(Mitte)religioossuse kvantitatiivsest uurimisest postkristlikus kultuurimiljöös
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23675/ua.v86i2.24621Keywords:
measuring religion in secularized societies, quantitative studies, methodology, nonreligionAbstract
On the quantitative study of (non-)religion in the post-Christian cultural landscape
The article discusses Christocentrism in the quantitative sociology of religion. The attention on ideal congregation-centered Christianity falls short in describing contemporary Estonian society since the share of people whom this focus would describe is increasingly marginal, even among Christians. This argument is supported by the analysis of the most interesting part of the EUU 2020 database, the qualitative explanations of picking certain identity labels and justifying attitudes towards different religious traditions. On the basis of the findings, it can be argued that when measuring „religion”, Christians are a relatively isolated group and that much of the descriptive statistics that, on superficial examination, seem to prove the still important position ofChristianity in society, in fact, do not do so. Therefore, in the post-Christian cultural context, the focus solely on „religion” alone is not justified as the aspects of the existential sphere and interpretations of „religion” outside Christianity are increasingly important in measuring and making sense of the data. The article concludes with a discussion on the possible focus of future EUU studies.
Downloads
References
Baker, Joseph O. ja Buster G. Smith. 2015. American Secularism: Cultural Contours of Nonreligious Belief Systems. New York: NYU Press.
Beaman, Lori G. ja Timothy Stacey, toim. 2021. Nonreligious Imaginaries of World Repairing: The Study of an Emergent Majority. Palgrave: Macmillan.
Berger, Peter L. 2014. The Many Altars of Modernity: Toward a Paradigm for Religion in a Pluralist Age. Boston: de Gruyter.
Chaves, Mark. 2010. „SSSR Presidential Address Rain Dances in the Dry Season: Overcoming the Religious Congruence Fallacy“. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 49 (1): 1–14.
Cotter, Christopher. 2020. The Critical Study of Non-Religion: Discourse, Identification and Locality. Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350095274
Davie, Grace. 1994. Religion in Britain Since 1945: Believing Without Belonging. Oxford, Cambridge: John Wiley & Sons.
Davie, Grace. 2007. „Vicarious Religion: A Methodological Challenge“. Everyday Religion: Observing Modern Religious Lives, toim Nancy T. Ammerman: 21–36. Oxford et al.: Oxford University Press.
Davie, Grace. 2010. „Vicarious religion: A response“. Journal of Contemporary Religion 25 (2): 261–266.
Demerath, N. J. 2000. „The Rise of „Cultural Religion“ in European Christianity: Learning from Poland, Northern Ireland, and Sweden“. Social Compass 47 (1): 127–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/003776800047001013
Eickelman, Dale ja James Piscatori. 2004. Muslim Politics. Princeton University Press.
Furseth, Inger, toim. 2018. Religious Complexity in the Public Sphere: Comparing Nordic Countries. Springer.
Gauthier, François ja Tuomas Martikainen, toim. 2013. Religion in the Neoliberal Age: Political Economy and Modes of Governance. Routledge.
Gustavsson, Caroline. 2018. „Existential configurations: a way to conceptualise people’s meaning-making“. British Journal of Religious Education 42 (1): 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2018.1556598
From, Erlend. 2023. „None of the Above. Yet a Tad Protestant?“ Protestantism and Protestantization, toim Tarald Rasmussen ja Vegard Ree Ytterbøe, 83–110. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. https://doi.org/10.13109/9783666568725.83
Hall, David. 1997. Lived Religion In America: Toward A History Of Practice. Princeton University Press.
