Kognitiivsete ja käitumisökoloogiliste religiooniteaduste kujunemisest ning praegusest uurimisseisust
Kokkuvõte
Review of the Current State of Research in the Ecological and Cognitive Study of Religion
This article is concerned with presenting a thorough overview of the research in the ecological and cognitive sciences of religion. Several different theories and research programs are analysed, among them the standard model of the cognitive science of religion, the costly signalling theory and the newer biocultural perspective. The supernatural punishment theory and modes of religiosity theory are also briefly analysed. The aim of the brief overviews is to assess the current state of research in the evolutionary approaches towards religiosity overall and see how they have tried to answer questions about religiosity as such. Special attention is given to the demonstration how these new approaches relate to the historical and more general discussions and questions of the study of religion. Overall it has been concluded that although a great amount of interesting research has been carried out and various different theoretical explanations of religion have been put forward, there remains still a lot of work to be done as none of the currently existing theories can be considered conclusively proven through empirical research or without theoretical or/and methodological problems.
Allalaadimised
Viited
Andersen, M., U. Schjoedt, K. L. Nielbo, and J. Sorensen. 2014. ‘Mystical Experience in the Lab’. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 26 (3): 217–45.
Barrett, J. L. 1998. ‘Cognitive Constraints on Hindu Concepts of the Divine’. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 37 (4): 608–19.
Barrett, J. L. 1999. ‘Theological Correctness: Cognitive Constraint and the Study of Religion’. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 11: 325–39.
Barrett, J. L. 2000. ‘Exploring the Natural Foundations of Religion’. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (1): 29–34.
Barrett, J. L. 2002. ‘Dumb Gods, Petitionary Prayer and the Cognitive Science of Religion’. In Current Approaches in the Cognitive Science of Religion, 95–96. London; New York: Continuum.
Barrett, J. L., and J. A. Lanman. 2008. ‘The Science of Religious Beliefs’. Religion 38 (2): 109–24.
Barrett, Justin L. 2007. ‘Cognitive Science of Religion: What Is It and Why Is It?’ Religion Compass 1 (6): 768–86.
Barrett, Justin L. 2011. ‘Cognitive Science of Religion: Looking Back, Looking Forward’. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 50 (2): 229–39.
Barrett, Justin, and Melanie Nyhof. 2001. ‘Spreading Non-Natural Concepts: The Role of Intuitive Conceptual Structures in Memory and Transmission of Cultural Materials’. Journal of Cognition and Culture 1 (1): 69–100.
Bateson, M., D. Nettle, and G. Roberts. 2006. ‘Cues of Being Watched Enhance Cooperation in a Real-World Setting’. Biology Letters 2 (3): 412–14.
Bering, Jesse, and Dominic Johnson. 2005. ‘“O Lord… You Perceive My Thoughts from Afar”: Recursiveness and the Evolution of Supernatural Agency’. Journal of Cognition and Culture 5 (1–2): 118–42.
Bering, Jesse M. 2002. ‘The Existential Theory of Mind’. Review of General Psychology 6 (1): 3–24.
Bliege Bird, Rebecca L., and Eric Alden Smith. 2005. ‘Signaling Theory, Strategic Interaction, and Symbolic Capital’. Current Anthropology 46 (2): 221–48.
Bloch, Maurice. 2004. ‘Are Religious Beliefs Counter-Intuitive?’ In Radical Interpretation in Religion, 129–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://www.myilibrary.com?id=4199.
Boyd, Robert, and Peter J. Richerson. 1995. ‘Why Does Culture Increase Human Adaptability?’ Ethology and Sociobiology 16 (2): 125–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(94)00073-G.
Boyer, Pascal. 1992. ‘Explaining Religious Ideas: Elements of a Cognitive Approach’. Numen 39 (1): 27–57. https://doi.org/10.2307/3270074.
Boyer, Pascal. 2001. Religion Explained: The Human Instincts That Fashion Gods, Spirits and Ancestors. London: Vintage.
Boyer, Pascal. 2002. ‘Why Do Gods and Spirits Matter at All?’ In Current Approaches in the Cognitive Science of Religion, 68–92. London; New York: Continuum.
