What is Estonian Philosophy?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12697/spe.2015.8.2.02Keywords:
definition of philosophy, Estonian philosophy, philosophy in Estonia, University of Tartu, family resemblance, open concept, African philosophy, Danish philosophy, Finnish philosophyAbstract
The purpose of this article is to inquire what should belong in an encyclopedia article entitled "Estonian philosophy," should one ever endeavour to write it. The question "What is Estonian philosophy?" has two parts. First we have to know what we mean by the concept philosophy and after that how we would specify Estonian philosophy? Relying on a Wittgensteinian approach, I will argue that philosophy is an open concept. Although all philosophical works have some resemblances to other philosophical works, it is impossible to find criteria characteristic of all the varieties of schools and traditions in which philosophizing is carried out. Philosophy should be understood as a certain social practice. There can, however, be a large number of different practices. I will show that if by Estonian philosophy we have in mind a philosophy that is originally and purely Estonian, then at this point such does not exist. If by Estonian philosophy we mean philosophy created in Estonia, regardless of the practitioners' ethnicity and the language in which they wrote, the history of our philosophy is very rich and diverse. People of many different ethnicities have created philosophy in Estonia, articulating their philosophical ideas in Estonian, English, German, Latin, Russian, and Swedish. And if we broaden our concept of Estonian philosophy to also include the work of philosophers of Estonian extraction living abroad, then one could write quite a respectable article on the topic.
Downloads
References
Allik, J. (2007). History of experimental psychology from an Estonian perspective, Psychological Research 71: 618-625.
Allik, J. (2009). Foreword, in A. Park (ed.), End of an Empire?, Tartu University Press, Tartu.
Allik, J. (ed.) (2004). Konstantin Ramul. Elu ja psühholoogia, Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus, Tartu.
Annist, A. (1944). “Kalevala” kui kunstiteos, Eesti Kirjastus, Tartu.
Appiah, K. A. (1992). In My Father’s House: Africa in the Philosophy of Culture, Oxford University Press, New York.
Backhaus, J. G. and Drechsler, W. (eds) (2006). Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900): Economy and Society, Springer, New York.
Blocker, G. (1987). African philosophy, African Philosophical Inquiry 1: 1-7.
Blum, R. (1969). Sotsiaalse revolutsiooni teooria, Eesti Raamat, Tallinn.
Bohl, V. (2015). We read minds to shape relationships, Philosophical Psychology 28: 674-694.
Bohl, V. and Gangopadhyay, N. (2014). theory of mind and the unobservability of other minds, Philosophical Explorations 17: 200-222.
Cohnitz,D. (2006). Gedankenexperimente in der Philosophie,Mentis, Paderborn.
Cohnitz, D. (2010). thought experiments outside science, Metascience 22: 410-417.
Cohnitz, D. and Haukioja, J. (2015). Intuitions in philosophical semantics, Erkenntnis. An International Journal of Analytic Philosophy 80: 617-641.
Cohnitz, D. andMarques, T. (2014). On disagreements, Disagreements. Special issue of Erkenntnis 79: 1-10.
Cohnitz, D., Pagin, P. and Rossberg, M. (eds) (2014). Monism, Pluralism, and Relativism: New Essays on the Status of Logic, Springer.
Cohnitz, D. and Sutrop, M. (2014). Brief aus Estland, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 62: 021-005.
Davies, A. (2014). Off-target responses to occasion-sensitivity, Dialectica 68: 499-520.
Davies, A. (forthcominga). Communicating by doing something else, in J. Collins, A. Davies and T. Doubler (eds), Charles Travis on Language, thought and Perception, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Davies, A. (forthcomingb). How to silence content with porn, context, and loaded questions, European Journal of Philosophy.
Defoort, C. (2001). Is there such a thing as Chinese philosophy? Arguments of an implicit debate, Philosophy East and West 51: 393-413.
Defoort, C. (2006). Is “Chinese philosophy” a proper name? A response to Rein Raud, Philosophy East and West 56: 625-660.
Delacampagne, C. (1997). A French perspective on internationalism in philosophy, Metaphilosophy 28: 397-412.
Drechsler, W. (1998). the philosophy of Hans-Georg Gadamer, Trames: Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences 2: 338-351.
Drechsler,W. (2000). Gadamer in Marburg, Blaues Schloss, Marburg.
Dummett, M. (1990). Origins of Analytical Philosophy, Duckworth, London.
Egan, D., Reynolds, S. and Wendland, A. J. (eds) (2010). Wittgenstein and Heidegger, Routledge, New York.
Freymann,W. (1921-1922). Filosoofia Tartu Ülikoolis, Üliõpilasleht 2.
Freymann,W. (1924). Tunnetusteooria põhiprobleemid, Loodus, Tartu.
