Tulemuslikum inseneriharidus võimekususkumuste toetamise kaudu
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12697/eha.2019.7.2.04Märksõnad:
implitsiitsed võimekususkumused, jäävususkumus, juurdekasvuuskumus, motivatsioon, akadeemiline edasijõudmine inseneriõppes, sekkumisuuringKokkuvõte
Tööturustatistika kohaselt on inseneride nappus Eestis suur probleem. Uurides kõrgkoolist väljalangemust, selgub paraku, et just tehnilist kõrgharidust omandavate üliõpilaste seas on väljalangemus kõige suurem. Uuringud näitavad, et vaimse võimekusega seotud juurdekasvuuskumuste toetamine parandab õppijate edasijõudmist matemaatikas ning et tehnikavaldkonna üliõpilaste implitsiitsed võimekususkumused mõjutavad kõrgkooliõpingutes edasijõudmist, sealhulgas väljalangemist. Siinses artiklis võetakse vaatluse alla Tallinna Tehnikakõrgkooli esimese õppeaasta üliõpilaste (N = 270) uskumused võimekuse muudetavuse kohta ning muud motivatsiooni ja õpipädevusega seotud tegurid. Uuringu eesmärk on hinnata, millised õppimisega seotud aspektid ennustavad edasijõudmist inseneriõppes. Samuti uuritakse, kas lühiajalise sekkumisega on võimalik muuta õppijate mõtteviisi juurdekasvuuskumuste suunas. Eksperimentaalsest sekkumisuuringust ühe õppekava alusel õppivate esmakursuslaste seas (N = 37) ilmneb, et sekkumisrühma üliõpilaste mõtteviisi muutus oli positiivne ehk jäävususkumused võimekuse muudetavuse kohta muutusid nõrgemaks. See osutab vajadusele toetada õppimisprotsessi puudutavaid arusaamu süsteemselt, õpetamismetoodikasse integreerituna ning kavandada õppejõudude õpetamis- ja õppimisalaste teadmiste arendamiseks asjakohaseid koolitusi.
Allalaadimised
Viited
Aronson, J., Fried, C. B., & Good, C. (2002). Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(2), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2001.1491
Aus, K., Jõgi, A.-L., Poom-Valickis, K., Eisenschmidt, E., & Kikas, E. (2017). Associations of newly qualified teachers’ beliefs with classroom management practices and approaches to instruction over one school year. European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(1), 28–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2016.1251897
Baker, D. R., Wood, L., Corkins, J., & Krause, S. (2015). Tinkering and technical selfefficacy of engineering students at the community college. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 39(6), 555–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2014.902780
Bandura, A. (1986). Fearful expectations and avoidant actions as coeffects of perceived self-inefficacy. American Psychologist, 41(12), 1389–1391. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.12.1389
Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x
Burnette, J. L., O’Boyle, E. H., VanEpps, E. M., Pollack, J. M., & Finkel, E. J. (2013). Mind-sets matter: A meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation. Psychological Bulletin, 139(3), 655–701. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029531
Dai, T., & Cromley, J. G. (2014). Changes in implicit theories of ability in biology and dropout from STEM majors: A latent growth curve approach. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(3), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.06.003
Dekker, G. W., Pechenizkiy, M., & Vleeshouwers, J. M. (2009). Predicting students drop out: A case study. In T. Barnes, M. Desmarais, C. Romero, & S. Ventura (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Educational Data Mining, EDM 2009, July 1-3, 2009. Cordoba, Spain (pp. 41–50). Retrieved from https://pure.tue.nl/ws/files/2813648/Metis233712.pdf.
Dommett, E. J., Devonshire, I. M., Sewter, E., & Greenfield, S. A. (2013). The impact of participation in a neuroscience course on motivational measures and academic performance. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 2(3–4), 122–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2013.05.002
Dweck, C. (2015a). Carol Dweck revisits the ’Growth Mindset’. Education Week, 35(5), 20–24. Retrieved from https://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2015/09/23/carol-dweck-revisits-the-growth-mindset.html.
Dweck, C. (2015b). “The Growth Mindset”. Talks at Google. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-71zdXCMU6A&t=1718s.
Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C. Y., & Hong, Y. Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A word from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6(4), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0604_1
Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
Eris, O., Chachra, D., Chen, H. L., Sheppard, S., Ludlow, L., Rosca, C., ... Toye, G. (2010). Outcomes of a longitudinal administration of the persistence in engineering survey. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(4), 371–395. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01069.x
Espenberg, K., Aksen, M., Beilmann, M., Vahaste, S., Loogus, T., & Kührt, U. (2014). Kõrgkooliõpingute katkestamise põhjused ja ennetamise võimalused Euroopa Liidu riikide näitel. Lõpparuanne. Külastatud aadressil https://www.digar.ee/arhiiv/nlib-digar:220931.
Haridussilm (s. a.). Külastatud aadressil https://www.haridussilm.ee/.
Heslin, P. A., & VandeWalle, D. (2008). Managers’ implicit assumptions about personnel. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(3), 219–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00578.x
Heublein, U., & Schmelzer, R. (2018). Die Entwicklung der Studienabbruchquoten an den deutschen Hochschulen: Berechnungen auf Basis des Absolventenjahrgangs 2016. Hannover: Deutsches Zentrum für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftforschung. https://idw-online.de/en/attachmentdata66127.pdf.
Hunt, C. (2011). National strategy for higher education to 2030. Report of the Strategy Group. Retrieved from http://hea.ie/assets/uploads/2017/06/National-Strategyfor-Higher-Education-2030.pdf.
Jõgi, A-L., & Aus, K. (2015). Õpipädevus. E. Kikas & A. Toomela (toim.), Õppimine ja õpetamine kolmandas kooliastmes. Üldpädevused ja nende areng (lk 112–146). Tallinn: Tallinna Ülikool. Külastatud aadressil https://www.hm.ee/sites/default/files/oppimine_ja_opetamine_3_kooliastmes.pdf.
Koenig, K., Schen, M., Edwards, M., & Bao, L. (2012). Addressing STEM retention through a scientific thought and methods course. Journal of College Science Teaching, 41(4), 23–29.
Kok, G., Gottlieb, N. H., Peters, G.-J. Y., Mullen, P. D., Parcel, G. S., Ruiter, R. A. C., ... Bartholomew, L. K. (2016). A taxonomy of behaviour change methods: An intervention mapping approach. Health Psychology Review, 10(3), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2015.1077155
Li, Q., McCoach, D. B., Swaminathan, H., & Tang, J. (2008). Development of an instrument to measure perspectives of engineering education among college students. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(1), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00953.x
Mamaril, N. J. A. (2014). Measuring undergraduate students’ engineering self-efficacy: A scale validation study (Doctoral dissertation). Lexington: University of Kentucky. Retrieved from https://uknowledge.uky.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1020&context=edp_etds.
Marsh, H. W., & Yeung, A. S. (1998). Longitudinal structural equation models of academic self-concept and achievement: Gender differences in the development of math and English constructs. American Educational Research Journal, 35(4), 705–738. https://doi.org/10.2307/1163464
Meyer, M. (2015). Persistence of engineering undergraduates at a public research university (Doctoral dissertation). Logan: Utah State University. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5302&context=etd.
Meyer, M., & Marx, S. (2014). Engineering dropouts: A qualitative examination of why undergraduates leave engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(4), 525–548. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20054
Mueller, C. M., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Praise for intelligence can undermine children’s motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.33
Paunesku, D., Walton, G. M., Romero, C., Smith, E. N., Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2015). Mind-set interventions are a scalable treatment for academic underachievement. Psychological Science, 26(6), 784–793. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615571017
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3702_4
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T, & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED338122.pdf.
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
Quinn, J. (2013). Drop-out and completion in higher education in Europe among students from under-represented groups. An independent report authored for the European Commission. Retrieved from https://nesetweb.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/2013-Drop-out-and-Completion-in-Higher-Education-in-Europeamong-students-from-under-represented-groups.pdf.
