Kuidas toetab Soome põhikooli loodusainete õppekava loodusteadusliku kirjaoskuse kujunemist

  • Jari Lavonen
Märksõnad: loodusainete õppekava, loodusteaduslik kirjaoskus, ülekantavad pädevused


Science subjects are introduced as separate subjects in the Finnish national lower-secondary level science curriculum. The curriculum concentrates on attitudes, which support the use of scientific knowledge in different science inquiry situations and contexts. The competence aims, introduced in the curriculum, emphasise the use of scientific knowledge, such as describing, explaining and predicting scientific phenomena, evaluating and identifying scientific issues, and interpreting data and evidence scientifically. The curriculum emphasises the learning of transversal competencies, such as learning critical and creative thinking skills and learning versatile ways of working. The curriculum also focuses on the use of knowledge in inquiry, life and living and society related situations. Overall, the description of the core subject matter knowledge aims to integrate Vision I (a conceptual approach) and Vision II (a contextual approach) related to the development of science literacy, introduced by Roberts.


Andmeid allalaadimiseks pole.


Ananiadou, K., & Claro, M. (2009). 21st century skills and competencies for new millennium learners in OECD countries: OECD Education Working Papers, 41. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/218525261154

Apple, M. W. (1993). The politics of official knowledge: Does a national curriculum make sense? Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 14(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/0159630930140101

Autio, T. (2014). The Internationalization of Curriculum Research. In W. Pinar (Ed.), International handbook of curriculum research (pp. 17–31). New York, NY: Routledge.

Bazzul, J. (2012). Neoliberal ideology, global capitalism, and science education: Engaging the question of subjectivity. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7(4), 1001–1020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9413-3

Bennett, N., Dunne, E., & Carré, C. (2000). Skills Development in Higher Education and Employment. The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

Burns, T., & Köster F. (Eds.) (2016). Governing Education in a Complex World. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264255364-en

Bybee, R., & McCrae, B. (2011). Scientific Literacy and Student Attitudes: Perspectives from PISA 2006 science. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.518644

Care, E., & Luo, R. (2016). Assessment of Transversal Competencies: Policy and Practice in the Asia-Pacific Region. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).

Carter, L. (2005). Globalisation and science education: Rethinking science education reforms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(5), 561–580. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20066

Change in Basic Education Act (Laki perusopetuslain muuttamisesta) 642/2010. Vaadatud aadressil http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/alkup/2010/20100642.

Council of the European Union (2019). Key competences for lifelong learning. Council of the European Union. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/297a33c8-a1f3-11e9-9d01-01aa75ed71a1.

Council, N. R. (2013). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. National Academies Press.

DeBoer, G. E. (2011). The globalization of science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 567–591. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20421

Finnish National Board of Education (2016). National core curriculum for basic education 2014. Helsinki: National Board of Education.

FNBE [Finnish National Board of Education] (2014). The National Core Curriculum for Basic Education. Helsinki: FNBE National Board of Education. Vaadatud aadressil https://eperusteet.opintopolku.fi/beta/#/fi/.

Garm, N., & Karlsen, G.E. (2004). Teacher education reform in Europe: The case of Norway; Trends and tensions in a global perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(7), 731–744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2004.07.004

Halinen, I. (2018). The new educational curriculum in Finland. In M. Matthes, L. Pulkkinen, C. Clouder, & B. Heys (Eds.), Improving the quality of childhood in Europe: Volume 7 (pp. 75–89). Brussels: Alliance for Childhood European Network Foundation. Vaadatud aadressil http://www.allianceforchildhood.eu/files/Improving_the_quality_of_Childhood_Vol_7/QOC%20V7%20CH06%20DEF%20WEB.pdf.

Heiman, M., & Slomianko, J. (Eds.). (1987). Thinking skills instruction: Concepts and techniques. Washington, DC: National Education Association. Vaadatud aadressil http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED306559.pdf.

Hodson, D. (2011). Looking to the future: Building a curriculum for social activism. Rotterdam: Sense. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-472-0_3

Holappa, A.-S. (2007) Perusopetuksen opetussuunnitelma 2000-luvulla – uudistus paikallisina prosesseina kahdessa kaupungissa [Curriculum of Basic School in 2000 Century: Renewal of Local Curriculum in two Cities]. Acta Universitatis Ouluensis. series E 94. Oulun yliopisto. Kasvatustieteiden tiedekunta.

Holbrook, J. (2010). Education through Science as a Motivational Innovation for Science Education for All. Science Education International, 21(2), 80–91.

Hopmann, S. (2007). Restrained teaching: The common core of Didaktik. European Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2007.6.2.109

Jauhiainen, P. (1995). Opetussuunnitelmatyö koulussa. Muuttuuko yläasteen opettajan työ ja ammatinkuva? [Preparation of a local curriculum: How do teacher professionalism and identity change?]. Tutkimuksia 154. Helsingin yliopiston opettajankoulutuslaitos.

