9. klassi õpilaste huvi eri kontekstis esitatud loodusteaduslike teemade õppimise vastu ja motivatsioon õppida loodusteadusi

Ainley, M., Hidi, S., & Berndorff, D. (2002). Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 545–561. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.545

Alebiosu, K. A. (2006). Gender and students’ interests in organic chemistry topics at the senior secondary level. Gender and Behavior, 4(1), 522–533. https://doi.org/10.4314/gab.v4i1.23343

Badri, M., Al Mazroui, K., Al Rashedi, A., & Yang, G. (2016). Variation by gender in Abu Dhabi high school students’ interests in physics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(2), 232–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9589-x

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review Psychology, 52, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1

Baram-Tsabari, A., & Kaadni, A. (2009). Gender dependency and cultural independency of science interest in an open and distant science learning environment. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i2.591

Baram-Tsabari, A., Sethi, R. J., Bry, L., & Yarden, A. (2010). Identifying students’ interests in biology using a decade of self-generated questions. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 6(1), 63–75.

Bennett, J., Lubben, F., & Hogarth, S. (2007). Bringing science to life: A synthesis of the research evidence on the effects of context-based and STS approaches to science teaching. Science Education, 91(3), 347–370. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20186

Betzner, J. P., & Marek, E. A. (2014). Teacher and student perceptions of earth science and its educational value in secondary schools. Creative Education, 5(11), 1019–1031. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2014.511116

Broman, K., Bernholt, S., & Parchmann, I. (2015). Analysing task design and students’ responses to context-based problems through different analytical frameworks. Research in Science & Technological Education, 33(2), 143–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2014.989495

Broman, K., & Parchmann, I. (2014). Students’ application of chemical concepts when solving chemistry problems in different contexts. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(4), 516–529. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RP00051J

Brophy, J. (2010). Kuidas õpilasi motiveerida. Käsiraamat õpetajatele. Tallinn: Archimedes.

Chen, A., & Shen, B. (2004). A web of achieving in physical education: Goals, interest, outside-school activity and learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 14(3), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2004.02.003

Cheng, Y.-C., & Yeh, H-Te (2009). From concepts of motivation to its application in instructional design: Reconsidering motivation from an instructional design perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(4), 597–605. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00857.x

Christidou, V. (2006). Greek students’ science related interests and experiences: Gender differences and correlations. International Journal of Science Education, 28(10), 1181–1199. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500439389

Dawson, C. (2000). Upper primary boys’ and girls’ interests in science: Have they changed since 1980? International Journal of Science Education, 22(6), 557–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900289660

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Self-determination research: Reflections and future directions. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 431–441). Rochester: University of Rochester Press.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2015). SDT: Questionnaires: Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI). Retrieved from http://selfdeterminationtheory.org/intrinsic-motivation-inventory/.

De Jong, O. (2006). Making chemistry meaningful: Conditions for successful context-based teaching. Education Quimica, 17, 215–221.

DeWitt, J., & Archer, L. (2015). Who aspires to a science career? A comparison of survey responses from primary and secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 37(13), 2170–2192. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1071899

Dohn, N. B. (2011). Upper secondary students’ situational interest: A case study of the role of a zoo visit in a biology class. International Journal of Science Education, 35(16), 2732–2751. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.628712

Eesti elukestva õppe strateegia 2020 (2014). Haridus- ja Teadusministeerium, Eesti Koostöö Kogu, sihtasutus Eesti Haridusfoorum. Külastatud aadressil https://hm.ee/sites/default/files/strateegia2020.pdf.

Fensham, P. J. (2004). Increasing the relevance of science and technology education for all students in the 21st century. Science Education International, 15(1), 7–27.

Gardner, P. L., & Tamir, P. (1989). Interest in biology. Part I: A multidimensional construct. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(5), 409–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660260506

Gilbert, J. K. (2006). On the nature of context in chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 957–976. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600702470

Gilbert, J. K., Bulte, A. M. W., & Pilot, A. (2011). Concept development and transfer in context-based science education. International Journal of Science Education, 33(6), 817–837. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.493185

Glynn, S. M., Brickman, P., Armstrong, N., & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2011). Science Motivation Questionnaire II: Validation with science majors and nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1159–1176. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20442

Glynn, S. M., & Koballa, T. R., Jr. (2006). Motivation to learn college science. In J. J. Mintzes & W. H. Leonard (Eds.), Handbook of college science teaching (pp. 25–32). Arlington: National Science Teachers Association Press.

