Filosoofia ajaloo uurimisest angloameerika traditsioonis G. Berkeley vaadete käsitlemise näitel
Keywords:
Berkeley, analüütiline filosoofia, ratsionaalne rekonstruktsioon, ajalooline rekonstruktsioonAbstract
Artikli eesmärgiks on kirjeldada, kuidas toimub filosoofia ajaloo uurimine angloameerika traditsioonis. Keskendun George Berkeley vaadete käsitlemisele, mis oli mu uurimistöö põhisuunaks ligikaudu aastatel 1995–2007. Isikliku kogemuse najal selgitan, millised tavad valitsevad professionaalses filosoofia ajaloo uurijate kogukonnas. Tutvustan erinevaid lähenemisviise ja tõekspidamisi, millest selle valdkonna asjatundjad nimetatud traditsioonis lähtuvad, ja selgitan ka enda positsiooni selles raamistuses. Leian, et filosoofia ajalugu tasub uurida sügavuti, kuid ei mõista hukka ka pealiskaudsemaid lähenemisi. Tutvustan tüüpilisi probleeme, lahendusi ja võtteid, millega filosoofia-ajaloolane tekstide tõlgendamisel kokku puutub. Artikli viimastes osades kirjeldan lähemalt oma kogemust Berkeley keelekäsituse detailsel uurimisel. Ühe konkreetse debati näitel selgitan, mille üle ja kuidas filosoofia-ajaloolased väitlevad.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Ayer, A. J. (1990) (1. tr 1936). Language, Truth and Logic, Penguin.
Ayers, M. (1970). Substance, Reality, and the Great, Dead Philosophers, American Philosophical Quarterly 7 (1): 38–49.
Ayers, M. (1978). Analytical Philosophy and the History of Philosophy, J. Reé, M. Ayers ja A. Westoby (toim), Philosophy and its Past, Harvester Press, Sussex, lk 41–66.
Ayers, M. (1991). Locke: Epistemology and Ontology, 2 vols, Routledge, London.
Ayers, M. (2019). Knowing and Seeing: Groundwork for a new empiricism, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Belfrage, B. (1985). The Clash on Semantics in Berkeley’s Notebook A, Hermathena 139: 117–126.
Belfrage, B. (1986a). Development of Berkeley’s Early Theory of Meaning, Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Étranger 3: 319–330.
Belfrage, B. (1986b). Berkeley’s Theory of Emotive Meaning (1708), History of European Ideas, 7 (6): 643–649.
Belfrage, B. (2007). The Theological Positivism of George Berkeley (1707-1708), J. Lemetti ja E. Piirimäe (toim), Acta Philosophica Fennica 83, Helsinki University Press, Helsinki, lk 37–52.
Bennett, J. F. (1971). Locke, Berkeley, Hume: Central Themes, Clarendon, Oxford.
Berkeley, G. (1948–57). The Works of George Berkeley Bishop of Cloyne, 9 vols, A. A. Luce ja Т. E. Jessop (toim), Thomas Nelson, London.
Berkeley, G. (1987). George Berkeley’s Manuscript Introduction, B. Belfrage (toim), Doxa, Oxford.
Berman, D. (1981). Cognitive Theology and Emotive Mysteries in Berkeley’s Alciphron, Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy 81c: 219–229.
Berman, D. (1986). Berkeley’s semantic revolution: 19 November 1707–11 January 1708, History of European Ideas 7 (6): 603–607.
Berman, D. (1994). George Berkeley: Idealism and the Man, Clarendon, Oxford.
Bettcher, T. M. (2007). Berkeley's Philosophy of Spirit: Consciousness, Ontology and the Elusive Subject (Continuum Studies in British Philosophy), Continuum, London.
Breidert, W. (1987). On the Early Reception of Berkeley in Germany, E. Sosa, (toim), Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley, Springer, Dordrecht, lk 231–241.
Breidert, W. (1989). George Berkeley 1685–1753. Vita Mathematica, Bd. 4, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, Boston, Berlin.
Downing, L. (2005). Berkeley’s natural philosophy and philosophy of science, K. Winkler (toim), The Cambridge Companion to Berkeley, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, lk 230–265.
Hatfield, G. (2005). The History of Philosophy as Philosophy, T. Sorell ja G. A. J. Rogers (toim), Analytic Philosophy and History of Philosophy, Clarendon Press, Oxford, lk 83–128.
Humphreys, J. (2020). What to do about George Berkeley, Trinity figurehead and slave owner?, The Irish Times, 18. juuni.