Freymann,W. (1900). Platons Suchen nach einer Grundlegung aller Philosophie, Mattiesen, Tartu.
Freymann,W. (1906). Loogika, Kool, Tartu.
Freymann,W. (1909). Filosoofia peakÜsimusi, Noor-Eesti, Tartu.
Gabriel, G. (1991). Zwischen Logik und Literatur. Erkenntnisformen vonDichtung, Philosophie und Wissenschaft, Metzler, Stuttgart.
Gabriel, G. (1997). Logik und Rhetorik der Erkenntnis. Zum Verhältnis von wissenschaftlichen und ästhetischer Weltauffassung, Ferdinand Schöningh, Paderborn.
Gabriel, G. (2000). Zwischen Wissenschaft¸ und Dichtung: Nichtpropositionale Vergegenwärtigung in der Philosophie, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 0: 415-425.
Gabriel, G. (2014). Fiktion, wahrheit und erkenntnis in der literatur, in C.Demmerling and I.V. Ferran (eds), Wahrheit, Wissen und Erkenntnis in der Literatur. Philosophische Beiträge, Akademie Verlag, Berlin, pp. 160-180.
Gahlings, U. (1996). Hermann Graf Keyserling, ein Lebensbild, Justus-von-Liebig-Verlag, Darmstadt.
Haapala, A. (1997). Interpreting Heidegger across philosophical traditions thesis, Metaphilosophy 28: 400-448.
Hackenschmidt, G. (1909). The Way to Life: Health and Physical Fitness, Milo Publishing Company.
Harnack, J. (1967). Scandinavian philosophy, in P. Edwards (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Macmillan, New York, pp. 294-002.
Hountondji, P. (1980). African Philosophy, Myth and Reality, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.
Ingemarsdotter, J. (2011). Ramism, rhetoric and reform. An intellectual biography of Johan Skytte (1577-1645), Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Uppsala Studies in History of Ideas
Inno, K. (1972). Tartu University in Estonia: During the Swedish rule (1602-1710), FÖrlag Vaba Eesti, Stockholm.
Jakapi, R. (2009). George Berkeley, in G. Oppy and N. Trakakis (eds), the History of Western Philosophy of Religion, Acumen, pp. 180-195.
Jakapi, R. (2010). Berkeley’s defence of the scripture in alciphron VI, in L. Jaffro, G. Brykman and C. Schwartz (eds), Berkeley’s Alciphron. English Text and Essays in Interpretation, Georg Olms Verlag, New York, pp. 050-056.
Järvelaid, P. (2009). Das Frühwerk Ilmar Tammelos: Der Weg zum Wissenschaftler, in R. Jakob, L. Philipps, E. Schweighofer and C. Varga (eds), Auf dem Weg zur Idee der Gerechtigkeit. GedenkschriŸ für Ilmar Tammelo, LIT,Wien-Münster, pp. 5-21.
Kallas, R. (1897). System der Gedächtnislehre: Psychologisch begründet u. klangmnemonisch veranschaulicht: Ein Beitrag zur Pädagogik, H. Laakmann, Jurjew.
Kangilaski, J. and Laasberg, M. (eds) (1999). Tähendus, tõde, meetod: Tekste analüütilisest filosoofiast I, Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus, Tartu.
Kangilaski, J., Mölder, B. and Palge, V. (eds) (2004). Püsimatu metaphysicus. Madis Kõiv 7 EYS Veljesto kirjastus, Tartu.
Kaplinski, J. (1995). Eesti filosoofia, Akadeemia 9: 1868-1876.
Karmo, T. (1980). Contingent non-identity, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61: 185-187.
Karmo, T. (1985). Are singular terms needed for describing the world?, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 60: 419-427.
Karmo, T. (1988). Some valid (but no sound) arguments trivially span the ‘is’-’ought’ gap, Mind 97: 252-257.
Kasak, E. (2014). Loogika alused, Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus, Tartu.
Kattago, S. (2014). Hannah Arendt on the world, in P.Hayden (ed.), Hannah Arendt: Key Concepts, Routledge, New York, pp. 52-65.
Kattago, S. (2015a). The Ashgate Research Companion to Memory Studies, Ashgate Publishing Ltd, Farnham.
Kattago, S. (2015b). The many sounds of Heidegger’s silence, in J. Winter and A. Dessingu (eds), Beyond Memory: Silence and the Aesthetics of Remembrance, Routledge, New York, pp. 81-90.
Kattago, S. (2015c). Written in stone, in S. Kattago (ed.), the Ashgate Research Companion to Memory Studies, Ashgate Publishing Ltd, Farnham, pp. 179-195.
Kattel, R., Burlamaqui, L. and Castro, A. (eds) (2012). Knowledge governance: Reasserting the public interest, Anthem Press, London.
Kennick, W. E. (1958). Does traditional aesthetics rest on a mistake?, Mind 67: 017-004.
