The usefulness of process-oriented writing in enhancing writing skills as a component of communicative competence among upper secondary school students

Authors

  • Helen Hint
  • Anni Jürine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12697/eha.2021.9.1.10

Keywords:

general competences, communicative competence, process-oriented writing, conceptions of writing, writing practices, upper secondary school

Abstract

Suhtluspädevuse kui ühe üldpädevuse arendamisega tuleb gümnaasiumi riiklikust õppekavast lähtuvalt mõtestatult tegeleda. Gümnaasiumile mõeldud suhtluspädevuse hindamisvahendi ega ka süstemaatilise arendustegevuse väljatöötamiseks pole aga Eestis seni uuringuid tehtud. Siinses uurimuses keskendume suhtluspädevuse kontekstis kitsamalt gümnasistide kirjaliku väljendusoskusega seotud pädevuse, st hoiakute ja praktikate mõõtmisele. Uurimuse esimene eesmärk on tutvustada uudset hindamisvahendit ning selle põhjal selgitada, millised on Eesti gümnasistide kirjaliku väljendusoskusega seotud praktikad ja hoiakud. Uurimuse teine eesmärk on analüüsida kolmeaastase pikiuuringu käigus ühes Eesti koolis tehtud protsessikeskse kirjutamise sekkumise efektiivsust. Võrdleme katsekooli ja kontrollkoolide õpilaste kirjutamisega seotud praktikaid ja hoiakuid ning nende muutumist läbi kolme kooliaasta. Uurimuse käigus selgus, et  protsessikeskse kirjutamise pidev teadlik rakendamine aitab parandada õpilaste kirjutamisega seotud hoiakud ja võtta omaks efektiivsemaid praktikaid.

PDF Summary

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aruvee, M., & Puksand, H. (2019). Kirjaoskuse arendamine eesti keele ja kirjanduse õpetajate vaatevinklist: sillad ja kuristikud teooria ja praktika vahel. Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakiri, 2(7), 154−180. https://doi.org/10.12697/eha.2019.7.2.07

Badger, R., & White, G. (2000). A Process Genre Approach to Teaching Writing. ELT Journal, 54(2), 153−160. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/54.2.153

Bazerman, C. (2009). Genre and Cognitive Development: Beyond Writing to Learn. Pratiques. Linguistique, littérature, didactique, 143/144, 127−138. https://doi.org/10.4000/pratiques.1419

Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01

Bayat, N. (2014). The Effect of the Process Writing Approach on Writing Success and Anxiety. 14(3), 1133–1141. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2014.3.1720

Boice, R. (1990). Professors as Writers. Stillwater: New Forums Press.

Boice, R. (1993). Writing Blocks and Tacit Knowledge. Journal of Higher Education, 64, 19−54. https://doi.org/10.2307/2959976

Boscolo, P., & Mason, L. (2001). Writing to Learn, Writing to Transfer. In P. Tynjälä, L. Mason & M. Lonka (Eds.), Writing as a Learning Tool: Intergrating Theory and Practice (pp. 83−104). Kluwer Academic: Dodrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0740-5_6

Cerrato-Lara, M., Castelló M., García-Velázquez R., & Lonka, K. (2017). Validation of the Writing Process Questionnaire in Two Hispanic Populations: Spain and Mexico. Journal of Writing Research, 9(2), 151−172. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2017.09.02.03

Chitez, M., Kruse, O., & Castelló, M. (2015). The European Writing Survey (EUWRIT): Background, Structure, Implementation, and Some Results. ZHAW Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften.

Dean, D. (2005). Strategic Writing: Moving Beyond the Classroom Assignment. The English Journal, 95(2), 82–88. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Ehala, M. (2000). Kirjutamise kunst: Tekstiõpetuse õpik. Künnimees.

Ehala, M., Kerge, K., Lepajõe, K., & Sõrmus, K. (2010). Kõrgkoolide üliõpilaste eesti keele oskuse tase. Uuringukokkuvõte. Tartu Ülikool. Külastatud aadressil https://dspace.ut.ee/bitstream/handle/10062/40660/Keel_korgkool.pdf?sequence= 1&isAllowed=y.

Ehala, M., Kerge, K., Lepajõe, K., & Sõrmus, K. (2015). Kõrgkoolide üliõpilaste eesti keele oskuse tase. Kordusuuring. Uuringu kokkuvõte. Tartu Ülikool. Külastatud aadressil https://dspace.ut.ee/bitstream/handle/10062/48709/funktsionaalse_300915.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.

Ehala, M., Laar, T., Soodla, K., Sõrmus, K., & Vija, M. (2014). Gümnaasiumi praktilise eesti keele kursuste metoodika õpik. Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus. Külastatud aadressil https://www.keel.ut.ee/sites/default/files/www_ut/eesti_keele_kursuste_metoodika.pdf.

Emig, J. (2011). Writing as a Mode of Learning. In V. Villaneuva & K. L. Arola (Eds.), Cross-talk in Comp Theory: A Reader. 3rd edition. Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English.

Fanetti, S., Bushrow, K., & Deweese, D. (2010). Closing the Gap between High School Writing Instruction and College Writing. The English Journal, 99(4), 77–83.

Gielen, S., Tops, L., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Smeets, S. (2010). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback and of various peer feedback forms in a secondary school writing curriculum. British Educational Research Journal, 36(1), 143–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920902894070

Goodson, P. (2013). Becoming an academic writer: 50 exercises for paced, productive, and powerful writing. SAGE Publications.

GRÕK = Gümnaasiumi riiklik õppekava. (2020). Riigi Teataja I, 28.07.2020, 13. Külastatud aadressil https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/128072020013.

