Eesti õpetajate, õpetajakoolituse üliõpilaste ning õppejõudude uurimistööalane kirjaoskus
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12697/eha.2021.9.2.11Märksõnad:
uurimistööalane kirjaoskus, uurimistööalased teadmised, eaduspõhine õpetamineKokkuvõte
Õpetajate uurimistööalane kirjaoskus väljendub teaduspõhises praktikas, oma õpetamise ja õpilaste õppimise uurimises ning õpilaste uurimistööalaste teadmiste omandamise toetamises. Kasutades kombineeritud uurimismeetodit, oli siinse uuringu eesmärk selgitada välja, millised on Eesti õpetajakoolituse üliõpilaste ja õppejõudude ning õpetajate uurimistööalased teadmised ning kirjeldada, kuidas kasutavad õpetajad uurimistööalast kirjaoskust oma õpetamistöös. Tulemused näitavad, et kui õppejõududel on teiste valimirühmadega võrreldes paremad teadmised, siis õpetajate ja üliõpilaste uurimistööalased teadmised on pigem sarnased. Intervjuudest õpetajatega selgus, et igapäevases õpetamistöös rakendatakse uurimistööalaseid teadmisi eelkõige õpilastele uurimistööga seotud ülesannete koostamisel. Teaduspõhisele õpetamisele eelistatakse praktilisi koolitusi ja arutelusid kolleegidega ning enda õpetamist ja õpilaste õppimise uurimist intervjuudes osalenud õpetajad pigem ei rakenda. Tulemused näitavad, et uurimistööalase kirjaoskuse kujunemist tuleb rohkem toetada ning kõige enam toetust vajavad just töötavad õpetajad.
Allalaadimised
Viited
Aspfors, J., & Eklund, G. (2017). Explicit and implicit perspectives on research-based teacher education: newly qualified teachers’ experiences in Finland. Journal of Education for Teaching, 43(4), 400–413.
Barber, M., & Mourshed, M. (2007). How the world’s best-performing school systems come out on top. McKinsey & Co.
Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., Neubrand, M., & Tsau, Y.-M. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 133–180. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209345157
Berliner, D. C. (2004) Describing the behavior and documenting the accomplishments of expert teachers. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 24(3), 200–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467604265535
Block, D. (2000). Revisiting the gap between SLA researchers and language teachers. Links & Letters, 7, 129–143.
Borg, S. (2010). Language teacher research engagement. Language Teaching, 43, 391–429. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444810000170
Bowen, G. A. (2006). Grounded theory and sensitizing concepts. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(3) 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500304
Boyd, D., Grossman, P., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2006). How changes in entry requirements alter the teacher workforce and affect student achievement. Education Finance and Policy, 1, 176–216. https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp.2006.1.2.176
Burn, K., & Mutton, T. (2015). A review of ‘research-informed clinical practice’ in Initial Teacher Education. Oxford Review of Education, 41(2), 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2015.1020104
Burns, T., & Köster, F. (2016). Modern governance challenges in education. Teoses T. Burns & F. Köster (toim), Governing Education in a Complex World (lk 17–39). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264255364-3-en
Carter, A. (2015). Carter review of Initial Teacher Training (ITT). DfE. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/carter-review-of-initial-teacher-training.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (1999). The Teacher Research Movement: A decade later. Educational Researcher, 28(7), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X028007015
Cooper, M., & Stewart, J. (2009). ’Learning together, shaping tomorrow’: New teachers try new ways. Research in Comparative and International Education, 4(1), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.2304/rcie.2009.4.1.111
Creswell, J. (2012). Educational research: planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.
Earl, L. M., & Timperley, H. (2008). Professional learning conversations: Challenges in using evidence for improvement. Springer.
Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
Evans, C., Waring, M., & Christodoulou, A. (2017). Building teachers’ research literacy: integrating practice and research, Research Papers in Education, 32(4), 403–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2017.1322357
German Council of Science and Humanities. (s.a.). Külastatud aadressil http://www.wissenschaftsrat.de/download/archiv/4418-00.pdf.
Grossman, P. L. (2010). Learning to practice: The design of clinical experience teacher preparation (Policy Brief). AACTE & NEA.
Kiely, R. (2008). The purpose, promise and potential of teacher research. Teoses M. Pawlak (toim), Investigating English language learning and teaching (lk 11–30). Adam Mickiewicz University.
King, M. (2002). Professional development to promote school wide inquiry. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00067-1
Ko, J., & Sammons, P. (2012). Effective teaching: A review of research. Executive summary report prepared for CfBT. University of Oxford, Department of Education.
Krajcik, J. S., & Sutherland, L. M. (2010). Supporting students in developing literacy in science. Science, 328(5977), 456–459. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1182593
Kutsestandard. Õpetaja, tase 7. (2020). Külastatud aadressil https://www.kutseregister.ee/ctrl/et/Standardid/exportPdf/10824233/.
