Kognitiivsete ja metakognitiivsete õpistrateegiate toetamine tehnoloogiaga tõhustatud keeleõppes
Kokkuvõte
Hea võõrkeeleoskus on globaliseeruvas maailmas eduka toimetuleku eeldus. On leitud, et õppija keeleoskus on seotud tema keeleõppestrateegiate kasutusega, seetõttu peetakse õpistrateegiate mõõtmist üheks enim levinud keeleõppe efektiivsuse hindamise meetodiks. Kuigi strateegiate kasutamise oskus ja harjumused on väga individuaalsed ning kujunevad välja pikema aja jooksul, on uuringud näidanud, et õppijaid on võimalik suunata kasutama efektiivsemaid õpistrateegiaid, toetades nende õpitegevust. Praeguse uurimuse eesmärk on töötada varasemate uurimistulemuste põhjal välja sekkumistegevused, millega toetatakse kognitiivseid ja metakognitiivseid keeleõppestrateegiaid tehnoloogiaga tõhustatud võõrkeelekursusel, ning katsetada nende efektiivsust. Sekkumine hõlmab spetsiaalseid õpiülesandeid, mille sooritamist toetatakse märguannetega. Andmed pärinevad nii ainetestist kui ka eesti keele jaoks kohandatud enesekohaste küsimustikega Est-SILLi, MSQLi ja SRL-SRSi eel- ja järeltestist, mis tehti neljakuusel erialase inglise keele kursusel. Uurimistulemused näitavad, et varasemates uurimustes välja pakutud kognitiivsete ja metakognitiivsete õpistrateegiate kombineeritud toetamine märguannetega annab positiivseid tulemusi nii keeleõppestrateegiate ja eneseregulatsiooni toetamisel kui ka aineteadmiste omandamisel.
SummaryAllalaadimisi
Viited
Askell-Williams, H., Lawson, M. J., & Skrzypiec, G. (2012). Scaffolding cognitive and metacognitive strategy instruction in regular class lessons. Instructional Science, 40(2), 413−443. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9182-5
Azevedo, T. (2004). Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students’ learning with hypermedia? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 523−535. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.523
Azevedo, T. (2005). Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 199−209. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4004_2
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bannert, M., & Reimann, P. (2012). Supporting self-regulated hypermedia learning through prompts. Instructional Science, 40(1), 193−211. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9167-4
Benson, P. (2011). Teaching and researching autonomy (2nd ed.). London: Pearson Education.
Berthold, K., Nückles, M., & Renkl, A. (2007). Do learning protocols support learning strategies and outcomes? The role of cognitive and metacognitive prompts. Learning and Instruction, 17(5), 564−577. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.007
Brunstein, J. C., & Glaser, C. (2011). Testing a path-analytic mediation model of how self-regulated writing strategies improve fourth graders’ composition skills: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(4), 922−938. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0024622
Chamot, A. U. (2005). Language learning strategy instruction: Current issues and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 112−130. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0267190505000061
Chen, C.-M. (2009). Personalized E-learning system with self-regulated learning assisted mechanisms for promoting learning performance. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(5), 8816–8829. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.11.026
Conteh-Morgan, M. (2002). Connecting the dots: Limited English proficiency, second language learning theories, and information literacy instruction. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 28(4), 191−197. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0099-1333(02)00282-3
Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2005). Using web-based pedagogical tools as scaffolds for self-regulated learning. Instructional Science, 33(5−6), 513−540. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11251-005-1278-3
Goh, T.-T., Seet, B.-C., & Chen, N.-S. (2012). The impact of persuasive SMS on students’ self-regulated learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 624–640. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01236.x
Hannafin, M., Land, S., & Oliver, K. (1999). Open learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2, pp. 115–140). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hodges, C. B. (2005). Self-regulation in web-based courses: A review and the need for research. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 6(4), 375−383.
Hsiao, T.-Y., & Oxford, R. L. (2002). Comparing theories of language learning strategies: A confirmatory factor analysis. The Modern Language Journal, 86(3), 368– 383. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00155
Jones, S. (1998). Learning styles and learning strategies: Towards learner independence. Forum for Modern Language Studies, 34(2), 114–129. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fmls/34.2.114
Kauffman, D. F., Zhao, R., & Yang, Y.-S. (2011). Effects of online note taking formats and self-monitoring prompts on learning from online text: Using technology to enhance self-regulated learning. Contemporary Educational Technology, 36(4), 313−322. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.04.001
Khatib, S. A. A. (2010). Meta-cognitive self-regulated learning and motivational beliefs as predictors of college students’ performance. International Journal for Research in Education, 27, 57−72.
Kiewra, K. A. (2002). How classroom teachers can help students learn and teach them how to learn. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 71−80. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_3
Kramarski, B., & Gutman, M. (2006). How can self-regulated learning be supported in mathematical E-learning environments? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(1), 24–33. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00157.x
Kramarski, B., & Michalsky, T. (2009). Investigating preservice teachers’ professional growth in self-regulated learning environments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 161−175. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0013101
Kramarski, B., & Michalsky, T. (2010). Preparing preservice teachers for self-regulated learning in the context of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 20(5), 434−447. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.05.003
Lee, H. W., Lim, K. Y., & Grabowski, B. L. (2010). Improving self-regulation, learning strategy use, and achievement with metacognitive feedback. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(6), 629−648. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9153-6
Leijen, Ä., Lam, I., Wildschut, L., & Simons, P. R.-J. (2009). Difficulties teachers report about students’ reflection: Lessons learned from dance education. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(3), 315–326. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13562510902898882
McKeachie, W. J. (1994). Teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers (9th ed.). Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath and Company.
