Õpetajate ja õpilaste hinnangud õpistrateegiate tõhususele: ülevaade Eesti koolide tulemustest

Agarwal, P. K., Nunes, L. D., & Blunt, J. R. (2021). Retrieval practice consistently benefits student learning: A systematic review of applied research in schools and classrooms. Educational Psychology Review, 33(4), 1409–1453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09595-9

Badali, S., Rawson, K. A., & Dunlosky, J. (2022). Do students effectively regulate their use of self-testing as a function of item difficulty? Educational Psychology Review, 34(3), 1651–1677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09665-6

Bentler, P. M. (1992). On the fit of models to covariances and methodology to the Bulletin. Psychological Bulletin, 112(3), 400–404. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.3.400

Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2011). Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: Creating desirable difficulties to enhance learning. In Psychology and the real world: Essays illustrating fundamental contributions to society. (pp. 56–64). Worth Publishers.

Brod, G. (2020). Generative learning: Which strategies for what age? Educational Psychology Review, 33(4), 1295–1318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09571-9

Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford publications.

Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230–258. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:somere:v:21:y:1992:i:2:p:230-258.

Carpenter, S. K., Cepeda, N. J., Rohrer, D., Kang, S. H. K., & Pashler, H. (2012). Using spacing to enhance diverse forms of learning: Review of recent research and implications for instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 24(3), 369–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-012-9205-z

Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834

Chen, O., Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2021). Spacing and interleaving effects require distinct theoretical bases: A systematic review testing the cognitive load and discriminativecontrast hypotheses. Educational Psychology Review, 33(4), 1499–1522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09613-w

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed ed.). L. Erlbaum Associates.

DeVellis, R. F., & Thorpe, C. T. (2021). Scale development: Theory and applications. Sage publications.

Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual review of psychology, 64, 135–168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750

Dignath, C., & Büttner, G. (2018). Teachers’ direct and indirect promotion of selfregulated learning in primary and secondary school mathematics classes – insights from video-based classroom observations and teacher interviews. Metacognition and Learning, 13(2), 127–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-018-9181-x

Dignath, C., & Veenman, M. V. J. (2020). The role of direct strategy instruction and indirect activation of self-regulated learning – Evidence from classroom observation studies. Educational Psychology Review, 33(2), 489–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09534-0

Dinsmore, D. L., & Hattan, C. (2020). Levels of strategies and strategic processing. In Handbook of strategies and strategic processing (pp. 29–46). Routledge.

Dirkx, K. J. H., Camp, G., Kester, L., & Kirschner, P. A. (2019). Do secondary school students make use of effective study strategies when they study on their own? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(5), 952–957. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3584

Duncan, T. G., & McKeachie, W. J. (2005). The Making of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educational Psychologist, 40(2), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4002_6

Dunlosky, J. (2013). Strengthening the student toolbox: Study strategies to boost learning. American Educator, 37(3), 12–21.

Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266

Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (Third edit). London and New York: Sage.

Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2015a). Eight ways to promote generative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 28(4), 717–741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9348-9

Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2015b). Learning as a generative activity. Cambridge University Press.

Foster, N. L., Mueller, M. L., Was, C., Rawson, K. A., & Dunlosky, J. (2019). Why does interleaving improve math learning? The contributions of discriminative contrast and distributed practice. Memory & Cognition, 47(6), 1088–1101. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-019-00918-4

French, B. F., & Finch, W. H. (2006). Confirmatory factor analytic procedures for the determination of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 13(3), 378–402. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1303_3

Glogger-Frey, I., Ampatziadis, Y., Ohst, A., & Renkl, A. (2018). Future teachers’ knowledge about learning strategies: Misconcepts and knowledge-in-pieces. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 28, 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.02.001

Granström, M., Kikas, E., & Eisenschmidt, E. (2023). Classroom observations: How do teachers teach learning strategies? Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1119519

Granström, M., Härma, E., & Kikas, E. (2022). Teachers’ knowledge of learning strategies. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2022.2074536

Gurung, R. A., Weidert, J., & Jeske, A. (2010). Focusing on how students study. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 28–35.

Halamish, V. (2018). Pre-service and in-service teachers’ metacognitive knowledge of learning strategies. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02152

Haridus- ja Noorteamet. (2022). Põhikooli lõpueksamite taustaküsitlus. https://harno.ee/eksamite-taustakusitlused

Haridus- ja Teadusministeerium (2018). Haridusvaldkonna arengukava 2021–2035. https://www.hm.ee/ministeerium-uudised-ja-kontakt/ministeerium/strateegilised-alusdokumendid-ja-programmid#haridusvaldkonna-are

Hattie, J. A. C., & Donoghue, G. M. (2016). Learning strategies: A synthesis and conceptual model. npj Science of Learning, 1(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/npjscilearn.2016.13

Hennok, L., Mädamürk, K., & Kikas, E. (2022). Memorization strategies in basic school: grade-related differences in reported use and effectiveness. European Journal of Psychology of Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-022-00630-z

Hu, L. t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Kang, S. H. K. (2016). Spaced repetition promotes efficient and effective learning. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(1), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215624708

Karpicke, J. D., Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L. (2009). Metacognitive strategies in student learning: Do students practise retrieval when they study on their own? Memory, 17(4), 471–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210802647009

Kikas, E., & Jõgi, A.-L. (2016). Assessment of learning strategies: Self-report questionnaire or learning task. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 31(4), 579–593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-015-0276-3

Kistner, S., Rakoczy, K., Otto, B., Klieme, E., & Büttner, G. (2015). Teaching learning strategies. The role of instructional context and teacher beliefs. Journal for educational research online, 7(1), 176–197.

