Mental State Attribution for Interactionism

  • Uku Tooming
Keywords: folk psychology, beliefs, desires, communication

Abstract

Interactionists about folk psychology argue that embodied interactions constitute the primary way we understand one another and thus oppose more standard accounts according to which the understanding is mostly achieved through belief and desire attributions. However, also interactionists need to explain why people sometimes still resort to attitude ascription. In this paper, it is argued that this explanatory demand presents a genuine challenge for interactionism and that a popular proposal which claims that belief and desire attributions are needed to make sense of counternormative behavior is problematic. Instead, the most promising conception of belief and desire ascriptions is the communicative conception which locates them in the context of declarative and imperative communication, respectively. Such a communication can take both verbal and non-verbal form.

Author Biography

Uku Tooming

Institute of Philosophy and Semiotics, University of Tartu

Rank: researcher

References

Alcoff, L. (1991). The problem of speaking for others, Cultural Critique 20: 5-32.

Andrews, K. (2009). Understanding norms without a theory of mind, Inquiry 52: 433-448.

Anscombe, E. (1959). Intention, Blackwell, Oxford.

Apperly, I., Samson, D., Carroll, N., Hussain, S. & Humphries, G. (2006). Intact first- and second-order false belief reasoning in a patient with severely impaired grammar, Social Neuroscience 1: 334-348.

Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Boesch, C. (2002). Cooperative hunting roles among taie chimpanzees, Human Nature 13: 27-46.

Brandom, R. (2000). Articulating Reasons: An Introduction to Inferentialism, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

Buttelman, F., Carpenter, M. & M., T. (2009). Eighteen-month-old infants show false belief understanding in an active helping paradigm, Cognition 112: 337-342.

Camaioni, L., Perucchini, P., Bellagamba, F. & Colonnesi, C. (2004). The role of declarative pointing in developing a theory of mind, Infancy 5: 291-308.

Carruthers, P. (2013). Mindreading in infancy, Mind and Language 28: 141-172.

Conee, E. & Feldman, R. (2001). Internalism defended, American Philosophical Quarterly 38: 1-18.

Csibra, G. (2008). Goal attribution to inanimate agents by 6.5-month-old infants, Cognition 107: 705-717.

Davidson, D. (1963). Actions, reasons, and causes, The Journal of Philosophy 63: 685-700.

De Jaegher, H. & di Paolo, E. (2007). Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6: 485-507.

Gallagher, S. (2001). The practice of mind: Theory, simulation, or interaction, Journal of Consciousness Studies 8: 83-107.

Gallagher, S. (2006). How the Body Shapes the Mind, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

Gallagher, S. (2008a). Direct perception in the interactive context, Consciousness and Cognition 17: 535-543.

Gallagher, S. (2008b). Inference or interaction? Social cognition without precursors, Philosophical Explorations 11: 163-174.

Gallagher, S. (2012). In defence of phenomenological approaches to social cognition: Interacting with the critics, Review of Philosophy and Psychology 3: 187-212.

Gallagher, S. & Hutto, D. (2008). Understanding others through primary interaction and narrative practice, in J. Zlatev, T. Racine, C. Sinha & E. Itkonen (eds), The Shared Mind: Perspectives on Intersubjectivity, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 17-38.

Gauker, C. (1994). Thinking Out Loud: An Essay on the Relation between Thought and Language, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

Gauker, C. (2003). Words without Meaning, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Gauker, C. (2011). Words and Images: An Essay on the Origin of Ideas, Oxford University Press, New York.

Gergely, G. & Csibra, G. (2003). Teleological reasoning in infancy: The naive theory of rational action, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7: 287-292.

Goldman, A. (1989). Interpretation psychologized, Mind & Language 4: 161-185.

Goldman, A. (2006). Simulating Minds: The Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience of Mindreading, Oxford University Press, New York.

Gopnik, A. & Meltzoff, A. (1997). Words, Thoughts, and Theories, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Gordon, R. (1995). The simulation theory: Objections and misconceptions, Mind & Language 7: 1-10.

