108 (5): 482–98.

Greenawalt, Kent. 2009. Religion & the Constitution. Establishment & Fairness. Vol. 2. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

GRER (Groupe de Recherche “Education et Religions”). 2011. Religion et Education Citoyenne [Religion and Citizenship Education]. Brussels: Lumen Vitae.

Hooghe, Marc, and Sarah Botterman. 2009. Religieuze Praktijk in België 2007: Een Statistische Analyse. Rapport Ten Behoeve van de Belgische Bisschoppenconferentie. Leuven: KULouvain – Faculty of Social Sciences.

Huyse, Luc. 1987. De Verzuiling Voorbij [Beyond Pillarization]. Leuven: Kritak.

Jackson, Robert. 2004. Rethinking Religious Education and Plurality: Issues in Diversity and Pedagogy. London: Routledge Falmer.

Jackson, Robert, ed. 2007. Religion and Education in Europe. Developments, Contexts and Debates. Münster: Waxmann.

Jackson, Robert. 2008. ‘Teaching about Religions in the Public Sphere: European Policy Initiatives and the Interpretive Approach’. Numen 55 (2–3): 151–82.

Jackson, Robert. 2014. Signposts – Policy and Practice for Teaching about Religions and Non-Religious World Views in Intercultural Education. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

Jensen, Tim. 2008. ‘RS Based RE in Public Schools: A Must for a Secular State’. Numen 55 (2–3): 123–50.

Jensen, Tim. 2011. ‘Why Religion Education, as a Matter of Course, Ought to Be Part of the Public School Curriculum’. In Religious Education in a Plural, Secularised Society. A Paradigm Shift. Münster: Waxmann Verlag.

Keast, John, ed. 2007. Religious Diversity and Intercultural Education: A Reference Book for Schools. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.

Loobuyck, Patrick, and Leni Franken. 2011. ‘Towards Integrative Religious Education in Belgium and Flanders. Challenges and Opportunities’. British Journal of Religious Education 33 (1): 17–30.

Miedema, Siebren. 2012. ‘Maximal Citizenship Education and Interreligious Education in Common Schools’. In Religious Schooling in Liberal Democracies: Commitment, Character, and Citizenship, 96–102. London/New York: Routledge.

OSCE. 2007. Toledo Guiding Principles on Teaching about Religions and Beliefs in Public Schools. Warsaw: Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights.

Statistic Yearbook of Education 2013–2014. n.d.

Temperman, Jeroen. 2010. ‘State Neutrality in Public School Education: An Analysis of the Interplay Between the Neutrality Principle, the Right to Adequate Education, Children’s Right to Freedom of Religion or Belief, Parental Liberties, and the Position of Teachers’. Human Rights Quarterly 32 (4): 865–97.

‘Vlaams Secretariaat Voor Katholiek Onderwijs [Flemish Secretary of Catholic Education], Opdrachstverklaring van Het Katholiek Onderwijs in Vlaanderen [Mission Statement for Catholic Education in Flanders)’. n.d. Accessed 19 March 2015. http://ond.vsko.be/portal/page?_pageid=1510,1136186and_dad=portaland_schema= PORTAL.

Wright, Andrew. 2001. ‘Religious Literacy and Democratic Citizenship’. In The Fourth R for the Third Millennium: Education in Religion and Values for the Global Future, 201–19. Dublin: Lindisfarne Books.

N.d.-a. L’Exécutif Des Musulmans de Belgique. Accessed 26 November 2015. http://www.embnet.be/Portals/0/leerplan%20 Basisonderwijs.pdf.

N.d.-b. VZW Centrum Islamonderwijs (ASBL Center Islam Education). Accessed 26 November 2015. http://www.centrumislamonderwijs.be/images/leerplan%20so%20in%20ontwerp.pdf.

##submission.downloads##

Avaldatud

2016-01-01

Väljaanne

Rubriik

Artiklid / Articles