Kerner, G. C. (1962). Approvals, reasons, and moral argument,Mind 71: 474-486.
Kerner, G. C. (1966). The Revolution in Ethical theory, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Kerner, G. C. (1970). Passions and the cognitive foundation of ethics, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 00: 177-192.
Kerner, G. C. (1971). the immorality of utilitarianism and the escapism of rule-utilitarianism, Philosophical Quarterly 21: 06-50.
Kerner, G. C. (1982). Emotions are judgements of value, Topoi 1-2: 52-56.
Kerner, G. C. (1990). three Philosophical Moralists: Mill, Kant, and Sartre, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Keyserling, H. v. (1910). Prolegomena zur Naturphilosophie, Lehmann, München.
Keyserling, H. v. (1919). Das Reisetagebuch eines Philosophen, Reichl, Darmstadt.
Keyserling, H. v. (1922). Schöpferische Erkenntnis,Otto Reichl Verlag, Darmstadt.
Koort, A. (1902). Keel ja loogika, Akadeemiline Emakeele Selts, Tartu.
Koort, A. (1908a). Kaasaegset filosoofiat I, Akadeemiline Kooperatiiv, Tartu.
Koort, A. (1908b). Sissejuhatus filosoofiasse, Akadeemiline Kooperatiiv, Tartu.
Kooskora, M. (2010). The role of (right) values in an economic crisis, Journal of Management and Change 00/01: 49-65.
Kooskora, M. (2015). Building capacity for CSR through supportive initiatives in Estonia, in S. O. Idowu (ed.), Key Initiatives in Corporate Social Responsibility Global Dimension of CSR in Corporate Entities, Springer, Switzerland, pp. 240-260.
Kraepelin, E. (1885). Zur Psychologie des Komischen, I-II, Philosophische Studien 2: 128-160; 327-361.
Kull, K. (2001). Jakob von UexkÜll: An introduction, Semiotica 104: 1-59.
Kull, K. (2011). Juri Lotman in English: Bibliography, Sign Systems Studies 39: 343-356.
Kuusk, P. (2001). Physical reality, theoretical physics, and mathematics, in R. Vihalemm (ed.), Estonian Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 200-214.
Kõiv, M. (1999-2000). Was ist des Esten Philosophie: Metafilosoofiline mõtisklus, Akadeemia 11-12: 2449-248 2670-2704; 1-4: 190-22 417-44 609-67 901-926.
Kõiv, M. (2000). “Kalevipoeg” Tammsaare tähendamissõnade kumas, Looming 12: 1850-1881.
Kõiv, M. and Kuusk, P. (2001). What is time?, Estonian Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 201-246.
Lepajõe, M., Volt, I. and Viiding, K. (eds) (2015). Constitutiones Academiae Dorpatensis (Academiae Gustavianae), Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus, Tartu.
Lõhkivi, E. (2011). Identity and rationality: Towards normative cultural studies of science, Baltic Journal of European Studies 9: 97-110.
Lõhkivi, E. and Vihalemm, R. (eds) (2012). Towards a Practical Realist Account of Science, Special issue of Studia Philosophica Estonica, 5.2.
Linzbach, J. (1916). Principy filosofskogo jazyka. Opyt tocnogo jazykoznanija, Petrograd.
Linzbach, J. (1921). Transcendent algebra: Ideografie matematical: Experiment de un lingue filosofic, Reval. Author’s edition.
Loone, E. (1992). Soviet Marxism and Analytical Philosophies of History, Verso, London.
Loone, E. (1990). Eesti filosoofia ida ja lääne piiril, in Ülo Matjus (ed.), Studia Philosophica, 1 (07), Acta et commentationes Universitatis Tartuensis, 96 Tartu Ülikool, Tartu, pp. 129-155.
Loone, E. (1996). Marx, Gellner, power, in J. A. Hall and I. C. Jarvie (eds), the Social Philosophy of Ernst Gellner, Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp. 585-596.
Loone, E. (2000). Marxism, in A. J.Motyl (ed.), Encyclopedia of Nationalism, Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 465-484.
Loone, E. (2002). Eesti filosoofia eesti kultuuris pärast II maailmasõda, in H. Eenmaa (ed.), Eesti filosoofia: Mis see on?, SE&JS, Tallinn.
Loone, E. (2000). Dialectic materialism, in W.Outhwaite (ed.), The Blackwell Dictionary of Modern Social Thought, Malden, Oxford, pp. 161-162.
Lotman, M. (2000). A few notes on the philosophical background of the Tartu school of semiotics, European Journal for Semiotic Studies 12: 20-46.
Lott, T. (2011). Plato on the rationality of belief, theaetetus 184- Trames: Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences 15: 339-364.
Luik, T. (2002). Filosoofiast kõnelda, Ilmamaa, Tartu.
