A Kantian Interpretation of Niels Bohr's Early Correspondence Principle: 1917-1924


  • Roberto Angeloni University of Paris-Diderot


Bohr, Kant, atomic theory, correspondence principle, quantum physics


In the present paper I aim to discuss the philosophical foundations of the early correspondence principle (1917-1924), by comparing the conceptual structure underlying the first correspondence principle with the procedure of analogy that Immanuel Kant introduced in the Critique of Judgment from 1790. On such a comparison, I will seek to demonstrate the consistency of the conceptual ratio according to which the correspondence principle is to the classical "concepts" of space and time, as these a priori forms of intuition (space and time), in Kant, are related to the separate faculty of pure intuition. As a result, it will turn out that the conceptual structure of the correspondence principle suits to the Kantian doctrine of a separate faculty of pure intuition, which is divided from the faculty of understanding. The aim is to shed new light on the line of reasoning underlying Niels Bohr's analogical thinking in quantum physics.


Download data is not yet available.


Beller, M. (1999) Quantum Dialogue. The Making of a Revolution. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

Bohr, N. (1937) “Causality and Complementarity”, Philosophy of Science pp. 289-29 in NBCW 1 pp. 40-48.

Bohr, N. (1925) “Atomic Theory and Mechanics”, Nature, 11 pp. 845-85 in NBCW pp. 273-280.

Bohr, N. (1923a) “L’application de la theorie des quanta aux problemes atomiques”, in Atomes et electrons, Rapports et discussions du Conseil de Physique tenu Bruxelles du 1er au 6 Avril 1921. Paris: Gauthier-Villars, 192 pp. 228-24 in NBCW pp. 364-380.

Bohr, N. (1923b) “On Atomernes Bygning”, FT, 2 pp. 6-44. Translated as “The Structure of the Atom”, Nature 11 pp. 29-4 in NBCW pp. 467-482.

Bohr, N. (1923c) “Über die Anwendung der Quantentheorie auf den Atombau. I. Die Grundpostulate der Quantentheorie”. ZP 1 pp. 117-165. Translated as On the Application of the Quantum Theory to Atomic Structure, part I: The Fundamental Postulates, supplement to Proceedings of Cambridge Philosophical Society (1924), pp. 1-4 in NBCW pp. 457-499.

Bohr, N. (1920) “On the Series Spectra of the Elements”, Lecture before the German Physical Society in Berlin (27 April 1920), pp. 22-60. English translation by A. D. Udden, in NBCW pp. 241-282.

Bohr, N. (1918) On the Quantum Theory of Line-Spectra, Part I, pp. 1-36. Copenhagen, in NBCW 67-102.

Bohr, N. (1915) “On the Quantum Theory of Radiation and the Structure of the Atom”, Philosophical Magazine, 3 pp. 394-41 in NBCW 391-415.

Bohr, N. (1913) “On the Constitution of Atoms and Molecules”, Philosophical Magazine, 2 pp. 1-2 in NBCW pp. 159-185.

Born M., Heisenberg, W., Jordan, P. (1925) “Zur Quantenmechanik 2”, Zeitschr. F. Phys., 35: 557-61 English translation in Van Der Waerden 196 pp. 321-385.

Chevalley, C. (1994) ‘‘Niels Bohr’s Words and the Atlantis of Kantianism, in J. Faye - H. J. Folse (Eds.), Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy. Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer Academic Publisher.

Darrigol, O. (2014) Physics and Necessity, New York: Oxford University Press.

Darrigol, O. (1997) “Classical Concepts in Bohr’s Atomic Theory (1913-1925), Physis, 3 545-567.

Darrigol, O. (1992), From c-numbers to q-numbers. The Classical Analogy in the History of Quantum Theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Einstein, A. (1916) “Strahlungs-Emission und -Absorption nach der Quantentheorie”, Deutsche Physikalische Gesellschaft, Verhandlungen, 1 pp. 318-323.

Einstein, A. (1906) “Zur Theorie der Lichterzeugung und Lichtabsorption “, Ann. d. Phys., 2 pp. 199-206.

Einstein, A. (1905) “Über einen die Erzeugung und Verwandlung des Lichtes betreffenden heuristischen Gesichtspunkt”, Ann. d. Phys. 1 pp. 132-14 received 18 March 1905. English transl. in H. A. Boorse and L. Motz (Ed.), The World of the Atom, Vol. 1. Oxford: Pergamon, 196 pp. 544-557.

Faye, J. (1991) Niels Bohr: his Heritage and Legacy. An Anti-Realistic Point of View of Quantum Mechanics. Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer.

Honner, J. (1987) The Description of Nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Heisenberg, W. (1925) “Über quantentheoretische Umdeutung kinematischer und mechanischer Beziehungen”, Z. Phys., 3 pp. 879-89 English translation in Van Der Waerden 196 pp. 261-276.

Kant, I. (1790) Critique of the Power of Judgment. P. Guyer and E. Mathews (transl.), P. Guyer (Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.

Kramers, H. A. (1923) The Atom and the Bohr Theory of its Structure. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.

MacKinnon, E. (2012) Interpreting Physics. Language and the Classical/Quantum Debate. Springer.

MacKinnon, E. (1982) Scientific Explanation and Atomic Physics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Murdoch, D. (1987) Niels Bohr’s Philosophy of Physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Planck, M. (1900) “Zur Theorie des Gesetzes der Energieverteilung im Normalspectrum”, Verh. d. D. Phys. Ges., pp. 237-24 presented 14 December 1900. English transl. ter Haar 1967 and Kangro 1972.

Pringe, H. (2009) “A Transcendental Account of Correspondence and Complementarity”, in M. Bitbol, P. Kerszberg, J. Petitot (Eds.), Constituting Objectivity. Transcendental Perspectives on Modern Physics. Springer.

Pringe, H. (2007) Critique of the Quantum Power of Judgment. Berlin: de Gruyter.

Rosenfeld, L. - Hoyer, U. (Eds.), Niels Bohr Collected Works, Vol. 2: Work on Atomic Physics, 1912-1917. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company, 1981.

Rosenfeld, L. - Rud Nielsen, J. (Eds.), Niels Bohr Collected Works, Vol. 3: The Correspondence Principle, 1918-1923. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company, 1976.

Rosenfeld, L. - Rud Nielsen, J. (Eds), Niels Bohr Collected Works, Vol. 1: Early Work, 1905-1911. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company, 1972.

Shimony, A. (1983). Reflections on the philosophy of Bohr, Heisenberg, and Schrödinger. In R. Cohen (Ed.), Physics, philosophy, and psychoanalysis: Essays in Honor of Adolf Grünbaum (pp. 209-221). Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.




How to Cite

Angeloni, R. (2017). A Kantian Interpretation of Niels Bohr’s Early Correspondence Principle: 1917-1924. Studia Philosophica Estonica, 10(1), 8–24. Retrieved from https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/spe/article/view/14481