Boyer, Pascal, and Charles Ramble. 2001. ‘Cognitive Templates for Religious Concepts: Cross-Cultural Evidence for Recall of Counter-Intuitive Representations’. Cognitive Science 25 (4): 535–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(01)00045-3.
Bulbulia, J. A., D. Xygalatas, U. Schjoedt, S. Fondevila, C. G. Sibley, and I. Konvalinka. 2013. ‘Images from a Jointly-Arousing Collective Ritual Reveal Affective Polarization’. Frontiers in Psychology 4: 1–11.
Bulbulia, Joseph. 2004. ‘Religious Costs as Adaptations That Signal Altruistic Intention’. Evolution and Cognition 10 (1): 19–20.
Bulbulia, Joseph, and Edward Slingerland. 2012. ‘Religious Studies as a Life Science’. Numen 59 (5/6): 564–613.
Cosmides, Leda, and John Tooby. 1992. ‘The Psychological Foundations of Culture’. In The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, 19–136. New York: Oxford University Press.
Donald, Merlin. 2000. ‘The Central Role of Culture in Cognitive Evolution – a Reflection on the Myth of the “Isolated Mind”’. In Culture, Thought, and Development, 19–38. Mahwah (N.J.): L. Erlbaum Associates.
Donald, Merlin. 2011. ‘The First Hybrid Minds on Earth’. In Religious Narrative, Cognition and Culture: Image and Word in the Mind of Narrative, 67–96. Sheffield: Equinox.
Engler, Steven. 2004. ‘Constructionism versus What?’ Religion 34 (4): 291–313.
Geertz, A. W. 2010. ‘Brain, Body and Culture: A Biocultural Theory of Religion’. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 22 (4): 304–21.
Geertz, Armin W., ed. 2010. ‘Too Much Mind and Not Enough Brain, Body and Culture. On What Needs to Be Done in the Cognitive Science of Religion’. Historia Religionum. An International Journal 2: 21–37.
Geertz, Armin W. 2011. ‘Religious Narrative, Cognition and Culture: Approaches and Definitions’. In Religious Narrative, Cognition and Culture: Image and Word in the Mind of Narrative, 9–29. Sheffield: Equinox.
Geertz, Armin W. 2013. ‘The Meaningful Brain: Clifford Geertz and the Cognitive Science of Culture’. In Mental Culture: Classical Social Theory and the Cognitive Science of Religion, 176–96. Durham: Acumen.
Geertz, Armin W. 2014. ‘Whence Religion? How the Brain Constructs the World and What This Might Tell Us about the Origins of Religion, Cognition and Culture’. In Origins of Religion, Cognition and Culture, 17–70. London, New York: Routledge.
Geertz, Clifford. 1990. ‘Religioon Kui Kultuurisüsteem’. Translated by Triinu Pakk. Akadeemia, no. 11: 2301–29.
Geertz, Clifford. 2007. ‘Tihe Kirjeldus: Tõlgendava Kultuuriteooria Poole’. Vikerkaar 22 (4–5): 78–110.
Gervais, W. M., and J. Henrich. 2010. ‘The Zeus Problem: Why Representational Content Biases Cannot Explain Faith in Gods’. Journal of Cognition and Culture 10 (3–4): 383–89.
Guthrie, Stewart. 1980. ‘A Cognitive Theory of Religion’. Current Anthropology 21 (2): 181–203.
Hawkes, Kristen, and Rebecca Bliege Bird. 2002. ‘Showing off, Handicap Signaling, and the Evolution of Men’s Work’. Evolutionary Anthropology 58: 58–67.
Henrich, J., S. J. Heine, and Ara Norenzayan. 2010. ‘The Weirdest People in the World?’ Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (2/3): 61–135.
Jensen, Jeppe Sinding. 2010a. ‘Doing It the Other Way Round: Religion as a Basic Case of “Normative Cognition”’. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 22 (4): 322–29.
Jensen, Jeppe Sinding. 2010b. ‘Religion as the Unintended Byproduct of Brain Functions in the ‘standard Cognitive Science of Religion Model‘’. In Contemporary Theories of Religion: A Critical Companion, 129–55. London: Routledge.
Jensen, Jeppe Sinding. 2011. ‘Framing Religious Narrative, Cognition and Culture Theoretically’. In Religious Narrative, Cognition, and Culture: Image and Word in the Mind of Narrative, 31–50. Sheffield, Oakville: Equinox.