Luks, L. (2015). Nihilism ja kirjandus: Ei kogemine filosoofia ja kirjanduse Ühtesulamisel, Tallinna Ülikooli Kirjastus, Tallinn.
Luts, M. (1997). Sissejuhatus Õigusfilosoofiasse, Juura, Tallinn.
Makarov, M. (1960). Materialistliku dialektika kategooriad, Eesti Riiklik Kirjastus, Tallinn.
Masing, U. (2004). Keelest ja meelest. Taevapõdra rahvaste meelest ehk juttu boreaalsest hoiakust, Ilmamaa, Tartu. Urmas Sutrop (ed.).
Matjus, Ü. (1992). Spricht das Sein auch estnisch?, Zur philosophischen Aktualität Heideggers: Symposium der Alexander von Humboldt – Stiftung vom 24.-2. April 1989 in Bonn – Bad Godesberg, Vittorio Klostermann, Frankfurt am Main, pp. 165-165.
Matjus, Ü. (2000). Millest kõneldakse siis, kui kõneldakse eesti filosoofiast?, in T. Lott, K. Lõuk, E. Parhomenko, R. Sirkel, K. Traks and E. Veskimets (eds), Tõtt-Öelda: Ettekandeid seminaridelt “Keel ja filosoofia” (Madsa 2002) ning “Millest kõneldakse siis, kui kõneldakse Eesti filosoofiast”, Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus, Tartu, pp. 104-115.
Matjus, Ü. (2004). Kõrb kasvab, Ilmamaa, Tartu.
Mbiti, J. (1969). African Religions and Philosophy, Doubleday, New York.
McLaughlin, P. (2007). Anarchism and Authority, Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot.
Meel, M. and Saat, M. (2002). Ethical life cycle of an innovation, Journal of Business Ethics 39: 21-27.
Meel, M. and Saat, M. (2012). Using Kantian ethics for estimating corporate social responsibility, Scientia Nova 16: 7-16.
Mets, A. and Kuusk, P. (2009). the constructive realist account of science and its application to Ilya Prigogine’s conception of laws of nature, Foundations of Science 14: 209-248.
Mölder, B. (1999). Emakeelefilosoofia, Akadeemia 11: 2202-2212.
Mölder, B. (2010). Mind Ascribed: An Elaboration and Defence of Interpretivism, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Mölder, B. (2014). Constructing time: Dennett and Grush on temporal representation, in V. Arstila and D. Lloyd (eds), Subjective Time: The Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience of Temporality, the MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 217-208.
Mölder, B. (2016). Time in intersubjectivity: Some tools for analysis, in B. Mölder, V. Arstila and P. Ohrstrom (eds), Philosophy and Psychology of Time, Springer International Publishing, pp. 205-224.
Männiste, I. (2010). Henry Miller: The Inhuman Artist – A Philosophical Inquiry, Bloomsbury, New York.
Müürsepp, P. (2010). The aim of science–knowledge or wisdom, Problemos 84: 72-84.
Naan, G. (1969). Võim ja vaim. Bürokraatia ja intelligents tänapäeva kodanlikus Ühiskonnas, Looming 12: 1856-1872; 1875-1878.
Näpinen, L. and Müürsepp, P. (2002). The concept of chaos in contemporary science: On Jean Bricmont’s critique of Ilya Prigogine’s ideas, Foundations of Science 7: 465-479.
Orsi, F. (2010). Fitting attitudes and solitary goods, Mind 122: 687-698.
Orsi, F. (2015a). the guise of the good, Philosophy Compass 10: 714-724.
Orsi, F. (2015b). Valuetheory, Bloomsbury, London.
Ott, M. (2015). Väekirjad. Filosoofilised esseed, Tallinna Ülikooli Kirjastus, Tallinn.
Parhomenko, E. (1990). Gottlob Benjamin Jäsche Immanuel Kanti loengute väljaandjana, Studia Philosophica 1: 20-40.
Parhomenko, E. (2002). Filosoofia Eestis: Üks metaentsüklopeediline esitus, Akadeemia 14: 1579-15Ëœ7.
Parhomenko, E. (2004). Philosophie in Estland. Eine metaenzyklopädische Darstellung, in C. Häntsch (ed.), Philosophieren im Ostseeraum. Beiträge des Nord- und osteuropäischen Forums für Philosophie Greifswald, Veröffentlichungen des Osteuropa-Instituts München: Forschungen zum Ostseeraum, Wiesbaden, pp. 281-288.
Parhomenko, E. (2015). Der Himmel als Stimmungsbogen des Denkens Über Tartu im Februar 180 Studia Philosophica Estonica 8.2: 91-102.
Park, A. (2009). End of an Empire?, Tartu University Press, Tartu.
Parve, V. (1999). Well-being: An essentially fuzzy concept, Trames: Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences 3: 58-71.
