Connecting professionalism, learning and identity

Authors

  • Manon C. P. Ruijters
  • P. Robert-Jan Simons

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12697/eha.2020.8.2.02b

Keywords:

professional learning, professional identity, learning communities, categories of learning, professional learning culture, learning preferences

Abstract

This is a conceptual article in which we try to connect some of our previous publications into a coherent new model of learner identity. The first phase of our research concerns the research and theories about professional and work-related learning, followed by work on the learning landscape: a metaphor for organizational learning. The third phase looks at added learning preferences: five ways of work-related learning. Phase four introduces the concept of the learning professional, and phase five looks at research and theories about professional identity: what inalienably connects: who you are (person), the work you do (profession) and the context in which you shape it. In the discussion, we try to explain how the various models can be connected, differentiated and integrated. Professional identity is the basis for all the other approaches. In an integrated set of questions, we bring it all together, introducing the new concept of learner identity and focusing on consequences for facilitating a professional learning culture.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

Berings, M.G.M.C. (2006). On-the-job learning styles: conceptualization and instrument development for the nursing profession. PhD. Tilburg: Tilburg University.

Bolhuis, S. M. (1995). Leren en veranderen bij volwassenen. Een nieuwe benadering. [Learning and change with adults: a new approach]. Bussum: Coutinho.

Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Doornbos, A. J. (2006). Work related learning at the Dutch police force. PhD. Nijmegen: Radboud University.

Engeström, Y. (1999). Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, R.-L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 377–404). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812774.025

Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Romer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363

Freidson, E. (2001). Professionalism: the third logic. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Gardner, H., & Shulman, L. S. (2005). The professions in America today: Crucial but fragile. Daedalus, 134, 13–18. https://doi.org/10.1162/0011526054622132

Greenwood, E. (1957). Attributes of a profession. Social work, July, 45–55.

Illeris, K. (2014). Transformative learning and identity. New York: Routledge.

James, W. (1890). The Principles of Psychology. Adelaide (Australia): eBooks@Adelaide. The University of Adelaide Library. University of Adelaide.

Kegan, R. (2009). What 'form' transforms? A constructive-developmental approach to transformative learning. K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning (pp. 35–52). New York: Routledge.

Meggison, D. (1996). Planned and emergent learning. Management Learning, 27, 411–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507696274002

Nolin, J. (2008). In search of a new theory of professions. Report of the University of Borås (Sweden) in the series Science for the professions, 4, 1–53.

Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2002). Epistemological foundations for CSCL: A comparison of three models of innovative knowledge. G. Stahl (Ed.), Proceedings of CSCL 2002 (pp. 24–32). Hillsdale: Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.3115/1658616.1658621

Ruijters, M. C. P. (2006). Liefde voor leren [Love for learning]. Doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University.

Ruijters, M. C. P., & Simons, P. R. J. (2006). Het leerlandschap van organisaties [The learning landscape of organizations]. Develop, 2, 54–63.

Ruijters, M. C. P. (Ed.) (2015a). Je binnenste buiten. Over professionele identiteit in organisaties. [Your inside out. About professional identity in organizations]. Deventer: Vakmedianet.

Ruijters, M. C. P. (2015b). Praktijkverkenningen. [Exploring practice] M. C. P. Ruijters (Ed.), Je binnenste buiten. Over professionele identiteit in organisaties. [Your inside out. About professional identity in organizations] (pp. 145–190). Deventer: Vakmedianet.

Ruijters, M. C. P. (2015c). Professionele identiteit. [Professional identity]. In M. C. P. Ruijters (Ed.), Je binnenste buiten. Over professionele identiteit in organisaties. [Your inside out. About professional identity in organizations] (pp. 191–240). Deventer: Vakmedianet.

Ruijters, M. P. C., & Simons, P. R. J. (2015). Professionaliteit [Professionality]. M. C. P. Ruijters (Ed.), Je binnenste buiten. Over professionele identiteit in organisaties. [Your inside out. About professional identity in organizations] (pp. 59–98). Deventer: Vakmedianet.

Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization. London: Random House.

Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27, 4–13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X027002004

Shaffer, D. W. (2006). How Computer Games Help Children Learn. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Simons, P. R. J., & Ruijters, M. C. P. (2001). Work related learning: Elaborate, expand, externalise. In L. Nieuwenhuis (Ed.), Dynamics and stability in VET and HRD (pp. 101–114). Enschede: Twente University Press.

Simons P. R. J., & Ruijters M. C. P. (2004). Learning Professionals: Towards an Integrated Model. H.P.A. Boshuizen, R. Bromme, & H. Gruber (Eds.) Professional Learning: Gaps and Transitions on the Way from Novice to Expert. Innovation and Change in Professional Education (pp. 207–229). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2094-5_11

Simons, P. R. J., & Ruijters, M. C. P. (2008). Varieties of work-related learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 47(4), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2008.07.001

Simons, P. R. J., & Ruijters, M. C. P. (2014). The real professional is a learning professional. S. Billet, C. Harteis & H. Gruber (Eds.), International Handbook of research in professional and practice based learning (pp. 955–985). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8902-8_35

Thijssen, J. (1987). Bedrijfsopleidingen als werkterrein. [Training and development as field of work]. Den Haag: Vuga.

Van Oeffelt, T., Ruijters, M. C. P., Van Hees, A., & Simons, P. R. J. (2017). Professional identity, a neglected core concept of professional development. K. Black, R. Warhurst, & S. Corlett (Eds.), Identity as a Foundation for Human Resource Development (pp. 237–252). London: Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315671482-16

Van Oeffelt, T. P. A., Ruijters, M. C. P., & Wempe, J. F. D. B. (2020). Towards collective professionalism: Lessons from a systematic review of literature on the history of professionalism. Manuscript in preparation.

Downloads

Published

2020-11-01

How to Cite

Ruijters, M. C. P., & Simons, P. R.-J. (2020). Connecting professionalism, learning and identity. Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakiri. Estonian Journal of Education, 8(2), 32–56. https://doi.org/10.12697/eha.2020.8.2.02b

Issue

Section

Articles