Habicht, K., Tragel, I., & Vija, M. (2020). Mustandi matemaatika ja puhtandi ilu. Külastatud aadressil https://www.blog.keel.ut.ee/opetajale-ja-opilasele/mustandimatemaatika-ja-puhtandi-ilu/.

Habicht, K., Lindlo, N. K., Tragel, I., & Vija, M. (2020). "Eksamieksperdi" kogemusele tagasi vaadates. Oma Keel, 2, 68–71.

Hausenberg, A.-R. (2006). Eksamite tagasimõju keeleõppele. Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu Aastaraamat, 2, 43–52. https://doi.org/10.5128/ERYa2.04

Henning, L. H. (1981). Paradox as a treatment for writer’s block. Personnel & Guidance Journal, 60(2), 112–113. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2164-4918.1981.tb00655.x

Hint, H., Jürine, A., & Tragel, I. (2020). Suhtluspädevus. Teoses M. Pedaste (toim), Üldpädevused gümnaasiumis (lk 133−158). Tartu: Tartu Ülikool.

Hovardas, T., Tsivitanidou, O. E., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2014). Peer versus expert feedback: An investigation of the quality of peer feedback among secondary school students. Computers & Education, 71, 133–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.019

Kerge, K., Uusen, A., Põlda, H., & Puksand, H. (2014). Loovkirjutiste süntaksimuutujate areng teismeeas. Emakeele Seltsi Aastaraamat, 59, 46−76. https://doi.org/10.3176/esa59.03

Kikas, E., & Toomela, A. (2015). Õppimine ja õpetamine kolmandas kooliastmes. Üldpädevused ja nende arendamine. Eesti Ülikoolide Kirjastus.

Klassen, R., Ang, R., Chong, W., Krawchuk, L., Huan, V., Wong, I., & Yeo, L. (2009). A cross-cultural study of adolescent procrastination. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 19(4), 799–811. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2009.00620.x

Lepajõe, K., Talsi, K., & Tepp, L. (2013). Loodusteaduste õpikute keelest. Emakeele Seltsi Aastaraamat, 58, 126–147. https://doi.org/10.3176/esa58.06

Lonka, K. (1996). The writing process questionnaire. Department of Psychology, University of Helsinki, Finland.

Lonka, K. (2003). Helping doctoral students to finish their theses. In L. Björk, G. Bräuer, L. Rienecker, G. Ruhmann & P. Stray Jørgensen (Eds.), Teaching Academic Writing Across Europe (pp. 113–131). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer University Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48195-2_9

Lonka, K., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (1996). Epistemologies, Conceptions of Learning, and Study Practices in Medicine and Psychology. Higher Education, 31(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129105

Lonka, K., Chow, A., Keskinen, J., Hakkarainen, K., Sandström, N., & Pyhältö, K. (2014). How to Measure PhD. Students’ Conceptions of Academic Writing – and Are They Related to Well-being? Journal of Writing Research, 5(3), 245–269. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2014.05.03.1

Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W. (2009). To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer’s own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2008.06.002

Neumeister, K. L. S. (2004). Understanding the relationship between perfectionism and achievement motivation in gifted college students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48, 219–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620404800306

Perpignan, H., Rubin, B., & Katznelson, H. (2007). ’By-products’: The added values of academic writing instruction for higher education. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6, 163–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2007.05.003

Puksand, H. (2014). Teismeliste lugemisoskuse mõjutegurid. Tallinna Ülikool, sotsiaalteaduste dissertatsioonid. VALI trükikoda.

Puksand, H., & Kerge, K. (2011). Õpiteksti analüüs kirjaoskuse omandamise kontekstis. Emakeele Seltsi Aastaraamat, 57, 162–217. https://doi.org/10.3176/esa57.09

R Core Team. (2020). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org.

Revelle, W. (2020). psych: Procedures for Psychological, Psychometric, and Personality Research (R package version 2.0.8). Northwestern University. https://cran.r-project.org/package=psych.

Rienecker, L., & Stray Jørgensen, P. (2013). The good paper. A handbook for writing papers in higher education. Samfundslitteratur Denmark.

Sawyer, K. (2009). Writing as a Collaborative Act. In S. B. Kaufman & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), The Psychology of Creative Writing (pp. 166–179). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sengupta, S. (2000). An investigation into the effects of revision strategy instruction on L2 secondary school learners. System, 28, 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00063-9

Seo, E. H. (2008). Self-efficacy as a mediator in the relationship between self-oriented perfectionism and academic procrastination. Social Behaviour and Personality, 36, 753–764. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2008.36.6.753

Soodla, P., Puksand, H., & Luptova, O. (2015). Suhtluspädevus. Teoses E. Kikas & A. Toomela (toim), Õppimine ja õpetamine kolmandas kooliastmes. Üldpädevused ja nende arendamine (lk 147–184). Tallinn: Eesti Ülikoolide Kirjastus.

Van Waes, L., Leijten, M., & Van Weijen, D. (2009). Keystroke logging in writing research: Observing writing processes with inputlog. GFL-German as a Foreign Language, 2(3), 41–64.

Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer International Publishing.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-01

How to Cite

Hint, H., & Jürine, A. (2021). The usefulness of process-oriented writing in enhancing writing skills as a component of communicative competence among upper secondary school students. Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakiri. Estonian Journal of Education, 9(1), 243–273. https://doi.org/10.12697/eha.2021.9.1.10

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 1 (2021)

Section

Articles

License

The authors who publish in Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakiri. Estonian Journal of Education agree to the following terms:

  1. This journal provides immediate open access to its content. All the articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License.
  2. Authors grant the journal right of (1) first publication and distribution of the article, (2) making it available to public, (3) public presentation.
  3. Authors have the right to enter into separate contractual arrangements for posting the article to an institutional repository or publish it in a book with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are permitted to post citations from their work online (e.g. on their website) with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal (see Open Access).