Parve, V. (2001). Paternalism under pressure, in J. Joerden and J. Neumann (eds), Studien zur Ethik in Ostmitteleuropa. Medizinethik, Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main, pp. 212-105.
Pears, D. (1966). Wittgenstein and Austin, in B. Williams and A. Monte-0ore (eds), British Analytical Philosophy, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, pp. 17-09.
Pietarinen, A.-V. (2006). Signs of Logic: Peircean themes on the Philosophy of Language, Games, and Communication, Springer, Dordrecht.
Pietarinen, A.-V. (ed.) (2007). Gametheory and Linguistic Meaning, Elsevier Science, Oxford.
Pihlström, S. (2003). Pragmatistic influences in twentieth century Finnish philosophy: From pre-analytic to post-analytic thought, Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 80: 511-505.
Pihlström, S. (2014). Pragmatic realism, in K. R. Westphal (ed.), Realism, Science, and Pragmatism, Routledge, New York, pp. 251-282.
Piirimäe, E. (2015a). Berlin, Herder and the counter-enlightenment, Eighteenth-Century Studies 49: 71-76.
Piirimäe, E. (2015b). Kant’s politics in context, Intellectual History Review 25: 462-464.
Piirimäe, E. (2015c). Philosophy, sociability and modern patriotism: Young Herder between Rousseau and Abbt, History of European Ideas 41: 640-661.
Piirimäe, H. (2007). Rahvusteadused ja teised humanitaarteadused, in T. Hiio and H. Piirimäe (eds), Universitas Tartuensis 1602-200 Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus, Tartu.
Pork, A. (1982). A note on schemes of historical explanation – problem of status, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 12: 409-410.
Pork, A. (1985). Assessing relative causal importance in history, History and theory 24: 62-69.
Pork, A. (1989).the role of examples in social explanation–some problems of Marxist interpretation, Philosophy in the Social Sciences 19: 41-54.
Pork, A. (1990). History, lying, and moral responsibility, History and theory 29: 021-000.
Ramul, K. (1929). Über nichtempirische Psychologie, Archiv für die gesamte Psychologie 70: 069-406.
Ramul, K. (1960). the problem of measurement in the psychology of the eighteenth century, American Psychologist 15: 256-265.
Ramul, K. (1960). Some early measurements and ratings in psychology, American Psychologist 18: 650-659.
Rauch, G. v. (1940). Die Universität Dorpat und das Eindringen der frühen Aufklärung in Livland 1690-171 Georg Olms Verlag, New York.
Raud, R. (2006). Philosophies versus philosophy: In defense of a flexible definition, Philosophy East and West 56: 618-625.
Raud, R. (2010). Classical Japanese Philosophy, Nanzan University, Nagoya.
Raud, R. (2010). thinking with Dogen: reading philosophically into and beyond the textual surface, Whither Japanese Philosophy, the University of Tokyo Center for Philosophy, Tokyo.
Raud, R. (2014). What is Japanese about Japanese philosophy?, in M. Sano and L. Jianhui (eds), Rethinking “Japanese Studies”. Nichibunken Symposium, Kopenhaagen, August 201 Nichibunken, Kyoto, pp. 15-27.
Raud, R. (2015a). Casting off the bonds of karma: Watsuji, Shinran and DFIogen on the problem of free will, Journal of Japanese Philosophy 3: 50-69.
Raud, R. (2015b). Dogen’s idea of buddha-nature: Dynamism and nonreferentiality, Asian Philosophy 25: 1-14.
Raukas, M. (2002). Rahvusfilosoofiast, in H. Eenmaa (ed.), Eesti filosoofia: Mis see on?, SE&JS, Tallinn.
Rebane, S. (2000). Kes Ütles, et Tallinna Mauricius oli Albertus Magnuse õpilane?, Acta Historica Tallinnensia 7: 0-14.
Reiland, I. (2014). On experiencing high-level properties, American Philosophical Quarterly 51: 177-1˜7.
Reiland, I. (2015a). Experience, seemings, and evidence, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 96: 510-504.
Reiland, I. (2015b). On experiencing meanings, Southern Journal of Philosophy 50: 481-492.
Rolin, K., Hasse, C. and Lõhkivi, E. (eds) (2011). Gender, Physics, and Workplace Culture. Special issue of Science Studies: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Science and Technology Studies.
Ruus, V., Loit, L., Blum, R. and Volkov, I. (1982). Üleülikoolilised kateedrid, in K. Siilivask and H. Palamets (eds), Tartu Ülikooli ajalugu. Kolmes köites 1602-179 Eesti Raamat, Tallinn, pp. 208-247.
Ruutsoo, R. (1978). Filosoofia, kultuur, ajalugu, Looming 3: 459-474.
