Koostöine õpetamine ülikoolis: õppejõu ja assistendi vaade
Kokkuvõte
Märksõna koostöö on kõrghariduse võlu- ja võtmesõna, mis aitab toime tulla piiratud ressursside ning kasvava konkurentsiga. Ühise õpetamise vorme on kõrgkoolides kasutusel palju, alates loengute jagamisest eri õppejõudude vahel kuni õpetamiseni võrdselt vastutavate ja panustavate partneritena dialoogi pidades. Artiklis kirjeldatakse ja analüüsitakse Eleri Lõhmuse ja Henry Naritsa koosõpetamise kogemust audiovisuaalse produktsiooni praktilisel kursusel Tartu Ülikooli ühiskonnateaduste instituudis 2018. aasta sügissemestril. Artikkel põhineb autoetnograafiliselt dokumenteeritud materjalil, mida Lõhmus ja Narits kogusid ühistöö käigus. Artikli kolmas autor tegi intervjuud üliõpilastega, et lisada autoetnograafilistele tähelepanekutele õppija vaatepunkt. Kogutud empiirilise materjali analüüs osutab, et koosõpetamine kõrgkoolis on efektiivne ja arendav kõigile osalistele, aga õppetöö õnnestumine sõltub planeerimis- ja refleksioonioskustest ning vajab praegusest rohkem formaalset tuge.
SummaryAllalaadimisi
Viited
Anderson, L. (2006). Analytic autoethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35(4), 373–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241605280449
Andersson, R., & Bendix, L. (2006). eXtreme teaching: A framework for continuous improvement. Computer Science Education, 16(3), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993400600912335
Atkinson, P. (2006). Rescuing autoethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35(4), 400–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241606286980
Austin, A. E., & Baldwin, R. G. (1991). Faculty collaboration: Enhancing the quality of scholarship and teaching. Washington: George Washington University.
Bullough, R. V., Young, J., Birrell, J. R., Clark, C. D., Egan, W. M., Erickson, L., … & Welling, M. (2003). Teaching with a peer: A comparison of two models of student teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(1), 57–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00094-X
Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Steca, P., & Malone, P. S. (2006). Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of job satisfaction and students’ academic achievement: A study at the school level. Journal of School Psychology, 44(6), 473–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.09.001
Crawford, R., & Jenkins, L. E. (2018). Making pedagogy tangible: Developing skills and knowledge using a team teaching and blended learning approach. The Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(1), 127–142. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2018v43n1.8
Da Fonte, M. A., & Barton-Arwood, S. M. (2017). Collaboration of general and special education teachers: Perspectives and strategies. Intervention in School and Clinic, 53(2), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451217693370
Delamont, S., & Atkinson, P. (1995). Fighting familiarity: Essays on education and ethnography. Cresskill: Hampton Press.
Dugan, K., & Letterman, M. (2008). Student appraisals of collaborative teaching. College Teaching, 56(1), 11–15. https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.56.1.11-16
Eesti inimarengu aruanne (2001). Tallinn: Tallinna Pedagoogikaülikool, rahvusvaheliste ja sotsiaaluuringute instituut.
Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. P. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 733–768). Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (2001). Participant observation and fieldnotes. In P. Atkinson, A. Coffey, S. Delamont, J. Lofland, & L. Lofland (Eds.), Handbook of ethnography (pp. 352–368). London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608337.n24
Friend, M. (2008). Co-teaching: A simple solution that isn’t simple after all. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 2(2), 9–19.
Gaytan, J. (2010). Instructional strategies to accommodate a team-teaching approach. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 73(1), 82–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1080569909358097
George, M. A., & Davis-Wiley, P. (2000). Team teaching a graduate course: Case study: A clinical research course. College Teaching, 48(2), 75–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567550009595818
Gordon, T., Holland, J., & Lahelma, E. (2001). Ethnographic research in educational settings. In P. Atkinson, A. Coffey, S. Delamont, J. Lofland, & L. Lofland (Eds.), Handbook of ethnography (pp. 352–368). London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608337.n13
Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice (3rd ed.). London, New York: Routledge.
