Hints and guesses: Legal modes of semio-logical reasoning

  • Dinda L. Gorlée Van Alkemadelaan 806, NL–2597 BC The Hague


Legal semiotics is an internationally proliferated subfield of general semiotics. The three-step principles of Peirce’s semiotic logic are the three leading categories: firstness, secondness and thirdness, grounded on the reverse principles of logic: deduction, induction and — Peirce’s discovery — abduction. Neither induction nor abduction can provide a weaker truth claim than deduction. Abduction occurs in intuitive conclusions regarding the possibility of backward reasoning, contrary to the system of law. Civil-law cultures possess an abstract deductive orientation, governed by the rigidity of previous written law, whereas the actual fragility of a common-law system with cases and precedents inclines to induction, orienting its habituality (habits) in moral time and space. Customary law gives credit to abductive values: relevant sentiments, beliefs and propositions are upgraded to valid reasoning. The decision-making by U.S. case law and English common-law is characterized as decision law with abductive undertones.


Download data is not yet available.

Metrics (links, shares etc)

Metrics Loading ...
How to Cite
Gorlée, D. L. (2005). Hints and guesses: Legal modes of semio-logical reasoning. Sign Systems Studies, 33(2), 239-272. https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2005.33.2.01