Ruutsoo, R. (1991). Eesti filosoofia bürokraatia ja kultuuri vahel, Looming 12: 1668-1684.
Ruutsoo, R. (2001). Filosoofiakirjandus eesti keeles ja filosoofiline kultuur aastail 1918-194 in T. Tender (ed.), Raamatu osa Eesti arengus: Eesti Raamatu Aasta avakonverents. 6.-7. aprillil 200 Tartu Ülikool, Tartu, pp. 249-268.
Ruutsoo, R. (2004). Konstantin Ramul ja filosoofia sõdadevahelises Tartu Ülikoolis, in J. Allik (ed.), Konstantin Ramul. Elu ja psühholoogia, Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus, Tartu, pp. 01-55.
Ruutsoo, R. and Luik, T. (1982). Humanitaarteadused. Filosoofia, in H. Piirimäe (ed.), Tartu Ülikooli ajalugu. Kolmes kÖites 1602-179 Valgus, Tallinn pp. 181-189.
Salmela, M. (2004). Finnish philosophy in the first half of the 20th century, in I. Pitkäranta (ed.), Ajatuksen kulku: suomalaiset filosofit maailmalla–maailma filosofit Suomessa, Helsingin yliopiston kirjasto, Helsinki.
Savisaar, E. and Valt, L. (1980). Globaalprobleemid ja tuleviku stsenaariumid, Eesti Raamat, Tallinn.
Schmied-Kowarzik, W. (1912). Umriss einer neuen analytischen Psychologie und ihr Verhältnis zur empirischen Psychologie, Leipzig.
Schmied-Kowarzik,W. (1927). Die Objektivation des Geistigen. Der objective Geist und seine Formen, J. A. Barth, Leipzig.
Schwenke, H. (2006). Zurück zur Wirklichkeit. Bewusstsein und Erkenntnis bei Gustav Teichmüller, Schwabe, Basel.
Schwidtal, M. and Undusk, J. (eds) (2007). Baltisches Welterlebnis. Die kul turgeschichtliche Bedeutung von Alexander, Eduard und Hermann Graf Keyserling, Winter, Heidelberg.
Searle, J. R. (1995). the Construction of Social Reality, Lane, London.
Semel, H. (1918). Die Universität Dorpat (1802-1918). Skizzen zu ihrer Geschichte von Lehrern und ehemaligen SchÜlern, H. Laakmann, Dorpat.
Semper, J. (1904). Prantsuse vaim: Esseed, Noor-Eesti, Tartu.
Simm, K. (2011). the concepts of common good and public interest: From Plato to biobanking, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20: 554-562.
Simm, K. (2014). Biobanks and feedback, in R. Chadwick, M. Levitt and D. Shickle (eds), the Right to Know and the Right not to Know, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 55-70.
Sirkel, R. (2011). Alexander of Aphrodisias’s account of universals and its problems, Joural of the History of Philosophy 49: 297-014.
Sirkel, R. and Tahko, T. (eds) (2014). Aristotelian Metaphysics: Essence and Ground, Special issue of Studia Philosophica Estonica, 7.2.
Sooväli, J. (2015a). Friedrich Nietzsche’s influence on the Estonian intellectual landscape, Studia Philosophica Estonica 8.2: 140-154.
Sooväli, J. (2015b). Gapping the subject: Nietzsche and Derrida, in J. Constancio, M. J.Mayer Branco and B. Ryan (eds), Nietzsche and the Problem of Subjectivity, De Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 406-450.
Steinberg, H. and Angermeyer, M. C. (2001). Emil Kraepelin’s years at Dorpat as professor of psychiatry in nineteenth-century Russia, History of Psychiatry XII: 297-027.
Stenius, E. (1960). Wittgenstein’s Tractatus: A Critical Exposition of Its Main Lines ofthought, Blackwell, London.
Stolovich, L. (1959). fisteticeskoe v dejstvitel’nosti i v iskusstve, Iskusstvo, Moscow.
Stolovich, L. (1961). Predmet fistetiki, Iskusstvo, Moscow.
Stolovich, L. (1969). Kategorija prekrasnogo i obðcestvennyj ideal. Istorikoproblemnye ocerki, Iskusstvo, Moscow.
Stolovich, L. (1972). Priroda fisteticeskoj cennosti, Politizdat, Moscow.
Stolovich, L. (1978). Filosofija krasoty, Politizdat, Moscow.
Stolovich, L. (2005a). Istoriia russkoi filosofii: Ocerki, Respublika, Moscow.
Stolovich, L. (2005b). Pljuralizm v filosofii i filosofija pljuralizma, Ingri, Tallinn.
Stolovich, L. (2006). Kohtumised elu radadel, Ilo, Tallinn. Aive Pevkur (transl.), Ruth JÜrjo (ed.).
