Mille ajalugu on religiooniuuringute ajalugu? – Metodoloogilisi täheldusi
Kokkuvõte
What is the History of Religious Studies the History of? -Methodological Reflections
The goal of this article is to analyse the ways how scholars of religions have understood and depicted the history of the discipline itself. Specifically, the article concentrates on the question of the beginning. Typically the second half of the 19th century is understood as the time when the study of religion took shape and developed into a separate academic discipline with its own identity. However, there are also those who disagree with this assessment. Therefore, in this article I analyse the arguments in favour of one or another time period and point out the reasons why disciplinary history can be understood so differently. It is noteworthy that a very similar discussion also exists among historians of science. They as well are struggling with the question of beginning. However, Andrew Cunningham has made a rather intriguing suggestion, proposing to understand scientific practice above all as a human activity and thus study it as such. Because of these similarities and parallels I have pointed out how and why historians of religious studies should adapt a similar approach. The last part of the article focuses on the history of the study of religion in Estonia, drawing attention to the various problems and understudied research questions still present in the study of the history of the discipline in Estonia.
Allalaadimised
Viited
Abbott, Andrew. 2002. ‘The Disciplines and the Future’. In The Future of the City of Intellect: The Changing American University. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Baird, Robert J. 1998. ‘How Religion Became Scientific’. In Religion in the Making: The Emergence of the Sciences of Religion, 205–29. Leiden: Brill.
Beinorius, Audrius. 2005. ‘Buddhism in the Early European Imagination: A Historical Perspective’. Acta Orientalia Vilnensia 6 (2): 7–22.
Bianchi, Ugo, Claas Jouco Bleeker, and Alessandro Bausani, eds. 1972. Problems and Methods of the History of Religions: Proceedings of the Study Conference Organized by the Italian Society for the History of Religions on the Occasion of the Tenth Anniversary of the Death of Raffaele Pettazzoni, Rome, 6th to 8th December 1969. Leiden: Brill.
Borges, Jorge Luis. 2000. Valik Esseid. Avatud Eesti Raamat. Tallinn: Vagabund.
Collini, Stefan. 1988. ‘“Discipline History” and “Intellectual History” Reflections on the Historiography of the Social Sciences in Britain and France’. Revue de Synthèse 109 (3–4): 387–99.
Cunningham, Andrew. 1988. ‘Getting the Game Right: Some Plain Words on the Identity and Invention of Science’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 19 (3): 365–89.
Cunningham, Andrew. 1991. ‘How the Principia Got Its Name, or Taking Natural Philosophy Seriously’. History of Science 29 (4): 377–92.
Cunningham, Andrew. 2001. ‘A Reply to Peter Dear’s “Religion, Science and Natural Philosophy: Thoughts on Cunningham’s Thesis”’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 32 (2): 387–91.
Dear, Peter. 2001a. ‘Religion, Science and Natural Philosophy: Thoughts on Cunningham’s Thesis’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 32 (2): 377–86.
Dear, Peter. 2001b. ‘Reply to Andrew Cunningham’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 32 (2): 393–95.
Dear, Peter. 2001c. ‘Reply to Andrew Cunningham’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 32 (2): 393–95.
Dear, Peter. 2005. ‘What Is the History of Science the History Of?’ Isis 96 (3): 390–406.
Despland, Michel. 1998. ‘Sciences of Religion in France during the July Monarchy (1830–1848)’. In Religion in the Making: The Emergence of the Sciences of Religion, 31–43. Leiden: Brill.
Eliade, Mircea. 1964. ‘The Quest for the “Origins” of Religion’. History of Religions 4 (1): 154–69.
Freiberger, Oliver. 2011. ‘Der Vergleich Als Methode Und Konstitutiver Ansatz Der Religionswissenschaf’. In Religionen Erforschen: Kulturwissenschaftliche Methoden in Der Religionswissenschaft, 199–218. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Geertz, A. W. 2014. ‘Long-Lost Brothers: On the Co-Histories and Interactions Between the Comparative Science of Religion and the Anthropology of Religion’. Numen 61 (2/3): 255–80.
Geertz, Armin W., and Tim Jensen. 2014. ‘From the History of Religions to the Study of Religion in Denmark: An Essay on the Subject, Organizational History and Research Themes’. Temenos 50 (1): 79–113.
Gilhus, Ingvild Sælid. 2014. ‘Founding Fathers, Turtles and the Elephant in the Room: The Quest for Origins in the Scientific Study of Religion’. Temenos 50 (2): 193–214.