Glynn, S. M., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Brickman, P. (2009). Science Motivation Questionnaire: Construct validation with nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(2), 127–146. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20267

Hagay, G., Baram-Tsabari, A., Ametller, J., Cakmakci, G., Lopes, B., Moreira, A., & Pedrosa-de-Jesus, H. (2013). The generalizability of students’ interests in biology across gender, country and religion. Research in Science Education, 43(3), 895–919. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9289-y

Hair, J. F., Jr., William, C. B., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper-Saddle River: Pearson Education.

Harp, S. F., & Mayer, R. E. (1997). The role of interest in learning from scientific text and illustrations: On the distinction between emotional interest and cognitive interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 92–102. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.92

Hidi, S. (1990). Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational Research, 60(4), 549–571. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543060004549

Hidi, S. (2000). An interest researcher’s perspective: The effects of extrinsic and intrinsic factors on motivation. In C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic motivation: Controversies and new directions (pp. 309–339). New York: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012619070-0/50033-7

Hidi, S. (2001). Interest, reading, and learning: Theoretical and practical considerations. Educational Psychology Review, 13(3), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016667621114

Hidi, S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2000). Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century. Review of Educational Research, 70(2), 151–179. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070002151

Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4

Hidi, S., Renninger, K. A., & Krapp, A. (2004). Interest, a motivational variable that combines affective and cognitive functioning. In D. Y. Dai & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp. 89–115). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Hong, J.-L., Shim, K.-C., & Chang, N.-K. (1998). A study of Korean middle school students’ interests in biology and their implications for biology education. International Journal of Science Education, 20(8), 989–999. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980200806

Häussler, P., & Hoffmann, L. (2002). An intervention study to enhance girls’ interest, self-concept, and achievement in physics classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(9), 870–888. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10048

King, D. (2012). New perspectives on context-based chemistry education: Using a dialectical sociocultural approach to view teaching and learning. Studies in Science Education, 48(1), 51–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2012.655037

Krapp, A. (1999). Interest, motivation and learning: An educational-psychological perspective. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14(l), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173109

Krapp, A. (2002). An educational-psychological theory of interest and its relation to SDT. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 405–427). Rochester: University of Rochester Press.

Krapp, A. (2005). Basic needs and the development of interest and intrinsic motivational orientations. Learning and Instruction, 15(5), 381–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.007

Krapp, A., Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (1992). Interest, learning and development. In K. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 3–25). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

Krapp, A., & Prenzel, M. (2011). Research on interest in science: Theories, methods, and findings. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.518645

Larson, R. W. (2000). Toward a psychology of positive youth development. American Psychologist, 55(1), 170–183. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.170

Lavonen, J., Gedrovics, J., Byman, R., Meisalo, V., Juuti, K., & Uitto, A. (2008). Students’ motivational orientations and career choice in science and technology: A comparative investigation in Finland and Latvia. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 7(2), 86–102.

Lepper, M. R., Corpus, J. H., & Iyengar, S. S. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: Age differences and academic correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 184–196. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.184

Levitt, K. E. (2001). An analysis of elementary teachers’ beliefs regarding the teaching and learning of science. Science Education, 86(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1042

Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2006). New directions in goal-setting theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(5), 265–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00449.x

Maehr, M. L., & Meyer, H. A. (1997). Understanding motivation and schooling: Where we’ve been, where we are, and where we need to go. Educational Psychology Review, 9(4), 371–409. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024750807365

Matthews, B. (2004). Promoting emotional literacy, equity and interest in science lessons for 11–14 year olds; the ‘Improving Science and Emotional Development’ project. International Journal of Science Education, 26(3), 281–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000097406

Merenda, P. F. (1997). Methods, plainly speaking: A guide to the proper use of factor analysis in the conduct and reporting of research: Pitfalls to avoid. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 30(3), 156–164.

OECD (2007). PISA 2006. Science competencies for tomorrow’s word. Volume I: Analysis. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/9807011e.pdf?expires=1482159352&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=05D0789B67C3C0A68C9FB0923E0A2209.

OECD (2016). PISA 2015 results (Vol. 1). Excellence and equity in education. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/education/pisa-2015-results-volume-i_9789264266490-en#.WFfpYVN96Uk.

Osborne, J. W. (2015). What is rotating in exploratory factor analysis? Practical assessment, Research & Evaluation, 20(2). Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=20&n=2.