Stolovich, L. (2011). On the fate of Kant collection at the University of Tartu, Kantovsky Sbornik. Selected articles 2008-200 Kaliningrad, pp. 75-88.
Stolovich, L. (2010). How did Kant’s death mask end up in Tartu? A surprising finding at the archive of art muuseum of the University of Tartu, Kantovsky sbornik. Selected articles 201 pp. 76-78.
Strümpell, L. H. (1844). Die Verschiedenheit der Kindernaturen. Ein Vortrag; zum Besten des Dorpater HÜlfsvereins, Dorpat.
Strümpell, L. H. (1861). Die Geschichte der griechischen Philosophie: zur Übersicht, Repetition und Orientierung bei eigenen Studien, Voss, Leipzig.
Strümpell, L. H. (1869a). Erziehungsfragen, gemeinverständlich erörtert, Verlag für erziehenden Unterricht, Leipzig.
Strümpell, L. H. (1869b). Lehrpläne für Knabenelementarschulen des Dorpater Lehrbezirks mit den nÖtigen Erläuterungen und Ergänzungen, entworfen unter Mitwirkung erfahrener Schulmänner, Gläser, Dorpat.
Strümpell, L. H. (1874). Die Natur und Entstehung der Träume, Veit, Leipzig.
Strümpell, L. H. (1884). Grundriss der Psychologie oder Lehre von der Entwicklung des Seelenlebens im Menschen, Leipzig.
Strümpell, L. H. (1890). Die Pädagogische Pathologie oder die Lehre von den Fehlern der Kinder. Versuch einer Grundlegung für gebildete Ältern, Studierende der Pädagogik, Lehrer, sowie für Schulbehörden und Kinderärzte, Leipzig.
Suter, R. (2004). Kerner, George Cyril, in J. R. Shook (ed.), Dictionary of Modern American Philosophers, 1860-196 Thoemmes, Bristol, pp. 1295-1296.
Sutrop, M. (2000). Fiction and Imagination: The Anthropological Function of Literature, Mentis, Paderborn.
Sutrop, M. (2002). Imagination and the act of fiction-making, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 80: 002-044.
Sutrop, M. (2004). Mis on (eesti) filosoofia?, in J. Kangilaski, B. Mölder and V. Palge (eds), PÜsimatu metaphysicus. Madis Kõiv 7 EYS Veljesto Kirjastus, Tartu, pp. 169-186.
Sutrop, M. (2007). Trust, in M. Häyry, R. Chadwick, V. 0rnason and G. 0rnason (eds),the Ethics and Governance of Human Genetic Databases. European Perspectives, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 190-198.
Sutrop, M. (2014). Fiktion, Vorstellung und moralische Erkenntnis, in C. Demmerling and I. F. Vendrell (eds), Wahrheit, Wissen und Erkenntnis in der Literatur. Philosophische Beiträge, Akademie Verlag, Berlin, pp. 24?-262.
Sutrop, M. (2016). What role do emotions play in moral disagreements?, in T.Airaksinen and W. Gasparski (eds), Desire: Concept and its Practical Context, Transaction Publishers, pp. 183-199.
Sutrop, M. and Käpp, T. (eds) (2011). Ethics in Sciences and Society. University of Tartu Centre for Ethics 1 Estonian Language Foundation, Tartu.
Sutrop, M. and Simm, K. (eds) (2011). From Informed Consent to No Consent: Health, Biomedical Research, and Security, Special issue Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 20 (4).
Sutrop, U. (1996). Nietzsche, Kaplinski ja eesti filosoofia, Akadeemia 6: 1146-1162.
Sutrop, U. (2001). Umwelt - word and concept: Two hundred years of semantic change, Semiotica 134: 447-462.
Sutrop, U. (2006). Bertrand Russell in Estonia, Russell: the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 26: 55-76.
Sutrop, U. (2012). Kuidas me mõistame rahvusteadust?, Akadeemia 24: 1155- 117 1816-1817.
Talpsepp, E. (2015). Biological essentialism concerning the species category, Recent Developments in the Philosophy of Science: EPSA 1? Helsinki, European Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Springer, pp. 369-380.
Tamm, M. and Kull, K. (2016). Toward a reterritorialisation of cultural theory: Estonian theory from Baer via UexkÜll to Lotman, History of the Human Sciences 29: 75-9..
Tammelo, I. (1959). Justice and Doubt. An Essay on the Fundamentals of Justice, Springer, Vienna.
Tammelo, I. (1977). Zureorie der Gerechtigkeit, Lang, Frankfurt am Main.
Tammelo, I. (1978). Modern Logic in the Service of Law, Springer, Vienna.
Teichmüller, G. (1874). Studien zur Geschichte der Begri.e, Weidmann, Berlin.
Teichmüller, G. (1876-1879). Neue Studien zur Geschichte der Begriffe, Perthes, Gotha.