Rattan, A., Savani, K., Chugh, D., & Dweck, C. S. (2015). Leveraging mindsets to promote academic achievement: Policy recommendations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(6), 721–726. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615599383
Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 353–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026838
Schommer-Aikins, M., Mau, W.-C., Brookhart, S., & Hutter, R. (2000). Understanding middle students’ beliefs about knowledge and learning using a multidimensional paradigm. The Journal of Educational Research, 94(2), 120–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670009598750
Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder: Westview Press.
Spitzer, B., & Aronson, J. (2015). Minding and mending the gap: Social psychological interventions to reduce educational disparities. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12067
Suhre, C. J., Jansen, E. P., & Harskamp, E. G. (2007). Impact of degree program satisfaction on the persistence of college students. Higher Education, 54(2), 207–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-005-2376-5
Sun, K. L. (2015). There’s no limit: Mathematics teaching for a growth mindset (Doctoral dissertation). Stanford: Stanford University. Retrieved from https://stacks.stanford.edu/file/druid:xf479cc2194/Sun-Dissertation-Upload-augmented.pdf.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
Talsma, K., Schüz, B., Schwarzer, R., & Norris, K. (2018). I believe, therefore I achieve (and vice versa): A meta-analytic cross-lagged panel analysis of self-efficacy and academic performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 61, 136–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.11.015
Valentine, J. C., DuBois, D. L., & Cooper, H. (2004). The relation between self-beliefs and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 111–133. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3902_3
Vinter, K., Aus, K., & Arro, G. (2019). Eesti ja vene õppekeelega põhikooliõpilaste akadeemiline läbipõlemine. Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakiri, 7(1), 128–156. https://doi.org/10.12697/eha.2019.7.1.06
Walton, G. M. (2014). The new science of wise psychological interventions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(1), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413512856
Wilson, Z. S., Holmes, L., deGravelles, K., Sylvain, M. R., Batiste, L., Johnson, M., ... & Warner, I. M. (2012). Hierarchical mentoring: A transformative strategy for improving diversity and retention in undergraduate STEM disciplines. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(1), 148–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9292-5.
Wolters, C. A. (1998). Self-regulated learning and college students’ regulation of motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 224–235. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.2.224
Üliõpilaste õpingute katkestamiste põhjused ja võimalikud meetmed õpingutes edasijõudmise toetamiseks üheksa rakenduskõrgkooli näitel (2015). Haridus- ja Teadusministeerium, Euroopa Sotsiaalfond. Külastatud aadressil https://www.tktk.ee/wp-content/uploads/%C3%9Cli%C3%B5pilaste-%C3%B5pingute-katkestamiseuuring.pdf2015.pdf.
Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Mindsets that promote resilience: When students believe that personal characteristics can be developed. Educational Psychologist, 47(4), 302–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.722805
Yeager, D. S., Romero, C., Paunesku, D., Hulleman, C. S., Schneider, B., Hinojosa, C., ... Trott, J. (2016). Using design thinking to improve psychological interventions: The case of the growth mindset during the transition to high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(3), 374–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000098
Yeager, D. S., & Walton, G. M. (2011). Social-psychological interventions in education: They’re not magic. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 267–301. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311405999
##submission.downloads##
Avaldatud
Kuis viidata
Väljaanne
Rubriik
Litsents
Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakirja autorid nõustuvad allpool esitatud tingimustega.
- Ajakirjas avaldatud artiklitele on tagatud vaba juurdepääs Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 litsentsiga määratud õiguste mahus.
- Autor loovutab ajakirjale tasuta tema poolt loodud artikli varalised õigused, sh õiguse artikli (1) avaldamisele ja levitamisele, (2) üldsusele kättesaadavaks tegemisele ja eksponeerimisele, (3) avalikule esitamisele.
- Autoril on õigus Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakirja eelneval nõusolekul sõlmida lepinguid kolmandate isikutega publitseeritud artikli säilitamiseks raamatukogu repositooriumis või avaldamiseks raamatu peatükina. Nõudeks on teiseses töös viitamine esmasele allikale, st artiklile Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakirjas.
- Pärast artikli ilmumist ajakirjas on autoritel lubatud avaldada Internetis (nt oma veebilehel) motiveeritud mahus tsitaate ning levitada linke koos korrektse viitega ajakirjas ilmunud artiklile (vt Open Access).