Intertextual and Intratextual Transformations in the Testament of Job
Märksõnad:
Testament of Job, reception history, perception of suffering, intertextualityKokkuvõte
Biblical Job is a character that simply cannot escape comment and his story has been retold across the monotheistic religions and across a wide variety of genres, in which he is sometimes praised and sometimes condemned. The Book of Job contains many ambiguities that leave plenty of room for ambivalent interpretations, as is especially evident in the reception history of the Book of Job in the Jewish literary tradition. The long reception history of the Book of Job helps exemplify how intertextuality functions, how old material is reset into new contexts and how characters transform, both from one text to another and within the changed context of a single text. A good example of this is the pseudepigraphic Testament of Job when explored in light of its reception history both in the Jewish tradition (or the lack of such) and in the context of the biblical Book of Job. The aim of the current paper therefore is to highlight the intertextual (from patient sufferer to an enduring “athlete”) as well the intratextual transformation of Job (from reward-oriented suffering towards freedom from sufferings thorough insight) as presented in the Testament of Job.
Allalaadimised
Viited
Begg, Christopher. 1994. “Comparing Characters: The Book of Job and the Testament of Job”. The Book of Job, ed. Wim A. M. Beuken: 433–445. Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium, 114. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
Boyarin, Daniel. 1990. Intertextuality and the Reading of Midrash. Indiana Studies in Biblical Literature, 3. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Brock, S. P., Picard, J.-C. 1967. Testmentum Iobi. Apocalypsis Baruchi graece. Pseudepigrapha Veteris Testamenti Graece, 2. Leiden: Brill.
Del Sordo, Bree C. 2008. Transformation in the Stories of Job. M.A. Thesis. Washington, DC: American University.
DiTommaso, Lorenzo. 2012. “Pseudepigrapha Notes IV: 5. The Testament of Job. 6. The Testament of Solomon”. Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha, 21: 313–320.
Dochhorn, Jan. 2010. “Das Testament Hiobs als exegetischer Text: Ein Beitrag zur Rezeptionsgeschichte der Hiob-Septuaginta”. Die Septuaginta – Texte, Theologien, Einflüsse, edd. Wolfgang Kraus and Martin Karrer: 671–688. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament, 252. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Eisen, Robert. 2004. The Book of Job in Medieval Jewish Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Friedman, H. H. & Lipman, S. 1999. “Satan the Accuser: Trickster in Talmudic and Midrashic Literature”. Thalia: Studies in Literary Humor, 18: 31–41.
Goitein, H. 1890. Der Optimismus und Pessimismus in der jüdischen Religionsphilosophie. Eine Studie über die Behandlung der Theodicee in derselben bis auf Maimonides. Berlin: Mayer & Müller.
Goldin, Judah. 1955. The Fathers Accarding ta Rabbi Nathan. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Goodman, Lenn Evan. 1988. “Introduction”. The Book of Theodicy: Translation and Commentary on the Book of Job: 3-27. Yale Judaica Series, 25. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Gordis, Robert. 1978. The Book of God and Man – A Study of Job. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
Gruen, William. 2009. “Seeking a Context for the Testament of Job”. Journal of the Study of the Pseudepigrapha, 18: 163–179.
Guffey, Andrew. 2012. “From Jewish Wisdom to Hellenistic Ethics and Internalized Apocalypticism: The Testament of Job as the “Mystic’s Solution” to Theodicy”. Paper held at SBL Annual Meeting, https://www.academia.edu/8603460/Job_and_the_Mystics_Solution_to_Theodicy_Philosophical_Paideia_and_Internalized_Apocalypticism_in_the_Testament_of_Job (19.05.19).
Haas, Cees. 1989. “Job’s Perseverance in the Testament of Job”. Studies on the Testament of Job, edd. Michael A. Knibb and Pieter W. van der Horst: 117–154. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haralambakis, Maria. 2012. The Testament of Job: Text, Narrative and Reception History. Library of Second Temple Studies. London: Bloomsbury.