Teichmüller, G. (1882). Die wirkliche und die scheinbareWelt. Neue Grundlegung der Metaphysik, Koebner, Breslau.
Teichmüller, G. (1886). Religionsphilosophie, Koebner, Breslau.
Teichmüller, G. (2014a). Gesammelte Schriften 1. Die wirkliche und die scheinbare Welt: Neue Grundlegung der Metaphysik, Schwabe, Basel. Heiner Schwenke (ed.).
Teichmüller, G. (2014b). Gesammelte Schriften 2. Religionsphilosophie. Vorlesungen Über Philosophie des Christentums, Schwabe, Basel. Heiner Schwenke (ed.).
Teichmüller, G. (2014c). Gesammelte Schriften 3. Neue Grundlegung der Psychologie und Logik, nach der posthumen Ausgabe von Jakob Ohse, Schwabe, Basel. Heiner Schwenke (ed.).
Tennmann, E. (1936a). Ekstaas ja müstika, Noor-Eesti, Tartu.
Tennmann, E. (1936b). Üldine usundipsühholoogia, Akadeemiline Kooperatiiv, Tartu.
Todd, T. (1992). Muscles, memory: And George Hackenschmidt, Iron Game History 2: 10-15.
Tool, A. (2007). Wilhelm Dilthey on the objectivity of knowledge in human sciences, Trames: Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences 11: 3-14.
Tool, A. (2014). Wilhelm Dilthey, in J. Helin, T. Hernes, D. Hjorth and R. Holt (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Process Philosophy and Organization Studies, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 129-142.
Tooming, U. (2014). Pleasures of the communicative conception, Grazer Philosophische Studien 90: 253-272.
Tooming, U. (2015). Without pretense: A critique of Goldman’s model of simulation, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 14: 561-575.
UexkÜll, J. v. (1909). Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tiere, Springer, Berlin.
UexkÜll, J. v. (1920). eoretische Biologie, Verlag von Gebrüder Paetel, Berlin.
Vaska, V. (1964). e Concept of Being in the Philosophy of Teichmüller, PhD thesis, Columbia University, Ann Arbor.
Vihalem, M. (2011). How to get rid of the subject? On some aspects of Nietzsche’s critique of subjectivity, Problemos 80: 158-171.
Vihalem, M. (2014). Revolt against Schopenhauer and Wagner? An insight into Nietzsche’s perspectivist aesthetics, Studies on Art and Architecture 23: 177-199.
Vihalemm, R. (19.1). Ühe teaduse kujunemislugu. Keemia arenguteest, Valgus, Tallinn.
Vihalemm, R. (2008). Teadusfilosoofilisest vaatepunktist, EKSA, Tallinn.
Vihalemm, R. (2015). eoretical philosophy and philosophy of science in Soviet times: Some remarks on the example of Estonia, 1960-199 Studia Philosophica Estonica 8.2: 194-227.
Viik, T. (2011a). Human spatiality: A cultural phenomenology of landscapes and places, Problemos 79: 103-114.
Viik, T. (2011b). Originating the western world: A cultural phenomenology of historical consciousness, in A.-T. Tymieniecka (ed.), Analecta Husserliana: Phenomenology / Ontopoiesis Retriving Geo-Cosmic Horizons of Antiquity, Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 227-240.
Volt, M. (2011). Kuidas õigustada esteetilist hoiakut?, Kunstiteaduslikke Uurimusi, pp. 11.-129.
Weitz, M. (1956). The role of theory in aesthetics, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 15: 27-35.
Wendland, A. J. (2014). Language, truth and logic: Heidegger on the practical and historical grounds of abstract thought, in A. Skodo (ed.), Other Logics: Alternative to Former Logic in the History of thought and Contemporary Philosophy, Brill Publishing, Leiden, pp. 67-.4.
Wendland, A. J. and Winkler, R. (2015). Hegel’s critique of Kant, South African Journal of Philosophy 34: 129-142.
Westermarck, E. (1891). The History of Human Marriage, Frenckell & Son, Helsinki.
Westermarck, E. (1906-1908). e Origin and Development of the Moral Ideas, Macmillan & Co.
Westermarck, E. (1932). Ethical Relativity, Kegan Paul, London.
Williford, K. and Jakapi, R. (2009). Berkeley’s theory of meaning in Alciphron VII, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17: 99-11..
Wiredu, K. (1992). On defining African philosophy, in H. Nagl-Docekal and F. M.Wimmer (eds), Postkoloniales Afrika, Oldenbourg Verlag, Wien, pp. 40-64.
Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophische Untersuchungen. Philosophical Investigations, Blackwell, Oxford.
Wittgenstein, L. (1996). Loogilis-filosoofiline traktaat. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, Ilmamaa, Tartu. Jaan Kangilaski, Veiko Palge (transl.).