URL: https://www.irishtimes.com/culture/what-to-do-about-george-berkeley-trinity-figurehead-and-slave-owner-1.4277555
Jakapi, R. (1998). Esse est percipi, Studia Philosophica 3 (39): 7–13.
Jakapi, R. (2002a). Emotive Meaning and Christian Mysteries in Berkeley’s Alciphron, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 10 (3): 401–411.
Jakapi, R. (2002b). Ayer, Berman, Berkeley ja emotiivne tähendus, Akadeemia 11: 2365–2386.
Jakapi, R. (2002c). Berkeley, Mysteries, and Meaning: A Critique of the Non-Cognitivist Interpretation, Dissertationes philosophicae Universitatis Tartuensis 2, Tartu University Press, Tartu.
Jakapi, R. (2002d). Faith, Truth, Revelation and Meaning in Berkeley’s Defense of the Christian Religion (in Alciphron), The Modern Schoolman 80 (1): 23–34.
Jakapi, R. (2003). Entry 720 of Berkeley’s Philosophical Commentaries and ‘non-cognitive’ propositions in Scripture, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 85 (1): 86–90.
Jakapi, R. (2007a). Berkeley and the Separate State of the Soul: A Note, Berkeley Studies 18: 24–28.
Jakapi, R. (2007b). Was Berkeley a Utilitarian? J. Lemetti ja E. Piirimäe (toim), Acta Philosophica Fennica 83, Helsinki University Press, Helsinki, lk 53–68.
Jakapi, R. (2007c). Christian Mysteries and Berkeley’s Alleged Non-Cognitivism, S. H. Daniel (toim), Reexamining Berkeley’s Philosophy, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, lk 188–198.
Jakapi, R. (2014). Samuel Colliber on the Soul and Immortality, Studia z Historii Filozofii 4 (5): 127–147.
Jakapi, R. (2020). Early Modern Natural Philosophy Allied with Revealed Religion: Boyle and Whiston, M. Fuller, D. Evers, A. Runehov, K-W. Sæther ja B. Michollet (toim), Issues in Science and Theology: Nature – And Beyond. Transcendence and Immanence in Science and Religion, Springer, Cham, lk 233–243.
Laerke, M., Smith, J. E. H. ja Schliesser, E. (toim) (2013). Philosophy and Its History: Aims and Methods in the Study of Early Modern Philosophy, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Moore, G. E (1903). The Refutation of Idealism, Mind 12 (48): 433–453.
Muehlmann, R. (1995). The Substance of Berkeley's Philosophy, R. G. Muehlmann (toim), Berkeley’s Metaphysics: Structural, Interpretive, and Critical Essays, The Pennsylvania State University Press, lk 89–105.
Newton, I. (1841). Historical Account Of Two Notable Corruptions Of Scripture: In A Letter To A Friend, Watchmaker Publishing.
Newton-Smith, W. H. (1985). Berkeley’s philosophy of science, J. Foster ja H. Robinson (toim), Essays on Berkeley: A Tercentennial Celebration, Clarendon Press, Oxford, lk 151–161.
Pearce, K. L. (2017). Language and the Structure of Berkeley’s World, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Pete, K. (2021). Ayer and Berkeley on the Meaning of Ethical and Religious Language, A. T. Tuboly (toim), The Historical and Philosophical Significance of Ayer’s Language, Truth and Logic (History of Analytic Philosophy), Palgrave Macmillan, lk 307–331.
Peterschmitt, L. (2008). Can Berkeley Be an Instrumentalist? Towards a Reappraisal of Berkeley’s Philosophy of Science, Berkeley Studies 19: 19–31.
Reé, J., Ayers, M. ja Westoby, A. (toim) (1978). Philosophy and its Past, Harvester Press, Sussex.
Rorty, R. (1984). The Historiography of Philosophy: Four Genres, R. Rorty, J. B. Schneewind ja Q. Skinner (toim), Philosophy in History: Essays in the Historiography of Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, lk 49–75.
Rorty, R., Schneewind J. B. ja Skinner Q. (toim) (1984). Philosophy in History: Essays in the Historiography of Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Scott, M. (2013). Religious Language, Palgrave Macmillan.
Skinner, Q. (1969). Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas, History and Theory 8: 3–53.
Skinner, Q. (2002). Visions of Politics. Volume 1: Regarding Method, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Sorell, T. ja Rogers, G. A. J. (toim) (2005). Analytic Philosophy and History of Philosophy, Clarendon, Oxford.
Strawson, P. F. (1966). Bounds of Sense: An Essay on Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, Methuen, London.
