Lugemisoskuse ja -motivatsiooni seosed õpetajate kasvatusstiilidega esimeses klassis
Kokkuvõte
Töö eesmärk oli analüüsida, kas ja kuidas erinevad esimese klassi laste lugemisoskus ja motivatsioon lapsekeskse, õpetajakeskse ja laps-domineeriva kasvatusstiiliga õpetajate klassides. Uuringus osalesid 440 õpilast ja nende õpetajad (N = 21). Esimese klassi alguses ja lõpus hinnati laste lugemistehnilisi oskusi ning motivatsiooni (huvi ja tajutud võimekust), klassi lõpus ka loetu mõistmist. Igas klassis vaadeldi kolme õppetundi, klassitegevused kodeeriti vaatlusmõõdiku ECCOM abil (Stipek & Byler, 2005). Vaatlustulemuste alusel jaotati õpetajad lapsekeskse (n = 8), õpetajakeskse (n = 7) ja laps-domineeriva (n = 6) kasvatusstiiliga õpetajateks. Õpetajate lapsekeskne kasvatusstiil seostus positiivselt ning õpetajakeskne ja laps-domineeriv stiil negatiivselt laste lugemisoskuse ja -huviga. Uurimuse tulemused täiendavad varasemaid teadmisi õpetaja tegevuste ja laste oskuste ja motivatsiooni seostest ning neil on praktiline väärtus õpetajakoolituses.
SummaryAllalaadimisi
Viited
Aunola, K., Nurmi, J.E., Niemi, P., Lerkkanen, M.K., & RaskuPuttonen, H. (2002). Developmental dynamics of achievement strategies, reading performance and parental beliefs. Reading Research Quarterly, 37(3), 310–327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.37.3.3
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: PrenticeHall.
Becker, M., McElvany, N., & Kortenbruck, M. (2010). Intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation as predictors of reading literacy: A longitudinal study. Journal of Edu- cational Psychology, 102(4), 773–785. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0020084
Bergman, L. R., & ElKhouri, B. M. (2002). Sleipner 2.1. Retrieved from http://www2. psychology.su.se/sleipner/.
Cain, K. (2009). Children’s reading comprehension difficulties: A consideration of the precursors and consequences. In C. Wood & V. Connelly (Eds.), Contemporary Perspectives on Reading and Spelling (pp. 59–75). London: Routledge.
Connor, C. M., Morrison, F. J., Fishman, B. J., Ponitz, C. C., Glasney, S., Under wood, P. S., ... Schatschneider, C. (2009a). The ISI classroom observation system: Examining the literacy instruction provided to individual students. Educational Researcher, 38(2), 85–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09332373
Connor, C. M., Morrison, F. J., & Katch, L. E. (2004). Beyond the reading wars: Exploring the effects of childinstruction interactions on growth in early reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8(4), 305–336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0804_1
Connor, C. M., Piasta, S. B., Fishman, B., Glasney, S., Schatschneider, C., Crowe, E., ... Morrison, F. J. (2009b). Individualizing student instruction precisely: Effects of child × instruction interactions on first graders’ literacy development. Child Development, 80(1), 77–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.14678624.2008.01247.x
Daniels, D. H., & Shumow, L. (2003). Child development and classroom teaching: A review of the literature and implications for educating teachers. Applied Develop- mental Psychology, 23(5), 495–526. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S01933973(02)001399
Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (2000). The „what” and „why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the selfdetermination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefes, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
Eccles, J., Wigfield, A., Harold, R. D., & Blumenfeld, P. (1993). Age and gender dif ferences in children’s self and task perceptions during elementary school. Child Development, 64(3), 830–847. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1131221
Georgiou, G. K., Parrila, R., & Papadopoulos, T. C. (2008). Predictors of word decod ing and reading fluency across languages varying in orthographic consistency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 566–580. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/00220663.100.3.566
Gettinger, M., & Kohler, K. M. (2011). Processoutcome approaches to classroom management and effective teaching. In C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 73–95). New York, London: Routledge.
Gottfried, A. E. (1990). Academic intrinsic motivation in young elementary school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 525–538. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/00220663.82.3.525
Guthrie, J. T., Hoa, A. L. W., Wigfield, A., Tonks, S. M., Humenick, N. M., & Littles, E. (2007). Reading motivation and reading comprehension growth in the later ele mentary years. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(3), 282–313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.05.004
Guthrie, J., Wigfield, A., & Von Secker, C. (2000). Effects of integrated instruction on motivation and strategy use in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 331–341. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/00220663.92.2.331
Hamre, B., & Pianta, R. (2010). Classroom environments and developmental pro cesses: Conceptualization and measurement. In J. L. Meece & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Handbook of research on schools, schooling, and human development (pp. 25–41). New York, London: Routledge.
Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2(2), 127–160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00401799
Häyrinen, T., SereniusSirve, S., & Korkman, M. (1999). Lukilasse. Helsinki: Psyko logien kustannus.
Kalev, L. (2008). Lugemisoskuse tase esimeses klassis (Magistritöö). Tartu Ülikool, Tartu.
