Õppekavaarenduse eestvedamise rutiinid kooli arengueesmärkide elluviimisel Eesti üldhariduskoolide näitel

Autorid

  • Kätlin Vanari
  • Kristiina Poll
  • Eve Eisenschmidt

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12697/eha.2024.12.1.04

Märksõnad:

õppekava, eestvedamine, organisatsiooni rutiin, eesmärgid

Kokkuvõte

Kooli arengueesmärkide elluviimisel on oluline roll kooli õppekavaarendusel, kuid pole teada, kuivõrd organisatsiooni tegevusmustrid arengukava ja õppekava seoseid toetavad. Uuringu eesmärk on välja selgitada, kuidas toetavad kooli õppekavaarenduse eestvedamise rutiinid kooli arengueesmärkide elluviimist. Uurisime, (1) millised on kooli õppekavaarendusega seotud arengueesmärgid; (2) kuidas mõistab juhtmeeskond õppekava kooli arengueesmärkide elluviimisel; ja (3) millised õppekavaarenduse eestvedamise rutiinid on koolis kujunenud. Seitsme kooli juhtumiuuringu põhjal selgus, et arengueesmärkides domineerivad õppekava rakendamise eesmärgid ja õppekava hindamine on vähesel määral eesmärgistatud. Kooli juhtmeeskondade arusaamades on segadus õppekava rollist kooliarenduses. Uuritud koolides on õppekavaarenduse eestvedamise rutiinid, mis tagavad ülesannete delegeerimise. Samas ei toimi õpetajate koostöö õppekavaarenduses piisavalt.

Summary

Allalaadimised

Download data is not yet available.

Viited

Alua, F. (2016). School learning improvement plans: An Unggai Bena case study. Contemporary PNG Studies, 25(November), 115–130. https://www.dwu.ac.pg/en/images/All_Attachements/Research%20Journals/vol_25/2016-V25-10_School_learning_improvement_plans_An_Unggai_Bena_case_study.pdf.

Andersson, R. (2022). Approaching change through pragmatic routines: A case study of a municipal response to a teacher certification reform in the Swedish school-age educare. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 9(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2022.2050593

Bendikson, L., Broadwith, M., Zhu, T., & Meyer, F. (2020). Goal pursuit practices in high schools: Hitting the target? Journal of Educational Administration, 58(6), 713–728. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-01-2020-0020

Binkhorst, F., Handelzalts, A., Poortman, C. L., & van Joolingen, W. R. (2015). Understanding teacher design teams – A mixed methods approach to developing a descriptive framework. Teaching and Teacher Education, 51, 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.07.006

Bradley, L. H., Meyers, M., & Curtis, S. (2017). Curriculum Leadership: Beyond Boilerplate Standards (2nd Edition). Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, Incorporated.

Caputo, A., & Rastelli, V. (2014). School improvement plans and student achievement: Preliminary evidence from the Quality and Merit Project in Italy. Improving Schools, 17(1), 72–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480213515800

Chow, A. w.k. (2016). Teacher learning communities: The landscape of subject leadership. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(2), 287–307. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-07-2014-0105

Conley, S., & Enomoto, E. K. (2005). Routines in school organizations: Creating stability and change. Journal of Educational Administration, 43(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230510577263

DeMatthews, D. E., & Wang, Y. (2023). How can principals lead in the school improvement planning process? Reducing biases in shared decision making. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 96(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2022.2163971

Deng, Z. (2010). Curriculum Planning and Systems Change. In International Encyclopedia of Education (pp. 384–389). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00062-2

Eisenschmidt, E., Ahtiainen, R., Kondratjev, B. S., & Sillavee, R. (2021). A study of Finnish and Estonian principals’ perceptions of strategies that foster teacher involvement in school development. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2021.2000033

Erss, M., Mikser, R., Löfström, E., Ugaste, A., Rõuk, V., & Jaani, J. (2014). Teachers’ views of curriculum policy: The case of Estonia. British Journal of Educational Studies, 62(4), 393–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2014.941786

Fontes, & Haridus- ja Teadusministeerium (2023). Haridusjuhi kompetentsimudel. https://www.hm.ee/sites/default/files/documents/2023-05/Haridusjuhi_kompetentsimudel%202023.pdf.

Glatthorn, A. A., Boschee, F., & Whitehead, B. M. (2006). Curriculum Leadership: Development and Implementation. SAGE Publications.

Grützmacher, L., Holzer, J., Lüftenegger, M., Schober, B., & Prenzel, M. (2023). The stimulation of school improvement processes: The orientation of development perspectives. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2023.2246950

Handelzalts, A. (2019). Collaborative Curriculum Development in Teacher Design Teams. In J. Pieters, J. Voogt, & N. Pareja Roblin (Eds.), Collaborative Curriculum Design for Sustainable Innovation and Teacher Learning (pp. 159–173). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20062-6_9

Harris, A., Jones, M., & Crick, T. (2020). Curriculum leadership: A critical contributor to school and system improvement. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2020.1704470

Ho, D. C. W. (2010). Leadership for school improvement: Exploring factors and practices in the process of curriculum change. Early Education & Development, 21(2), 263–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409280903582835

Krull, E. (2020). Õppekava koostamise lähtealused: Teooria ja praktika. Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus.

Kukemelk, H., & Kitsing, M. (2020). Estonia: School Governance In Estonia – Turnaround from Order-Oriented to Inclusive and Evidence-Based Governance. In Educational Authorities and the Schools: Organisation and Impact in 20 States. Springer.