Gornall, Alastair. 2015. ‘Fame and Philology: R. C. Childers and the Beginnings of Pāli and Buddhist Studies in Britain’. Contemporary Buddhism 16 (2): 462–89.
Gross, Andres. 2002. ‘Uku Masingu Üliõpilastööd’. Usuteaduslik Ajakiri 50 (1): 3–32.
Hallik, Martin, and Olaf-Mihkel Klaassen. 2002. Keiserlik Tartu Ülikool (1802-1918) Ja Orient: Eesti-Oriendi Kultuurisuhete Üldisel Taustal. Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus.
Harrison, P. 2007. ‘Was There a Scientific Revolution?’ European Review 15 (4): 445–58.
Harrison, Peter. 2006. ‘“Science” and “Religion”: Constructing the Boundaries’. The Journal of Religion 86 (1): 81–106.
Harrison, Peter. 2013. ‘„Teadus“ Ja „Religioon“: Piirjooni Kujundades’. Translated by Indrek Peedu. Akadeemia 25 (3; 4): 453–64; 579–603.
Hjelde, Sigurd. 2014. ‘Das Aufkommen Der Idee Einer Religionswissenschaft’. Zeitschrift Für Religionswissenschaft 22 (2): 150–75.
Hock, Klaus. 2006. Einführung in Die Religionswissenschaft. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Hoffmann, Henryk, and Tomáš Bubík. 2015. ‘Preface’. In Studying Religions with the Iron Curtain Closed and Opened: The Academic Study of Religion in Eastern Europe, 6–16. Leiden; Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004292789.
Hume, David. 2015. Dialoogid Loomulikust Religioonist. Loomulik Usundilugu. Avatud Eesti Raamat. Tallinn: Eesti Keele Sihtasutus.
Idinopulos, Thomas A., and Edward A. Yonan, eds. 1994. Religion and Reductionalism: Essays on Eliade, Segal and the Challenge of the Social Sciences for the Study of Religion. Leiden, New York, Köln: Brill.
Jensen, Jeppe Sinding. 2004. ‘Why Magic? It’s Just Comparison’. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 16 (1): 45–60.
Jordan, Louis Henry. 1905. Comparative Religion, Its Genesis and Growth. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Jordan, Louis Henry. 1915. Comparative Religion, Its Adjuncts and Allies. London: Oxford University Press.
Josephson, Jason Ānanda. 2013. ‘God’s Shadow: Occluded Possibilities in the Genealogy of “Religion”’. History of Religions 52 (4): 309–39.
King, Richard. 2013. ‘The Copernican Turn in the Study of Religion’. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 25 (2): 137–59.
Kippenberg, Hans Gerhard. 1997. Die Entdeckung Der Religionsgeschichte: Religionswissenschaft Und Moderne. München: C.H.Beck.
Kulmar, Tarmo. 1998. ‘Üliõpilasorientalistika Hiilgeaeg 1971–1983’. In Tartu Ülikool 1970-1988, 106–14. Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus.
Kulmar, Tarmo. 2000. ‘Religiooniteadused Ja Usundilugu Teadusliku Uurimisvaldkonnana Eestis’. Usuteaduslik Ajakiri 47 (1): 102–19.
Kulmar, Tarmo, ed. 2006. ‘Orientalistika Õppimine Ja Uurimine Eestis I’. In Eesti Akadeemilise Orientaalseltsi Aastaraamat, 1:9–27. Tartu: Eesti Akadeemiline Orientaalselts.
Lahe, Jaan. 2011. ‘Idamaised Usundid Rooma Riigis Kui Probleem Religiooniteaduse Ajaloos’. Usuteaduslik Ajakiri 62 (1): 112–42.
Martin, L. H. 2008. ‘The Uses (and Abuses) of the Cognitive Science for the Study of Religion’. CSSR Bulletin 37 (4): 95–98.
Martin, L. H., and Donald Wiebe. 2012. ‘Religious Studies as a Scientific Discipline: The Persistence of a Delusion’. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 80 (3): 587–97.
Meyer, Christian. 2015. ‘The Emergence of “Religious Studies” (Zongjiaoxue) in Late Imperial and Republican China, 1890-1949’. Numen 62 (1): 40–75.
Molendijk, Arie L. 2005. The Emergence of the Science of Religion in the Netherlands. Leiden; Boston: Brill.
Narayanan, Vasudha. 2015. ‘The History of the Academic Study of Religion in Universities, Centers, and Institutes in India’. Numen 62 (1): 7–39.
Osler, Margaret J. 1998. ‘Mixing Metaphors: Science and Religion or Natural Philosophy and Theology in Early Modern Europe’. History of Science 36 (1): 91–113.
