Evaluation of primary school teachers’ exemplar-based linguistic communication based on structured observation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12697/eha.2016.4.1.08Keywords:
classroom communication style, communicative profile, primary school teacher, structured observationAbstract
Õpetaja keele- ja suhtluseeskuju mõjutab oluliselt õppeprotsessi kvaliteeti. See realiseerub harjumuspärase tunnisuhtlusstiilina, mis hõlmab nii mitteverbaalse kui ka verbaalse suhtluse komponente: õpetaja ja õpilaste tegevuste kommenteerimist, õpilaste vastuste kordamist ja laiendamist, küsimuste valikut ning keelekasutuse raskusastme varieerimist. Uurimuse eesmärk on hinnata struktureeritud vaatluse teel klassiõpetajate (N = 46) suhtlusstiile ja nende seoseid õpilaste (N = 611) emakeeleoskustega 3. klassis. Rühma- ja indiviidikesksete analüüside ning multimodaalse videoanalüüsi põhjal ilmneb neli suhtlusprofiili, mis eristuvad verbaalse ja mitteverbaalse suhtluse komponentide kasutuse poolest. Kõige vähem kasutavad õpetajad emakeeletunnis enda ja õpilaste tegevuste kommenteerimist ning kõige rohkem õpilaste vastuste kordamist ja täiendamist. Uurimistulemustest selgub, et õpetajatel, kelle suhtlusstiil sai kõrge hinnangu, on oodatust rohkem emakeeletestis kehvema tulemuse saavutanud õpilasi.
SummaryDownloads
References
Alibali, M. W., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1993). Gesture-speech mismatch and mechanisms of learning: What the hands reveal about a child’s state of mind. Cognitive Psychology, 25(4), 468-523. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1993.1012
Allwood, J., & Ahlsén, E. (2012). Multimodal communication. In A. Mehler, L. Romary, & D. Gibbon (Eds.), Handbook of technical communication (pp. 435-460). Berlin, Boston, Beijing: De Gruyter Mouton. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110224948.435
Bavelas, J. B., Chovil, N., Lawrie, D. A., & Wade, A. (1992). Interactive gestures. Discourse Processes, 15(4), 469–489. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01638539209544823
Bergman, L. R., Magnusson, D., & El-Khouri, B. M. (2003). Studying individual development in an interindividual context: A person-oriented approach. Mahwah, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bergman, L. R., & Wångby, M. (2014). Indiviidile suunatud käsitlusviis: lühike teoreetiline ja praktiline juhend. Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakiri, 2(1), 7-28. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12697/eha.2014.2.1.02
Burchinal, M. R., Peisner-Feinberg, E., Pianta, R., & Howes, C. (2002). Development of academic skills from preschool through second grade: Family and classroom predictors of developmental trajectories. Journal of School Psychology, 40(5), 415-436. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4405(02)00107-3
Chomsky, N. (1964). The development of grammar in child language: Discussion. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 29(1), 35-42. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1165753
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). London, New York: Routledge.
Damhuis, R., & de Blauw, A. (2008). High quality interaction in the classroom: A focus for professional learning. L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 8(4), 107–126.
De Nooijer, J. A., van Gog, T., Paas, F., & Zwaan, R. A. (2014). Words in action: Using gestures to improve verb learning in primary school children. Gesture, 14(1), 46–69. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/gest.14.1.03noo
Garcia, G. E., Pearson, P. D., Taylor, B. M., Bauer, E. B., & Stahl, K. A. D. (2011). Socio-constructivist and political views on teachers’ implementation of two types of reading comprehension approaches in low-income schools. Theory Into Practice, 50(2), 149–156. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2011.558444
Gleason, J. B., & Ratner, N. B. (2009). The development of language (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10), 1489-1522. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00096-X
Gosse, C. S., McGinty, A. S., Mashburn, A. J., Hoffman, L. M., & Pianta, R. C. (2014). The role of relational and instructional classroom supports in the language development of at-risk preschoolers. Early Education and Development, 25(1), 110–133. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2013.778567
Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2010). Classroom environments and developmental processes: Conceptualization and measurement. In J. L. Meece & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Handbook of research on schools, schooling, and human development (pp. 25–41). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
Howes, C., Burchinal, M., Pianta, R., Bryant, D., Early, D., Clifford, R., & Barbarin, O. (2008). Ready to learn? Childen’s pre-academic achievement in pre-kindergarten programs. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23(1), 27–50. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2007.05.002
Huttenlocher, J., Vasilyeva, M., Cymerman, E., & Levine, S. (2002). Language input and child syntax. Cognitive Psychology, 45(3), 337–374. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0285(02)00500-5
Ingerpuu-Rümmel, E. (2012). Teadmise esiletulemine võõrkeeletunni multimodaalses suhtluses. Eesti ja soome-ugri keeleteaduse ajakiri ESUKA / Journal of Estonian and Finno-Ugric Linguistics JEF, 3, 9-30.
