Õpetajate hoiakud ja enesetõhusus kaasava hariduse rakendamisel: eestikeelsete DATIS- ja TEIP-SF-küsimustike psühhomeetriliste näitajate hindamine
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12697/eha.2025.13.1.08Märksõnad:
hoiakud kaasava hariduse rakendamisel, enesetõhusus kaasava hariduse rakendamisel, õpetajad, psühhomeetriaKokkuvõte
Et rakendada kaasavat haridust tõhusalt, tuleb mõtestada vajaminevat toetust ja parandada vajadusel hariduspraktikate kvaliteeti. Seepärast on oluline uurida ja hinnata õpetajate hoiakuid ja enesetõhusust. Eestis on kaasava haridusega seotud hoiakute ja enesetõhususe mõõtmiseks kasutatud mitmeid küsimustikke, kuid vajadus spetsiifiliselt kaasava hariduse rakendamise kontekstiks kohandatud mõõtevahendite järele püsib. Uuringus eestindati küsimustikud DATIS ja TEIP-SF, kasutades tagasitõlke meetodit. Seejärel rakendati uurivat ja kinnitavat faktoranalüüsi, et hinnata mõõtevahendite psühhomeetrilisi omadusi ja struktuurset valiidsust eesti keeles. Tulemuste põhjal selgus, et eestindatud uurimisinstrumentidel DATIS-EE ja TEIP-SF-EE on sobivad psühhomeetrilised omadused, et rakendada neid kaasava hariduse kontekstis ja hinnata õpetajate kaasava haridusega seotud hoiakuid ja uskumusi.
Allalaadimised
Viited
Alnahdi, G. H. (2019). Rasch validation of the Arabic version of the Teacher Efficacy for Inclusive Practices (TEIP) scale. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 62, 104–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.05.004
Avramidis, E., Toulia, A., Tsihouridies, C., & Stroilos, V. (2019). Teachers’ attitudes towards inclusion and their self-efficacy for inclusive practices as predictors of willingness to implement peer tutoring. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 19(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12477
Bandura, A. (1997) Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
Cardona-Molto, M. C., Ticha, R., & Abery, B. H. (2020). The Spanish version of the Teacher Efficacy for Inclusive Practice (TEIP) scale: Adaptation and psychometric properties. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 809–823. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.2.809
Conroy, M. A., Sutherland, K. S., Algina, J., Ladwig, C., Werch, B., et al. (2019). Outcomes of the BEST in CLASS intervention on teachers’ use of effective practices, self-efficacy, and classroom quality. School Psychology Review, 48(1), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR-2018-0003.V48-1
de Boer, A., Pijl, S. J., & Minnaert, A. (2011). Regular primary school teachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education: A review of the literature. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15(3), 331–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110903030089
deVellis R. F., & Thorpe, C. T. (2022). Scale development. Theory and applications (5th ed.). SAGE.
Ewing, D. L., Monsen, J. J., & Kielblock, S. (2017). Teachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education: A critical review of published questionnaires. Educational Psychology in Practice, 34(2), 150–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667363.2017.1417822
Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statsitics (4th edition.). SAGE.
Forlin, C., Loreman, T., & Sharma, U. (2011). The Sentiments, Attitudes, and Concerns about Inclusive Education Revised (SACIE-R) scale for measuring pre-service teachers’ perceptions about inclusion. Exceptionality Education International, 21(3), 50–65. https://doi.org/10.5206/eei.v21i3.7682
Harkness, J. A., Villar, A., & Edwards, B. (2010). Translation, adaptation, and design. In J. A. Harkness, M. Braun, B. Edwards et al., (Eds.), Survey methods in multinational, multiregional, and multicultural contexts (pp. 117–140). Wiley.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Jakubovic, E., & Memisevic, H. (2024). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Teacher Efficacy for Inclusive Practices scale: A study of teachers in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Journal of Research in Special Needs Education, 24(4), 1026–1034. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12693
Jordan, A., Schwartz, E., & McGhie-Richmond, D. (2009). Preparing teachers for inclusive classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(4), 535–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.02.010
Kaiser, H. F., & Rice, J. (1974). Little Jiffy, Mark Iv. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34(1), 111–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447403400115
Kell, K., & Lindemann, K. (2021). Õpetaja enesetõhusus kaasava hariduse rakendamisel – Teacher Efficacy for Inclusive Practices (TEIP) skaala adapteerimine eesti keelde. [Magistritöö, Tallinna Ülikool]. ETERA https://www.etera.ee/s/dFTIWHNuq4
Kielblock, S. (2018). Inclusive education for all: Development of an instrument to measure the teachers’ attitudes (Doctoral dissertation). Justus Liebig University Giessen, Germany; Macquarie University Sydney, Australia.
Kivirand, T., Leijen, Ä., Lepp, L., & Malva, L. (2020). Kaasava hariduse tähendus ja tõhusa rakendamise tegurid Eesti kontekstis: õpetajaid koolitavate või nõustavate spetsialistide vaade. Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakiri, 8(1), 48–71. https://doi.org/10.12697/eha.2020.8.1.03
Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (5th edition.). Guilford.