Mcmahon, M., & Oliver, R. (2001). Promoting self-regulated learning in an on-line environment. In C. Montgomerie & J. Viteli (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2001 (pp. 1299−1305). Chesapeake, VA: AACE. Retrieved from http://ro.ecu.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5815&context=ecuworks.
Mäeots, M. (2014). Inquiry-based learning in a web-based learning environment: A theoretical framework of inquiry-based learning processes (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://dspace.utlib.ee/dspace/bitstream/handle/10062/43719/maeots_mario.pdf?sequence=1.
Nash-Ditzel, S. (2010). Metacognitive reading strategies can improve self-regulation. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 40(2), 45−63. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2010.10850330
O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (2002). Learning strategies in second language acquisition (4th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York, NY: Newbury House/Harper & Row.
Oxford, R. L., & Crookall, D. (1989). Research on language learning strategies: Methods, findings, and instructional issues. The Modern Language Journal, 73(4), 404–419. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1989.tb05321.x
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531−566). San Diego etc.: Academic Press. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-012109890-2/50043-3
Pintrich, P., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
Quintana, C., Zhang, M., & Krajcik, J. (2005). A framework for supporting metacognitive aspects of online inquiry through software-based scaffolding. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 235−244. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4004_5
Rubin, J. (1975). What the "good language learner" can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9(1), 41–51. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3586011
Saks, K., & Leijen, Ä. (2014). Model for supporting cognitive and metacognitive strategies in technology enhanced language learning. The 22nd International Conference on Computers in Education, 630−639.
Saks, K., Leijen, Ä., Edovald, T., & Õun, K. (2015a). Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Estonian version of MSLQ. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 597−604. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.278
Saks, K., Leijen, Ä., & Täht, K. (2015b). Developing a model for measuring Estonian EFL learners’ language learning strategies. INTED 2015 Proceedings (pp. 1241−1247).
Saks, K., Leijen, Ä., Õun, K., & Täht, K. (2015c). Factorial structure of SILL revisited: Adaptation of SILL for Estonian EFL learners. In H. Metslang, M. Langemets, & M.-M. Sepper (Eds.), Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu aastaraamat (pp. 241−261). Tallinn: Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühing. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5128/erya11.15
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1994). Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Stern, H. H. (1975). What can we learn from the good language learner? Canadian Modern Language Review, 31, 304–318.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1986). Becoming a self-regulated learner: Which are the key subprocesses? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11(4), 307–313. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(86)90027-5
Toering, T., Elferink-Gemser, M. T., Jonker, L., van Heuvelen, M. J. G., & Visscher, C. (2012). Measuring self-regulation in a learning context: Reliability and validity of the Self-Regulation of Learning Self-Report Scale (SRL-SRS). International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 10(1), 24−38. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2012.645132
Tsai, M.-J. (2009). The model of strategic e-learning: Understanding and evaluating student e-learning from metacognitive perspectives. Educational Technology & Society, 12(1), 34–48.
Victori, M., & Lockhart, W. (1995). Enhancing metacognition in self-directed language learning. System, 23(2), 223−234. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0346-251x(95)00010-h
Weinstein, C. E. (1994). Strategic learning/strategic teaching: Flip sides of a coin. In P. R. Pintrich, D. R. Brown, & C. E. Weinstein (Eds.), Student motivation, cognition, and learning: Essays in honor of Wilbert J. McKeachie (pp. 257−273). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Winne, P. H. (1996). A metacognitive view of individual differences in self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 8(4), 327−353. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1041-6080(96)90022-9
Winters, F. I., Greene, J. A., & Costich, C. M. (2008). Self-regulation of learning within computer-based learning environments: A critical analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 20(4), 429−444. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9080-9
Wong, M. S.-L. (2011). Language learning strategy use: A study of pre-service teachers in Malaysia. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED521415.pdf.
Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakirja autorid nõustuvad allpool esitatud tingimustega.
- Ajakirjas avaldatud artiklitele on tagatud vaba juurdepääs Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 litsentsiga määratud õiguste mahus.
- Autor loovutab ajakirjale tasuta tema poolt loodud artikli varalised õigused, sh õiguse artikli (1) avaldamisele ja levitamisele, (2) üldsusele kättesaadavaks tegemisele ja eksponeerimisele, (3) avalikule esitamisele.
- Autoril on õigus Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakirja eelneval nõusolekul sõlmida lepinguid kolmandate isikutega publitseeritud artikli säilitamiseks raamatukogu repositooriumis või avaldamiseks raamatu peatükina. Nõudeks on teiseses töös viitamine esmasele allikale, st artiklile Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakirjas.
- Pärast artikli ilmumist ajakirjas on autoritel lubatud avaldada Internetis (nt oma veebilehel) motiveeritud mahus tsitaate ning levitada linke koos korrektse viitega ajakirjas ilmunud artiklile (vt Open Access).
