Remix, literacy and creativity: An analytic review of the research literature

Authors

  • Michele Knobel

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12697/eha.2017.5.2.02b

Keywords:

creativity, literacy, digital remix, pedagogical practice, fans, new literacies

Abstract

Creativity is often identified as a key factor contributing to national economic growth and as an important life skill for personal and group wellbeing. Therefore, it is worth taking a close look at "creativity" as a concept and a practice, and to examine what might be at stake when grouping them together, especially in relation to schooling. The situation at schools is in marked contrast to a sizeable body of out-of-school research which shows how people are being creative and imaginative in their meaning making practices, especially within remix practices. The purpose of the paper is to survey existing English language research on digital remix and literacy with a view to identifying patterns across these studies that speak of the ways in which ordinary, everyday people have been practicing creativity. In the course of conducting this analytic review empirical publications published in English over the past two decades were examined and an overview of scientific literature on remix and literacy in out-of-school spaces was drawn up, identifying interesting patterns regarding creative endeavor and meaning making that might usefully inform classroom pedagogy. A related aim was to identify patterns concerning how digital remix and literacy have been studied to date. All of the 36 reviewed studies emphasise how approaching creativity as a thoroughly social phenomenon helps to confront instrumental approaches. The remix work documented in these studies show how committed people are to deliberately work at "being creative" and how that may help people to creatively engage with, or respond to, the rapid pace of change, with existing and emerging social, governmental and environmental problems, as well as to establish and maintain relationships across distance and differences.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Beghetto, R., & Kaufman, J. (Eds.) (2017). Nurturing creativity in the classroom (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316212899

Boccella, N., & Salerno, I. (2016). Creative economy, cultural industries and local development. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 223, 291–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.370

Burn, A. (2009). Making new media: Creative production and digital literacies. New York: Peter Lang.

Burwell, C. (2013). The pedagogical potential of video remix: Critical conversations about culture, creativity and copyright. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 57(3), 205–213. https://doi.org/10.1002/JAAL.205

Cloonan, A., Hutchison, K., & Paatsch, L. (2015). Creative, critical, digital: Connecting home and school literacies. Report prepared for Catholic Education Melbourne, Australia.

Craft, A. (2003). Limits to creativity in education: Dilemmas for the educator. British Journal of Educational Studies, 51(2), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8527.t01-1-00229

Curwood, J. S., & Gibbons, D. (2010). "Just like I have felt": Multimodal counternarratives in youth-produced digital media. International Journal of Learning and Media, 1(4), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1162/ijlm_a_00034

Florida, R. (2012). The rise of the creative class: revisited. New York: Basic Books.

Gee, J. P. (2007). Good video games + good learning. New York etc.: Peter Lang.

Gee, J. P. (2012). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideologies in discourses (4th ed.). New York: Routledge.

Gee, J. P. (2013). Good video games + good learning (2nd ed.). New York etc.: Peter Lang.

Gee, J. P., Hull, G., & Lankshear, C. (1996). The new work order: Behind the language of the new capitalism. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.

Hinsdale, B. (1900). Teaching the language-arts: Speech, reading composition. New York: Appleton.

Jenkins, H., Ito, M., & boyd, d. (2015). Participatory culture in a networked era. Cambridge: Polity.

Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013688

Knobel, M., & Kalman, J. (Eds.) (2016). New literacies and teacher learning. New York: Peter Lang.

Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (2014). Studying new literacies. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 58(2), 97–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.314

Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2011). New literacies: Everyday practices and social learning. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2015). Creativity and language in digital remix. Keynote paper presented to Futuuri! Language Summer School and the Language Centre Conference, Jyväskylä, Finland, June 5.

Lessig, L. (2009). Remix. New York: Penguin.

Navas, E., Gallagher, O., & burrough, x. (Eds.) (2015). The Routledge companion to remix studies. New York: Routledge.

Peppler, K. (2014). New creativity paradigms: Arts learning in the digital age. New York etc.: Peter Lang.

Runco, M., & Albert, R. (2010). Creativity research: A historical approach. In J. Kaufman & R. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 3–19). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Stickley, T., Parr, H., Atkinson, S., Daykin, N., Clift, S., De Nora, T., … Hogan, S. J. (2017). Arts, health & wellbeing: Reflections on a national seminar series and building a UK research network. Arts and Health, 9(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/17533015.2016.1166142

Street, B. V. (1984). Literacy in theory and in practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Võgotski, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Wilson, N. (2010). Social creativity: Re-qualifying the creative economy. Inter national Journal of Cultural Policy, 16(3), 367–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286630903111621

Downloads

Published

2017-10-28

How to Cite

Knobel, M. (2017). Remix, literacy and creativity: An analytic review of the research literature. Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakiri. Estonian Journal of Education, 5(2), 31–53. https://doi.org/10.12697/eha.2017.5.2.02b

Issue

Section

Articles