Eesti ja Soome õpetajate enesetõhusus seoses paradigma muutusega loodusteaduslikus hariduses: sotsiaalteaduslike teemade integreerimine

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191

Boedeker, P., Newell, A., & Moreno, N. (2023). COVID-19 public health lessons in science class boost knowledge and efficacy beliefs. Health Education Journal, 82(7), 792–806. https://doi.org/10.1177/00178969231198951

Borg, C., Gericke, N., Höglund, H.-O., & Bergman, E. (2014). Subject- and experience-bound differences in teachers’ conceptual understanding of sustainable development. Environmental Education Research, 20(4), 526–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2013.833584

Brevik, L. M., Gudmundsdottir, G. B., Lund, A., & Strømme, T. A. (2019). Transformative agency in teacher education: Fostering professional digital competence. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 102875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.07.005

Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. National Science Teachers Association.

Caprara, G., Barbaranelli, C., Steca, P., & Malone, P. (2006). Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of job satisfaction and students’ academic achievement: A study at the school level. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 473–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.09.001

Cotton, D. R. E. (2006). Implementing curriculum guidance on environmental education: The importance of teachers’ beliefs. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(1), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270500038644

Cruz, E., & Albuquerque Costa, F. (2025). Empowering teacher agency in the development of digital competence in primary education: Lessons from the Escol@s Digitais Project. European Educational Research Journal, 14749041251369925. https://doi.org/10.1177/14749041251369925

Davis, F., & Davis, F. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Dayan, E., & Tsybulsky, D. (2024). Designing and teaching socio-scientific issues online: Digital curation in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 0(0), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2024.2381133

Digikiirendi arenguprogramm. (2025, September 14). https://harno.ee/arenguvoimalused-ja-kvalifikatsioonid/kogukonnale/esf-tegevused-2015-2023#digikiirendi.

European Commission. (2023). Digital Education Action Plan (2021–2027): Resetting education and training for the digital age. https://education.ec.europa.eu/focustopics/digital-education/action-plan.

Evagorou, M., Albe, V., Angelides, P., Couso, D., Chirlesan, G., Evans, R., Dillon, J., Garrido, A., Güven, D., Zeynep Mugaloglu, E., & Nielsen, J. A. (2014). Preparing preservice science teachers to teach socio-scientific (SSI) argumentation. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 69, 39–48.

Evans, N. (Snowy), Stevenson, R. B., Lasen, M., Ferreira, J.-A., & Davis, J. (2017). Approaches to embedding sustainability in teacher education: A synthesis of the literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 405–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.01.013

Finnish National Board of Education. (2016). National Core Curriculum for Basic Education 2014. Helsinki: FNBE.

Finnish National Board of Education. (2019). National Core Curriculum for General Upper Secondary Schools. Helsinki: FNBE.

Finnish National Board of Education. (2022). National Core Curriculum for Early Childhood Education and Care. Helsinki: FNBE.

Gümnaasiumi riiklik õppekava. (2011). Vabariigi Valitsus. https://http.riigiteataja.ee/akt/129082014021?leiaKehtiv

Haberbosch, M., Vick, P., Feuchter, F., & Schaal, S. (2025). Exploring molecular biology in lower secondary education: Assessing content relevance and teachers’ challenges, self-efficacy, and knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 0(0), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2025.2517887

Hadjichambis, A., Reis, P., Paraskeva-Hadjichambi, D., Cincera, J., Boeve-de Pauw, J., Gericke, N., & Knippels, M.-C. (2020). Conceptualizing Environmental Citizenship for 21st Century Education. Environmental Discourses in Science Education, Vol. 4. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20249-1

Herranen, J., & Aksela, M. (2024). Fostering teachers as sustainability and climate change educators through understanding of teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs. LUMAT: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, 12(3), 30–52. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.12.3.2085

Jimoyiannis, A. (2010). Designing and implementing an integrated technological pedagogical science knowledge framework for science teachers professional development. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1259–1269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.022

Kaarakainen, M.-T., & Saikkonen, L. (2021). Multilevel analysis of the educational use of technology: Quantity and versatility of digital technology usage in Finnish basic education schools. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(4), 953–965. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12534

Karışan, D., & Zeidler, D. (2023). Teaching socioscientific issues in the digital age: Emerging trends and unexplored frontiers [Dijital çağda sosyobilimsel konuların öğretimi: Ortaya çıkan eğilimler ve keşfedilmemiş sınırlar]. Turkish Journal of Education, 13(1), 92–109. https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.1384524

Key competences for lifelong learning. (2019). Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/569540

Klassen, R. M., & Tze, V. M. C. (2014). Teachers’ self-efficacy, personality, and teaching effectiveness: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 12, 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.06.001

Laius, A., & Orgusaar, G. (2025). The critical role of science teachers’ readiness in harnessing digital technology benefits. Education Sciences, 15(8), 1001. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15081001

Laurie, R., Nonoyama-Tarumi, Y., Mckeown, R., & Hopkins, C. (2016). contributions of education for sustainable development (esd) to quality education: A synthesis of research. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 10(2), 226–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973408216661442

