Matemaatikapädevuse dimensioonid ja nende hindamine põhikoolis

Ainevaldkond "Matemaatika". Põhikooli riiklik õppekava. Lisa 3 (2014). Riigi Teataja 2011, 1. Külastatud aadressil https://www.riigiteataja.ee/aktilisa/1290/8201/4018/141m%20lisa3.pdf#

Ainsworth, S., Bibby, P., & Wood, D. (1997, August). Evaluating principles for multirepresentational learning environments. Paper presented at the 7th European Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction, Athens, Greece, 500–501.

Boesen, J., Lithner, J., & Palm, T. (2018). Assessing mathematical competencies: an analysis of Swedish national mathematics tests. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62(1), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1212256

Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2001). Applying the Rasch model fundamental measurement in the human sciences. ERL Lawrence Baum Associates Publishers, London.

Bowen, N. K., & Guo, S. (2011). Structural equation modelling. New York: Oxford University Press.

Cai, J., Jakabcsin, M. S., & Lane, S. (1996). Assessing students’ mathematical communication. School Science and Mathematics, 96(5), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1996.tb10235.x

Edwards, M., Harper, S., Cox, D., Quinlan, J., & Phelps, S. (2014). Cultivating deductive thinking with angle chasing. The Mathematics Teacher, 107(6), 426–431. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacher.107.6.0426

Elia, I., Gagatsis, A., & Demetriou, A. (2007). The effects of different modes of representation on the solution of one-step additive problems. Learning and Instruction, 17, 658–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.011

Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Compton, D. L., Powell, S. R., Seethaler, P. M., Capizzi, A. M., et al. (2006). The cognitive correlates of third-grade skill in arithmetic, algorithmic computation, and arithmetic word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.29

Grønmo, L. S., Lindquist, M., Arora, A., & Mullis, I. V. S. (2015) TIMSS 2015 Mathematics Framework. Külastatud aadressil https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2015/downloads/T15_FW_Chap1.pdf

Haapasalo, L., & Kadijevich, D. (2000). Two types of mathematical knowledge and their relation. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 21, 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03338914

Halmos, P.R. (1980). The heart of mathematics. The American Mathematical Monthly, 87(7), 519–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029890.1980.11995081

Hasanah, S. I., Tafrilyanto, C. R., & Aini, Y. (2019). Mathematical reasoning: The characteristics of students’ mathematical abilities in problem solving. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1188. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012057

Hendriana, H., Slamet, U. R., & Sumarmo, U. (2014). Mathematical connection ability and self-confidence (An experiment on junior high school students through contextual teaching and learning with mathematical manipulative). International Journal of Education, 8(1), 1–11. https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/ije/article/view/1726/1176

Højsted, I. H. (2021). Teachers reporting on dynamic geometry utilization related to reasoning competency in Danish lower secondary school. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 6, 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-020-00059-3

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (2009). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Johanson, M., Pedaste, M., Pastak, M., Täht, K., Sõrmus, M., & Jukk, H. (2021). Matemaatikapädevuse hindamine Eesti e-tasemetöödega. Estonian Journal of Education/Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakiri, 9(2), 100–126. https://doi.org/10.12697/eha.2021.9.2.05

Jones, K. (2000). Providing a foundation for deductive reasoning: Students’ interpretations when using dynamic geometry software and their evolving mathematical explanations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44(1/2), 55–85. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012789201736

Juandi, D. (2021). Heterogeneity of problem-based learning outcomes for improving mathematical competence: A systematic literature review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1722. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1722/1/012108

Kikas, E., Peets, K., Palu, A., & Afanasjev, J. (2009). The role of individual and contextual factors in the development of maths skills. Educational psychology, 29(5), 541–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410903118499

Larsson, M., & Ryve, A. (2012). Balancing on the edge of competency-oriented versus procedural-oriented practices: Orchestrating whole-class discussions of complex mathematical problems. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 24(4), 447–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-012-0049-0

Leung, A. (2015). Discernment and reasoning in dynamic geometry environments. In S. Cho (Ed.), Selected regular lectures from the 12th international congress on mathematical education, 451–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17187-6_26

Linacre, J. M. (2020). Winsteps1 (Version 4.5.4) [Arvuti tarkvara]. Beaverton: Winsteps.com http://www.winsteps.com.

Lithner, J. (2008). A research framework for creative and imitative reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67, 255–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-007-9104-2

Lithner, J., Bergqvist, E., Bergqvist, T., Boesen, J., Palm, T., & Palmberg, B. (2010). Mathematical competencies: A research framework. In The seventh mathematics education research seminar, Stockholm, January 26–27, 2010 (pp. 157–167). Svensk förening för matematikdidaktisk forskning, SMDF.

Lomibao, L. S., Luna, C. A., & Namoco, R. A. (2016). The influence of mathematical communication on students’ mathematics performance and anxiety. American Journal of Educational Research, 4(5), 378–382. http://pubs.sciepub.com/education/4/5/3/.