Kornell, N., & Bjork, R. A. (2007). The promise and perils of self-regulated study. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(2), 219–224. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194055

McCabe, J. (2011). Metacognitive awareness of learning strategies in undergraduates. Memory & Cognition, 39(3), 462–476. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-010-0035-2

McCabe, J. (2018). What learning strategies do academic support centers recommend to undergraduates? Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 7(1), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.10.002

McDaniel, M. A., Agarwal, P. K., Huelser, B. J., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger III, H. L. (2011). Test-enhanced learning in a middle school science classroom: The effects of quiz frequency and placement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(2), 399–414. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021782

Merilo, K., Eisenschmidt, E., & Kikas, E. (2021). Developing students’ learning strategies with the support of the intervention programme and involving parents. Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakiri. Estonian Journal of Education, 9(1), 219–242. https://doi.org/10.12697/eha.2021.9.1.09

Moder, K. (2010). Alternatives to F-test in one way ANOVA in case of heterogeneity of variances (a simulation study). Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 52(4), 343.

Morehead, K., Rhodes, M. G., & DeLozier, S. (2016). Instructor and student knowledge of study strategies. Memory, 24(2), 257–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2014.1001992

O’Reilly, T., & McNamara, D. S. (2007). The impact of science knowledge, reading skill, and reading strategy knowledge on more traditional "High-Stakes" measures of high school students’ science achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 44(1), 161–196. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831206298171

Ornstein, P., Coffman, J., Grammer, J., Souci, P. S., & McCall, L. (2010). Linking the classroom context and the development of children’s memory skills. In Handbook of Research on Schools, Schooling and Human Development. Routledge.

Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422

R Core Team. (2022). The R Project for Statistical Computing. In (Version 4.2.1) R foundation for statistical computing. https://www.R-project.org/

Rau, M. A., Aleven, V., & Rummel, N. (2015). Successful learning with multiple graphical representations and self-explanation prompts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 30–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037211

Rawson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (2005). Rereading effects depend on time of test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(1), 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.1.70

Rodriguez, F., Kataoka, S., Janet Rivas, M., Kadandale, P., Nili, A., & Warschauer, M. (2021). Do spacing and self-testing predict learning outcomes? Active Learning in Higher Education, 22(1), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787418774185

Roediger, H. L., & Butler, A. C. (2011). The critical role of retrieval practice in longterm retention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.003

Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17(3), 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x

Roediger, H. L., & Pyc, M. A. (2012). Inexpensive techniques to improve education: Applying cognitive psychology to enhance educational practice. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1(4), 242–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.09.002

Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02

Rutkowski, L., & Svetina, D. (2014). Assessing the hypothesis of measurement invariance in the context of large-scale international surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74(1), 31–57.

Schleepen, T. M. J., & Jonkman, L. M. (2012). Children’s use of semantic organizational strategies is mediated by working memory capacity. Cognitive Development, 27(3), 255–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2012.03.003

Shevlin, M., & Miles, J. (2000). Applying regression and correlation: A guide for students and researchers. Applying Regression and Correlation, 1–272.

Smith, M. A., & Karpicke, J. D. (2014). Retrieval practice with ort-answer, multiplechoice, and hybrid tests. Memory, 22(7), 784–802. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2013.831454

Surma, T., Camp, G., de Groot, R., & Kirschner, P. A. (2022). Novice teachers’ knowledge of effective study strategies. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.996039

Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in science education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2

Vabariigi Valitsus (2021). Gümnaasiumi riiklik õppekava. RT I, 23.04.2021, 11. https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/123042021011

Vabariigi Valitsus (2023). Põhikooli riiklik õppekava. RT I, 08.03.2023, 5. https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/112042022010

van de Schoot, R., Lugtig, P., & Hox, J. (2012). A checklist for testing measurement invariance. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(4), 486–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2012.686740

Waeytens, K., Lens, W., & Vandenberghe, R. (2002). "Learning to learn": Teachers’ conceptions of their supporting role. Learning and instruction, 12(3), 305–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00024-X

Weinstein, Y., McDermott, K. B., & Szpunar, K. K. (2011). Testing protects against proactive interference in face–name learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(3), 518. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0085-x

Weinstein, Y., Sumeracki, M., & Caviglioli, O. (2019). Understanding how we learn: A visual guide. Routledge.

Yeo, D. J., & Fazio, L. K. (2019). The optimal learning strategy depends on learning goals and processes: Retrieval practice versus worked examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(1), 73. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000268