Jacobs, Irving. 1971. The Book of Job in Rabbinic Thought. PhD diss. London University, http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1381932/ (19.05.19).
Kalman, Jason. 2005. With Friends Like These: Turning Points in the Jewish Exegesis of the Biblical Book of Job. PhD diss. Montreal, McGill University, https://www.academia.edu/2511296/With_Friends_Like_These_Turning_Points_in_the_Jewish_Exegesis_of_the_Book_of_Job (19.05.19).
Kraft, Robert A. 1974. The Testament of Job, According to the SV Text. Society of Biblical Literature Texts and Translations, 5. Missoula, MT: Scholars Press.
Kohler, Kaufman. 1897. “The Testament of Job: An Essene Midrash on the Book of Job reedited and translated with Introductory and Exegetical Notes”. Semitic Studies in Memory of Rev. Dr. Alexander Kohut, ed. G. A. Kohut: 264–338. Berlin: Calvary & Co.
Leibowitz, Joseph H. 1987. The Image of Job in Rabbinic Literature. PhD diss. Berkley, CA: University of California.
List, Nick. 2018. The Testament of Job: Bibliography for Research 1999-2018, https://www.academia.edu/37831743/The_Testament_of_Job_Bibliography_for_Research_1999-2018 (19.05.19).
Mittleman, Alan. 2009. “The Job of Judaism and the Job of Kant”. The Harvard Theological Review, 102: 25–50.
Nicholls, Peter. 1982. The Structure and Purpose of the Testament of Job. PhD. diss. Jerusalem, Hebrew University.
O’Connor, John-Patrick M. 2017. “Satan and Sitis: The Significance of Clothing Changes in the Testament of Job”. Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha, 26: 305–319.
Oberhänsli-Widmer, Gabrielle. 2003. Hiob in jüdischer Antike und Moderne. Die Wirkungsgeschichte Hiobs in der jüdischen Literatur. Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener Verlag.
Rogers, Jesse. 2012. “The Testament of Job as an Adaptation of LXX Job”. Text-Critical and Hermeneutical Studies in the Septuagint, edd. J. Cook and H.-J. Stipp: 395–408. Vetus Testamentum, Supplements, 157. Leiden: Brill.
Schaller, Berndt. 1980. “Das Testament Hiobs und die Septuaginta-Übersetzung des Buches Hiob”. Biblica, 61: 377–406.
Schreiner, Stefan. 2012. “Der Prophet Ayyub und das Theodizeeproblem im Islam”. Die jüdische Bibel in islamischer Auslegung, edd. Friedmann Eißler and Matthias Morgenstern: 196–209. Texts and Studies in Medieval and Early Modern Judaism, 27. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Schwartz, Israel. ed. 1868. Liber Ijobi: duobus tomis comprehensus, 1/2. Berlin: Gerschel Verlagsbuchhandlung.
Sefaria, https://www.sefaria.org/?home (05.10.2020).
Spittler, Robert P. 1983. “The Testament of Job”. The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha: Apocalyptic Literature & Testaments, 1, ed. J. Charlesworth: 829–868. New York: Doubleday.
Spittler, Robert P. 1989. “The Testament of Job: A History of Research and Interpretation”. Studies on the Testament of Job, edd. Michael A. Knibb and Pieter W. van der Horst: 7–32. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Trotter, Jonathan R. 2016. The Role of Charity in the Testament of Job, https://www.academia.edu/14331525/The_Role_of_Charity_in_the_Testament_of_Job (19.05.19).
Wiernikowski, Isaak. 1902. Das Buch Hiob nach der Auffassung des Talmud und Midrasch. I. Teil. Breslau: H. Fleischmann.
Wisse, Maarten. 2003. Scripture between Identity and Creativity: A Hermeneutical Theory Building upon Four Interpretations of Job. Ars Disputandi Supplement Series, 1. Utrecht: Ars Disputandi.
