High performance leadership in unusually challenging educational circumstances
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12697/eha.2015.3.1.02bAbstract
This paper draws on findings from the results of a study of leadership in high performing organizations in three sectors. Organizations were sampled and included on the basis of high performance in relation to no performance, past performance, performance among similar peers and performance in the face of limited resources or challenging circumstances. The paper concentrates on leadership in four schools that met the sample criteria. It draws connections to explanations of the high performance ofEstoniaon the OECD PISA tests of educational achievement. The article argues that leadership in these four schools that performed above expectations comprised more than a set of competencies. Instead, leadership took the form of a narrative or quest that pursued an inspiring dream with relentless determination; took improvement pathways that were more innovative than comparable peers; built collaboration and community including with competing schools; and connected short-term success to long-term sustainability.
Downloads
References
Alas, R., Tafel, K., & Tuulik, K. (2007). Leadership style during transition in society: Case of Estonia. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 5(1), 50–60.
Arreguin-Toft, I. (2001). How the weak win wars: A theory of asymmetric conflict. International Security, 26(1), 93–128. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/016228801753212868
Borman, G. D., Rachuba, L., Datnow, A., Alberg, M., MacIver, M., Stringfield, S., & Ross, S. (2000). Four models of school improvement. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.
Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
Calkins, A., Guenther, W., Belfiore, G., & Lash, D. (2007). The turnaround challenge: Why America’s best opportunity to dramatically improve student achievement lies in our worst-performing schools. Mass Insight Education (NJ1). Retrieved from http://www.oxydiane.net/IMG/pdf_TheTurnaroundChallenge_MainReport.pdf.
Chapman, C. (2008). Towards a framework for school-to-school networking in challenging circumstances. Educational Research, 50(4), 403–420. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00131880802499894
Christensen, C. M. (2013). The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (2000). Fusion leadership: Unlocking the subtle forces that change people and organizations. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Fullan, M. (2005). Leadership & sustainability: System thinkers in action. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1998). Exploring the principal’s contribution to school effectiveness: 1980–1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(2), 157– 191. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0924345980090203
Hargreaves, A., Boyle, A., & Harris, A. (2014). Uplifting leadership: How organizations, teams, and communities raise performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2006). Sustainable leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hargreaves, A., & Shirley, D. (2009). The fourth way: The inspiring future for educational change. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
Harris, A. (2008). Distributed school leadership: Developing tomorrow’s leaders. London: Routledge.
Harris, A., Chapman, C., Muijs, D., Russ, J., & Stoll, L. (2006). Improving schools in challenging contexts: Exploring the possible. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(4), 409–424. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09243450600743483
How did Estonia become a leader in technology? (2013, July). The Economist explains. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2013/07/economist-explains-21.
Kannapel, P. J., Clements, S. K., Taylor, D., & Hibpshman, T. (2005). Inside the black box of high-performing high-poverty schools. A report of the Prichard Committee for Academic Excellence. Retrieved from http://www.prichardcommittee.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Inside-the-Black-Box.pdf.
Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2000). The effects of different sources of leadership on student engagement in school. In K. A. Riley & K. Seashore Louis (Eds.), Leadership for change and school reform: International perspectives (pp. 50–66). Oxon, New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
Leithwood, K., Seashore Louis, K., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). Review
of research: How leadership influences student learning. The Wallace Foundation.
Retrieved from http://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/school-leadership/key-research/Documents/How-Leadership-Influences-Student-Learning.pdf.
OECD (2014). PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do: Student performance in mathematics, reading and science (Vol. 1, Rev. ed.). OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindingspisa-2012-results-volume-I.pdf.
Olson, P. (2012). Why Estonia has started teaching its first-graders to code. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/parmyolson/2012/09/06/why-estonia-hasstarted-teaching-its-first-graders-to-code/.
Picucci, A. C., Brownson, A., Kahlert, R., & Sobel, A. (2002). Driven to succeed: High-performing, high-poverty, turnaround middle schools. Volume I: Cross-case analysis of high-performing, high-poverty, turnaround middle schools. Austin: The University of Texas at Austin.
Robinson, V. M., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational administration quarterly, 44(5), 635–674. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08321509
Sahlberg, P. (2011). Finnish lessons: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? New York: Teachers College Press.
Spillane, J. P., & Camburn, E. (2006). The practice of leading and managing: The distribution of responsibility for leadership and management in the schoolhouse. Paper prepared for presentation at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, April 7–11, 2006.
Starratt, R. J. (2004). Ethical leadership (Vol. 8). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Stoll, L., & Fink, D. (1996). Changing our schools. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Supovitz, J. A., Sirinides, P., & May, H. (2010). How principals and peers influence teaching and learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(1), 31–56. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1094670509353043
UNICEF Office of Research (2013). Child well-being in rich countries: A comparative overview. Innocenti Report Card 11. Florence: UNICEF Office of Research.
Winter, S. G. (2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 991–995. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.318
Wise Channel (2014). PISA rankings: Estonia on the upgrade [video file]. Available from http://youtu.be/9_uHF2H0NyI.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors who publish in Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakiri. Estonian Journal of Education agree to the following terms:
- This journal provides immediate open access to its content. All the articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License.
- Authors grant the journal right of (1) first publication and distribution of the article, (2) making it available to public, (3) public presentation.
- Authors have the right to enter into separate contractual arrangements for posting the article to an institutional repository or publish it in a book with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted to post citations from their work online (e.g. on their website) with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal (see Open Access).
