Elanikkonna tüpoloogia lähtuvalt inimeste suhestumisest usu ja moraali teemadesse

Authors

  • Laur Lilleoja

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23675/ua.v86i2.24615

Keywords:

religious identities, latent class analysis, moral understandings

Abstract

Population Typology Based on Attitudes Towards Religion and Morality
The aim of this study was to map the typical religious and moral worldviews of Estonians. Five distinct types of individuals were identified, which can be grouped into three main categories: devout and spiritual people (Types I and II, 27%), those clearly opposed to religion (Type III, 31%), and those indifferent to religion (Types IV and V, 42%).
The analysis showed that the religious identity of respondents in Types I, II, and III matched well with their value structures, while the patterns were less clear for Types IV and V. This confirms that it is easier to define religious identity with a structured worldview, whereas about 40% of respondents do not fit clearly into any category.
It was found that conservative and religious individuals are generally more satisfied with life, while conservative and non-religious individuals tend to be less satisfied. There is also a strong correlation between religious-moral worldviews and supernatural experiences – devout and especially spiritual individuals are significantly more likely to have such experiences, while the likelihood is almost nonexistent for secular individuals.
Among non-religious respondents, there is a notable portion who can be associated with vicarious religion – they consider faith and the church institutionally important, but do not personally practice any form of faith.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allport, Gordon W. ja Michael J. Ross. 1967. „Personal religious orientation and prejudice“. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 5 (4): 432.

Altnurme, Lea. 2013. „Uus vaimsus – mis see on“. Mitut usku Eesti, III: Uue vaimsuse eri, toim Marko Uibu, 18–36. Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus.

Altnurme, Lea. 2016. „Asenduskristlus“. Kuhu lähed, Maarjamaa? Quo vadis, Terra Mariana?, toim Eerik Jõks, 152–164. Tallinn: Eesti Kirikute Nõukogu.

Beilmann, Mai ja Laur Lilleoja. 2015. „Social trust and value similarity: The relationship between social trust and human values in Europe“. Studies of Transition States and Societies 7 (2): 19–30.

Diener, Ed, Louis Tay ja David G. Myers. 2011. „The religion paradox: If religion makes people happy, why are so many dropping out?“ Journal of personality and social psychology 101 (6): 1278–1290.

Fukuyama, Yoshio. 1961. „The major dimensions of church membership“. Review of Religious Research 2 (4): 154–161.

Glock, Charles Y. ja Rodney Stark. 1970. Religion and society in tension: A publication from the research program in the Sociology of Religion Survey Research Center. Berkeley: University of California.

Khaptsova, A. ja Shalom H. Schwartz. 2016. „Life satisfaction and value congruence“. Social Psychology 47: 163–173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/A000268

Koenig, Harold G. 2012. „Religion, spirituality, and health: The research and clinical implications“. ISRN Psychiatry 8: 1–15.

Lee, Lois. 2014. „Secular or nonreligious? Investigating and interpreting generic ‘not religious’ categories and populations“. Religion 44 (3): 466–482.

Lilleoja, Laur. 2021. „Elanikkonna tüpoloogia lähtuvalt inimeste suhestu¬misest usu ja moraaliga seotud teemadesse“. Ettekanne 11. novembril Eesti Kirikute Nõukogu ja Tartu Ülikooli Usuteaduskonna interdistsiplinaarsel konverentsil „Eesti elanike maailmapilt „Elust, usust ja usuelust 2020“ uuringu valguses“. Tartu Ülikool.

Lindeman, Marjaana, Michiel van Elk, Jari Lipsanen, Pinja Marin ja Uffe Schjødt. 2019. „Religious Unbelief in Three Western European Countries: Identifying and Characterizing Unbeliever Types Using Latent Class Analysis“. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 29 (3): 184–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2019.1591140

Linzer, Drew A. ja Jeffrey Lewis. 2007. „poLCA: Polytomous Variable Latent Class Analysis“. Journal of Statistical Software 42 (10): 1–29. https://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/polisci/faculty/lewis/pdf/poLCA-JSS-final.pdf

Molteni, Francesco ja Ferruccio Biolcati. 2018. „Shifts in religiosity across cohorts in Europe: A multilevel and multidimensional analysis based on the European Values Study“. Social Compass 65 (3): 413–432.

Muthén, Bengt ja Linda Muthén. 2000. „Integrating person-centered and variable-centered analyses: Growth mixture modeling with latent trajectory classes“. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 24: 88–891. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2000.tb02070.x

Pew Research Center. 2018. „Being Christian in Western Europe“. Report, 28. mai. http://www.pewforum.org/2018/05/29/being-christian-in-western-europe/

Remmel, Atko. 2017. „Religion, interrupted? Observations on religious indifference in Estonia“. Religious Indifference: New Perspectives from Studies on Secularization and Nonreligion, toim Johannes Quack ja Cora Schuh, 123–142. Spingler.

Revilla, Melanie, Daniel Zavala-Rojas ja Willem E. Saris. 2016. „Creating a good question: How to use cumulative experience“. The SAGE Hand¬book of Survey Methodology, toim Christof Wolf, Dominique Joye, Tom Smith ja Yang-chih Fu, 236–254.

Rokeach, Milton. 1973. The Nature of Human Values. New York: The Free Press.

Schwartz, S. H. ja W. Bilsky. 1987. „Toward a psychological structure of human values“. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53: 550–562.

Snoep, Liesbeth. 2008. „Religiousness and happiness in three nations: a research note“. Journal of Happiness Studies 9 (2): 207–211.

Thiessen, Joel ja Sarah Wilkins-Laflamme. 2017. „Becoming a religious none: Irreligious socialization and disaffiliation“. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 56 (1): 64–82.

Published

2024-12-02

How to Cite

Lilleoja, Laur. 2024. “Elanikkonna tüpoloogia lähtuvalt Inimeste Suhestumisest Usu Ja Moraali Teemadesse”. Usuteaduslik Ajakiri 86 (2):8-30. https://doi.org/10.23675/ua.v86i2.24615.

Issue

Section

Artiklid / Articles