Porvoo ja Meissen: kaks olulist sammu anglikaani ja luterlike kirikute suhetes
Kokkuvõte
Porvoo and Meissen: Two Important Steps in the Relationship between Lutheran and Anglican Churches. By Veiko Vihuri
The paper is an introduction to the developments connected with two ecumenical documents: “Meissen Common Statement” and “Porvoo Common Statement”. The article is also meant as an introduction to the dialogue between Anglicans and Lutherans. These documents represent a significant advancement towards the visible unity of the two churches, but it is not the end of the process. There are many possibilities still to be used in order to turn these formal documents into practical cooperation.
Allalaadimised
Viited
Avis, Paul. 1988. ‘What Is Anglicanism?’ In The Study of Anglicanism, 419. London: SPCK; Fortress Press.
Bell, G. K. A, ed. 1924. Documents on Christian Unity 1920-24. London: Oxford U.P.
Dalferth, Ingolf. 1997. ‘Ministry and the Office of Bishop According to Meissen and Porvoo: Protestant Remarks about Several Unclarified Questions’. In Visible Unity and the Ministry of Oversight, 33–34. London: Church House.
Dalman, Johan. 2001. ‘What Porvoo Does to Me’. Unity Digest, no. 23: 26–30.
Jenson, Robert W. 1996. ‘The Church as Communio’. In The Catholicity of the Reformation, 1–12. Grand Rapids (Mich.); Cambridge: Eerdmans Publishing.
Kirk, Kenneth E., ed. 1946. The Apostolic Ministry: Essays on the History and the Doctrine of Episcopacy. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
Laats, Alar, and Tiit Pädam, trans. 1996. Porvoo Ühisavaldus: Kõnelused Briti Ja Iiri Anglikaani Kirikute Ning Põhjamaade Ja Balti Luterlike Kirikute Vahel: 9.-13. Oktoobril 1992 Soomes Järvenpääl Toimunud 4. Plenaaristungil Kokkulepitud Tekst. Tallinn: EELK Konsistooriumi kirjastusosakond.
Martikainen, Jouko. 1985. ‘Luterlus Kristlike Konfessioonide Keskel?’ In Eesti Evangeelne Luterlik Kirik, 47. Tallinn: EELK Konsistoorium.
Miller, David L. 1999. ‘CCM: Bishops Seek Bridges’. The Lutheran, 54–55.
Pihkala, Juha. 1993. ‘Apostolisen Uskon Tunnustaminen Nykyajassa’. Teologinen Aikakauskirja, no. 1: 17–27.
Quanbeck, Warren A. 1970. ‘A Contemporary View of Apostolic Succession’. In Lutherans and Catholics in Dialogue IV: Eucharist and Ministry, 178–88. New York: Representatives of the USA National Committee of the Lutheran World Federation and the Bishop’s Committee for Ecumenical and Interreligious Affairs.
Salumaa, Elmar. 1982. ‘Armulauaõpetuse Piirjooni’. In Eesti Evangeelne Luterlik Kirik, 19. Tallinn: EELK Konsistoorium.
Sykes, Stephen. 1999. ‘Episkope and Episcopacy in Some Recent Bilateral Dialogues’. In Episkopé and Episcopacy and the Quest for Visible Unity: Two Consultations, 103. Geneva: WCC Publications.
Tanner, Mary. 1997. ‘The Anglican Position on Apostolic Continuity and Apostolic Succession in the Porvoo Common Statement’. In Visible Unity and the Ministry of Oversight, 115. London: Church House.
Tasmuth, Randar. 2001. ‘Meie Usume Ühte...’ Eesti Kirik, 15 August 2001.
The Report of the Meissen Commission, 1991-1996. 1997. London: General Synod of the Church of England.
Võõbus, Arthur, ed. 1962. ‘Kirik Ja Selle Olemus Uue Testamendi Kuulutuses, Ristikoguduse Ajaloolises Kujunemises Ja Kaasaja Kristluses’. In Issanda Kiriku Tööpõllul, 36–45. Stockholm: Eesti Vaimulik Raamat.