Herbert, David ja Josh Bullock. 2020. „Reaching for a New Sense of Connection: Soft Atheism and „Patch and Make Do“ Spirituality amongst Nonreligious European Millennials“. Culture and Religion 21 (2): 157–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/14755610.2020.1862887
Hjarpe, Jan. 1997. „What will be chosen from the Islamic basket?“ European Review 5 (3): 267-274. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1234-981X(199707)5:3<267::AID-EURO196>3.0.CO;2-F
Hjarvard, Jan. 2011. „The Mediatisation of Religion: Theorising Religion, Media and Social Change“. Culture and Religion 12 (2): 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/14755610.2011.579719
Hošek, Pavel. 2015. „Discerning the Signs of the Times in Post-communist Czech Republic: A Historical, Sociological and Missiological Analysis of Contemporary Czech Culture“. A Czech Perspective on Faith in a Secular Age, toim Tomáš Halík ja Pavel Hošek, 13–42. Washington: The Council for Research in Values and Philosophy.
Hošek, Pavel, Atko Remmel ja Ain Riistan. 2019. „Postkristliku kultuurimiljöö tekkeloo kontuurjooni Tšehhi ja Eesti näitel“. Usuteaduslik Ajakiri 76 (3): 29–52.
Huss, Boaz. 2014. „Spirituality: The Emergence of a New Cultural Category and Its Challenge to the Religious and the Secular“. Journal of Contemporary Religion 29 (1): 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537903.2014.864803
Jonuks, Tõnno ja Atko Remmel. 2020. „Metsarahva kujunemine – retrospektiivne vaade müüdiloomele“. Keel ja Kirjandus 6: 459–482.
Kilemit, Liina. 2020. Kristlike kogudustega liitumise põhjustest. Doktoritöö. Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus.
Kilemit, Liina, Lea Altnurme ja Laur Lilleoja. 2021. „Koroonaaeg soosib vaimseid otsinguid“. Postimees, 23. detsember 2021. https://arvamus.postimees.ee/7413677/koroonaaeg-soosib-vaimseid-otsinguid
Kilemit, Liina. 2021. „Eesti Kirikute Nõukogu värskeimast religioonisotsio¬loogilisest küsitlusest varasemate taustal“. Kirik & Teoloogia, 10. detsember. https://kjt.ee/2021/12/eesti-kirikute-noukogu-varskeimast-religioonisotsioloogilisest-kusitlusest-varasemate-taustal/
Lee, Lois. 2015. Recognizing the Non-Religious: Reimagining the Secular. Oxford University Press.
Lilleoja, Laur. 2021. „Elanikkonna tüpoloogia lähtuvalt inimeste suhestumisest usu ja moraaliga seotud teemadesse“. Ettekanne 11. novembril Eesti Kirikute Nõukogu ja Tartu Ülikooli Usuteaduskonna interdistsiplinaarsel konverentsil. https://arvamus.postimees.ee/7381180/jarelvaadatav-eesti-elanike-maailmapilt-uuringu-elust-usust-ja-usuelust-2020-valguses
Lilleoja, Laur. 2024. Elanikkonna tüpoloogia lähtuvalt inimeste suhestumisest usu ja moraaliga seotud teemadesse. Usuteaduslik Ajakiri 86 (2): 8–28.
Nešpor, Zdeněk. 2010. „Attitudes towards Religion(s) in a ‘Non-believing’ Czech Republic“. Anthropological Journal of European Cultures 19 (1): 68–84.
Orsi, Roberto. 2003. „Is the study of lived religion irrelevant to the world we live in?“ Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 42 (2): 169–174.
Peedu, Indrek. 2019. „Kas religioonide hääbumine on oht?“ Sirp, 20. september 2019. https://www.sirp.ee/s1-artiklid/c9-sotsiaalia/kas-religioonide-haabumine-on-oht/
Remmel, Atko ja Meelis Friedenthal. 2020. „Atheism and Freethought in Estonian Culture“. Freethought and Atheism in Central and Eastern Europe. The Development of Secularity and Nonreligion, toim Tomáš Bubík, Atko Remmel ja David Vaclavik, 84–110. Routledge.
Remmel, Atko. 2013. „Marksistlikust ateismist massilise ebausuni“. Usuteaduslik Ajakiri 65 (2): 88–117.
Remmel, Atko. 2016. „Eesti ühiskonna religioossusest ja sekulariseerumisest mittereligioossete eestlaste alusel“. Kuhu Lähed, Maarjamaa? Quo Vadis, Terra Mariana? Toim Eerik Jõks, 131–150. Tallinn: Eesti Kirikute Nõukogu.