Heyes, C. (2014). False belief in infancy: A fresh look, Developmental Science 17: 647-659.

Hutto, D. (2004). The limits of spectatorial folk psychology, Mind & Language 19: 548-573.

Hutto, D. (2008). Folk Psychological Narratives: The Sociocultural Basis of Understanding Reasons, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Kovaacs, A., Teglas, E. & Endress, A. (2010). The social sense: Susceptibility to others' beliefs in human infants and adults, Science 330: 1830-1834.

Leudar, I., Costall, A. & Francis, D. (2004). Theory of mind: A critical assessment, Theory & Psychology 14: 571-578.

Liszkowski, U., Carpenter, M., Striano, T. & Tomasello, M. (2006). 12- and 18-month olds point to provide information for others, Journal of Cognition and Development 7: 173-187.

Malle, B. F., Knobe, J. & Nelson, S. (2007). Actor-observer asymmetries in behavior explanations: New answers to an old question, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 93: 491-514.

McGann, M. & de Jaegher, H. (2009). Self-other contingencies: Enacting social perception, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8: 417-437.

Onishi, K. & Baillargeon, R. (2005). Do 15-month-old infants understand false beliefs, Science 308: 255-258.

Perry, S., Baker, M., Fedigan, L., Gros-Louis, J., Jack, K., MacKinnon, K., Manson, J. H., Panger, M., Pyle, K. & Rose, L. (2003). Social conventions in wild white-faced capuchin monkeys, Current Anthropology 44: 241-258.

Platts, M. (1979). Ways of Meaning, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

Rakoczy, H. & Tomasello, M. (2009). Done wrong or said wrong? Young children understand the normative directions of fit of different speech acts, Cognition 113: 205-212.

Ratcliffe, M. (2007). Rethinking Commonsense Psychology: A Critique of Folk Psychology, Theory of Mind and Simulation, Palgrave MacMillan, New York.

Reddy, V. (2008). How Infants Know Minds, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

Schwitzgebel, E. (2010). Acting contrary to our professed beliefs or the gulf between occurrent judgment and dispositional belief, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91: 531-553.

Southgate, V., van Maanen, C. & Csibra, G. (2007). Infant pointing: Communication to cooperate or communication to learn?, Child Development 78: 735-740.

Sterenly, K. (2012). Language, gesture, skill: The co-evolutionary foundations of language, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 367: 2141-2151.

Stich, S. & Nichols, S. (2003). Mindreading: An Integrated Account of Pretence, Self-Awareness, Understanding Other Minds, Oxford University Press, New York.

Stout, R. (2006). The Inner Life of a Rational Agent. In Defense of Philosophical behaviorism, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.

Thompson, M. (2008). Life and Action. Elementary Strutures of Practical Thought, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

Tomasello, M. (1999). The Cultural Origins of Cognition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

Tooming, U. (2014). Pleasures of the communicative conception, Grazer Philosophische Studien 90: 253-272.

Torrance, S. & Froese, T. (2011). An inter-enactive approach to agency: Participatory sense-making, dynamics, and sociality, Humana.Mente 15: 21-53.

Turri, J. (2013). The test of truth: An experimental investigation of the norm of assertion, Cognition 129: 279-291.

Van Cleave, M. & Gauker, C. (2010). Linguistic practice and false-belief tasks, Mind & Language 25: 298-328.

Varley, R. & Siegal, M. (2000). Evidence for cognition without grammar from causal reasoning and `theory of mind' in an agrammatic aphasic patient, Current Biology 10: 723-726.

Wellman, H. & Woolley, J. (1990). From simple desires to ordinary beliefs: The early development of everyday psychology, Cognition 35: 245-275.

Zawidzki, T. (2013). Mindshaping: A New Framework for Understanding Human Social Cognition, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Published
2017-02-15
How to Cite
Tooming, U. (2017). Mental State Attribution for Interactionism. Studia Philosophica Estonica, 9(1), 184-207. https://doi.org/10.12697/spe.2016.9.1.08