Eessõna
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12697/eha.2017.5.1.01Kokkuvõte
Ligikaudu kümme aastat on nn Rocardi raporti "Science education now: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe" avaldamisest saadik olnud loodusteaduslik ja matemaatikaharidus Euroopa Liidus varasemast suurema tähelepanu all. Selle eesmärk on suurendada loodusteadustes, inseneri- ja matemaatikavaldkonnas karjääri valivate inimeste hulka, et tagada liikmesriikide areng neile erialadele tugineva innovatsiooni kaudu. Ka Euroopa Komisjoni hiljutises raportis "Science education for responsible citizenship" (2015) rõhutatakse, et tulevikusuundumused eeldavad kõigi ühiskonnaliikmete senisest paremat arusaamist loodusteadustest ja tehnoloogiast, et tagada nende aktiivne ja vastutustundlik osalemine otsustusprotsessis ja teadmistepõhises innovatsioonis. Muutus algab aga koolist, kus tuleb senisest enam pöörata tähelepanu loodusteadusliku-tehnoloogiaalase kirjaoskuse kõrgematele tasemetele.
Allalaadimised
Viited
Bybee, R. W. (1997). Toward an understanding of scientific literacy. In W. Gräber & C. Bolte (Eds.), Scientific literacy: An international symposium (pp. 37–68). Kiel: Institute for Science Education at the University of Kiel.
Cañas, J. A., Novak, J. D., & Reiska, P. (2015). How good is my concept map? Am I a good Cmapper? Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 7(1), 6–19.
Chang, C.-Y., Hsiao, C.-H., & Barufaldi, J. P. (2006). Preferred-actual learning environment ‘spaces’ and earth science outcomes in Taiwan. Science Education, 90(3), 420–433. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20125
Choi, K., Lee, H., Shin, N., Kim, S.-W., & Krajcik, J. (2011). Re-conceptualization of scientific literacy in South Korea for the 21st century. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 670–697. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20424
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2015). SDT: Questionnaires: Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI). Retrieved from http://selfdeterminationtheory.org/intrinsic-motivation-inventory/.
European Commission (2015). Science education for responsible citizenship. Report to the European Commission of the Expert Group on Science Education. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/research/swafs/pdf/pub_science_education/KI-NA-26-893-EN-N.pdf.
Ferrari, A. (2013). DIGCOMP: A framework for developing and understanding digital competence in Europe (Report No. JRC83167). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Fortus, D., Dershimer, R. C., Krajcik, J. S., Marx, R. W., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2004). Design-based science and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 1081–1110. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20040
Gago, J. M., Ziman, J., Caro, P., Constantinou, C. P., Davies, G., Parchmann, I., … Sjøberg, S. (2004). Europe needs more scientists: Report by the High Level Group on Increasing Human Resources for Science and Technology. Brussels: European Commission.
Gilbert, J. K. (2006). On the nature of context in chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 957–976. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600702470
Holbrook, J., & Rannikmäe, M. (2007). The nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1347–1362. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601007549
Holbrook, J., & Rannikmäe, M. (2009). The meaning of scientific literacy. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4(3), 275–288.
Holbrook, J., Rannikmäe, M., Reiska, P., & Ilsley, P. (Eds.) (2008). The need for a paradigm shift in science education for post-Soviet societies. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Hüsing, T., Korte, W. B., Fonstad, N., Lanvin B., Cattaneo, G., Kolding, M., … van Welsum, D. (2013). e-Leadership: e-Skills for competitiveness and innovation. Vision, roadmap and foresight scenarios. Final report. Retrieved from http://eskills-vision.eu/fileadmin/eSkillsVision/documents/VISION%20Final%20Report.pdf.
Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300500
Laius, A., Post, A., & Rannikmäe, M. (2016). Determining support of Estonian stakeholders for a new competence-based science education curriculum. International Journal of Education and Information Technologies, 10, 15–24.
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., … Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
Reiska, P., & Soika, K. (2015). Suggestions for teacher education from concept mapping studies. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 7(1), 149–161.
Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific literacy/Science literacy. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 729–780). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Rocard, M., Csermely, P., Jorde, D., Lenzen, D., Walberg-Henrikson, H., & Hemmo, V. (2007). Science education now: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe. Brussels: European Commission.
Romine, W. L., Sadler, T. D., & Kinslow, A. T. (2017). Assessment of scientific literacy: Development and validation of the Quantitative Assessment of Socio-Scientific Reasoning (QuASSR). Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(2), 274–295. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21368
Sjøberg, S., & Schreiner, C. (2002). ROSE handbook: Introduction, guidelines and underlying ideas. Retrieved from http://folk.uio.no/sveinsj/ROSE%20handbook.htm.
Teppo, M., & Rannikmäe, M. (2008). Paradigm shift for teachers: More relevant science teaching. In J. Holbrook, M. Rannikmäe, P. Reiska, & P. Ilsley (Eds.), The need for a paradigm shift in science education for post-Soviet societies (pp. 25–46). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
##submission.downloads##
Avaldatud
Kuis viidata
Väljaanne
Rubriik
Litsents
Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakirja autorid nõustuvad allpool esitatud tingimustega.
- Ajakirjas avaldatud artiklitele on tagatud vaba juurdepääs Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 litsentsiga määratud õiguste mahus.
- Autor loovutab ajakirjale tasuta tema poolt loodud artikli varalised õigused, sh õiguse artikli (1) avaldamisele ja levitamisele, (2) üldsusele kättesaadavaks tegemisele ja eksponeerimisele, (3) avalikule esitamisele.
- Autoril on õigus Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakirja eelneval nõusolekul sõlmida lepinguid kolmandate isikutega publitseeritud artikli säilitamiseks raamatukogu repositooriumis või avaldamiseks raamatu peatükina. Nõudeks on teiseses töös viitamine esmasele allikale, st artiklile Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakirjas.
- Pärast artikli ilmumist ajakirjas on autoritel lubatud avaldada Internetis (nt oma veebilehel) motiveeritud mahus tsitaate ning levitada linke koos korrektse viitega ajakirjas ilmunud artiklile (vt Open Access).