Karlep, K. (2005). Lev Võgotski ideede aktuaalsus tänapäeval. Haridus, 8, 30-35.
Kikas, E. (1997). Conceptual development in school-aged children: The impact of teaching (doctoral dissertation). Tartu Ülikool, Tartu. Retrieved from http://dspace.ut.ee/handle/10062/42695.
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212–218. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
Krips, H. (2011). Õpetajate suhtlemiskompetentsus ja suhtlemisoskused (doktoritöö). Tartu Ülikool, Tartu. Külastatud aadressil dspace.ut.ee/bitstream/handle/10062/17218/krips_heiki.pdf.
Krips, H. (2013). Õpetaja suhtlemiskompetentsusest ja selle arendamisest õpetajakoolituses. E. Krull, Ä. Leijen, M. Lepik, J. Mikk, L. Talts, & T. Õun (toim.), Õpetajate professionaalne areng ja selle toetamine. Projekti "Õpetajate professionaalne areng ja selle toetamine" tulemused õpetajakoolituse teenistuses (lk 103–117). Tartu: Eesti Ülikoolide Kirjastus.
LeBaron, C. (2008). Microethnography. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of communication (Vol. 3, pp. 3120-3124). USA, Canada, etc.: Blackwell Publishing.
LoCasale-Crouch, J., Konold, T., Pianta, R., Howes, C., Burchinal, M., Bryant, M., ... Barbarin, O. (2007). Observed classroom quality profiles in state-funded pre-kindergarten programs and associations with teacher, program, and classroom characteristics. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 22(1), 3–17. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2006.05.001
Lyle, S. (2008). Dialogic teaching: Discussing theoretical contexts and reviewing evidence from classroom practice. Language and Education, 22(3), 222–240. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500780802152499
Margutti, P., & Drew, P. (2014). Positive evaluation of student answers in classroom instruction. Language and Education, 28(5), 436–458. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2014.898650
Mashburn, A. J., Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., Downer, J. T., Barbarin, O. A., Bryant, D., ... Howes, C. (2008). Measures of classroom quality in prekindergarten and children’s development of academic, language, and social skills. Child Development, 79(3), 732–749. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01154.x
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Mercer, N. (2013). The social brain, language, and goal-directed collective thinking: A social conception of cognition and its implications for understanding how we think, teach, and learn. Educational Psychologist, 48(3), 148–168. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.804394
Mercer, N., & Dawes, L. (2014). The study of talk between teachers and students, from the 1970s until the 2010s. Oxford Review of Education, 40(4), 430–445. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2014.934087
Merola, G., & Poggi, I. (2003). Multimodality and gestures in the teacher’s communication. Proceedings of the Gesture Workshop 2003, Genova, Italy. Retrieved from http://host.uniroma3.it/docenti/poggi/cursitopdf/poggiteacher.pdf.
Mihkels, K. (2013). Keel, keha ja kaardikepp: õpetaja algatatud parandussekventside multimodaalne analüüs (doktoritöö). Tartu Ülikool, Tartu. Külastatud aadressil https://dspace.ut.ee/handle/10062/29189.
Mondada, L. (2006). Video recording as the preservation of fundamental features for analysis. In H. Knoblauch, J. Raab, H.-G. Soeffner, & B. Schnettler (Eds.), Video analysis (pp. 51-68). Bern: Lang.