König, J., Blömeke, S., Klein, P., Suhl, U., Busse, A., & Kaiser, G. (2014). Is teachers’ general pedagogical knowledge a premise for noticing and interpreting classroom situations? A video-based assessment approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 38, 76–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.11.004
Lillejord, S., & Børte, K. (2016). Partnership in teacher education – A research mapping. European Journal of Teacher Education, 39(5), 550–563. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2016.1252911
Malva, L., & Leijen, Ä. (2020). Läbilõikeline ülevaade üliõpilaste hinnangutest Tartu Ülikooli õpetajakoolituse õppekavade sidususele 2014.–2018. aastal. Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakiri, 8(1), 100–127. https://doi.org/10.12697/eha.2020.8.1.05
Malva, L., Leijen, Ä., & Arcidiacono, F. (2021). Identifying teachers’ general pedagogical knowledge: A video stimulated recall study. Educational Studies, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2021.1873738
Malva, L., Leijen, Ä., & Baucal, A. (2020). Towards measuring teachers’ general pedagogical knowledge – A mixed method investigation of a pilot test. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 64, 100815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.100815
Malva, L., Linde, M., Poom-Valickis, K., & Leijen, Ä. (2018). OECD õpetaja pedagoogiliste teadmiste pilootuuringu Eesti raport. Haridus- ja Teadusministeerium.
Munthe, E., & Rogne, M. (2015). Research based teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 46, 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.10.006
Mutton, T., Burn, K., & Hagger, H. (2010). Making sense of learning to teach: Learners in context. Research Papers in Education, 25(1), 73–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520802382912
NCSL (2012). Powerful professional learning: a school leader’s guide to joint practice development. National College for School Leadership.
Ophoff, J. G., Schladitz, S., Leuders, J., Leuders, T., & Wirtz, M. A. (2015) Assessing the development of educational research literacy: the effect of courses on research methods in studies of educational science. Peabody Journal of Education, 90(4), 560–573. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2015.1068085
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., De Jong, T., Van Riesen, S. A., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
Pedaste, M. (2021). Inquiry approach and phases of learning in undergraduate research. Teoses H. A. Mieg, B. Ambos, A. Brew, W. Deicke, & J. Lehmann (toim), Cambridge handbook of undergraduate research. Cambridge University Press.
Pedaste, M., Baucal, A., & Reisenbuk, E. (2021). Towards a science inquiry test in primary education: Development of items and scales. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00278-z
Pedder, D., James, M., & MacBeath, J. (2005). How teachers value and practise professional learning. Research Papers in Education, 20(3), 209–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520500192985
Roulston, K., Legette, R., DeLoach, M., & Pittman, C. B. (2005). What is ’research’ for teacher-researchers? Educational Action Research, 13(2), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790500200283
Schepens, A., Aelterman, A., & Van Keer, H. (2007). Studying learning processes of student teachers with stimulated recall interviews through changes in interactive cognitions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(4), 457–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.12.014
Shank, G., & L. Brown. (2013). Exploring educational research literacy. Routledge.
Sonmark, K., Revai, N., Gottschalk, F., Deligiannidi, K., & Burns, T. (2017). Understanding teachers’ pedagogical knowledge: report on an international pilot study. OECD Education working Papers.
Sugrue, C., & Day, C. (2002). Developing teachers and teaching practice: international research perspectives. Routledge.
Zeichner, K. (2014). The struggle for the soul of teaching and teacher education in the USA. Journal of Education for Teaching, 40(5), 551–568.
Tagle, T., Díaz, C., Etchegaray, P., Alarcón, P., Quintana, M., & Ramos, L. (2020). Lesson planning: What types of professional knowledge are activated by chilean pre-service EFL teachers? Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 17(1), 258–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2014.956544
Tatto, M. T. (2015). The role of research in the policy and practice of quality teacher education: An international review. Oxford Review of Education, 41(2), 171–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2015.1017405
Wilson, A., Åkerlind, G., Walsh, B., Stevens, B., Turner, B., & Shield, A. (2013). Making ‘professionalism’ meaningful to students in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(8), 1222–1238. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.833035
Winch, C., Oancea, A., & Orchard, J. (2013). The Contribution of Research to Teachers’ Professional Learning. Paper Commissioned for the BERA-RSA Inquiry. BERA.
##submission.downloads##
Avaldatud
Kuis viidata
Väljaanne
Rubriik
Litsents
Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakirja autorid nõustuvad allpool esitatud tingimustega.
- Ajakirjas avaldatud artiklitele on tagatud vaba juurdepääs Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 litsentsiga määratud õiguste mahus.
- Autor loovutab ajakirjale tasuta tema poolt loodud artikli varalised õigused, sh õiguse artikli (1) avaldamisele ja levitamisele, (2) üldsusele kättesaadavaks tegemisele ja eksponeerimisele, (3) avalikule esitamisele.
- Autoril on õigus Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakirja eelneval nõusolekul sõlmida lepinguid kolmandate isikutega publitseeritud artikli säilitamiseks raamatukogu repositooriumis või avaldamiseks raamatu peatükina. Nõudeks on teiseses töös viitamine esmasele allikale, st artiklile Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakirjas.
- Pärast artikli ilmumist ajakirjas on autoritel lubatud avaldada Internetis (nt oma veebilehel) motiveeritud mahus tsitaate ning levitada linke koos korrektse viitega ajakirjas ilmunud artiklile (vt Open Access).