Osborne, J., & Collins, S. (2001). Pupils’ views of the role and value of the science curriculum: a focus group study. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 441–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690010006518

Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199

Pilot, A., & Bulte, A. M. W. (2006). The use of “contexts” as a challenge for the chemistry curriculum: Its successes and the need for further development and understanding. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 1087–1112. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600730737

PISA 2015 Eesti tulemused: Eesti 15-aastaste õpilaste teadmised ja oskused matemaatikas, funktsionaalses lugemises ja loodusteadustes (2016). Tallinn: Innove. Külastatud aadressil https://www.hm.ee/sites/default/files/pisa_2015_final_veebivaatamiseks_0.pdf.

Potvin, P., & Hasni, A. (2014). Analysis of the decline in interest towards school science and technology from grades 5 through 11. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(6), 784–802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9512-x

Prenzel, M. (1992). The selective persistence of interest. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 71–98). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

Põhikooli riiklik õppekava (2011). Riigi Teataja I, 29.08.2014, 20. Külastatud aadressil https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/114012011001.

Ramsden, J. M. (1998). Mission impossible? Can anything be done about attitudes to science? International Journal of Science Education, 20(2), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980200201

Reeve, J., & Jang, H. (2006). What teachers say and do to support students’ autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 209–218. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.209

Reid, N., & Skryabina, E. (2003). Gender and physics. International Journal of Science Education, 25(4), 509–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069022000017270

Renninger, K. A. (1990). Children’s play interests, representations, and activity. In R. Fivush & J. A. Hudson (Eds.), Knowing and remembering in young children (Emory Cognition Series, Vol. 3, pp. 127–165). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Renninger, K. A. (2000). Individual interest and its implications for understanding intrinsic motivation. In I. C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and

extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 375–407). San Diego: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012619070-0/50035-0

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(2), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020

Salta, K., & Tzougraki, C. (2004). Attitudes toward chemistry among 11th grade students in high schools in Greece. Science Education, 88(4), 535–547. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10134

Schraw, G., & Lehman, S. (2001). Situational interest: A review of the literature and directions for future research. Educational Psychology Review, 13(1), 23–52. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009004801455

Schreiner, C., & Sjøberg, S. (2004). Sowing the seeds of ROSE. Background, rationale, questionnaire development and data collection for ROSE (The Relevance of Science Education) – a comparative study of students’ views of science and science education. Acta Didactica, 4. Oslo: University of Oslo.

Schreiner, C., & Sjøberg, S. (2007). Science education and young people’s identity construction: Two mutually incompatible projects? In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The re-emergence of values in the science education (pp. 231–248). Rotterdam: Sense.

Silvia, P. J. (2006). Exploring the psychology of interest. New York: Oxford University Press.

Sjøberg, S., & Schreiner, C. (2008). Concerns for the environment. Data from ROSE (The Relevance of Science Education). Retrieved from http://www.roseproject.no/network/countries/norway/eng/nor-sjoberg-env2008.pdf.

Stevens, J. P. (2009). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (5th ed.). New York: Routledge.

Teppo, M. (2004). Grade nine students’ opinions relating to the relevance of science education (Master’s thesis). Tartu: University of Tartu. Retrieved from http://dspace.ut.ee/bitstream/handle/10062/1057/Teppo.pdf?sequence=5&isAllowed=y.

Teppo, M., & Rannikmäe, M. (2008). Paradigm shift for teachers: More relevant science teaching. In J. Holbrook, M. Rannikmäe, P. Reiska, & P. Ilsley (Eds.), The need for a paradigm shift in science education for post-Soviet societies (pp. 25–46). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

Trumper, R. (2006). Factors affecting junior high school students’ interest in physics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-006-0355-6

Van Aalsvoort, J. (2004). Logical positivism as a tool to analyse the problem of chemistry’s lack of relevance in secondary school chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 26(9), 1151–1168. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000205369

Walper, L. M., Pollmeier, K., Lange, K., Kleickmann, T., & Möller, K. (2016). From general science teaching to discipline-specific science teaching: Physics instruction and students’ subject-related interest levels during the transition from primary to secondary school. In N. Papadouris, A. Hadjigeorgiou, & C. Constantinou (Eds.), Insights from research in science teaching and learning: Selected papers from the ESERA 2013 conference (Vol. 2, pp. 271–288). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20074-3_18