Practical Realism: Against Standard Scientific Realism and Anti-Realism

  • Rein Vihalemm Department of Philosophy, University of Tartu
Keywords: practical realism, pragmatic realism, standard scientific realism, critical scientific realism, Kantianism, Marxism


In this paper, the elaboration of the concept of practical realist philosophy of science which began in the author's previous papers is continued. It is argued that practical realism is opposed to standard scientific realism, on the one hand, and antirealism, on the other. Standard scientific realism is challengeable due to its abstract character, as being isolated from practice. It is based on a metaphysical-ontological presupposition which raises the problem of the God's Eye point of view (as it was called by Hilary Putnam). Joseph Rouse's conception of science as practice, Sami Pihlström's pragmatic realism, and even Ilkka Niiniluoto's critical scientific realism are interpreted as practical realist conceptions. Pihlström suggests that the contemporary scientific realist should be prepared to accept the pragmatically naturalized Kantian transcendental perspective on realism. It is argued, however, that this realistically naturalized Kantianism can be nothing more than practical realism, as originated by Karl Marx.


Baird, D. (2004). Thing Knowledge: A Philosophy of Scientific Instruments, University of California Press, Berkeley.

Bensaude-Vincent, B. and Simon, J. (2008). Chemistry: The Impure Science, Imperial College Press, London.

Bird, A. (2000). Thomas Kuhn, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

Engels, F. (1886). Ludwig Feuerbach and the end of classical German philosophy. URL:

Giere, R. N. (1988). Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Hacking, I. (1988). The participant irrealist at large in the laboratory, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39: 177-294.

Hacking, I. (1999). The Social Construction of What?, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

Hoffmann, R. (2007). What might philosophy of science look like if chemists built it?, Synthese 155: 321-336.

Hook, S.(1976). From Hegel to Marx: Studies in the Intellectual Development of Karl Marx, 5th edn, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.

Kochan, J. (2011). Getting real with Rouse, Perspectives on Science 19:81-115.

Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts, Sage, London.

Marx, K. (1844). Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844. URL:

Marx, K. (1845). Theses on Feuerbach. URL:

Määttänen, P. (2003). Experimental practice and the problem of realism. Paper delivered at the 12th LMPS Congress, Oviedo.

Niiniluoto, I. (1999). Critical Scientific Realism, Oxford University Press, New York.

Pihlström, S. (2009). Pragmatist Metaphysics: An Essay on the Ethical Grounds of Ontology, Continuum International Publishing Grupp, London.

Pihlström, S. (2011). The problem of realism, from a pragmatist point of view: On the contextuality of scheme-(in)dependence in pragmatism, in R. Frega (ed.), Pragmatist Epistemologies, Lexington, Lanham, pp. 103-126.

Pihlström, S. (2012). Toward pragmatically naturalized transcendental philosophy of scientific inquiry and pragmatic scientific realism, Studia Philosophica Estonica 5.2: 79-94.

Rouse, J. (1987). Knowledge and Power: Toward a Political Philosophy of Science, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

Vihalemm, R. (2011a). Philosophy of chemistry against standard scientific realism and anti-realism. URL:

Vihalemm, R. (2011b). Towards a practical realist philosophy of science, Baltic Journal of European Studies 1: 46-60.

Vihalemm, R. (forthcoming a). What is a scientific concept: Some considerations concerning chemistry in practical realist philosophy of science, in J.-P. Llored(ed.), Philosophy of Chemistry: Practices, Methodologiesand Concepts, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Cambridge.

Vihalemm, R. (forthcoming b). Theoretical philosophy and philosophy of science in the Soviet times: Some remarks on the example of Estonia in 1960-199 Studia Philosophica Estonica 3.2.

Westphal, K. R. (2004). Kant’s Transcendental Proof of Realism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

How to Cite
Vihalemm, R. (2013). Practical Realism: Against Standard Scientific Realism and Anti-Realism. Studia Philosophica Estonica, 7-22.