Pals, Daniel L. 2006. Eight Theories of Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Põder, Thomas-Andreas. 2010. ‘Uku Masing, Religioonid Ja Kristlik Teoloogia. Religioonide Teoloogia – Kultuuride Dialoog’. Usuteaduslik Ajakiri 60 (1): 82–104.
Priede, Jānis. 2015. ‘Development of the Study of Religion in Latvia in the 20th Century’. In Studying Religions with the Iron Curtain Closed and Opened: The Academic Study of Religion in Eastern Europe, 199–238. Leiden; Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004292789.
Raud, Rein. 2013. Mis on Kultuur? Sissejuhatus Kultuuriteooriatesse. Gigantum Humeris. Tallinn: Tallinna Ülikooli Kirjastus: Eesti Keele Sihtasutus.
Saler, Benson. 2001. ‘Comparison: Some Suggestions for Improving the Inevitable’. Numen 48 (3): 267–75.
Schroeder, Leopold von. 2013. Memuaarid. Tartu: Ilmamaa.
Segal, Robert. 1989. ‘What Does Comparative Religion Compare?’ Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 1 (1): 65–70.
Segal, Robert. 1994. ‘Hume’s Natural History of Religion and the Beginning of the Social Scientific Study of Religion’. Religion 24 (3): 225–34.
Segal, Robert A. 1992. Explaining and Interpreting Religion: Essays on the Issue. New York; Bern; Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Sharpe, Eric J. 1989. ‘Sharpe on the Sharpe Symposium’. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 1 (2): 213–20.
Sharpe, Eric John. 1975. Comparative Religion: A History. London: Duckworth.
Smith, Jonathan Z. 1971. ‘Adde Parvum Parvo Magnus Acervus Erit’. History of Religions 11 (1): 67–90.
Smith, Jonathan Z. 1993. Map Is Not Territory: Studies in the History of Religions. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press.
Stausberg, Michael. 2007. ‘The Study of Religion(s) in Western Europe (I): Prehistory and History until World War II’. Religion 37 (4): 294–318.
Stausberg, Michael. 2008. ‘The Study of Religion(s) in Western Europe (II): Institutional Developments after World War II’. Religion 38 (4): 305–18.
Stausberg, Michael. 2009. ‘The Study of Religion(s) in Western Europe (III): Further Developments after World War II’. Religion 39 (3): 261–82.
Stephenson, Gunther. 1966. ‘Geschichte Und Religionswissenschaft Im Ausgehenden 18. Jahrhundert’. Numen 13 (1): 43–79.
Strenski, Ivan. 2006. Thinking about Religion: A Historical Introduction to Theories of Religion. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers.
Stroumsa, Gedaliahu A. Guy. 2010. A New Science: The Discovery of Religion in the Age of Reason. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Stuckrad, Kocku von. 2014. The Scientification of Religion: An Historical Study of Discursive Change, 1800-2000. Boston; Berlin: De Gruyter.
Talonen, Jouko, and Priit Rohtmets. 2014. ‘The Birth and Development of National Evangelical Lutheran Theology in the Baltics from 1918 to 1940’. Journal of Baltic Studies 45 (3): 345–73.
Václavík, David. 2015. ‘Searching and Finding: A History of the Slovak Study of Religion’. In Studying Religions with the Iron Curtain Closed and Opened: The Academic Study of Religion in Eastern Europe, 55–86. Leiden; Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004292789.
Valk, Ülo. 2014. ‘Folkloristic Contributions towards Religious Studies in Estonia: A Historical Outline’. Temenos 50 (1): 137–63.
Valk, Ülo, and Tarmo Kulmar. 2015. ‘Estonian Study of Religion: A Historical Outline of the 20th Century Developments’. In Studying Religions with the Iron Curtain Closed and Opened: The Academic Study of Religion in Eastern Europe, 166–98. Leiden; Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004292789.
Van Baaren, T. P., H. J. W. Drijvers, and Groningen Working-group for the Study of Fundamental Problems and Methods of Science of Religion, eds. 1973. Religion, Culture and Methodology: Papers of the Groningen Working-Group for the Study of Fundamental Problems and Methods of Science of Religion. The Hague, Paris: Mouton.
Waardenburg, Jean Jacques. 1974. Classical Approaches to the Study of Religion. Aims, Methods and Theories of Research. The Hague: Mouton & Co.
Xygalatas, Dimitris, and William McCorkle, eds. 2014. Mental Culture: Classical Social Theory and the Cognitive Science of Religion. New York: Routledge.