Lavonen, J., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2022). Experiences of Moving Quickly to Distance Teaching and Learning at All Levels of Education in Finland. In F. M. Reimers (Ed.), Primary and Secondary Education During Covid-19: Disruptions to Educational Opportunity During a Pandemic (pp. 105–123). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81500-4_4

Lee, H., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Choi, K. (2006). Korean science teachers’ perceptions of the introduction of socio-scientific issues into the science curriculum. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 6(2), 97–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926150609556691

Leijen, Ä., Jõgi, A.-L., Pedaste, M., Poom-Valickis, K., Uibu, K., Eisenschmidt, E., Oppi, P., Taimalu, M., Tinn, M., & Kalle, V. (2025). OECF rahvusvahelise õpetamise ja õppimise uuringu TALIS 2024 Eesti tulemused. HARNO. https://harno.ee/sites/default/files/documents/2025-11/TALIS2024_UURING_Eesti_tulemused.pdf

Lin, J., Neuman, K., Sadler, T. D., & Fortus, D. (2024). Transforming issues-based science education with innovative technologies. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 33(2), 157–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10086-5

Mikkilä-Erdmann, M., Warinowski, A., & Iiskala, T. (2019). Teacher Education in Finland and Future Directions. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.286

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Muench, S., Stoermer, E., Jensen, K., Asikainen, T., Salvi, M., & Scapolo, F. (2022). Towards a green & digital future. JRC Publications Repository. https://doi.org/10.2760/977331

Nagel, I., Guðmundsdóttir, G. B., & Afdal, H. W. (2023). Teacher educators’ professional agency in facilitating professional digital competence. Teaching and Teacher Education, 132, 104238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104238

OECD. (2019a). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. OECD Publishing. https://http.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-2018-assessment-and-analytical-framework_b25efab8-en.html

OECD. (2019b). TALIS 2018 Results (Volume I): Teachers and School Leaders as Lifelong Learners. TALIS, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1d0bc92a-en

OECD. (2023). OECD Digital Education Outlook 2023. https://doi.org/10.1787/c74f03de-en

Owens, D. C., & Sadler, T. D. (2024). Socio-scientific issues instruction for scientific literacy: 5E Framing to enhance teaching practice. School Science and Mathematics, 124(3), 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12626

Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003

Põhikooli riiklik õppekava. (2011). Vabariigi Valitsus. https://http.riigiteataja.ee/akt/129082014020?leiaKehtiv

Saarinen, A. I. L., Lipsanen, J., Hintsanen, M., Huotilainen, M., & Keltikangas-Järvinen, L. (2021). The use of digital technologies at school and cognitive learning outcomes: A population-based study in Finland. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 10(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.17583/ijep.2021.4667

Sadler, T. D. (2011). Situating Socio-scientific Issues in Classrooms as a Means of Achieving Goals of Science Education. In T. D. Sadler (Ed.), Socio-scientific Issues in the Classroom: Teaching, Learning and Research (pp. 1–9). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1159-4_1

Saunders, K. J., & Rennie, L. J. (2013). A pedagogical model for ethical inquiry into socioscientific issues in science. Research in Science Education, 43(1), 253–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9248-z

Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128, 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009

Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2010). Teacher self-efficacy and teacher burnout: A study of relations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 1059–1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.11.001

Smetana, L. K., & Bell, R. L. (2012). Computer simulations to support science instruction and learning: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 34(9), 1337–1370. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.605182

Soobard, R., & Rannikmäe, M. (2011). Assessing student’s level of scientific literacy using interdisciplinary scenarios. Science Education International, 22(2), 133–144.

Zee, M., & Koomen, H. M. Y. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being: A synthesis of 40 years of research. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 981–1015. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626801

Zeidler, D. L., Herman, B. C., & Sadler, T. D. (2019). New directions in socioscientific issues research. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0008-7

Zeidler, D. L., & Nichols, B. H. (2009). Socioscientific issues: Theory and practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173684

Tidemand, S., & Nielsen, J. A. (2017). The role of socioscientific issues in biology teaching: From the perspective of teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 39(1), 44–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1264644

Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2016). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2

Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1

Ulfert-Blank, A.-S., & Schmidt, I. (2022). Assessing digital self-efficacy: Review and scale development. Computers & Education, 191, 104626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104626

Valtonen, T., Kukkonen, J., Kontkanen, S., Sormunen, K., Dillon, P., & Sointu, E. (2015). The impact of authentic learning experiences with ICT on pre-service teachers’ intentions to use ICT for teaching and learning. Computers & Education, 81, 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.09.008

Valtonen, T., Leppänen, U., Hyypiä, M., Sointu, E., Smits, A., & Tondeur, J. (2020). Fresh perspectives on TPACK: Pre-service teachers’ own appraisal of their challenging and confident TPACK areas. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 2823–2842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10092-4

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46, 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926

von Knebel, K., Schroeder, S., & Bögeholz, S. (2023). Factors influencing self-efficacy beliefs of interdisciplinary science teaching – The role of teaching experience, science subjects studied, and desire to teach interdisciplinary science. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1147441