Remmel, Atko. 2019. „Religiooni uurimisest ilmalikus ühiskonnas“. Usuteadus¬lik Ajakiri 76 (3): 95–126.
Remmel, Atko. 2022. „„Meie peame tingimata rahvast tundma õppima“: kvantitatiivsetest religiooniuuringutest Eestis anno 2022“. Kirik & Teoloogia, 4. veebruar. https://kjt.ee/2022/02/meie-peame-tingimata-rahvast-tundma-oppima-kvantitatiivsetest-religiooniuuringutest-eestis-anno-2022/
Remmel, Atko. 2024. „Mittereligioossus Eestis: põlvkondlik vaade“. Usuteaduslik Ajakiri 86 (3), [ilmumas].
Smith, Jonathan Z. 2017. „Religioon, religioonid, religioossus“. Akadeemia 10: 1854–1877.
Smith, Wilfred Cantwell. 1962. The Meaning and End of Religion. Minneapolis: Fortress.
Taira, Teemu. 2022. Taking ‘Religion’ Seriously: Essays on the Discursive Study of Religion. Brill. https://brill.com/display/title/61969
Taves, Ann. 2020. „From Religious Studies to Worldview Studies“. Religion 50 (1): 137–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/0048721X.2019.1681124
Thurfjell, David. 2015. Det gudlösa folket: de postkristna svenskarna och religionen. Stockholm: Norstedts.
Thurfjell, David ja Atko Remmel. 2023. „„The Forest Is My Church“: Christianity, Secularisation and Love of Nature in a Northern European Existential Field“. Religion 54 (2): 203–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/0048721X.2023.2234364
Turpin, Hugh. 2022. Unholy Catholic Ireland: Religious Hypocrisy, Secular Morality, and Irish Irreligion. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Uibu, Marko. 2014. Inglid ja Inglipesa internetifoorum uue vaimsuse kandjate ja legitimeerijatena. Mäetagused 56: 181–204. https://doi.org/10.7592/MT2014.56.uibu
„Vaimulikud vastavad“. 2015. Tallinna Jaani koguduse koduleht. https://www.tallinnajaani.ee/vaimuelu/vaimulikud-vastavad/30-leer.html
Van den Hemel, Ernst, Oscar Salemink ja Irene Stengs. 2022. „Introduction. Management of Religion, Sacralization of Heritage“. Managing Sacralities: Competing and Converging Claims of Religious Heritage, toim Ernst van den Hemel, Oscar Salemink ja Irene Stengs, 1–20. Berghahn Books. https://doi.org/10.3167/9781800736177
Viilma, Urmas. 2021. „Urmas Viilma: kui riik lahkub maalt, siis kirik seda ei tee“. Eesti Rahvusringhääling, 2. detsember. https://www.err.ee/1608422690/urmas-viilma-kui-riik-lahkub-maalt-siis-kirik-seda-ei-tee
Voas, David. 2009. „The Rise and Fall of Fuzzy Fidelity in Europe“. European Sociological Review 25 (2): 155–68. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcn044
Voas, David. 2020. „Is the Secularization Research Programme Progressing? Debate on Jörg Stolz’s Article on Secularization Theories in the 21st Century: Ideas, Evidence, and Problems“. Social Compass 67 (2): 323–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037768620917329
Wilkins-Laflamme, Sarah. 2022. Religion, Spirituality and Secularity among Millennials: The Generation Shaping American and Canadian Trends. Routledge.
Üprus, Avo. 2021. „Avo Üprus: kirikud olgu lahti kõikide jaoks – see pole meelelahutuse, vaid meelerahu paik!“. Postimees, 1. august. Vaadatud 14. augustil 2023. https://arvamus.postimees.ee/7305700/avo-uprus-kirikud-olgu-lahti-koikide-jaoks-see-pole-meelelahutuse-vaid-meelerahu-paik