Helms, M. M., Alvis, J. M., & Willis, M. (2005). Planning and implementing shared teaching: An MBA team-teaching case study. Journal of Education for Business, 81(1), 29–34. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.81.1.29-34
Henderson, C., Beach, A., & Famiano, M. (2009). Promoting instructional change via co-teaching. American Journal of Physics, 77(3), 274–283. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3033744
Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
Jones, S. H., Adams, T. E., & Ellis, C. (Eds.) (2016). Handbook of autoethnography. London, New York: Routledge.
Kamens, M. W. (2007). Learning about co-teaching: A collaborative student teaching experience for preservice teachers. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 30(3), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/088840640703000304
Knights, S., & Sampson, J. (1995). Reflection in the context of team-teaching. Studies in Continuing Education, 17(1–2), 58–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037950170106
Krammer, M., Rossmann, P., Gastager, A., & Gasteiger-Klicpera, B. (2018). Ways of composing teaching teams and their impact on teachers’ perceptions about collaboration. European Journal of Teacher Education, 41(4), 463–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2018.1462331
Leavitt, M. C. (2006). Team teaching: Benefits and challenges. Speaking of Teaching, 16(1), 1–4.
Liebel, G., Burden, H., & Heldal, R. (2017). For free: Continuity and change by team teaching. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(1), 62–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1221811
Mansell, J. (2006). Team teaching in further education. Educational Research, 17(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188740170102
Marincovich, M., Prostko, J., & Stout, F. (Eds.) (1998). The professional development of graduate teaching assistants. Bolton: Anker Pub.
Park, C. (2002). Neither fish nor fowl? The perceived benefits and problems of using graduate teaching assistants (GTAs) to teach undergraduate students. Higher Education Review, 35(1), 30–42.
Park, C. (2004). The graduate teaching assistant (GTA): Lessons from North American experience. Teaching in Higher Education, 9(3), 349–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/1356251042000216660
Plank, K. M. (Ed.) (2011). Team teaching: Across the disciplines, across the academy. Sterling: Stylus Pub.
Preissle, J. (1999). An educational ethnographer comes of age. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 28(6), 650–659. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124199129023758
Sandholtz, J. H. (2000). Interdisciplinary team teaching as a form of professional development. Teacher Education Quarterly, 27(3), 39–54.
Saroyan, A., Dagenais, J., & Zhou, Y. (2009). Graduate students’ conceptions of university teaching and learning: Formation for change. Instructional Science, 37(6), 579–600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9071-8
Shibley, I. A. (2006). Interdisciplinary team teaching: Negotiating pedagogical differences. College Teaching, 54(3), 271–274. https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.54.3.271-274
Stewart, T., & Perry, B. (2005). Interdisciplinary team teaching as a model for teacher development. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language, 9(2), 1–17.
Strömpl, J. (2014). Etnograafiline uurimus. Sotsiaalse analüüsi meetodite ja metodoloogia õpibaas. Külastatud aadressil http://samm.ut.ee/etnograafiline-uurimus.
Vangrieken, K., Dochy, F., Raes, E., & Kyndt, E. (2013). Team entitativity and teacher teams in schools: Towards a typology. Frontline Learning Research, 1(2), 86–98. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v1i2.23
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wadkins, T., Miller, R. L., & Wozniak, W. (2006). Team teaching: Student satisfaction and performance. Teaching of Psychology, 22(2), 118–120.
Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakirja autorid nõustuvad allpool esitatud tingimustega.
- Ajakirjas avaldatud artiklitele on tagatud vaba juurdepääs Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 litsentsiga määratud õiguste mahus.
- Autor loovutab ajakirjale tasuta tema poolt loodud artikli varalised õigused, sh õiguse artikli (1) avaldamisele ja levitamisele, (2) üldsusele kättesaadavaks tegemisele ja eksponeerimisele, (3) avalikule esitamisele.
- Autoril on õigus Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakirja eelneval nõusolekul sõlmida lepinguid kolmandate isikutega publitseeritud artikli säilitamiseks raamatukogu repositooriumis või avaldamiseks raamatu peatükina. Nõudeks on teiseses töös viitamine esmasele allikale, st artiklile Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakirjas.
- Pärast artikli ilmumist ajakirjas on autoritel lubatud avaldada Internetis (nt oma veebilehel) motiveeritud mahus tsitaate ning levitada linke koos korrektse viitega ajakirjas ilmunud artiklile (vt Open Access).
