Soolised erinevused Eesti põhikooliõpilaste funktsionaalses lugemisoskuses

Banas, S., & Sanchez, C. A. (2012). Working memory capacity and learning underlying conceptual relationships across multiple documents. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(4), 594–600. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2834

Basabara, D., Yovanoff, P., Alonzo, J., & Tindal, G. (2013). Examining the structure of reading comprehension: Do literal, inferential, and evaluative comprehension truly exist? Reading and Writing, 26(3), 349–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9372-9

Britton, B. K., & Gulgoz, S. (1991). Using Kintsch’s computational model to improve instructional text: Effects of reading inference calls on recall and cognitive structures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 329–345. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.3.329

Brozo, W. G. (2006). Bridges to literacy for boys. Educational Leadership, 64, 71–74.

Brozo, W., Shiel, G., & Topping, K. (2007). Engagement in reading: Lessons from three PISA countries. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 51(4), 304–315. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.51.4.2

Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Teaching the spoken language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2011). Matthew effects in young readers: Reading comprehension and reading experience aid vocabulary development. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(5), 431–443. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219411410042

Cartwright, K. B., Lee, S. A., Taboada Barber, A., DeWyngaert, L. U., Lane, A. B., & Singleton, T. (2020). Contributions of executive function and cognitive intrinsic motivation to university students’ reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(3), 345–369. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.273

Euroopa Nõukogu (2007). Euroopa keeleõppe raamdokument: õppimine, õpetamine ja hindamine. Tartu: Haridus- ja Teadusministeerium.

European Commission (2019). Key competences for lifelong learning. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

Gee, J. P. (2012). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology on discourses. London, New York: Routledge.

Guthrie, J. T. (2008). Reading motivation and engagement in middle and high school. In J. T. Guthrie (Ed.), Engaging adolescents in reading (pp. 1–16). Corwin Press.

Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2005). Roles of motivation and engagement in reading comprehension assessment. In S. G. Paris & S. A. Stahl (Eds.), Children’s reading comprehension and assessment (pp. 187–214). Routledge.

Harris, T. L., & Hodges, R. E. (Eds.). (1995). The literacy dictionary. The vocabulary reading and writing. Delaware: International Reading Association.

Hausenberg, A.-R., Ilves, M., Kaivapalu, A., Kerge, K., Kern, K., Kitsnik, M., Krall, I., Rummo, K., Rüütmaa, T. (2008). Iseseisev keelekasutaja. B1- ja B2-taseme eesti keele oskus. Tallinn: Riiklik Eksami- ja Kvalifikatsioonikeskus.

Ivey, G., & Broaddus, K. (2001). "Just plain reading": A survey of what makes students want to read in middle school classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 36(4), 350–377. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.36.4.2

Johnson, D., & Kress, G. (2003). Globalisation, literacy and society: Redesigning pedagogy and assessment. Assessment in Education, 10 (1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940301697

Keefe, E. B., & Copeland, S. R. (2011). What is literacy? The power of a definition. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 36(3–4), 92–99. https://doi.org/10.2511/027494811800824507

Kerge, K. (2010). Keeleõppe sotsiokognitiivsest paradigmast. Teoses M. Kadakas (koost), Põhikooli valdkonnaraamat "Eesti keel ja kirjandus". Tallinn: Riiklik Eksami- ja Kvalifikatsioonikeskus. Külastatud aadressil https://oppekava.ee/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Keele%C3%B5ppe_sotsiokognitiivsest_paradigmast.pdf.

Kern, R. (2000). Literacy and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kibui, A. W. (2012). Reading and comprehension in the African context: A cognitive enquiry. Limuru: Zapf Chancery Publishers Africa. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvgc6073

Kirsch, I. (2001). The international adult literacy survey (IALS): Understanding what was measured. Educational Testing Service. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.2001.tb01867.x

Knobel, M. (2017). Remiksimist, kirjaoskust ja loovust käsitleva teaduskirjanduse analüütiline ülevaade. Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakiri, 5(2), 8–30. https://doi.org/10.12697/eha.2017.5.2.02a

Kärbla, T. (2020). Assessment of text comprehension and teaching comprehension strategies in Estonian basic school. Dissertationes Pedagogicae Universitatis Tartuensis 35. Tartu: Tartu Ülikool.

Kärbla, T., Männamaa, M., & Uibu, K. (2020). Vocabulary and text comprehension levels: What should be considered in assessments?. Educational Psychology, 40(7), 875–892. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1703172

Kärbla, T., Uibu, K., & Männamaa, M. (2018). Pikilõikeline sissevaade eesti keele taseme- ja eksamitööde tekstimõistmisülesannetesse. Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakiri, 6(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.12697/eha.2018.6.1.07

Litman, C., Marple, S., Greenleaf, C., Charney-Sirott, I., Bolz, M. J., Richardson, L. K., Hall, A. H., George, M., & Goldman, S. R. (2017). Text-based argumentation with multiple sources: A descriptive study of opportunity to learn in secondary English language arts, history, and science. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26(1), 79–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2016.1256809

Must, O., Must, A., Raudik, V. (2001). Lugemiskirjaoskus. Akadeemia, 7, 1431–1448.

National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) (2019). Explore results from the 2019 NAEP reading assessment. Külastatud aadressil https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/ reading/?grade=4.

National Reading Panel (NRP) (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute for Child Health and Human Development.

