Tulemuslikum inseneriharidus võimekususkumuste toetamise kaudu

Autorid

  • Britt Petjärv
  • Kati Aus
  • Grete Arro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12697/eha.2019.7.2.04

Märksõnad:

implitsiitsed võimekususkumused, jäävususkumus, juurdekasvuuskumus, motivatsioon, akadeemiline edasijõudmine inseneriõppes, sekkumisuuring

Kokkuvõte

Tööturustatistika kohaselt on inseneride nappus Eestis suur probleem. Uurides kõrgkoolist väljalangemust, selgub paraku, et just tehnilist kõrgharidust omandavate üliõpilaste seas on väljalangemus kõige suurem. Uuringud näitavad, et vaimse võimekusega seotud juurdekasvuuskumuste toetamine parandab õppijate edasijõudmist matemaatikas ning et tehnikavaldkonna üliõpilaste implitsiitsed võimekususkumused mõjutavad kõrgkooliõpingutes edasijõudmist, sealhulgas väljalangemist. Siinses artiklis võetakse vaatluse alla Tallinna Tehnikakõrgkooli esimese õppeaasta üliõpilaste (N = 270) uskumused võimekuse muudetavuse kohta ning muud motivatsiooni ja õpipädevusega seotud tegurid. Uuringu eesmärk on hinnata, millised õppimisega seotud aspektid ennustavad edasijõudmist inseneriõppes. Samuti uuritakse, kas lühiajalise sekkumisega on võimalik muuta õppijate mõtteviisi juurdekasvuuskumuste suunas. Eksperimentaalsest sekkumisuuringust ühe õppekava alusel õppivate esmakursuslaste seas (N = 37) ilmneb, et sekkumisrühma üliõpilaste mõtteviisi muutus oli positiivne ehk jäävususkumused võimekuse muudetavuse kohta muutusid nõrgemaks. See osutab vajadusele toetada õppimisprotsessi puudutavaid arusaamu süsteemselt, õpetamismetoodikasse integreerituna ning kavandada õppejõudude õpetamis- ja õppimisalaste teadmiste arendamiseks asjakohaseid koolitusi.

PDF Summary

Allalaadimised

Download data is not yet available.

Viited

Aronson, J., Fried, C. B., & Good, C. (2002). Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(2), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2001.1491

Aus, K., Jõgi, A.-L., Poom-Valickis, K., Eisenschmidt, E., & Kikas, E. (2017). Associations of newly qualified teachers’ beliefs with classroom management practices and approaches to instruction over one school year. European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(1), 28–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2016.1251897

Baker, D. R., Wood, L., Corkins, J., & Krause, S. (2015). Tinkering and technical selfefficacy of engineering students at the community college. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 39(6), 555–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2014.902780

Bandura, A. (1986). Fearful expectations and avoidant actions as coeffects of perceived self-inefficacy. American Psychologist, 41(12), 1389–1391. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.12.1389

Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x

Burnette, J. L., O’Boyle, E. H., VanEpps, E. M., Pollack, J. M., & Finkel, E. J. (2013). Mind-sets matter: A meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation. Psychological Bulletin, 139(3), 655–701. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029531

Dai, T., & Cromley, J. G. (2014). Changes in implicit theories of ability in biology and dropout from STEM majors: A latent growth curve approach. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(3), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.06.003

Dekker, G. W., Pechenizkiy, M., & Vleeshouwers, J. M. (2009). Predicting students drop out: A case study. In T. Barnes, M. Desmarais, C. Romero, & S. Ventura (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Educational Data Mining, EDM 2009, July 1-3, 2009. Cordoba, Spain (pp. 41–50). Retrieved from https://pure.tue.nl/ws/files/2813648/Metis233712.pdf.

Dommett, E. J., Devonshire, I. M., Sewter, E., & Greenfield, S. A. (2013). The impact of participation in a neuroscience course on motivational measures and academic performance. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 2(3–4), 122–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2013.05.002

Dweck, C. (2015a). Carol Dweck revisits the ’Growth Mindset’. Education Week, 35(5), 20–24. Retrieved from https://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2015/09/23/carol-dweck-revisits-the-growth-mindset.html.

Dweck, C. (2015b). “The Growth Mindset”. Talks at Google. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-71zdXCMU6A&t=1718s.

Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C. Y., & Hong, Y. Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A word from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6(4), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0604_1

Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256

Eris, O., Chachra, D., Chen, H. L., Sheppard, S., Ludlow, L., Rosca, C., ... Toye, G. (2010). Outcomes of a longitudinal administration of the persistence in engineering survey. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(4), 371–395. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01069.x

Espenberg, K., Aksen, M., Beilmann, M., Vahaste, S., Loogus, T., & Kührt, U. (2014). Kõrgkooliõpingute katkestamise põhjused ja ennetamise võimalused Euroopa Liidu riikide näitel. Lõpparuanne. Külastatud aadressil https://www.digar.ee/arhiiv/nlib-digar:220931.

Haridussilm (s. a.). Külastatud aadressil https://www.haridussilm.ee/.

Heslin, P. A., & VandeWalle, D. (2008). Managers’ implicit assumptions about personnel. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(3), 219–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00578.x

Heublein, U., & Schmelzer, R. (2018). Die Entwicklung der Studienabbruchquoten an den deutschen Hochschulen: Berechnungen auf Basis des Absolventenjahrgangs 2016. Hannover: Deutsches Zentrum für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftforschung. https://idw-online.de/en/attachmentdata66127.pdf.

Hunt, C. (2011). National strategy for higher education to 2030. Report of the Strategy Group. Retrieved from http://hea.ie/assets/uploads/2017/06/National-Strategyfor-Higher-Education-2030.pdf.