Kitchen, J., & Figg, C. (2011) Establishing and sustaining teacher educator professional development in a self-study community of practice: Pre-tenure teacher educators developing professionally. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(5), 880–890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.02.003

Lavonen, J. (2007). National science education standards and assessment in Finland. In D. Waddington, P. Nentwig & S. Schaze (Eds.), Making it comparable (pp. 101–126). Berlin: Waxmann.

Levinson, R. (2010). Science education and democratic participation: An uneasy congruence? Studies in Science Education, 46(1), 69–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260903562433

Maier, R., & Schmidt, A. (2015). Explaining organizational knowledge creation with a knowledge maturing model. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 13(4), 361–381. https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2013.56

Markes, I. (2006). A review of literature on employability skill needs in engineering. European Journal of Engineering Education, 31(6), 637–650. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790600911704

Ministry of Education and Culture (MEC). (2017). Osaamiseen ja tutkimukseen isot lisäpanostukset ensi vuoden budjetissa [Next year’s budget promises more resources for education]. Ministry of Education and Culture. Vaadatud aadressil http://minedu.fi/artikkeli/-/asset_publisher/osaamiseen-koulutukseen-ja-tutkimukseen-isot-lisapanostukset-ensi-vuoden-budjetissa.

NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Niemi, H. Toom, A., & Kallioniemi, A. (2012). Miracle of education: The principles and practices of teaching and learning in Finnish schools. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-811-7

Nonaka, I., von Krogh, G., & Voelpel, S. (2006). Organizational knowledge creation theory: Evolutionary paths and future advances. Organization Studies, 27(8), 1179–1208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606066312

OECD (2005). Definition and selection of competencies (DeSeCo): Executive summary. Paris: OECD Publishing. Vaadatud aadressil http://www.oecd.org/pisa/35070367.pdf.

OECD (2007). PISA 2006: Science competencies for tomorrow’s world, volume 1: Analysis. Paris: OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264040014-en

OECD (2013). PISA 2012. Results in focus. What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. Paris: OECD Publishing. Vaadatud aadressil http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-overview.pdf.

Ogborn, J. (2002). Ownership and transformation: Teachers using curriculum innovations. Physics Education, 37, 142–146. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/37/2/307

Oliva, P. (1997). The Curriculum: Theoretical Dimensions. New York: Longman.

Oppiminen uudistuu (2018). Tasa-arvoisen peruskoulun tulevaisuus: Koulutustakuusta osaamistakuuseen [The future of equal primary school: From training skills to knowledge skills]. Vaadatud aadressil https://oppiminenuudistuu.wordpress.com/category/uusi-peruskoulu/.

Reimers, F. M., & Chung, C. K. (2016). A comparative study of the purposes of education in the twenty-first century. In F. M. Reimers & C. K. Chung (Eds.), Teaching and learning for the twenty-first century: Educational goals, policies, and curricula from six nations (pp. 1–24). Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.

Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific literacy/ science literacy. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 729–780). Mahwah, N. J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (LEA).

Roberts, D. B., & Bybee, W. R. (2014). Scientific literacy, science literacy, and science education. In N. G. t. Lederman & S. K. t. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education. (Vol. 2, pp. 545–558). New York: Routledge.

Saari, A., Salmela, S., & Vilkkilä, J. (2014). Governing Autonomy. In W. Pinar (Ed.), International handbook of curriculum research (pp. 183–200). New York, NY: Routledge.

Sjöström, J., Frerichs, N., Zuin, V., & Eilks, I. (2017). Use of the concept of Bildung in the international science education literature, its potential, and implications for teaching and learning. Studies in Science Education, 53(2), 165–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2017.1384649

Vahtivuori-Hänninen, S. H., Halinen, I., Niemi, H., Lavonen, J. M. J., Lipponen, L., & Multisilta, J. (2014). A new Finnish national core curriculum for basic education and technology as an integrated tool for learning. In Niemi, H., Multisilta, J., Lipponen, L., & M. Vivitsou (Eds.), Finnish innovations & technologies in schools: A guide towards new ecosystems of learning (pp. 33–44). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-749-0_2

Vincent-Lancrin, S., González-Sancho, C., Bouckaert, M., de Luca, F., Fernández-Barrerra, M., Jacotin, G., Urgel, J., & Vidal, Q. (2019). Fostering students’ creativity and critical thinking: What it means in school, educational research and innovation. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/62212c37-en

Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competencies: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.668938

Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.

Westbury, I. (2000). Teaching as a reflective practice: what might Didaktik teach Curriculum? In S. Hopmann, K. Riquarts, & I. Westbury (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Willbergh, I. (2015). The problems of ‘competence’ and alternatives from the Scandinavian perspective of Bildung. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47(3), 334–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2014.1002112

Young, J. C., Hall. C., & Clarke, A. (2007). Challenges to university autonomy in initial teacher education programmes: The cases of England, Manitoba, and British Columbia. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.008

Kuis viidata
Lavonen, J. (2021). Kuidas toetab Soome põhikooli loodusainete õppekava loodusteadusliku kirjaoskuse kujunemist. Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakiri. Estonian Journal of Education, 9(2), 26-46. https://doi.org/10.12697/eha.2021.9.2.02b