Oakhill, J. V., Cain, K., & Bryant, P. E. (2003). The dissociation of word reading and text comprehension: Evidence from component skills. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18(4), 443–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000008

OECD (2008). Lugemisoskus. PISA 2009 raamdokument. Tallinn: REKK. Külastatud aadressil https://www.innove.ee/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Lugemisoskus__PISA_2009__Raamdokument.pdf.

OECD (2010). PISA 2009 results: What students know and can do – student performance in reading, mathematics and science. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264091450-en

OECD (2019a). PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en

OECD (2019b). PISA 2018 Released field treial and main survey new reading items. PARIS: OECD Publishing. Külastatud aadressil https://www.oecd.org/pisa/test/PISA-2018-Released-New-REA-Items.pdf.

OECD (2019c). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do. Paris: OECD Publishing. Külastatud aadressil https://www.oecd.org/education/pisa-2018-results-volume-i-5f07c754-en.htm

OECD (s.a.). Rapa Nui. Külastatud aadressil https://pisa2018-questions.oecd.org/platform/index.html?user=&domain=REA&unit=R551-RapaNui&lang=est-EST.

Pahl, K., & Rowsell, J. (2005). Literacy and education: Understanding the new literacy studies in the classroom. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.

Pandis, M., & Vernik-Tuubel, E.-M. (2004). Funktsionaalne kirjaoskus. Teoses A. Ots (toim), Üldoskused – õpilase areng ja selle soodustamine koolis (lk 163–184). Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus.

Pedaste, M., Uibu, K., Rannikmäe, M., & Tagamets, E. (2019). Kuidas toetada tasemetöödega aineõppes üldiste oskuste kujunemist? Riigikogu Toimetised, 40, 125−134.

PIRLS (2016). Progress in international reading literacy study (PIRLS) 2016. International results in reading. Külastatud aadressil http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/pirls2016/international-results/pirls/student-achievement/

Puksand, H. (2011). Eesti koolinoorte lugemisharjumused meedia näitel. Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu aastaraamat, 7, 179−195. https://doi.org/10.5128/ERYa7.11

Puksand, H. (2014a). Lugemisoskuse hindamine PISA uuringus. Oma Keel, 1(28), 76−82.

Puksand, H. (2014b). Teismeliste lugemisoskuse mõjutegurid. Tallinna Ülikooli sotsiaalteaduste dissertatsioonid 78. Tallinn: Tallinna Ülikool.

Puksand, H. (2019). Lugemine. Teoses G. Tire (toim). PISA 2018 Eesti tulemused. Eesti 15-aastaste õpilaste teadmised ja oskused funktsionaalses lugemises, matemaatikas ja loodusteadustes (21−42). Tallinn: Innove.

Richter, T., & Rapp, D. N. (2014). Comprehension and validation of text information: Introduction to the special issue. Discourse Processes, 51(1–2), 1−6. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2013.855533

Rutherford, L., Merga, M. K., & Singleton, A. (2018). Influences on Australian adolescents’ recreational reading. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 41(1), 44–56.

Sabatini, J., O’Reilly, T., Weeks, J., & Wang, Z. (2020). Engineering a twenty-first century reading comprehension assessment system utilizing scenario-based assessment techniques. International Journal of Testing, 20(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2018.1551224

Sahin, A. (2013). The effect of text types on reading comprehension. Mevlana International Journal of Education, 3(2), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.13054/mije.13.27.3.2

Schleicher, A. (2019). PISA 2018: Insights and interpretations. Paris: OECD Publishing. Külastatud aadressil https://www.oecd.org/pisa/PISA%202018%20Insights%20and%20Interpretations%20FINAL%20PDF.pdf.

Schwabe, F., McElvany, N., & Trendtel, M. (2015). The school age gender gap in reading achievement: Examining the influences of item format and intrinsic reading motivation. Reading Research Quarterly, 50(2), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.92

Scribner, S. (1984). Literacy in three metaphors. American Journal of Education, 93, 6–21. https://doi.org/10.1086/443783

Simkin, M. G., & Kuechler, W. L. (2005). Multiple‐choice tests and student understanding: What is the connection? Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 3(1), 73–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2005.00053.x

Street, B. V. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge, New York, Melbourne: CUP.

Zwaan, R. A., & Singer, M. (2003). Text comprehension. In A. C. Graesser, M. A. Gernsbacher, & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), Handbook of discourse processes (pp. 89−127). Routledge.

Temizyürek, F. (2008). The impact of different types of texts on Turkish language reading comprehension at primary school grade eight students. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 30, 141–152.

Tett, L., & St.Clair, R. (2010). Adult literacy education. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education (pp. 107–112). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00019-1

Tire, G., Puksand, H., Henno, I., & Lepmann, T. (2010). PISA 2009-Eesti tulemused. Eesti 15-aastaste õpilaste teadmised ja oskused funktsionaalses lugemises, matemaatikas ja loodusteadustes. Tallinn: Haridus- ja Teadusministeerium.

UNESCO Institute for Statistics (2008). International literacy statistics: A review of concepts, methodology, and current data. Montréal, Canada: UNESCO Institute for Statistics.

White, S., Chen, J., & Forsyth, B. (2010). Reading-related literacy activities of american adults: Time spent, task types, and cognitive skills used. Journal of Literacy Research, 42, 276–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/1086296X.2010.503552

Yau, J. L. C., & Lee, P. Y. (2018). Achievement differences and gender gaps in reading motivation: An examination of Taiwanese adolescent readers of English as a foreign language. Taiwan Journal of TESOL, 15(1), 33–60.