Künsting, J., Neuber, V., & Lipowsky, F. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy as a long-term predictor of instructional quality in the classroom. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 31, 299–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-015-0272-7
Leijen, Ä., Arcidiacono, F., & Baucal, A. (2021). The dilemma of inclusive education: Inclusion for some or inclusion for all. Frontiers in Psychology, 12–2021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.633066
Leijen, Ä., Pedaste, M., Baucal, A., Poom-Valickis, K., & Lepp, L. (2024). What predicts instructional quality and commitments to teaching: Self-efficacy, pedagogical knowledge or integration of the two? Frontiers in Psychology, 15–2024. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1287313
Lohmann, A., Wulfekühler, H., Wiedebusch, S., & Hensen, G. (2018). Parents’ attitudes towards inclusive education in day care facilities. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 23(12), 1232–1247. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1444106
Lübke, L., Pinquart, M., & Schwinger, M. (2019). How to measure teachers’ attitudes towards inclusion: evaluation and validation of the Differentiated Attitudes Towards Inclusion Scale (DATIS). European Journal of Special Needs Education, 34(3), 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2018.1479953
MacFarlane, K., & Woolfson L. M. (2013). Teacher attitudes and behavior toward the inclusion of children with social, emotional and behavioral difficulties in mainstream schools: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.08.006
Matić, I., Škrbić, R., Kerkez, J., & Veselinović, M. (2022). Self-assessment of teacher efficacy in Serbia: Serbian adaptation of the Teacher Efficacy for Inclusive Practice (TEIP) scale. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 38(4), 497–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2022.2120333
Monsen, J. J., Ewing, D. L., & Boyle, J. (2015). Psychometric properties of the revised Teachers’ Attitude Towards Inclusion Scale. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 3(1), 64–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2014.938383
Monsen, J. J., Ewing, D. L., & Kwoka, M. (2014) Teachers’ attitudes towards inclusion, perceived adequacy of support and classroom learning environment. Learning Environments Research, 17, 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-013-9144-8
Narkun, Z., & Smogorzewska, J. (2019). Studying self-efficacy among teachers in Poland is important: Polish adaptation of the Teacher Efficacy for Inclusive Practice (TEIP) scale. Exceptionality Education International, 29(2), 110–216. https://doi.org/10.5206/eei.v29i2.9405
Newsom, J. T. (2023). Summary of miminum sample size recommendations. Portland State University. https://web.pdx.edu/~newsomj/semclass/ho_sample%20size.pdf.
Park, M.-H., Dimitrov, D. M., Das, A., & Gichuru, M. (2016). The Teacher Efficacy of Inclusive Practices (TEIP) scale: Dimensionality and factor structure. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 16(1), 2–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12047
Pedaste, M., Leijen, Ä., Kivirand, T., Nelis, P., & Malva, L. (2021). School leaders’ vision is the strongest predictor of their attitudes towards inclusive education practice. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 28(8), 1503–1519. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2021.1994661
Poom-Valickis, K., & Ulla, T. (2024). The potential of action research to support positive attitudes toward inclusive education in initial teacher education. Teoses V. Symeonidis (Toim) Enhancing the value of teacher education research: Implications for policy and practice (lk 274–297). TEPE Book Series: Brill. https://brill.com/downloadpdf/display/title/69609.pdf.
Põhikooli- ja gümnaasiumiseadus (2010). RT I, 09.06.2010, 240. https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/13332410.
Põhikooli ja gümnaasiumiseadus (2018). RT I, 1.02.2018, 3. https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/122012018003.
Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
Räis, M.-L., Kallaste, E., & Sandre, S. (2016). Haridusliku erivajadusega õpilaste kaasava hariduskorralduse ja sellega seotud meetmete tõhusus. Uuringu lõppraport. Eesti Rakendusuuringute keskus CENTAR. https://centar.ee/uus/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Pohiraport-final.pdf.
Räis, M.-L., & Sõmer, M. (2016). Haridusliku erivajadusega õpilaste kaasava hariduskorralduse ja sellega seotud meetmete tõhusus. Temaatiline raport: kaasamise tähenduslikkus. Eesti Rakendusuuringute keskus CENTAR. https://centar.ee/pdf/ee/2016_Haridusliku_erivajadusega_opilaste_kaasava_hariduskorralduse_ja_sellega_seotud_meetmete_tohusus_kaasamise_tahenduslikkus.pdf.