Jensen, Jeppe Sinding. 2013. ‘Normative Cognition in Culture and Religion’. Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion 1 (1): 47–70.
Jensen, Jeppe Sinding. 2014. ‘Cognition and Culture’. In Origins of Religion, Cognition and Culture, 241–51. New York: Routledge.
Johnson, Dominic D. P., and Jesse M. Bering. 2009. ‘Hand of God, Mind of Man: Punishment and Cognition in the Evolution of Cooperation’. In The Believing Primate: Scientific, Philosophical, and Theological Reflections on the Origin of Religion, 26–43. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kelemen, Deborah. 1999. ‘The Scope of Teleological Thinking in Preschool Children’. Cognition 70 (3): 241–72.
Kelemen, Deborah. 2004. ‘Are Children “Intuitive Theists”? Reasoning about Purpose and Design in Nature.’ Psychological Science 15 (5): 295–301.
King, Richard. 2013. ‘The Copernican Turn in the Study of Religion’. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 25 (2): 137–59.
Konvalinka, Ivana, Dimitris Xygalatas, Joseph Bulbulia, Uffe Schjødt, Else-Marie Jegindø, Sebastian Wallot, Guy Van Orden, and Andreas Roepstorff. 2011. ‘Synchronized Arousal between Performers and Related Spectators in a Fire-Walking Ritual’. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108 (20): 8514–19.
Kundt, Radek. 2007. ‘Can Cognitive Science of Religion Help Us to Better Understand the Reasons for Nestorius’ Downfall?’ Sacra Aneb Rukovet Religionisty 1 (5): 56–64.
Lawson, E. Thomas, and Robert N McCauley. 1999. Rethinking Religion: Connecting Cognition and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lawson, E. Thomas, and Robert N. McCauley. 2002. ‘The Cognitive Representation of Religious Ritual Form’. In Current Approaches in the Cognitive Science of Religion, 153–76. London; New York: Continuum.
Lehtsaar, Tõnu. 2013. Sissejuhatus Religioonipsühholoogiasse. Tallinn: Eesti Keele Sihtasutus.
Levy, Gabriel. 2013. ‘The Prospects and Pitfalls of “Just-So” Storytelling in Evolutionary Accounts of Religion’. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 25 (4–5): 451–59.
Martin L. H. 2013. ‘The Ecology of Threat Detection and Precautionary Response from the Perspectives of Evolutionary Psychology, Cognitive Science and Historiography: The Case of the Roman Cults of Mithras’. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 25 (4–5): 431–50.
Martin, Luther H. 2006. ‘The Roman Cult of Mithras: A Cognitive Perspective’. Religio 14 (2): 131–46.
Nettle, D., M. A. Gibson, D. W. Lawson, and R. Sear. 2013. ‘Human Behavioral Ecology: Current Research and Future Prospects’. Behavioral Ecology 24 (5): 1031–40.
Nettle, Daniel. 2009. ‘Beyond Nature versus Culture: Cultural Variation as an Evolved Characteristic’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 15 (2): 223–40.
Norenzayan, Ara. 2013. Big Gods: How Religion Transformed Cooperation and Conflict. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Norenzayan, Ara, and Azim F. Shariff. 2008. ‘The Origin and Evolution of Religious Prosociality’. Science 322: 58–62.
Peedu, Indrek. 2012. ‘Kuluka Signaliseerimise Religiooniteooriast’. Akadeemia, no. 3: 492–507.
Peedu, Indrek. 2016. ‘The Trouble with Words – Concepts of Religion in the Cognitive Science of Religion and the Role of Emotions’. In Issues in Science and Theology: Do Emotions Shape the World? Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26769-2.
Penner, Hans H., and Edward A. Yonan. 1972. ‘Is a Science of Religion Possible?’ The Journal of Religion 52 (2): 107–33.
Powell, R., and S. Clarke. 2012. ‘Religion as an Evolutionary Byproduct: A Critique of the Standard Model’. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63 (3): 457–86.
Purzycki, Benjamin G., and Richard Sosis. 2010. ‘Religious Concepts as Necessary Components of the Adaptive Religious System’. In The Nature of God - Evolution and Religion, 37–59. Marburg: Tectum Verlag.