Kõiv, P., Lamesoo, K., & Erss, M. (2013). Kooliõppekava arendamine koolijuhtide pilgu läbi (Ülevaade haridussüsteemi välishindamisest 2012/2013, pp. 68–71). Haridus- ja Teadusministeerium. https://www.digar.ee/arhiiv/nlib-digar:236132.

Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077

Liljenberg, M., & Nordholm, D. (2017). Organisational routines for school improvement: Exploring the link between ostensive and performative aspects. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2017.1309685

Lipscombe, K., Tindall-Ford, S., & Lamanna, J. (2021). School middle leadership: A systematic review. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220983328

Maag Merki, K., Wullschleger, A., & Rechsteiner, B. (2022). Adapting routines in schools when facing challenging situations: Extending previous theories on routines by considering theories on self-regulated and collectively regulated learning. Journal of Educational Change. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-022-09459-1

Meyer, F., Bendikson, L., & Le Fevre, D. M. (2020). Leading school improvement through goal-setting: Evidence from New Zealand schools. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, December(14), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220979711

Meyer, F., & Patuawa, J. (2022). Novice principals in small schools: Making sense of the challenges and contextual complexities of school leadership. Leadership & Policy in Schools, 21(2), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2020.1757722

Mikser, R., Kärner, A., & Krull, E. (2016). Enhancing teachers’ curriculum ownership via teacher engagement in state-based curriculum-making: The Estonian case. Journal of Curriculum Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2016.1186742

Mikser, R., Viirpalu, P., & Krull, E. (2023). Reflection of teachers’ feelings of curriculum ownership in their curriculum definitions: The example of Estonia. Curriculum Journal, July, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.217

O’Connor, C., & Joffe, H. (2020). Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220

Priestley, M., Alvunger, D., Philippou, S., & Soini, T. (2021). Curriculum Making in Europe: Policy and Practice Within and Across Diverse Contexts. Emerald Group Publishing.

Põhikooli- ja gümnaasiumiseadus (2010). Riigi Teataja I, 2010, 41, 240 https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/13332410?leiaKehtiv.

Robinson, V., & Gray, E. (2019). What difference does school leadership make to student outcomes? Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 49(2), 171–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/03036758.2019.1582075

Rääk, K., Eisenschmidt, E., & Tammets, K. (2021). Exploring the perceptions of Estonian teachers’ data use in school development. Education Sciences, 11(6), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11060262

Sinnema, C. E. L., & Robinson, V. M. J. (2012). Goal setting in principal evaluation: Goal quality and predictors of achievement. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 11(2), 135–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2011.629767

Soini, T., Pyhältö, K., Haverinen, K., Sullanmaa, J., Leskinen, E., & Pietarinen, J. (2022). Building coherence and impact: Differences in Finnish school level curriculum making. Curriculum Perspectives, 42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-022-00165-9

Spillane, J. P., & Hopkins, M. (2013). Organizing for instruction in education systems and school organizations: how the subject matters. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(6), 721–747. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2013.810783

Stake, R. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/the-art-of-case-study-research/book4954.

Sun, J., & Leithwood, K. (2015). Direction-setting school leadership practices: A metaanalytical review of evidence about their influence. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 26(4), 499–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2015.1005106

Tartu Ülikooli eetikakeskus. (2023). Hea Teadustava. Eesti Teadusagentuur. https://eetika.ee/et/sisu/hea-teadustava.

Tight, M. (2019). Documentary Research in the Social Sciences. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529716559

Vanari, K., & Eisenschmidt, E. (2022). Missions, visions, and goals for school improvement – A typology of Estonian schools. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2022.2160360

Vanari, K., Lamesoo, K., Poll, K., & Leppik, K. (2021). Lõpparuanne projektile "Riikliku õppekava katsetamise läbiviimine". Tallinna Ülikool, Tartu Ülikool. https://hm.ee/sites/default/files/documents/2022-10/rok_katsetuse_lopparuanne_2020_kaanepildiga.pdf.

Viirpalu, P., Krull, E., & Mikser, R. (2014). Investigating Estonian teachers’ expectations for the general education curriculum. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 16(2), 54–70. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2014-0011

Viirpalu, P., Krull, E., & Mikser, R. (2022). Teachers’ feelings of curriculum ownership: The Estonian case. Journal of Baltic Studies, 53(3), 373–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/01629778.2021.2001550

Voogt, J., Pieters, J., & Pareja Roblin, N. (2019). Collaborative Curriculum Design in Teacher Teams: Foundations. In J. Pieters, J. Voogt, & N. Pareja Roblin (Eds.), Collaborative Curriculum Design for Sustainable Innovation and Teacher Learning (pp. 5–18). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20062-6_1

Wai-Yan Wan, S., & Leung, S. (2022). Integrating phenomenography with discourse analysis to study Hong Kong prospective teachers’ conceptions of curriculum leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 52(1), 91–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2021.1946484

Wolthuis, F., Hubers, M., Veen, K., & Vries, S. (2021). The Concept of Organizational Routines and Its Potential for Investigating Educational Initiatives in Practice: A Systematic Review of Literature. Review of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211051424

Yin, R., K. (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (3rd Edition, Vol. 5). SAGE Publications Inc.

##submission.downloads##

Avaldatud

2024-04-25

Väljaanne

Rubriik

Artiklid