J. Randvere’s “Ruth” (1909) as an Example of Literary Decadence and the Quintessence of Young Estonia’s (1905–1915) Modern Ideology

Authors

  • Mirjam Hinrikus ETA Underi ja Tuglase Kirjanduskeskus / Tallinna Ülikool, Roosikrantsi 6, 10119 Tallinn

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12697/IL.2015.20.2.16

Keywords:

literary decadence, fin de siècle, modernization of Estonian culture, Young Estonian movement, J. Randvere’s “Ruth” (1909)

Abstract

This article is based on the interpretation of a segment of the reception of J. Randvere’s provocative, short essay-novella “Ruth” (1909), which was written by Johannes Aavik, a well-known Young Estonian and one of the principal modernizers of the Estonian language. This segment of reception regards “Ruth” as the quintessence of Young Estonia’s ideology, but does not offer a full explanation of how this ideology in “Ruth” is associated, on the one hand, with Young Estonians’ ambitions in modernizing Estonian literature and, on the other, with the broader fin de siècle European culture. I shall ask through which discourses does this ideology, which is innovative in the context of Estonian culture at the beginning of the 20th century, express itself in “Ruth”? What imaginations, representations and associations appear in “Ruth” in relation to the Young Estonian program, which interweaves tradition and/ or Estonian national-mindedness on the one hand, and Europeannes and/or modern ideas on the other. Or who are these Europeans and Estonians with whom Young Estonians wish to identify? Although Young Estonian ideology in “Ruth” has mostly been associated with connotations of decadence like “a culture of individuality”, “artificiality” and “aestheticism”, I will argue that in “Ruth” counter-discourses also come to the forefront. In other words, “Ruth” becomes the quintessence of the Young Estonia ideology, because it serves as a metaphoric counterpart to the Young Estonians’ program: “let us be Estonians, but let us become Europeans”. Through the reproduction of decadent discourse, which is in this text in the dominant position, “Ruth” oscillates between the ambivalent valorizations of signs of health (norms) and disease or decadence (deviation from the norms), accompanied, on the one hand, and among other things by opposition to the national discourse and, on the other hand, to the signs of decadence, that is the neutralization of the symptoms of decadence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