Sahli Lozano, C., Brandenberg, K., Ganz, A.S., & Wüthrich, S. (2022). Accommodations, modifications, and special education interventions: Influence on teacher expectations. Educational Research and Evaluation, 27(5–8), 396–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2022.2103571
Sahli Lozano, C., Wütrich, S., Baumli, N., Sharma, U, Loreman, T., & Forlin, C. (2023). Development and validation of a short form of the Teacher Efficacy for Inclusive Practices Scale (TEIP-SF). Journal of Research in Specian Educational Needs, 23(4), 263–388. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12607
Saloviita, T. (2015). Measuring pre-service teachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education: Psychometric properties of the TAIS scale. Teaching and Teacher Education, 52, 66–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.09.003
Saloviita, T. (2020). Attitudes of teachers towards inclusive education in Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 64(2), 270–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2018.1541819
Savolainen, H., Malinen, O.-P., & Schwab, S. (2020). Teacher efficacy predicts teachers’ attitudes towards inclusion: A longitudinal cross-lagged analysis. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 1(15), 958–978. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1752826
Shaeffer, S. (2019). Inclusive education: A prerequisite for equity and social justice. Asia Pacific Education Review 20, 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09598-w
Sharma, U., Loreman, T., & Forlin, C. (2012). Measuring teacher efficacy to implement inclusive practices. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 12(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-3802.2011.01200.x
Silm, G., Lepp, L., Kivirand, T., Leijen, Ä., Pedaste, M., Nelis, P., Rikanson, L., Sild, A., & Kutti, A. (2024). Kaasava hariduskorralduse tõhusus üldhariduses 2023. Uuringu lõppraport. Tartu Ülikool. Haridusteaduste Instituut. https://www.hm.ee/sites/default/files/documents/2024-09/Kaasava%20hariduskorralduse%20t%C3%B5husus%20%C3%BCldhariduses%202023%20L%C3%95PPRAPORT.pdf.
Sousa, V. D., & Rojjanasrirat, W. (2011). Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: A clear and user-friendly guideline. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 17(2), 268–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x
Takala, M., Pihlaja, P., & Viljamaa, E. (2023). ‘Yes it’s good, but … ’ – student teachers’ inclusion narratives. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 67(7), 1056–1068. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2022.2115133
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(1), 783–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
Täht, K., Mikkor, K., Aaviste, G., & Rozgonjuk, D. (2024). What motivates and demotivates Estonian mathematics teachers to continue teaching? The roles of self-efficacy, work satisfaction, and work experience. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 27(6), 961–980. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-023-09587-2
UNESCO. (2019, September). Inclusive education for persons with disabilities – Are we making progress? Background paper prepared for the International Forum on inclusion and equity in education – Every learner matters, Cali, Colombia. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/in/rest/annotationSVC/DownloadWatermarkedAttachment/attach_import_a3696852-2552-4df3-874a-b46d170693d9?_=370386eng.pdf&to=51&from=1.
Valgma, I. (2024). Õpetajate kaasava hariduse hoiakute skaalade DATIS ja TAIS adapteerimine eesti keelde. [Magistritöö, Tallinna Ülikool]. ETERA https://www.etera.ee/s/NZfBJvREqc .
Vapper, T. (2024, 4. juuni). Koolidel napib võimalusi HEV-õpilasi aidata. Õpetajate leht. https://opleht.ee/2024/06/koolidel-napib-voimalusi-hev-opilasi-aidata/.
Vogiatzi, C-A., Charitaki, G., Korukoutas, E., & Forlin, C. (2022). The Teacher Efficacy for Inclusive Practices (TEIP) Scale: Further evidence for construct validity in Greek-speaking teachers. Prospects, 52, 387–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-022-09605-w
Weisel, A., & Dror, O. (2006). School climate, sense of efficacy and Israeli teachers’ attitudes towards inclusion of students with special needs. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 1(2), 157–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197906064677
Wilson, C., Marks Woolfson, L., Durkin, K., & Elliott, M. A. (2016). The impact of social cognitive and personality factors on teachers’ reported inclusive behaviour. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(3), 353–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12118
Yada, A., Leskinen, M., Savolainen, H., & Schwab, S. (2022). Meta-analysis of the relationship between teachers’ self-efficacy and attitudes toward inclusive education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 109, 103521, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103521
##submission.downloads##
Avaldatud
Kuis viidata
Väljaanne
Rubriik
Litsents
Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakirja autorid nõustuvad allpool esitatud tingimustega.
- Ajakirjas avaldatud artiklitele on tagatud vaba juurdepääs Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 litsentsiga määratud õiguste mahus.
- Autor loovutab ajakirjale tasuta tema poolt loodud artikli varalised õigused, sh õiguse artikli (1) avaldamisele ja levitamisele, (2) üldsusele kättesaadavaks tegemisele ja eksponeerimisele, (3) avalikule esitamisele.
- Autoril on õigus Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakirja eelneval nõusolekul sõlmida lepinguid kolmandate isikutega publitseeritud artikli säilitamiseks raamatukogu repositooriumis või avaldamiseks raamatu peatükina. Nõudeks on teiseses töös viitamine esmasele allikale, st artiklile Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakirjas.
- Pärast artikli ilmumist ajakirjas on autoritel lubatud avaldada Internetis (nt oma veebilehel) motiveeritud mahus tsitaate ning levitada linke koos korrektse viitega ajakirjas ilmunud artiklile (vt Open Access).