Jõgi, A-L., & Aus, K. (2015). Õpipädevus. E. Kikas & A. Toomela (toim.), Õppimine ja õpetamine kolmandas kooliastmes. Üldpädevused ja nende areng (lk 112–146). Tallinn: Tallinna Ülikool. Külastatud aadressil https://www.hm.ee/sites/default/files/oppimine_ja_opetamine_3_kooliastmes.pdf.

Koenig, K., Schen, M., Edwards, M., & Bao, L. (2012). Addressing STEM retention through a scientific thought and methods course. Journal of College Science Teaching, 41(4), 23–29.

Kok, G., Gottlieb, N. H., Peters, G.-J. Y., Mullen, P. D., Parcel, G. S., Ruiter, R. A. C., ... Bartholomew, L. K. (2016). A taxonomy of behaviour change methods: An intervention mapping approach. Health Psychology Review, 10(3), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2015.1077155

Li, Q., McCoach, D. B., Swaminathan, H., & Tang, J. (2008). Development of an instrument to measure perspectives of engineering education among college students. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(1), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00953.x

Mamaril, N. J. A. (2014). Measuring undergraduate students’ engineering self-efficacy: A scale validation study (Doctoral dissertation). Lexington: University of Kentucky. Retrieved from https://uknowledge.uky.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1020&context=edp_etds.

Marsh, H. W., & Yeung, A. S. (1998). Longitudinal structural equation models of academic self-concept and achievement: Gender differences in the development of math and English constructs. American Educational Research Journal, 35(4), 705–738. https://doi.org/10.2307/1163464

Meyer, M. (2015). Persistence of engineering undergraduates at a public research university (Doctoral dissertation). Logan: Utah State University. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5302&context=etd.

Meyer, M., & Marx, S. (2014). Engineering dropouts: A qualitative examination of why undergraduates leave engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(4), 525–548. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20054

Mueller, C. M., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Praise for intelligence can undermine children’s motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.33

Paunesku, D., Walton, G. M., Romero, C., Smith, E. N., Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2015). Mind-set interventions are a scalable treatment for academic underachievement. Psychological Science, 26(6), 784–793. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615571017

Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3702_4

Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T, & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED338122.pdf.

Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33

Quinn, J. (2013). Drop-out and completion in higher education in Europe among students from under-represented groups. An independent report authored for the European Commission. Retrieved from https://nesetweb.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/2013-Drop-out-and-Completion-in-Higher-Education-in-Europeamong-students-from-under-represented-groups.pdf.

Rattan, A., Savani, K., Chugh, D., & Dweck, C. S. (2015). Leveraging mindsets to promote academic achievement: Policy recommendations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(6), 721–726. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615599383

Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 353–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026838

Schommer-Aikins, M., Mau, W.-C., Brookhart, S., & Hutter, R. (2000). Understanding middle students’ beliefs about knowledge and learning using a multidimensional paradigm. The Journal of Educational Research, 94(2), 120–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670009598750

Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder: Westview Press.

Spitzer, B., & Aronson, J. (2015). Minding and mending the gap: Social psychological interventions to reduce educational disparities. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12067

Suhre, C. J., Jansen, E. P., & Harskamp, E. G. (2007). Impact of degree program satisfaction on the persistence of college students. Higher Education, 54(2), 207–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-005-2376-5

Sun, K. L. (2015). There’s no limit: Mathematics teaching for a growth mindset (Doctoral dissertation). Stanford: Stanford University. Retrieved from https://stacks.stanford.edu/file/druid:xf479cc2194/Sun-Dissertation-Upload-augmented.pdf.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2

Talsma, K., Schüz, B., Schwarzer, R., & Norris, K. (2018). I believe, therefore I achieve (and vice versa): A meta-analytic cross-lagged panel analysis of self-efficacy and academic performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 61, 136–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.11.015

Valentine, J. C., DuBois, D. L., & Cooper, H. (2004). The relation between self-beliefs and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 111–133. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3902_3

Vinter, K., Aus, K., & Arro, G. (2019). Eesti ja vene õppekeelega põhikooliõpilaste akadeemiline läbipõlemine. Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakiri, 7(1), 128–156. https://doi.org/10.12697/eha.2019.7.1.06

Walton, G. M. (2014). The new science of wise psychological interventions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(1), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413512856

Wilson, Z. S., Holmes, L., deGravelles, K., Sylvain, M. R., Batiste, L., Johnson, M., ... & Warner, I. M. (2012). Hierarchical mentoring: A transformative strategy for improving diversity and retention in undergraduate STEM disciplines. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(1), 148–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9292-5.

Wolters, C. A. (1998). Self-regulated learning and college students’ regulation of motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 224–235. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.2.224

Üliõpilaste õpingute katkestamiste põhjused ja võimalikud meetmed õpingutes edasijõudmise toetamiseks üheksa rakenduskõrgkooli näitel (2015). Haridus- ja Teadusministeerium, Euroopa Sotsiaalfond. Külastatud aadressil https://www.tktk.ee/wp-content/uploads/%C3%9Cli%C3%B5pilaste-%C3%B5pingute-katkestamiseuuring.pdf2015.pdf.

Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Mindsets that promote resilience: When students believe that personal characteristics can be developed. Educational Psychologist, 47(4), 302–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.722805

Yeager, D. S., Romero, C., Paunesku, D., Hulleman, C. S., Schneider, B., Hinojosa, C., ... Trott, J. (2016). Using design thinking to improve psychological interventions: The case of the growth mindset during the transition to high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(3), 374–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000098

Yeager, D. S., & Walton, G. M. (2011). Social-psychological interventions in education: They’re not magic. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 267–301. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311405999

##submission.downloads##

Avaldatud

2019-11-01

Väljaanne

Rubriik

Artiklid

Nende autorite loetumad artiklid