Nystrand, M., Wu, L. L., Gamoran, A., Zeiser, S., & Long, D. A. (2003). Questions in time: Investigating the structure and dynamics of unfolding classroom discourse. Discourse Processes, 35(2), 135–198. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15326950DP3502_3
Orlich, D. C., Harder, R. J., Callahan, R. C., Trevisan, M. S., & Brown, A. (2010). Teaching strategies: A guide to effective instruction (9th Ed.). Boston, MA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Pentimonti, J. M., & Justice, L. M. (2010). Teachers’ use of scaffolding strategies during read alouds in the preschool classroom. Early Childhood Education Journal, 37, 241–248. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10643-009-0348-6
Perry, K. E., Donohue, K. M., & Weinstein, R. S. (2007). Teaching practices and the promotion of achievement and adjustment in first grade. Journal of School Psychology, 45(3), 269–292. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2007.02.005
Pianta, R. C., & Hamre, B. K. (2009). Conceptualization, measurement, and improvement of classroom processes: Standardized observation can leverage capacity. Educational Researcher, 38(2), 109–119. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09332374
Pianta, R. C., La Paro, K. M., & Hamre, B. K. (2008). Classroom assessment scoring system (CLASS). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
Poggi, I. (2002). Towards the alphabet and the lexicon of gesture, gaze and touch. In P. Bouissac (Ed.), Multimodality of human communication: Theories, problems and applications. Virtual Symposium 2001-2002, University of Toronto, Victoria College, May 3-5, 2002. Retrieved from http://www.semioticon.com/virtuals/talks/geyboui41.pdf.
Põhikooli riiklik õppekava (2010). Riigi Teataja I 2010, 6, 22. Külastatud aadressil https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/13273133.
Reznitskaya, A., Anderson, R. C., McNurlen, B., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., Archodidou, A., & Kim, S. (2001). Influence of oral discussion on written argument. Discourse Processes, 32(2–3), 155–175. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2001.9651596
Salminen, J. (2014). The teacher as a source of educational support: Exploring teacher-child interactions and teachers’ pedagogical practices in Finnish preschool classrooms. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä. Retrieved from http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-39-5982-1.
Salminen, J., Hännikäinen, M., Poikonen, P.-L., & Rasku-Puttonen, H. (2013). A descriptive case analysis of instructional teaching practices in Finnish preschool classrooms. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 27(2), 127–152. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2013.767289
Sime, D. (2008). "Because of her gesture, it’s very easy to understand": Learner’s perceptions of teacher’s gestures in the foreign language class. In S. G. McCafferty & G. Stam (Eds.), Gesture: Second language acquisition and classroom research (pp. 259–290). New York, London: Routledge.
Stehman, S. V. (1997). Selecting and interpreting measures of thematic classification accuracy. Remote sensing of Environment, 62(1), 77–89. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(97)00083-7
Zepeda, C. D., Richey, J. E., Ronevich, P., & Nokes-Malach, T. J. (2015). Direct instruction of metacognition benefits adolescent science learning, transfer, and motivation: An in vivo study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(4), 954–970. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/edu0000022
Thompson, P. (2008). Learning through extended talk. Language and Education, 22(3), 241–256. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2167/le754.0
Toomela, A. (Ed.). (2010). Systemic person-oriented study of child development in early primary school. Frankfurt am Main etc.: Peter Lang.
Uibu, K., & Männamaa, M. (2014). Õpetamistegevused ja õpilaste tekstimõistmine üleminekul esimesest kooliastmest teise astmesse. Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakiri, 2(1), 96–131. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12697/eha.2014.2.1.05
Von Eye, A. (2000). Introduction to configural frequency analysis: The search for types and antitypes in cross-classifications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Võgotski, L. (2014). Mõtlemine ja kõne. Tartu: Ilmamaa.
Webb, N. M., Nemer, K. M, & Ing, M. (2006). Small-group reflections: Parallels between teacher discourse and student behavior in peer-directed groups. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 63–119. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1501_8
Wertsch, J. V. (1979). From social interaction to higher psychological processes: A clarification and application of Vygotsky’s theory. Human Development, 22(1), 1–22. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000272425
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors who publish in Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakiri. Estonian Journal of Education agree to the following terms:
- This journal provides immediate open access to its content. All the articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License.
- Authors grant the journal right of (1) first publication and distribution of the article, (2) making it available to public, (3) public presentation.
- Authors have the right to enter into separate contractual arrangements for posting the article to an institutional repository or publish it in a book with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted to post citations from their work online (e.g. on their website) with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal (see Open Access).
