Kyd and Marlowe’s Revolution: from Surrey’s Aeneid to Marlowe’s Tamburlaine
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12697/smp.2013.1.1.02Keywords:
English iambic pentameter, Surrey, Kyd, Marlowe, versification styleAbstract
The Early New English iambic pentameter was re-created by Wyatt and Surrey in the first half of the 16th c. Surrey introduced blank iambic pentameter into English poetry, and the first English tragedy, Gorboduc, was written in this versification form. Early New English playwrights were feeling their way into the iambic meter, and wrote “by the foot”: the mean stressing on even syllables reached 90 percent, while on the odd syllables it fell to 5 percent. The authors of first new English tragedies were members of the parliament or the gentlemen of the City Inns, and they wrote for the aristocratic audience and the Court. Their subject matter and their characters matched the verse form: they were stiff and stilted.
Marlowe and Kyd represented a new generation of playwrights who wrote for the commercial stage patronized by commoners. Marlowe and Kyd created different sets of plots and personages and a different versification style. Marlowe’s Tamburlaine and Kyd’s The Spanish Tragedy had a powerful impact on generations of English playwrights, from Shakespeare to Shirley. The particulars of the Earlier New English versification style compared to later Elizabethan dramaturgy are discussed in the presentation.
Downloads
References
Barber, Charles 2004 [1976]. Early Modern English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Cunliffe, John W. 1912. Early English Classical Tragedies. Edited, with Introduction and Notes by John W. Cunliffe. Oxford: Clarendon.
Dobson, Eric John 1968. English pronunciation 1500–1700. Oxford: Clarendon.
Edwards, Philip 1966. Thomas Kyd and Early Elizabethan Tragedy. London: Longmans, Green & Co.
Groves, Peter L. 2005. Finding his Feet: Wyatt and the Founding of English Metre. In: Versification: An Electronic Journal of Literary Prosody 4. http://www.arsversificandi.net/current/groves.html
Hardison, Osborne Bennett 1989. Prosody and Purpose in the English Renaissance. London: John Hopkins University Press.
Kökeritz, Helge 1974 [1953]. Shakespeare’s Pronunciation. London: Yale University Press.
Lee, Sidney Lazarus 1909. The Chronicle History of King Leir: The Original of Shakespeare’s King Lear. London: Chatto & Windus.
Liddell, Mark H. 1910. Chaucer. The Prologue to The Canterbury Tales, The Knightes Tale, The Nonne Preestes Tale. New York, London: Macmillan.
Luick, Karl 1921. Über die Betonung der französischen Lehnworter im Mittel-englischen. In: Germanisch-Romanische Monatschrift 10, 14–19.
Meres, Francis 1938. Palladis Tamia (1598) by Francis Meres. New York: Scholars’ Facsimiles & Reprints.
Minkova, Donka 2005. Chaucer’s Language: Pronunciation, Morphology, Metre. In: Ellis, Steve (ed.), Chaucer: An Oxford Guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 130–158.
Padelford, Frederick Morgan (ed.) 1928. The Poems of Henry Howard Earl of Surrey. With an Introduction and Notes. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Tarlinskaja, Marina (forthcoming). Shakespeare and the Versification of English Drama 1561–1642. Farnham, Surrey, England; Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishers.
Tarlinskaja, Marina 1987. Shakespeare’s Verse. Iambic Pentameter and the Poet’s Idiosyncrasies. New York-Bern-Frankfurt am Main-Paris: Peter Lang.
Varn, Lynn 1987. Marlowe’s Muscular Verb: The Answer to His Might. In: Language and Style 20 (4), 357–370.
Vincent, Paul J. 2005. When harey Met Shakespeare. The Genesis of The First Part of Henry the Sixth. PhD thesis, The University of Auckland.
Wilson, Frank P.; Hunter George K. 1990. The English Drama 1485–1585. Oxford History of English Literature. Oxford: University Press.