Purzycki, Benjamin G. 2013. ‘The Extended Religious Phenotype and the Adaptive Coupling of Ritual and Belief’. Israel Journal of Ecology & Evolution 59 (2): 99–108.
Purzycki, Benjamin Grant, and Tayana Arakchaa. 2013. ‘Ritual Behavior and Trust in the Tyva Republic’. Current Anthropology 54 (3): 381–88.
Pyysiäinen, Ilkka. 2002. ‘Religion and the Counter-Intuitive’. In Current Approaches in the Cognitive Science of Religion, 110–32. London; New York: Continuum.
Pyysiäinen, Ilkka, and Marc Hauser. 2010. ‘The Origins of Religion: Evolved Adaptation or by-Product?’ Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14 (3): 104–9.
Pyysiäinen, Ilkka, Marjaana Lindeman, and Timo Honkela. 2003. ‘Counterintuitiveness as the Hallmark of Religiosity’. Religion 33 (4): 341–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.religion.2003.09.001.
Rappaport, Roy A. 1979. Ecology, Meaning, and Religion. Rich: North Atlantic Books.
Realo, Anu, and Jüri Allik. 2013. ‘Kultuur Ja Isiksus’. Tuna, no. 4: 2–25.
Richerson, Peter J., and Robert Boyd. 2005. Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press.
Ronald Fischer, Dimitris Xygalatas, Panagiotis Mitkidis, Paul Reddish, Penny Tok, Ivana Konvalinka, and Joseph Bulbulia. 2014. ‘The Fire-Walker’s High: Affect and Physiological Responses in an Extreme Collective Ritual’. PLoS ONE 9 (2): 1–6.
Ruffle, Bradley J., and Richard Sosis. 1-35. ‘Does It Pay To Pray? Costly Ritual and Cooperation’. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy 7 (1). https://doi.org/10.2202/1935-1682.1629.
Russell, Y. I., and F. Gobet. 2013. ‘What Is Counterintuitive? Religious Cognition and Natural Expectation’. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 4 (4): 715–49.
Sanderson, S. K. 2008. ‘Adaptation, Evolution, and Religion’. Religion 38 (2): 141–56.
Schjødt, Uffe. 2009. ‘The Religious Brain: A General Introduction to the Experimental Neuroscience of Religion’. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 21 (3): 310–39.
Schloss, Jeffrey P., and Michael J. Murray. 2011. ‘Evolutionary Accounts of Belief in Supernatural Punishment: A Critical Review’. Religion, Brain & Behavior 1 (1): 46–99.
Segal, Robert A. 1983. ‘In Defense of Reductionism’. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 51 (1): 97–124.
Shanahan, Timothy. 2004. The Evolution of Darwinism. Selection, Adaptation, and Progress in Evolutionary Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shariff, Azim F., and Ara Norenzayan. 2007. ‘God Is Watching You: Priming God Concepts Increases Prosocial Behavior in an Anonymous Economic Game’. Psychological Science 18 (9): 803–9.
Sharpe, Eric J. 1986. Comparative Religion: A History. London: Duckworth.
Slingerland, Edward G. 2008. What Science Offers the Humanities: Integrating Body and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=335043.
Slingerland, Edward, and Peter J. Richerson. 2014. ‘Toward a Second Wave of Consilience in the Cognitive Scientific Study of Religion’. Journal of Cognitive Historiography 1 (1): 121–30.
Smith, E. A., R. B. Bird, and D. W. Bird. 2003. ‘The Benefits of Costly Signaling: Meriam Turtle Hunters’. Behavioral Ecology 14: 116–26.
Sober, Elliott. 1993. Philosophy of Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Soler, Montserrat. 2012. ‘Costly Signaling, Ritual and Cooperation: Evidence from Candomblé, an Afro-Brazilian Religion’. Evolution and Human Behavior 33 (4): 346–56.
Sørensen, Jesper. 2005. ‘Religion in Mind: A Review Article of the Cognitive Science of Religion’. Numen 52 (4): 465–94.
Sosis, Richard. 2003. ‘Why Aren’t We All Hutterites?: Costly Signaling Theory and Religious Behavior’. Human Nature 14 (2): 91–127.