Lühikokkuvõte 2022/2023. õppeaasta 4. klassi matemaatika tasemetöö tulemustest (2022). Haridus- ja Noorteameti kodulehekülg. Külastatud aadressil https://projektid.edu.ee/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=144345118.

Lühikokkuvõte 2022/2023. õppeaasta 7. klassi matemaatika tasemetöö tulemustest (2022). Haridus- ja Noorteameti kodulehekülg. Külastatud aadressil https://projektid.edu.ee/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=144345148

Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2016). Mplus. Version 7.4 [Computer software]. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

NCTM (2000). Executive summary. Principles and standards for school mathematics. Külastatud aadressil https://www.nctm.org/uploadedFiles/Standards_and_Positions/PSSM_ExecutiveSummary.pdf

Neumann, I., Duchhardt, C., Grüßing, M., Heinze, A., Knopp, E., & Ehmke, T. (2013). Modeling and assessing mathematical competence over the lifespan. Journal for educational research online, 5(2), 80–109. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:8426

Niss, M. (2003). Mathematical competencies and the learning of mathematics: the Danish KOM project.

Niss, M., & Højgaard, T. (2019). Mathematical competencies revisited. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 102(1), 9–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09903-9

Niss, M., & Jensen, T.H. (eds.). (2002). Kompetencer og matematiklæring. Uddannelsesstyrelsens temahæfteserie, 18, 1–334, Undervisningsministeriet (Ministry of Education).

Nunes, T., & Csapó, B. (2011). Developing and assessing mathematical reasoning.

OECD (2000). Measuring Student Knowledge and Skill. The PISA 2000 assessment of reading, mathematical and scientific literacy. Külastatud aadressil http://www.oecd.org/education/school/programmeforinternationalstudentassessmentpisa/33692793.pdf

OECD (2003). The PISA 2003 assessment framework – mathematics, reading, science and problem solving, knowldge and skills. Külastatud aadressil http://www.oecd.org/education/school/programmeforinternationalstudentassessmentpisa/33694881.pdf

OECD (2018). Assessment and analytical framework. Külastatud aadressil http://www.oecd.org/education/pisa-2018-assessment-and-analytical-framework-b25efab8-en.htm

Pedaste, M. , Baucal A., & Reisenbuk, E. (2021). Towards a science inquiry test in primary education: development of items and scales. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(19). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00278-z

Pedersen, M. K., Bach, C. C., Gregersen, R. M., Højsted, I. H., & Jankvist, U. T. (2021). Mathematical representation competency in relation to use of digital technology and task design. A literature review. Mathematics, 9(4), 444. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9040444

Phonapichat, P., Wongwanich, S., & Sujiva, S. (2014). An analysis of elementary school students’ difficulties in mathematical problem solving, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3169–3174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.728

Primi, R., Ferrão, M. E., Almeida, L. S. (2010). Fluid intelligence as a predictor of learning: a longitudinal multilevel approach applied to math. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(5), 46–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.05.001

Põhikooli ja gümnaasiumi riiklik õppekava (2002). Riigi Teataja I 2002, 20, 116. Külastatud aadressil https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/12888846

Põhikooli matemaatika lõpueksami eristuskiri (2015). Haridus- ja Noorteameti kodulehekülg. Külastatud aadressil https://harno.ee/eksamid-testid-ja-uuringud/eksamid-testid-ja-lopudokumendid/pohikooli-lopueksamid#materjalid

Põhikooli riiklik õppekava (2021). Riigi Teataja I 2021, 10. Külastatud aadressil https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/123042021010

Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

Singley, A. T. M., & Bunge, S. A. (2014). Neurodevelopment of relational reasoning: Implications for mathematical pedagogy. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 3, 33–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2014.03.001

Siregar, N. D., & Surya, E. (2017). Analysis of students’ junior high school mathematical connectionability. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 33(2), 309–320.

Sumirattana, S., Makanong, A., & Thipkong, S. (2017). Using realistic mathematics education and the DAPIC problem-solving process to enhance secondary school students’ mathematical literacy. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(3), 307–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2016.06.001

Stylianou, D. A. (2011). An examination of middle school students’ representation practices in mathematical problem solving through the lens of expert work: Towards an organizing scheme. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 76, 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9273-2

Toomela, A., Mädamürk, K., Soodla, P., & Härma, E. (Toim) (2020). Arvutipõhised hindamisvahendid lugemis- ja matemaatikapädevuse hindamiseks põhikooli I ja II kooliastmes. Juhendid testide läbiviimiseks ja tulemuste interpreteerimiseks. Külastatud aadressil https://www.innove.ee/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Juhend_o%CC%83petajatele_kujundatud.pdf

Voutsina, C. (2012). Procedural and conceptual changes in young children’s problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79, 193–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9334-1