The Bible: Authorized King James Version (1998). R. Carroll ja S. Prickett (toim), Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Thiel, U. (2011). The Early Modern Subject: Self-Consciousness and Personal Identity from Descartes to Hume, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
West, P. (2018). Berkeley on the Relation Between Abstract Ideas and Language in Alciphron VII, Ruch Filozoficzny 74 (4): 51–70.
Williford, K. (2003). Berkeley’s Theory of Operative Language in the Manuscript Introduction, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 11 (2): 271–301.
Williford, K. ja Jakapi, R. (2009). Berkeley’s Theory of Meaning in Alciphron VII, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (1): 99–118.
Ayers, M. (1970). Substance, Reality, and the Great, Dead Philosophers, American Philosophical Quarterly 7 (1): 38–49.
Ayers, M. (1978). Analytical Philosophy and the History of Philosophy, J. Reé, M. Ayers ja A. Westoby (toim), Philosophy and its Past, Harvester Press, Sussex, lk 41–66.
Ayers, M. (1991). Locke: Epistemology and Ontology, 2 vols, Routledge, London.
Ayers, M. (2019). Knowing and Seeing: Groundwork for a new empiricism, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Belfrage, B. (1985). The Clash on Semantics in Berkeley’s Notebook A, Hermathena 139: 117–126.
Belfrage, B. (1986a). Development of Berkeley’s Early Theory of Meaning, Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Étranger 3: 319–330.
Belfrage, B. (1986b). Berkeley’s Theory of Emotive Meaning (1708), History of European Ideas, 7 (6): 643–649.
Belfrage, B. (2007). The Theological Positivism of George Berkeley (1707-1708), J. Lemetti ja E. Piirimäe (toim), Acta Philosophica Fennica 83, Helsinki University Press, Helsinki, lk 37–52.
Bennett, J. F. (1971). Locke, Berkeley, Hume: Central Themes, Clarendon, Oxford.
Berkeley, G. (1948–57). The Works of George Berkeley Bishop of Cloyne, 9 vols, A. A. Luce ja Т. E. Jessop (toim), Thomas Nelson, London.
Berkeley, G. (1987). George Berkeley’s Manuscript Introduction, B. Belfrage (toim), Doxa, Oxford.
Berman, D. (1981). Cognitive Theology and Emotive Mysteries in Berkeley’s Alciphron, Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy 81c: 219–229.
Berman, D. (1986). Berkeley’s semantic revolution: 19 November 1707–11 January 1708, History of European Ideas 7 (6): 603–607.
Berman, D. (1994). George Berkeley: Idealism and the Man, Clarendon, Oxford.
Bettcher, T. M. (2007). Berkeley's Philosophy of Spirit: Consciousness, Ontology and the Elusive Subject (Continuum Studies in British Philosophy), Continuum, London.
Breidert, W. (1987). On the Early Reception of Berkeley in Germany, E. Sosa, (toim), Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley, Springer, Dordrecht, lk 231–241.
Breidert, W. (1989). George Berkeley 1685–1753. Vita Mathematica, Bd. 4, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, Boston, Berlin.
Downing, L. (2005). Berkeley’s natural philosophy and philosophy of science, K. Winkler (toim), The Cambridge Companion to Berkeley, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, lk 230–265.
Hatfield, G. (2005). The History of Philosophy as Philosophy, T. Sorell ja G. A. J. Rogers (toim), Analytic Philosophy and History of Philosophy, Clarendon Press, Oxford, lk 83–128.
Humphreys, J. (2020). What to do about George Berkeley, Trinity figurehead and slave owner?, The Irish Times, 18. juuni.
URL: https://www.irishtimes.com/culture/what-to-do-about-george-berkeley-trinity-figurehead-and-slave-owner-1.4277555
Jakapi, R. (1998). Esse est percipi, Studia Philosophica 3 (39): 7–13.
Jakapi, R. (2002a). Emotive Meaning and Christian Mysteries in Berkeley’s Alciphron, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 10 (3): 401–411.
Jakapi, R. (2002b). Ayer, Berman, Berkeley ja emotiivne tähendus, Akadeemia 11: 2365–2386.
Jakapi, R. (2002c). Berkeley, Mysteries, and Meaning: A Critique of the Non-Cognitivist Interpretation, Dissertationes philosophicae Universitatis Tartuensis 2, Tartu University Press, Tartu.
Jakapi, R. (2002d). Faith, Truth, Revelation and Meaning in Berkeley’s Defense of the Christian Religion (in Alciphron), The Modern Schoolman 80 (1): 23–34.
