Preface
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12697/eha.2017.5.1.01Abstract
Ligikaudu kümme aastat on nn Rocardi raporti "Science education now: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe" avaldamisest saadik olnud loodusteaduslik ja matemaatikaharidus Euroopa Liidus varasemast suurema tähelepanu all. Selle eesmärk on suurendada loodusteadustes, inseneri- ja matemaatikavaldkonnas karjääri valivate inimeste hulka, et tagada liikmesriikide areng neile erialadele tugineva innovatsiooni kaudu. Ka Euroopa Komisjoni hiljutises raportis "Science education for responsible citizenship" (2015) rõhutatakse, et tulevikusuundumused eeldavad kõigi ühiskonnaliikmete senisest paremat arusaamist loodusteadustest ja tehnoloogiast, et tagada nende aktiivne ja vastutustundlik osalemine otsustusprotsessis ja teadmistepõhises innovatsioonis. Muutus algab aga koolist, kus tuleb senisest enam pöörata tähelepanu loodusteadusliku-tehnoloogiaalase kirjaoskuse kõrgematele tasemetele.
Downloads
References
Bybee, R. W. (1997). Toward an understanding of scientific literacy. In W. Gräber & C. Bolte (Eds.), Scientific literacy: An international symposium (pp. 37–68). Kiel: Institute for Science Education at the University of Kiel.
Cañas, J. A., Novak, J. D., & Reiska, P. (2015). How good is my concept map? Am I a good Cmapper? Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 7(1), 6–19.
Chang, C.-Y., Hsiao, C.-H., & Barufaldi, J. P. (2006). Preferred-actual learning environment ‘spaces’ and earth science outcomes in Taiwan. Science Education, 90(3), 420–433. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20125
Choi, K., Lee, H., Shin, N., Kim, S.-W., & Krajcik, J. (2011). Re-conceptualization of scientific literacy in South Korea for the 21st century. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 670–697. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20424
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2015). SDT: Questionnaires: Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI). Retrieved from http://selfdeterminationtheory.org/intrinsic-motivation-inventory/.
European Commission (2015). Science education for responsible citizenship. Report to the European Commission of the Expert Group on Science Education. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/research/swafs/pdf/pub_science_education/KI-NA-26-893-EN-N.pdf.
Ferrari, A. (2013). DIGCOMP: A framework for developing and understanding digital competence in Europe (Report No. JRC83167). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Fortus, D., Dershimer, R. C., Krajcik, J. S., Marx, R. W., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2004). Design-based science and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 1081–1110. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20040
Gago, J. M., Ziman, J., Caro, P., Constantinou, C. P., Davies, G., Parchmann, I., … Sjøberg, S. (2004). Europe needs more scientists: Report by the High Level Group on Increasing Human Resources for Science and Technology. Brussels: European Commission.
Gilbert, J. K. (2006). On the nature of context in chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 957–976. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600702470
Holbrook, J., & Rannikmäe, M. (2007). The nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1347–1362. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601007549
Holbrook, J., & Rannikmäe, M. (2009). The meaning of scientific literacy. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4(3), 275–288.
Holbrook, J., Rannikmäe, M., Reiska, P., & Ilsley, P. (Eds.) (2008). The need for a paradigm shift in science education for post-Soviet societies. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Hüsing, T., Korte, W. B., Fonstad, N., Lanvin B., Cattaneo, G., Kolding, M., … van Welsum, D. (2013). e-Leadership: e-Skills for competitiveness and innovation. Vision, roadmap and foresight scenarios. Final report. Retrieved from http://eskills-vision.eu/fileadmin/eSkillsVision/documents/VISION%20Final%20Report.pdf.
Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300500
Laius, A., Post, A., & Rannikmäe, M. (2016). Determining support of Estonian stakeholders for a new competence-based science education curriculum. International Journal of Education and Information Technologies, 10, 15–24.
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., … Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
Reiska, P., & Soika, K. (2015). Suggestions for teacher education from concept mapping studies. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 7(1), 149–161.
Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific literacy/Science literacy. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 729–780). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Rocard, M., Csermely, P., Jorde, D., Lenzen, D., Walberg-Henrikson, H., & Hemmo, V. (2007). Science education now: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe. Brussels: European Commission.
Romine, W. L., Sadler, T. D., & Kinslow, A. T. (2017). Assessment of scientific literacy: Development and validation of the Quantitative Assessment of Socio-Scientific Reasoning (QuASSR). Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(2), 274–295. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21368
Sjøberg, S., & Schreiner, C. (2002). ROSE handbook: Introduction, guidelines and underlying ideas. Retrieved from http://folk.uio.no/sveinsj/ROSE%20handbook.htm.
Teppo, M., & Rannikmäe, M. (2008). Paradigm shift for teachers: More relevant science teaching. In J. Holbrook, M. Rannikmäe, P. Reiska, & P. Ilsley (Eds.), The need for a paradigm shift in science education for post-Soviet societies (pp. 25–46). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors who publish in Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakiri. Estonian Journal of Education agree to the following terms:
- This journal provides immediate open access to its content. All the articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License.
- Authors grant the journal right of (1) first publication and distribution of the article, (2) making it available to public, (3) public presentation.
- Authors have the right to enter into separate contractual arrangements for posting the article to an institutional repository or publish it in a book with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted to post citations from their work online (e.g. on their website) with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal (see Open Access).