<div class="WordSection1"><p>Aavik, J.1915. Eesti kirjakeelse stiili arenemisjärgud. Visand. – <em>Noor-Eesti V. </em>[Tartu]: Noor-Eesti, 216–229.</p><p>AG. [Jaan Arenberg] 1911. Klassivahed ja „Noor-Eesti“ kunst. – <em>Mõtted. Teine raamat. </em>Tallinn: J. Lilienbachi toimetusel ja kirjastusel, 89–113.</p><p>Battersby, C. 1989. <em>Gender and Genius. Towards a New Feminist Aesthetics</em>. London: Women’s Press Limited.</p><p>Baudelaire, C. 1980. Notes nouvelles sur Edgar Poe. <em>– </em>C. Baudelaire. <em>Œuvres complètes</em>. Paris: Robert Laffont.</p><p>Bourget, P.1883. <em>Essais de Psychologie Contemporaine</em>. Paris: Gallimard.</p><p>Chalvin, A. 2010. <em>Johannes</em><em> </em><em>Aavik</em><em> </em><em>et</em><em> </em><em>la</em><em> </em><em>rénovation</em><em> </em><em>de</em><em> </em><em>la</em><em> </em><em>langue</em><em> </em><em>estonienne</em>. (Bibliothèque finno-ougrienne, 19). Paris: L’Harmattan-ADÉFO.</p><p>Gautier, T. 1861. Notice. – <em>Les Fleurs du Mal</em>. – C. Baudelaire. <em>Édition définitive</em>. Paris: Calmann-Lévy, 1–73.</p><p>Haava, A. 1910. Vastus Ruthile. – <em>Postimees</em>, 05.03, 08.03.</p><p>Hamburg, P. 1935. <em>Noor-Eesti.</em><em> </em><em>Olemus</em><em> </em><em>ja kirjandus-kultuuriline tegevus. </em>Tartu: Loodus.</p><p>Hinrikus, M. ed. 2006a. <em>J.</em><em> Randvere “Ruth” </em><em>19.</em>–<em>20.</em><em> </em><em>sajandivahetuse</em><em> </em><em>kultuuris.</em><em> </em>Tallinn: Underi ja Tuglase Kirjanduskeskus.</p><p>Hinrikus, M. 2006b. J. Randvere “Ruth” ja Otto Weiningeri “Geschlecht und Charakter”. – M. Hinrikus, ed., <em>J. Randvere “Ruth” 19.</em>–<em>20.</em><em> sajandivahetuse kultuuris. </em>Tallinn: Underi ja Tuglase Kirjanduskeskus, 145–169.</p><p>Hinrikus,  M. 2008.  J.  Randvere  “Ruthist”  –  eesti  kirjandusliku  dekadentsi ühest esimesest näitest. <em>– Methis. Studia Humaniora Estonica</em>, 1<em>–</em>2, 125<em>–</em>145.  <a id="pub-id::doi" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.7592/methis.v1i1-2.464">http://dx.doi.org/10.7592/methis.v1i1-2.464</a></p><p>Jürgenstein, A. 1909. Kirjandusline ülevaade. Noor-Eesti III 1909. – <em>Eesti Kirjandus</em>,4, 480–489.</p><p>Kafitz, D. 2004. <em>Décadence</em><em> </em><em>in</em><em> </em><em>Deutschland.</em><em> </em><em>Studien</em><em> </em><em>zu</em><em> </em><em>einem</em><em> </em><em>versunkenen</em><em> </em><em>Diskurs</em><em> </em><em>der</em><em> </em><em>90er</em><em> Jahre des 19. Jahrhunderts. </em>Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.</p><p>Kallas, A. 1918/1921. <em>Noor-Eesti:</em><em> </em><em>näopildid</em><em> </em><em>ja sihtjooned. </em>Tlk F. Tuglas. Tartu: Noor-Eesti.</p></div><p>Kirss, T. 2006. Ruthi õed: sajandipöörde naiste reaalsus ja fantaasia. – M. Hinrikus, ed., <em>J. Randvere “Ruth” 19.</em>–<em>20.</em><em> sajandivahetuse kultuuris. </em>Tallinn: Underi ja Tuglase Kirjanduskeskus, 71–98.</p><p>Kivimaa, K. 2006. Ruthi tegelaskujust <em>fin-de-siècle</em>’i kunstiideaalide taustal. – M. Hinrikus, ed., <em>J. Randvere “Ruth” 19.</em>–<em>20.</em><em> sajandivahetuse kultuuris. </em>Tallinn: Underi ja Tuglase Kirjanduskeskus, 215–226.</p><p>Langemets, A. 1980. “Ruthi” kurv. <em>– Keel ja Kirjandus</em>, 12, 709–714.</p><p>Lyytikäinen, P. 1997. <em>Narkissos</em><em> </em><em>ja sfinksi. Minä ja Toinen vuosisadanvaihteen kirjallisuudessa</em>, Helsinki: SKS.</p><p>Lyytikäinen, P. 2003. Foreword. <em>– </em>P. Lyytikäinen, ed., <em>Changing</em><em> </em><em>Scenes.</em><em> </em><em>Encounters</em><em> </em><em>between</em><em> European and Finnish Fin de Siècle. </em>Helsinki: SKS, 7–11.</p><p>Minor, O. 1910. Uusromantismus ja “Noor-Eesti”. – <em>Ääsi tules II. Kirjatööde kogu. </em>Peterburi Eesti Üliõpilaste Seltsi toimetised 11, Peterburi, 124–171.</p><p>Monticelli, D. 2008. Noor-Eesti projektist tänapäeva Eesti kultuurilis-poliitilise diskursuse taustal. Kriitilised ülestähendused. <em>– Methis. Studia Humaniora Estonica</em>, 1–2, 276–287.  <a id="pub-id::doi" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.7592/methis.v1i1-2.470">http://dx.doi.org/10.7592/methis.v1i1-2.470</a></p><p>Nietzsche, F. 1888/1996. <em>Ecce</em><em> </em><em>Homo</em>. <em>Kuidas saadakse selleks, mis ollakse</em>. Tallinn: Vagabund.</p><p>Ots, L. 2006. Ruth keset laineid: Randvere Ruthi ümbrus eesti kultuuriruumis. – M. Hinrikus, ed., <em>J.</em><em> </em><em>Randvere</em><em> </em><em>“Ruth”</em><em> </em><em>19.</em>–<em>20.</em><em> </em><em>sajandivahetuse</em><em> </em><em>kultuuris.</em><em> </em>Tallinn: Underi ja Tuglase Kirjanduskeskus, 15–39.</p><p>Parente-Čapková, V. 2014. <em>Decadent</em><em> </em><em>New</em><em> </em><em>Woman</em><em> </em><em>(Un)Bound:</em><em> </em><em>Mimetic</em><em> </em><em>Strategies</em><em> </em><em>in </em><em>L.</em><em>   Onerva’s   “Mirdja”.   </em>Turun   Yliopiston   Julkaisuja.   Annales   Universitatis Turkuensis. Turku: Painosalama OY.</p><p>Potolsky, M. 2004. Introduction. <em>– New Literary History. Forms and/of Decadence. </em>Vol 35, No 4.</p><p>Randvere, J. [Johannes Aavik] 1909/1980. <em>Ruth</em>. Tallinn, Perioodika (Loomingu Raamatukogu, 34/35).</p><p>Raun, T. 2009. The Estonian Engagement with Modernity. – The Role of Young Estonia in the Diversification of Political and Social Thought. – <em>TUNA,</em><em> Special issue</em>, 114–126.</p><p>Spackman, B. 1989. <em>Decadent</em><em> </em><em>Genealogies:</em><em> </em><em>The</em><em> </em><em>Rhetoric</em><em> </em><em>of Sickness from Baudelaire to d’Annunzio. </em>Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.</p><p>Suits, G. 1905. Noorte püüded.– <em>Noor-Eesti I, </em>3–19.</p><p>Talviste, K. 2006. Johannes Aavik ja dekadentismus. – M. Hinrikus, ed., <em>J. Randvere “Ruth” 19.</em>–<em>20.</em><em> sajandivahetuse kultuuris</em>. Tallinn: Underi ja Tuglase Kirjanduskeskus,193–203.</p><p>Tuglas, F. 1996. 1996. Kirjanduslik stiil. Lehekülgi eesti salmi ja proosa ajaloost. – F. Tuglas, <em>Kogutud teosed. 7. kd. Kriitika I. Kriitika II. </em>Toim Ü. Kurs. Tallinn: Underi ja Tuglase Kirjanduskeskus, 13–54.</p><p>Undusk J. 2006. Androgüünne Ruth. – M. Hinrikus, ed., <em>J. Randvere “Ruth” 19.</em>–<em>20. sajandivahetuse kultuuris</em>. Tallinn: Underi ja Tuglase Kirjanduskeskus, 227–244.</p>Vihma, H. 1980. Saateks J. Randvere “Ruthile”. – J. Randvere, Ruth. Tallinn: Perioodika (Loomingu Raamatukogu, 34/35), 62–80.

Downloads

Published

2015-12-31