Jakapi, R. (2003). Entry 720 of Berkeley’s Philosophical Commentaries and ‘non-cognitive’ propositions in Scripture, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 85 (1): 86–90.
Jakapi, R. (2007a). Berkeley and the Separate State of the Soul: A Note, Berkeley Studies 18: 24–28.
Jakapi, R. (2007b). Was Berkeley a Utilitarian? J. Lemetti ja E. Piirimäe (toim), Acta Philosophica Fennica 83, Helsinki University Press, Helsinki, lk 53–68.
Jakapi, R. (2007c). Christian Mysteries and Berkeley’s Alleged Non-Cognitivism, S. H. Daniel (toim), Reexamining Berkeley’s Philosophy, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, lk 188–198.
Jakapi, R. (2014). Samuel Colliber on the Soul and Immortality, Studia z Historii Filozofii 4 (5): 127–147.
Jakapi, R. (2020). Early Modern Natural Philosophy Allied with Revealed Religion: Boyle and Whiston, M. Fuller, D. Evers, A. Runehov, K-W. Sæther ja B. Michollet (toim), Issues in Science and Theology: Nature – And Beyond. Transcendence and Immanence in Science and Religion, Springer, Cham, lk 233–243.
Laerke, M., Smith, J. E. H. ja Schliesser, E. (toim) (2013). Philosophy and Its History: Aims and Methods in the Study of Early Modern Philosophy, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Moore, G. E (1903). The Refutation of Idealism, Mind 12 (48): 433–453.
Muehlmann, R. (1995). The Substance of Berkeley's Philosophy, R. G. Muehlmann (toim), Berkeley’s Metaphysics: Structural, Interpretive, and Critical Essays, The Pennsylvania State University Press, lk 89–105.
Newton, I. (1841). Historical Account Of Two Notable Corruptions Of Scripture: In A Letter To A Friend, Watchmaker Publishing.
Newton-Smith, W. H. (1985). Berkeley’s philosophy of science, J. Foster ja H. Robinson (toim), Essays on Berkeley: A Tercentennial Celebration, Clarendon Press, Oxford, lk 151–161.
Pearce, K. L. (2017). Language and the Structure of Berkeley’s World, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Pete, K. (2021). Ayer and Berkeley on the Meaning of Ethical and Religious Language, A. T. Tuboly (toim), The Historical and Philosophical Significance of Ayer’s Language, Truth and Logic (History of Analytic Philosophy), Palgrave Macmillan, lk 307–331.
Peterschmitt, L. (2008). Can Berkeley Be an Instrumentalist? Towards a Reappraisal of Berkeley’s Philosophy of Science, Berkeley Studies 19: 19–31.
Reé, J., Ayers, M. ja Westoby, A. (toim) (1978). Philosophy and its Past, Harvester Press, Sussex.
Rorty, R. (1984). The Historiography of Philosophy: Four Genres, R. Rorty, J. B. Schneewind ja Q. Skinner (toim), Philosophy in History: Essays in the Historiography of Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, lk 49–75.
Rorty, R., Schneewind J. B. ja Skinner Q. (toim) (1984). Philosophy in History: Essays in the Historiography of Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Scott, M. (2013). Religious Language, Palgrave Macmillan.
Skinner, Q. (1969). Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas, History and Theory 8: 3–53.
Skinner, Q. (2002). Visions of Politics. Volume 1: Regarding Method, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Sorell, T. ja Rogers, G. A. J. (toim) (2005). Analytic Philosophy and History of Philosophy, Clarendon, Oxford.
Strawson, P. F. (1966). Bounds of Sense: An Essay on Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, Methuen, London.
The Bible: Authorized King James Version (1998). R. Carroll ja S. Prickett (toim), Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Thiel, U. (2011). The Early Modern Subject: Self-Consciousness and Personal Identity from Descartes to Hume, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
West, P. (2018). Berkeley on the Relation Between Abstract Ideas and Language in Alciphron VII, Ruch Filozoficzny 74 (4): 51–70.
Williford, K. (2003). Berkeley’s Theory of Operative Language in the Manuscript Introduction, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 11 (2): 271–301.
Williford, K. ja Jakapi, R. (2009). Berkeley’s Theory of Meaning in Alciphron VII, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (1): 99–118.
Downloads
Published
2020-02-07
How to Cite
Jakapi, R. (2020). Filosoofia ajaloo uurimisest angloameerika traditsioonis G. Berkeley vaadete käsitlemise näitel. Studia Philosophica Estonica, 13, 9–26. Retrieved from https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/spe/article/view/17080