Sosis, Richard. 2004. ‘The Adaptive Value of Religious Ritual’. American Scientist 92 (2).
Sosis, Richard. 2005. ‘Does Religion Promote Trust?: The Role of Signaling, Reputation, and Punishment’. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion 1: 1–30.
Sosis, Richard. 2009. ‘The Adaptationist-Byproduct Debate on the Evolution of Religion: Five Misunderstandings of the Adaptationist Program’. Journal of Cognition and Culture 9 (3): 315–32.
Sosis, Richard. 2012. ‘Religioossed Käitumisviisid, Märgid Ja Signaalid: Signaliseerimisteooria Ja Religiooni Evolutsioon’. Translated by Indrek Peedu. Akadeemia, no. 2: 283–318.
Sosis, Richard, and Joseph Bulbulia. 2011. ‘The Behavioral Ecology of Religion: The Benefits and Costs of One Evolutionary Approach’. Religion 41 (3): 341–62.
Sosis, Richard, and Jordan Kiper. 2014. ‘Religion Is More Than Belief: What Evolutionary Theories of Religion Tell Us About Religious Commitment’. In Challenges to Religion and Morality: Disagreements and Evolution, 256–76. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sosis, Richard, Howard C. Kress, and James S. Boster. 2007. ‘Scars for War: Evaluating Alternative Signaling Explanations for Cross-Cultural Variance in Ritual Costs’. Evolution and Human Behavior 28 (4): 234–47.
Tomasello, Michael. 1999a. The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Tomasello, Michael. 1999b. ‘The Human Adaptation for Culture’. Annual Review of Anthropology 28: 509–29.
Tremlin, Todd. 2006. Minds and Gods: The Cognitive Foundations of Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Whitehouse, Harvey. 2002. ‘Modes of Religiosity: Towards a Cognitive Explanation of the Sociopolitical Dynamics of Religion’. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 14 (3/4): 293–315.
Whitehouse, Harvey. 2004. Modes of Religiosity: A Cognitive Theory of Religious Transmission. Walnut Creek, Calif.: AltaMira Press.
Wiebe, D. 2012. ‘It’s Never Been Better: Comments on the Current State of the Science of Religion’. Religio 20 (2): 173–92.
Wiebe, Donald. 1981. Religion and Truth: Towards an Alternative Paradigm for the Study of Religion. The Hague; Paris; New York: Mouton.
Wiebe, Donald. 2014. ‘The Significance of the Natural Experience of a „non-Natural“ World to the Question of the Origins of Religion’. In Origins of Religion, Cognition and Culture. London, New York: Routledge.
Wilson, David Sloan. 2002. Darwin’s Cathedral: Evolution, Religion, and the Nature of Society. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press. http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=1249433.
Wilson, David Sloan. 2005. ‘Testing Major Evolutionary Hypotheses about Religion with a Random Sample’. Human Nature 16 (4): 382–409.
Wilson, David Sloan. 2006. ‘Human Groups as Adaptive Units: Toward a Permanent Consensus’. In The Innate Mind. Culture and Cognition, 2:78–90. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wilson, M. 2010. ‘The Re-Tooled Mind: How Culture Re-Engineers Cognition’. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 5: 180–87.
Winterhalder, Bruce, and Eric Alden Smith. 2000. ‘Analyzing Adaptive Strategies: Human Behavioral Ecology at Twenty-Five’. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews 9 (2): 51–72.
Xygalatas, Dimitris. 2014. The Burning Saints: Cognition and Culture in the Fire-Walking Rituals of the Anastenaria. London; New York: Routledge. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=869686.
Xygalatas, Dimitris, Uffe Schjødt, Joseph Bulbulia, Andreas Roepstroff, Ivana Konvalinka, Else-Marie Jegindø, Paul Reddish, and Armin W. Geertz. 2013. ‘Autobiographical Memory in Fire-Walking Ritual’. Journal of Cognition and Culture 13: 1–16.
Zahavi, Amotz. 1975. ‘Mate Selection – a Selection for a Handicap’. Journal of Theoretical Biology 53 (1): 205–14.
Zahavi, Amotz, and Avishag Zahavi. 1997. The Handicap Principle: A Missing Piece of Darwin’s Puzzle. New York: Oxford University Press.