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kintsch, W. (2013). Revisiting the construction−integration model of text compre hension and its implications for instruction. In D. E. Alvermann, N. J. Unrau, & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 807–839). Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association. http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/0710.32
Landerl, K., & Wimmer, H. (2008). Development of word reading fluency and spell ing in a consistent orthography: An 8year followup. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 150–161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/00220663.100.1.150
Lepola, J., Niemi, P., Kuikka, M., & Hannula, M. M. (2005). Cognitivelinguistic skills and motivation as longitudinal predictors of reading and arithmetic achievement: A followup study from kindergarten to grade 2. International Journal of Educational Research, 43(4–5), 250–271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2006.06.005
Lerkkanen, M.K., Kikas, E., Pakarinen, E., Trossmann, K., Poikkeus, A.M., Rasku Puttonen, H., ... Nurmi, J.E. (2012a). A validation of the Early Childhood Class room Observation Measure in Finnish and Estonian kindergartens. Early Education and Development, 23(3), 323–350. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2010.527222
Lerkkanen, M.K., Kiuru, N., Pakarinen, E., Viljaranta, J., Poikkeus, A.M., Rasku Puttonen, H., ... Nurmi, J.E. (2012b). The role of teaching practices in the deve lopment of children’s interest in reading and mathematics in kindergarten. Con- temporary Educational Psychology, 37(4), 266–279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.03.004
Lindeman, J. (1998). ALLU – Ala-asteen lukutesti. Åbo: Åbo Akademis förlag.
McCombs, B. (2010). Learnercentered practices: Providing the context for positive learner development, motivation, and achievement. In J. L. Meece & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Handbook of research on schools, schooling, and human development (pp. 60–74). New York, London: Routledge.
McGraw, K. O., & Wong, S. P. (1996). Forming inferences about some intraclass cor relation coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 30–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1082989X.1.1.30
Mõttus, M. (2013). Sõnade äratundmise testi katsetamine 1.–3. klassi õpilaste lugemis- oskuse hindamisel (Seminaritöö). Tallinna Ülikooli psühholoogia instituut.
Oakhill, J., & Cain, K. (2007). Introduction to comprehension development. In
K. Cain & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Children’s comprehension problems in oral and written language: A cognitive perspective (pp. 3–40). New York: The Guilford Press.
Perfetti, C. A. (1994). Psycholinguistics and reading ability. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 849–894). San Diego: Academic Press.
Perry, K. E., Donohue, K. M., & Weinstein, R. S. (2007). Teaching practices and the promotion of achievement and adjustment in first grade. Journal of School Psychology, 45(3), 269–292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2007.02.005
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic defi nitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
Schunk, D. H. (1999). Socialself interaction and achievement behavior. Educational Psychologist, 34(4), 219–227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3404_3
Soodla, P., Vija, M., & Pajusalu, R. (2013). Eesti ja soome sõnalugemistestide võrdlus.
Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu aastaraamat, 9, 279–296. http://dx.doi.org/10.5128/ERYa9.18
Stipek, D., & Byler, P. (2004). The early childhood classroom observation measure. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19(3), 375–397. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2004.07.007
Stipek, D., & Byler, P. (2005). Early childhood classroom observation measure: Coding manual. Retrieved from authors electronically.
Stipek, D. J., Feiler, R., Byler, P., Ryan, R., Milburn, S., & Miller Salmon, J. (1998). Good beginnings: What difference does the program make in preparing young children for school? Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 19(1), 41–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S01933973(99)800276
Stipek, D., & MacIver, D. (1989). Developmental change in children’s assessment of intellectual competence. Child Development, 60(3), 521–538. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1130719
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Selfefficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1016
Torppa, M., Eklund, K., van Bergen, E., & Lyytinen, H. (2011). Parental literacy predicts children’s literacy: A longitudinal familyrisk study. Dyslexia, 17(4), 339– 355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dys.437
Vabariigi Valitsus (2010). Põhikooli riiklik õppekava. Riigi Teataja I 2010, 6, 22. Külastatud aadressil https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/13273133.
Walker, J. M. T. (2008). Looking at teacher practices through the lens of parenting style. The Journal of Experimental Education, 76(2), 218–240. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JEXE.76.2.218240
Wentzel, K. (2010). Students’ relationships with teachers. In J. L. Meece & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Handbook of research on schools, schooling, and human development (pp. 75–91). New York, London: Routledge.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancyvalue theory of achievement motiva tion. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (1997). Relations of children’s motivation for reading to the amount and breath of their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 420–432. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/00220663.89.3.420
Wigfield, A., Guthrie, J. T., Tonks, S., & Perencevich, K. C. (2004). Children’s moti vation for reading: Domain specificity and instructional influences. The Journal of Educational Research, 97(6), 299–309. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JOER.97.6.299310
Wilson, K. M., & Trainin, G. (2007). Firstgrade students’ motivation and achieve ment for reading, writing, and spelling. Reading Psychology, 28(3), 257–282. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02702710601186464
Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakirja autorid nõustuvad allpool esitatud tingimustega.
- Ajakirjas avaldatud artiklitele on tagatud vaba juurdepääs Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 litsentsiga määratud õiguste mahus.
- Autor loovutab ajakirjale tasuta tema poolt loodud artikli varalised õigused, sh õiguse artikli (1) avaldamisele ja levitamisele, (2) üldsusele kättesaadavaks tegemisele ja eksponeerimisele, (3) avalikule esitamisele.
- Autoril on õigus Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakirja eelneval nõusolekul sõlmida lepinguid kolmandate isikutega publitseeritud artikli säilitamiseks raamatukogu repositooriumis või avaldamiseks raamatu peatükina. Nõudeks on teiseses töös viitamine esmasele allikale, st artiklile Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakirjas.
- Pärast artikli ilmumist ajakirjas on autoritel lubatud avaldada Internetis (nt oma veebilehel) motiveeritud mahus tsitaate ning levitada linke koos korrektse viitega ajakirjas ilmunud artiklile (vt Open Access).
